Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online最新文献_第7页

Catholic voice and ART: revising the French bioethics law 天主教之声与艺术:修改法国生命伦理法

Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.11.001

Séverine Mathieu

引用次数: 3

(Not) wanting to choose: outside agencies at work in assisted reproductive technology (不想)选择:从事辅助生殖技术工作的外部机构

Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.008

Anne-Sophie Giraud

{"title":"(Not) wanting to choose: outside agencies at work in assisted reproductive technology","authors":"Anne-Sophie Giraud","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Human choice and interventions that could seem to threaten the course of ‘nature’ or ‘chance’ are at the heart of controversies over assisted reproductive technology across Western countries. These debates focus predominately on so-called ‘selective reproductive technology’. While today, the technique of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) raises few political and bioethical debates in France and other Western countries, concerns remain that human intervention might replace ‘natural’ processes, threatening human procreation. These polemics focus on situations that require a decision, notably embryo selection and the fate of spare frozen embryos. The choices involved are induced by the technology and organized by the law. In the French legal system, IVF patients and professionals have the opportunity and, to a certain extent, the responsibility to decide on the status of in-vitro embryos. This article shows that, in these situations, both IVF patients and professionals invoke outside agencies (‘instances tierces’), both to avoid making decisions and to recover a world order in which procreation is not entirely subject to human decision. In short, there is a need to feel that procreation is not entirely dependent on human intervention; that individuals do not decide everything. It appears that the choices that are made, their nature and the type of outside agency that is invoked are highly situated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.008","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38728194","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Reprotech in France and the United States: Differences and similarities – an introduction 法国和美国的再保护:异同——介绍

Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.02.001

Séverine Mathieu, Rayna Rapp

引用次数: 1

Reprotech in France and the United States: comparisons, reproductive technology and migrapolitics 法国和美国的再保护:比较，生殖技术和移民政治

Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.02.002

Charis Thompson

引用次数: 1

Cross-border reproductive care in the USA: who comes, why do they come, what do they purchase? 美国的跨境生殖保健:谁来，他们为什么来，他们买什么?

Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.003

Heather Jacobson

{"title":"Cross-border reproductive care in the USA: who comes, why do they come, what do they purchase?","authors":"Heather Jacobson","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.003","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.003","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article explores the participation of non-US-resident patients/clients in the US reproductive market, garnering a picture of cross-border reproductive care (CBRC) into the USA by drawing on the existing literature, identifying the frequency of and motivations for such arrangements, the primary sending countries, and the reproductive services sought. I find that although the expense of US CBRC necessarily limits the patient/client pool, it is largely non-economic factors that drive CBRC into the USA. The US CBRC patient/client base, which is diverse in terms of national origin, race and sexual orientation, is recruited by the US fertility industry and drawn to the full range of assisted reproductive technology (ART) services, such as in-vitro fertilization, surrogacy, oocyte donation and preimplantation genetic screening/preimplantation genetic diagnosis, available in the US market which are often restricted or limited in their countries of origin. CBRC patients/clients enjoy the legal clarity for establishing parentage and citizenship for their children available in the USA, as well as what some view as a medically and ethically superior ART market.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38709875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 14

In-vitro gametogenesis on YouTube – epistemological performances from Strasbourg and Los Angeles YouTube上的体外配子发生——来自斯特拉斯堡和洛杉矶的认识论表演

Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.12.001

Noémie Merleau-Ponty

引用次数: 1

ART with PGD: risky heredity and stratified reproduction ART与PGD：风险遗传和分层繁殖。

Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.007

Ilana Löwy

引用次数: 5

Reprint: Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology 转载：对受孕的追求把我们带到了哪里？人类学和社会学的课程。

Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.03.001

Marcia C. Inhorn

{"title":"Reprint: Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology","authors":"Marcia C. Inhorn","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.03.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2021.03.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Louise Brown, the world’s first test-tube baby, was born more than 40 years ago in England. For Louise Brown’s infertile mother, Lesley, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) was the ‘hope technology’ which allowed her to overcome her tubal infertility after 9 years of heart-breaking involuntary childlessness. Since then, IVF has travelled to diverse global locations, where millions of individuals and couples have embarked on technologically assisted ‘quests for conception’. After 40 years of IVF, where has the quest for conception taken us? This article outlines seven major global trajectories — namely, that the quest for conception has become more: (i) technological, because of a profusion of IVF-based innovations; (ii) masculine, because of men’s eager uptake of intracytoplasmic sperm injection, their own ‘masculine hope technology’; (iii) stratified, due to persistent race- and class-based barriers in IVF access; (iv) transnational, as infertile and other involuntarily childless people search across borders to overcome restrictions in their home countries; (v) selective, as IVF-based reprogenetic technologies eliminate genetic disease while exacerbating sex selection; (vi) moral, as religious sensibilities both accommodate and curtail the possibilities and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART); and (vii) extended, as new cryopreservation technologies prolong the reproductive lifespan and extend reproduction to the transgender community. The article concludes with thoughts on where future quests for conception might take us, and why IVF and other reproductive technologies are ‘good to think with’ in both the anthropology and sociology of reproduction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2021.03.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"39238682","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

Adapting the 14-day rule for embryo research to encompass evolving technologies 调整胚胎研究的14天规则，以涵盖不断发展的技术

Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.12.002

Kate Williams , Martin H. Johnson

引用次数: 18

Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology 对受孕的探索把我们带到了哪里?人类学和社会学的教训

Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.04.001

Marcia C. Inhorn

{"title":"Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology","authors":"Marcia C. Inhorn","doi":"10.1016/j.rbms.2020.04.001","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.rbms.2020.04.001","url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Louise Brown, the world’s first test-tube baby, was born more than 40 years ago in England. For Louise Brown’s infertile mother, Lesley, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) was the ‘hope technology’ which allowed her to overcome her tubal infertility after 9 years of heart-breaking involuntary childlessness. Since then, IVF has travelled to diverse global locations, where millions of individuals and couples have embarked on technologically assisted ‘quests for conception’. After 40 years of IVF, where has the quest for conception taken us? This article outlines seven major global trajectories — namely, that the quest for conception has become more: (i) technological, because of a profusion of IVF-based innovations; (ii) masculine, because of men’s eager uptake of intracytoplasmic sperm injection, their own ‘masculine hope technology’; (iii) stratified, due to persistent race- and class-based barriers in IVF access; (iv) transnational, as infertile and other involuntarily childless people search across borders to overcome restrictions in their home countries; (v) selective, as IVF-based reprogenetic technologies eliminate genetic disease while exacerbating sex selection; (vi) moral, as religious sensibilities both accommodate and curtail the possibilities and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART); and (vii) extended, as new cryopreservation technologies prolong the reproductive lifespan and extend reproduction to the transgender community. The article concludes with thoughts on where future quests for conception might take us, and why IVF and other reproductive technologies are ‘good to think with’ in both the anthropology and sociology of reproduction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37973,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biomedicine and Society Online","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rbms.2020.04.001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38235205","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 18