Acta ComitasPub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p13
Pande Gde Satria Wibawa, Pande Yogantara S.
{"title":"Keautentikan Akta Risalah Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Secara Elektronik Dalam Perspektif Cyber Notarylam Perspektif Cyber Notary","authors":"Pande Gde Satria Wibawa, Pande Yogantara S.","doi":"10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p13","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000The purpose of this study is to analyze the authenticity of the minutes of the General Meeting of Shareholders made electronically and the validity of the signature of the notary in the deed of the General Meeting of Shareholders made electronically. This study uses a normative legal research method by using a type of approach, namely, the statutory approach and the concept approach. The results of this study indicate that the GMS deed made electronically is an authentic deed if it uses the lex specialis derogate legi generali principle where the lex generalis is Article 16 paragraph (1) letter m of the Notary Jabata Law, while the lex specialis is Article 77 paragraph (1) in conjunction with the Elucidation of Article 77 paragraph (4) of the Limited Liability Company Law. The deed of the General Meeting of Shareholders can be ratified by a notary after being signed by the parties, and with the fulfillment of the provisions of Article 11 of the Information and Electronic Transaction Law, and the requirements specified in the provisions of Article 77 of the Limited Liability Company Law, as well as the ratification of the notary, the deed The General Meeting of Shareholders can be used as perfect evidence in court if in the future there are legal problems that occur between shareholders related to the deed of the General Meeting of Shareholders. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstrak \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa keautentikan akta risalah Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham yang dibuat secara elektronik dan keabsahan tandatangan notaris dalam akta Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham yang dibuat secara elektronik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metodepenelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan jenis pendekatan yaitu, pendekatan perundang-undang dan pendekatan konsep. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa Akta RUPS yang dibuat secara elektronik adalah akta otentik apabila menggunakan asas lex specialis derogate legi generali dimana yang menjadi lex generalis–nya adalah Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf m Undang-Undang Jabata Notaris, sedangkan lex specialis-nya adalah Pasal 77 ayat (1) jo Penjelasan Pasal 77 ayat (4) Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas. Akta Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham dapat disahkan oleh notaris setelah ditandatangani oleh para pihak, dan dengan terpenuhinya ketentuan pada Pasal 11 Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, dan persyaratan-persyaratan yang ditentukan dalam ketentuan Pasal 77 Undang-Undang PT, serta pengesahan notaris maka akta Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham dapat dijadikan alat bukti yang sempurna di pengadilan apabila dikemudian hari terdapat permasalahan hukum yang terjadi antar pemegang saham terkait akta Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham tersebut. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132051900","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acta ComitasPub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p6
I. G. Y. Arsawan, Akhmad Budi Cahyono
{"title":"Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Klien Atas Pembuatan Akta Di Hadapan Notaris Pengganti Yang Tidak Sah","authors":"I. G. Y. Arsawan, Akhmad Budi Cahyono","doi":"10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p6","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000The purpose of this paper is to find out how the legal consequences of making a deed by an unauthorized substitute notary and the form of legal protection for the parties as clients of the injured substitute notary. This study uses a normative legal research method that uses a law approach, a case approach and a conceptual approach to analyze the Surabaya Court Decision Number 728/PDT/P/2020/PN. Sby. The results of this study indicate that the making of a deed by a substitute notary that is not valid results in the deed being downgraded to under the hand based on Article 44 in conjunction with Article 84 UUJN and Article 1869 of the Civil Code. The degradation of the power of proof of the deed results in the aggrieved client being able to claim damages from the party who caused the loss. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstrak \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana akibat hukum dari pembuatan akta oleh notaris pengganti yang tidak sah serta bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak selaku klien dari notaris pengganti yang dirugikan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan konseptual untuk menganalisis Penetapan Pengadilan Surabaya Nomor 728/PDT/P/2020/PN. Sby. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan pembuatan akta oleh notaris pengganti yang tidak sah berakibat akta tersebut turun derajatnya menjadi di bawah tangan berdasarkan Pasal 44 jo Pasal 84 UUJN dan Pasal 1869 KUHPerdata. Degradasi kekuatan pembuktian akta tersebut mengakibatkan klien yang dirugikan dapat menuntut kerugian kepada pihak yang menyebabkan kerugian tersebut. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115999516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acta ComitasPub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p3
Gabriella Junita Tobing, Lastuti Abubakar, Tri Handayani
{"title":"Analisis Peraturan Penggunaan QRIS Sebagai Kanal Pembayaran Pada Praktik UMKM Dalam Rangka Mendorong Perkembangan Ekonomi Digital","authors":"Gabriella Junita Tobing, Lastuti Abubakar, Tri Handayani","doi":"10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p3","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 The purpose of this study is to analyze the Regulation of the Use of QRIS as an innovation of Bank Indonesia in the payment system and to know its Policy Implementation in business development or MSME activities as an effort to accelerate the development of the digital economy. The research method used is normative juridical research method as well as legal history, with descriptive analytical specifications. Data collection from this study is assisted by the method of document study and interview which is then analyzed qualitatively. Based on the results of this study, it was obtained that the implementation of QRIS based on existing regulations through PADG has not been optimal and comprehensive, then further regulations are needed to regulate the problem of digital economic innovation that can reach QRIS users to even the smallest sectors, such as PBI. Thus, MSMEs can help play a role in creating inclusive finance so as to encourage the development of the digital economy in Indonesia. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstrak \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis Peraturan dari Penggunaan QRIS sebagai inovasi Bank Indonesia dalam sistem pembayaran serta mengetahui Implementasi Kebijakannya dalam pengembangan bisnis atau kegiatan UMKM sebagai upaya percepatan perkembangan ekonomi digital. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif serta sejarah hukum, dengan spesifikasi deskriptif analitis. Pengumpulan data dari penelitian ini dibantu dengan metode studi dokumen serta wawancara yang kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini, diperoleh bahwa Pelaksanaan QRIS berdasarkan peraturan yang ada melalui PADG belum optimal dan komprehensif, maka dibutuhkan peraturan lebih lanjut untuk mengatur permasalahan inovasi ekonomi digital yang dapat menjangkau pengguna QRIS sampai ke sektor yang terkecil sekalipun, layaknya PBI. Dengan demikian UMKM dapat membantu berperan mendorong perkembangan ekonomi digital di Indonesia. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125026990","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acta ComitasPub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p11
Mustofa Abdul Basir, Jilly Febrian Muhadi, Rini Irianti Sundary
{"title":"Peran dan Tanggungjawab Notaris/PPAT dalam Meminimalisasi Tindakan Pemalsuan Bukti Setoran Perpajakan Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah","authors":"Mustofa Abdul Basir, Jilly Febrian Muhadi, Rini Irianti Sundary","doi":"10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p11","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000The purpose of this research is to find out the important role and obligations of a Notary/PPAT in minimizing falsification of tax payments on the deed of transfer of ownership rights to the land he made. This analysis is a juridical normative study with a library research method with a legal approach. From this analysis and study, it is found that the role of the Notary/PPAT is to provide counseling regarding tax obligations that must be completed by the parties in terms of making a deed of transfer of ownership rights to land made before him. The legal counseling can be in the form of services to help pay or validate the payment of taxes owed by the parties. Meanwhile, the responsibility of the Notary/PPAT in minimizing the falsification of tax payments on the deed of transfer of ownership rights to the land he made is to sign the deed of transfer of ownership rights to the land by the Notary/PPAT after the parties actually pay the tax owed and verify beforehand so that the Notary/PPAT PPAT completely avoids problems that may occur in the future. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstrak \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah dalam rangka mengetahui peran penting dan kewajiban Notaris/PPAT dalam meminimalisasi pemalsuan setoran perpajakan atas akta peralihan hak pemilikan atas tanah yang dibuatnya. Analisis ini merupakan telaah normatif yuridis dengan metode penelitian kepustakaan dengan pendekatan hukum. Dari analisis dan telaah ini diperoleh bahwa peran Notaris/PPAT adalah memberikan penyuluhan mengenai kewajiban perpajakan yang harus diselesaikan oleh para pihak dalam hal pembuatan akta atas peralihan hak pemilikan atas tanah yang dibuat di hadapannya. Penyuluhan hukum tersebut dapat berupa pelayanan untuk membantu membayarkan atau memvalidasi pembayaran pajak terutang para pihak. Sedangkan, tanggung jawab Notaris/PPAT dalam meminimalisasi pemalsuan setoran perpajakan atas akta peralihan hak pemilikan atas tanah yang dibuatnya adalah melakukan penandatanganan akta peralihan hak pemilikan atas tanah oleh Notaris/PPAT setelah benar-benar para pihak membayar pajak terutangnya dan memverifikasi terlebih dahulu agar Notaris/PPAT benar-benar terhindar dari permasalahan yang mungkin terjadi di kemudian hari. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127931450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acta ComitasPub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p8
I. M. A. Dwisana, Made Gde Subha Karma Resen
{"title":"Pembuktian Harta Bersama Dalam Perceraian Perkawinan Campuran Tanpa Perjanjian Kawin di Indonesia","authors":"I. M. A. Dwisana, Made Gde Subha Karma Resen","doi":"10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p8","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000The purpose of this research is to to find out and examine the position of Shared Property and the system of proof of joint property in the divorce of mixed marriage without marriage agreement This research uses normative legal methods and uses the approach of Legislation (The Statue Approach) and the approach of fact (The Fact Approach). The position of joint property in mixed marriage based on the Law in Indonesia is stipulated in Article 35 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law stipulated that \"the property obtained during the marriage is to be a joint property\". The system of proof of joint property in a mixed marriage divorce without a marriage agreement is the person who sues the property together in case of divorce, he must prove that the property is a joint property. although the law does not govern the proof of joint property but the judge can decide the case based on his conviction (The Rechtsvinding School). \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstrak \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui dan memahami Kedudukan Harta bersama serta sistem pembuktian harta bersama dalam perceraian perkawinan campuran tanpa perjanjian kawin Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif serta menggunakan pendekatan Perundang-Undangan (The Statue Approach) dan pendekatan fakta (The Fact Approach). Kedudukan Harta bersama dalam Perkawinan campuran berdasarkan Hukum di Indonesia diatur dalam Pasal 35 ayat (1) UU Perkawinan menentukan bahwa “harta benda yang di peroleh selama perkawian adalah menjadi harta bersama”. Sistem pembuktian harta bersama dalam perceraian perkawinan campuran tanpa perjanjian kawin yaitu orang yang menggugat harta bersama apabila terjadi percerian maka ia harus membuktikan bahwa harta tersebut merupakan harta bersama. meskipun undang-undang tidak mengatur mengenai pembuktian harta bersama tetapi hakim dapat memutuskan perkara berdasarkan keyakinannya (Aliran Rechtsvinding). \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"119 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123475970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acta ComitasPub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p16
Adinda Ari Wijayanti, I. G. K. Ariawan
{"title":"Upaya Perlindungan Terhadap Identitas Para Pihak Dalam Praktik Cyber Notary","authors":"Adinda Ari Wijayanti, I. G. K. Ariawan","doi":"10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p16","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Purpose of the research is to know the form of legal protection for personal data of the parties in the practice of Cyber ??Notary and explain the efforts that can be made to protect the confidentiality of personal data. This article is examined based on the existence of overlapping norms, by applying normative research methods through approaches to laws, conceptual and analytical approach. The study of legal materials is carried out by means of the study of legal materials and qualitative analysis. The answer from thats question is not found speciallity regulation governing the protection of personal data/identity in cyber notary practice, efforts are still needed to maximize legal protection for the security of personal data/identity of parties involved in cyber notary practices by This is done by filling out a data access form for Notaries and providing a code/barcode on the resulting electronic deed with the aim of providing legal certainty, benefit and justice, especially for the all parties who practice cyber notary practices have a clear legal protection. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstrak \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Tujuan penelitian ini ialah mengkaji bentuk perlindungan hukum data pribadi para pihak pada praktik Cyber Notary dan mengetahui upaya yang bisa diupayakan dalam perlindungan kerahasiaan data pribadi. Penelitian ini dikaji berdasarkan adanya tumpang tindih norma, dengan menerapkan metode metode penelitian normatif melalui pendekatan pada undang-undang, pendekatan konseptual serta pendekatan analisa. Pengkajian bahan hukum dilakukan dengan teknik studi bahan hukum serta dengan analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa masih belum adanya suatu peraturan khusus yang mengatur tentang perlindungan terhadap data pribadi/identitas dalam praktik cyber notary, masih diperlukan upaya-upaya untuk memaksimalkan perlindungan hukum bagi keamanan data diri/identitas pihak-pihak yang terlibat dalam praktik cyber notary dengan cara dengan pengisian formulir akses data bagi Notaris dan pemberian kode/barcode pada akta elektronik yang dihasilkan berjutuan salam menjamin kepastian hukum, kemanfaatan serta keadilan khususnya untuk pihak yang melakukan praktik cyber notary memliki payung hukum yang jelas. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"461 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116233126","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acta ComitasPub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p7
Putu Inten Andhita Dewi, I. W. Novy Purwanto
{"title":"Peran Notaris Dalam Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja","authors":"Putu Inten Andhita Dewi, I. W. Novy Purwanto","doi":"10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p7","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000This writing aims to analyze, examine and elaborate on the role of a Notary in the establishment of a Limited Company as stipulated in the Law on Limited Liability Companies and also the role of a Notary in the establishment of a Limited Company after the enactment of the Law on Job Creation. This is normative legal research method using statute approach, conceptual approach, and analytical approach. The results show that Article 7 of the Limited Liability Company Law requires the establishment of a Limited Company based on a notarial deed, this explicitly determines the role of a Notary in the establishment of a Limited Company. The enactment of the Job Creation Law provides a change in the concept of Limited Company, which can now be formed by individuals in accordance with the criteria for Micro and Small Enterprises based on the Statement of Establishment. However, the Job Creation Law stipulates that in the case that an individual PT does not meet the criteria as a Micro and Small Enterprises, the Limited Company must change its status in accordance with the Limited Liability Company Law and use a notarial deed as the basis for the establishment of the Limited Company. Hence, the role of the Notary is still required to make a notarial deed if the Individual Company changes the status of the Company in accordance with the Company Law. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstrak \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis, mengkaji dan mengelaborasi peranan Notaris dalam pendirian PT sebagaimana ditentukan dalam UU PT dan juga peranan Notaris dalam pendirian PT pasca diundangkannya UU Cipta Kerja. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konsep (conceptual approach), serta pendekatan analisis (analytical approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Pasal 7 UU Perseroan Terbatas mewajibkan pendirian PT diDasarkan pada akta notaris, hal ini secara eksplisit menentukan peran Notaris dalam pendirian PT. Pemberlakuan UU Cipta Kerja memberikan perubahan dalam konsep PT yang sekarang dapat dibentuk oleh perorangan sesuai dengan kriteria Usaha Mikro dan Kecil yang berdasarkan pada Pernyataan Pendirian. Tetapi, UU Cipta Kerja menentukan bahwa dalam PT Perorangan tidak memenuhi kriteria sebagai UMK, maka PT tersebut harus mengubah statusnya sesuai dengan UU PT dan menggunakan akta notaris sebagai dasar pendirian PT. Peran Notaris tetap dibutuhkan untuk membuat akta notaris apabila PT Perorangan mengubah status Perseroan sesuai dengan UU PT. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130322827","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acta ComitasPub Date : 2021-12-01DOI: 10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p9
Maria Fransiska Christiani Nawang, I. Putra
{"title":"Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Salinan Akta Notaris Oleh Pengadilan","authors":"Maria Fransiska Christiani Nawang, I. Putra","doi":"10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p9","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000The purpose of writing this article is to find out the legal consequences of a copy of the deed that is canceled in court and the risks to the Notary if he does not withdraw the canceled copy of the deed This type of legal dogmatic research/normative research is used by the author in this journal because of the legal vacuum in the JN law and JNP law. The approach used is the legal approach and the conceptual approach. The results of the study show that, the legal consequences of a copy of the deed that are canceled by the Court are that the deed becomes null and void or the deed is reduced to a deed under the hand. Regarding the risk to the notary if he does not withdraw the canceled copy of the deed, the notary can be involved in legal problems, namely participating in legal actions. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstrak \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Tujuan penulisan artikel ini yaitu untuk mengetahui akibat hukum terhadap salinan akta yang dilakukan pembatalan di pengadilan dan resiko terhadap Notaris apabila tidak menarik salinan akta yang dibatalkan. Jenis penelitian dogmatika hukum/penelitian normatif digunakan penulis dalam jurnal ini karena adanya kekosongan hukum dalam UUJN dan UUJNP. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan UU dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa, akibat hukum terhadap salinan akta yang dilakukan pembatalan oleh pengadilan adalah akta tersebut menjadi batal demi hukum atau akta diturunkan kekuatan pembuktiannya menjadi akta dibawah tangan. Mengenai resiko terhadap notaris apabila tidak menarik salinan akta yang dibatalkan adalah notaris dapat terlibat dalam permasalahan hukum yakni turut serta melakukan perbuatan hukum. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125211391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acta ComitasPub Date : 2021-06-30DOI: 10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i02.p15
Ni Made Dwikayanti, I. Priyanto
{"title":"Kedudukan Keputusan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Theresia K. Dimu","authors":"Ni Made Dwikayanti, I. Priyanto","doi":"10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i02.p15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i02.p15","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000This purpose is aim to analyse the power of Notary Honor Council on the decision related to law enforcement where notary is being subjected in criminal law in their authirty as Notary/PPAT in this study case Theresia K Dimu. The method that apply is normative where norm is the object of the writing. It is proven that the Notary Honor Council resolution addressed to the investigation of Theresia K Dimu Notary/PPAT is final and biding according to the constitution. Therefore, the resolution must be followed and boyed by the law enforecer including the Nusa Tenggara Timur Attorney General’s Office. The resolution taken by the Noraty Honor Council should be taken as the final step of the law enforcement. Hence, continuing the investigation of Theresia K Dimu, Notary/PPAT is against the law. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstrak \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Penulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan dari pada keputusan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris khususnya dalam kaitan dengan proses penegakan hukum terkait dengan tindak pidana yang diduga dilakukan oleh notaris berkaitan dengan tugas serta jabatannya khususnya terhadap Notaris/ PPAT Theresia K Dimu. Hasil penelitian yang dilakukan dengan metode penulisan normatif yang menempatkan norma sebagai objek dalam penulisan artikel ini, ditemukan bahwa keputusan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris terhadap pemeriksaan notaris/ PPAT Theresia K Dimu merupakan keputusan yang bersifat mengikat dikarenakan didasarkan pada kewenangan yang sah yang diperoleh dari peraturan perundang-undangan. Oleh sebab itu harus ditaati baik itu oleh notaris/ PPAT Theresia K Dimu maupun oleh Penegak hukum dalam hal ini Penyidik dari Kejaksaan Tinggi Nusa Tenggara Timur sehingga dengan demikian penetapan tersangka terhadap notaris/ PPAT Theresia K Dimu oleh Penyidik dari Kejaksaan Tinggi Nusa Tenggara Timur merupkan suatu perbuatan melawan hukum. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116747805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Acta ComitasPub Date : 2021-06-30DOI: 10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i02.p14
Syans Dias Aulia Abiandti, I. Setiabudhi
{"title":"Pemberian Wasiat Wajibah Atas Harta Warisan Kepada Ahli Waris Non-Muslim Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam","authors":"Syans Dias Aulia Abiandti, I. Setiabudhi","doi":"10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i02.p14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i02.p14","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstract \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000The purpose of writing is to know and analyze the regulation of wills in the provisions of fiqh and positive legal provisions in Indonesia, and the basis for consideration of the Judge is to grant inheritance rights in the form of compulsory wills to non-Muslim heirs. Normative legal research methods. The results of this study indicate that the provision of wills is only intended for adoptive parents or adopted children and not to be given to a non-Muslim as this is regulated in Article 209 KHI. Second, the basis for judges to grant compulsory wills for heirs of different religions is the jurispudence of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 368/K/Ag/1995 on the basis of being the freedom that is owned by the Judge, and the Judge has the obligation to make legal discoveries using the historical interpretation method, sociological interpretation, and the analogue argumentum based on morals, justice and the masses of society. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Abstrak \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000Adapun tujuan penulisan adalah mengetahui dan menganalisis mengenai pengaturan wasiat wajibah dalam ketentuan fikih dan ketentuan hukum positif di Indonesia, dan dasar pertimbangan Hakim memberikan hak waris dalam bentuk wasiat wajibah kepada ahli waris non muslim. Metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa, pemberian wasiat wajibah hanya diperuntukkan kepada orang tua angkat atau anak angkat dan tidak untuk diberikan kepada seseorang non-muslim sebagiamana hal ini diatur pada Pasal 209 KHI. Kedua, dasar hakim pemberian wasiat wajibah bagi ahli waris beda agama adalah yurispudensi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 368/K/Ag/1995, atas dasar asas kebebasan yang dimiliki oleh Hakim, dan Hakim memiliki kewajiban untuk melakukan penemuan hukum menggunakan metode penafsiran historis, penafsiran sosiologis, dan argumentum peranalogium dengan berlandasakan moral, keadilan dan kemashlatan masyarakat. \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":381646,"journal":{"name":"Acta Comitas","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123941425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}