Arthroplasty Today最新文献

{"title":"The Epidemiology of the Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in the United States From 2016 to 2022","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101517","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101517","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The number of revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) is projected to reach 572,000 cases annually by 2030 in the United States. This may be attributed to the successes of primary THAs combined with an aging population, patients desire to remain active, and expanded indications for younger patients. Given the evolving nature of revision THAs, an epidemiological analysis of (1) etiologies; (2) demographics, including age and region; and (3) lengths of stay (LOSs) may minimize the gap between appropriate understanding and effective intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>From 2016 to 2022, a national, all-payer database was queried. Incidences and indications were analyzed for a total of 102,476 patients who had revision THA procedures. Patients were stratified according to etiology of failure, age, US census region, primary payor class, and mean LOS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The most common etiologies for revision THA procedures were dislocation (16.7%) and infection (12.7%), followed by periprosthetic fracture (6.9%). The largest age group was 65-74 years (30.9%), followed by &gt;75 years (28.6%), then 55-64 (26.5%). The South had the largest total procedure cohort (36.9%), followed by the Midwest (27.5%), then the Northeast (19.7%), and the West (15.9%). The mean LOS was 4.10 days (range, 1.0-20.0).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Dislocation and infection remain leading indications for revision THA. These findings can properly guide surgeons toward appropriate management as well as toward active steps to minimizing these outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142553430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Accuracy of a New Augmented Reality Assisted Technique for Total Knee Arthroplasty: An In Vivo Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101565","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101565","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains the standard of care for treating end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee. Approximately 15%-20% of the patients are dissatisfied following surgery. To improve accuracy and outcomes of TKA, various assistive technologies have been introduced. For this study, an augmented reality (AR) system was explored and tested.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Knee + system (Pixee Medical, Besancon, France) was used to guide TKA. It uses a combination of quick response-code labeled instruments and AR glasses to guide tibial and femoral cuts. The primary research goal was to evaluate its accuracy by direct comparing the planned angular values for lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, hip-knee-ankle axis, and tibial slope to the intraoperative obtained values and the measured angles on postoperative full leg radiographs. The secondary research goal was to assess its feasibility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This retrospective study evaluated 124 patients, with a follow-up of at least 1 year. The average absolute difference between planned and measured postop values were 1.39° for lateral distal femoral angle, 1.03° for medial proximal tibial angle, 2.16° for tibial slope, and 1.51° for hip-knee-ankle axis. Within the follow-up period, 8 complications were observed. The average surgical time was 83 minutes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study has demonstrated a high accuracy, comparable to robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty, of the Knee + AR system. It has shown to be a safe, cheap and time-efficient assistive technology for patients undergoing medial pivot TKA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142553429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Periprosthetic Hip Fracture due to Ballistic Injuries","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101547","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101547","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Periprosthetic hip fractures are a common cause for revision. To date, however, there are no reports of periprosthetic fractures (PFs) in total hip arthroplasty caused by ballistic injury (BI). There are no current recommendations on the management of this pathology in the literature. The objective of this paper is to report on 2 successfully treated cases of PF caused by BIs. Additionally, a brief review of the literature regarding open fracture secondary to BIs is carried out. What we consider appropriate initial and definitive management for these patients is outlined. According to our clinical results and current evidence, adequate management for a BI Vancouver B1 femoral PF consists of early antibiotic therapy, surgical debridement, osteosynthesis with variable angle locking plate, structural allograft, cerclage wires, and negative pressure wound therapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142527332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Corrosion of Modular Dual-Mobility Acetabular Components Leading to Acetabular Bone Loss and Protrusio","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101543","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101543","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dual-mobility bearings are being increasingly utilized in total hip arthroplasty. Contemporary modular designs often feature inner cobalt-chromium liners that are seated in outer titanium acetabular shells. However, mating of these 2 dissimilar metals may lead to complications. We present a case report of a patient who was found to have osteolysis and acetabular protrusio due to an adverse local tissue reaction from corrosion between a cobalt-chromium liner and titanium acetabular shell that appeared to be well-seated clinically and radiographically. This case suggests that implant failure and associated adverse local tissue reactions may occur even in seemingly well-seated modular dual-mobility implants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142527331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty for Traumatic Acetabular Fracture Using an Image-free Second-Generation System","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101485","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101485","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Complex traumatic acetabular fractures with concomitant hip dislocations are an orthopaedic emergency often requiring open reduction and internal fixation; however, total hip arthroplasty (THA) for acute acetabular fractures may be indicated in certain scenarios. This study reports the case of a 65-year-old male who had a motor vehicle collision that resulted in acetabular fracture dislocation with concomitant femoral head fracture. The patient underwent acute image-free robotic THA. At 6-month follow-up, the patient had good pain management and was doing well after surgery. With the reported technique using a reamer basket, an image-free robotic system can be used in acute THA in patients to achieve appropriate cup positioning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142446379","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Perioperative Outcomes of Intramedullary Nail vs Hemiarthroplasty vs Total Hip Arthroplasty for Intertrochanteric Fracture: An Analysis of 31,519 Cases","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101513","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101513","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The purpose of this study is to compare 30-day perioperative outcomes following treatment of intertrochanteric (IT) fractures with intramedullary nail (IMN), total hip arthroplasty (THA), or hemiarthroplasty (HA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who had sustained an IT fracture treated with primary IMN, THA, or HA between 2017 and 2020. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes S72.141-S72.146, subtypes A through C, were used to identify eligible patients and were cross-referenced to primary Current Procedural Terminology codes, used to identify the following procedure types: 27245: IMN; 27130: THA; and 27236: HA. Revision cases and patients who underwent arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were excluded. Outcomes of interest included reoperation, readmission, operative time, length of stay, and major and minor complications. Multivariate regression was used to evaluate differences in postoperative outcomes between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 29,809 IT fractures treated with IMN (94.6%), 1493 treated with HA (4.7%), and 217 treated with THA (0.70%). There was a statistically significant increase in 30-day reoperation rates (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.99 [95% confidence interval = 1.51, 2.63], <em>P</em> &lt; .001) when combining all arthroplasty patients compared to IMN. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall complication rate between IMN (13.58%) and HA (14.60%, aOR = 1.09, <em>P</em> = .315) or THA (11.98%, aOR = 1.00, <em>P</em> = .998). When compared to IMN (0.12%), there was a statistically significantly decreased need for transfusion in the HA group (aOR = 0.71 [95% confidence interval = 0.61, 0.80], <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Primary HA is associated with an increased 30-day reoperation rate and decreased need for blood transfusion, but there were no other significant differences in postoperative morbidity identified among IMN, THA, and HA in the treatment of IT fractures. Given the challenges and inferior outcomes associated with conversion arthroplasty, the lack of significant difference in morbidity between the 3 groups suggests that primary arthroplasty may be a safe and viable treatment option in selected patients with IT fractures. Comparative studies with longer clinical follow-up will be necessary to establish the appropriate indications and further evaluate the clinical outcomes of primary arthroplasty in the treatment of IT fractures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142446378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Cement Viscosity and Application Time Lead to Significant Changes in Cement Penetration and Contact Surface Area","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101476","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101476","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Application time and viscosity are factors that can significantly affect the properties of bone cement and implant fixation. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of different application times of 2 different cements on mechanical parameters, cement interdigitation, and cement distribution.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>P.F.C. Sigma tibial trays were cemented with high-viscous Palacos R and medium- to low-viscous Simplex P in an open-cell model. The application was performed at different times within the manufacturer’s specifications. Cement interdigitation and micromotion were measured with computed tomography scan using a novel method.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant differences of insertion forces were found at all times of cement application. Cement penetration decreased with increasing pressure and viscosity. No significant differences were shown for micromotion between Palacos R and Simplex P except for an increase for Simplex P from 3 to 7 minutes at the bone-cement interface. Simplex P appeared to trap air at the implant-cement interface at 3 minutes and increased at 7 minutes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Cement distribution and intrusion of Palacos R and Simplex P decreased with time. Simplex P trapped air at the implant-cement interface, decreasing the amount of contact at the implant-cement interface, which is worrisome for long-term implant fixation. Given the significant changes in cement properties after mixing, it is necessary for surgeons to understand the viscosity and timing of cement application to achieve optimal cement penetration and surface contact area to potentially decrease implant loosening. High-viscous Palacos R should be applicated immediately with doughing time and medium-viscous Simplex P for about 4 minutes considering a threshold of minimum pressure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142446377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Improves Accuracy and Reproducibility of the Polyethylene Insert Thickness Compared to Manual Instrumentation or Navigation: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101489","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101489","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Increased accuracy and lower rates of component positioning outliers have been associated with better long-term survival and functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study investigates the accuracy of robotic-assisted TKA compared to navigation-assisted and manual instrumentation techniques, using polyethylene tibial insert thickness as a surrogate.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Consecutive primary TKA by a single surgeon were retrospectively reviewed and divided in 3 groups: manual instrumentation, navigation-assisted, and robotic-assisted (RA-TKA). Polyethylene insert thickness, deviation from planned thickness, and rate of outliers were compared between the 3 groups using nonparametric analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Bonferroni corrections. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of polyethylene thickness ≥9 mm. The learning curve for RA-TKA was evaluated with a box plot graph of groups of 10 consecutive cases.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 474 patients in manual instrumentation TKA, 257 in navigation-assisted TKA and 225 in RA-TKA, with median polyethylene thicknesses of 6.0 (interquartile range 5.0-7.0), 6.0 (interquartile range 5.0-7.0), and 5.0 (interquartile range 5.0-6.0) millimeters, respectively (P˂0.001 RA-TKA compared to both other groups). Polyethylene inserts with a thickness ≥9 mm were used in 28 (5.9%) manual instrumentation TKA, 13 (5.1%) navigation-assisted TKA, and 1 (0.4%) RA-TKA (<em>P</em> = .004). Independent predictors for polyethylene thickness ≥9 mm included surgical technique, left side, and male sex. A learning curve of &lt;30 cases was observed before consistent polyethylene thickness was achieved in RA-TKA.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Tibial polyethylene insert thickness, as a surrogate of surgical accuracy, is more reproducible in robotic-assisted than in navigation-assisted or manual-instrumentation TKA. The learning curve to reach high levels of reproducibility with this technique is relatively short.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142441239","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Retaining a Well-fixed Cone During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Surgical Technique and Outcomes","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101477","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101477","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Metaphyseal cones are frequently used in revision total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). However, during subsequent aseptic re-revisions, removing a well-fixed cone can be difficult. One innovative option is to retain the well-fixed cone and cement a new, stemmed revision component through the retained cone, yet minimal data exist on this technique. We describe a technique for retaining a well-fixed cone during re-revision TKA and report outcomes in 6 patients with 6 well-fixed metaphyseal cones. At a mean of 4 years follow-up, no retained cones with a new femoral or tibial component with stems were revised and there was no radiographic evidence of aseptic loosening. These early data suggest that retaining a well-fixed cone can be safe in re-revision TKA to minimize morbidity associated with cone removal.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>IV (retrospective study).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142441237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Patient-Specific Acetabular Safe Zones in Total Hip Arthroplasty: External Validation of a Quantitative Approach to Preoperatively Templating Spinopelvic Parameters","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101508","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101508","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Spinopelvic mechanics are critical in total hip arthroplasty; however, there is no established consensus for adjusting acetabular component positioning based on spinopelvic parameters. This study aimed to (1) validate a recently developed Patient-Specific acetabular safe-zone calculator that factors in spinopelvic parameters and (2) compare differences with hip-spine classification targets.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 3750 patients underwent primary total hip arthroplasty across 3 academic referral centers, with 33 (0.88%) requiring revision for instability. Spinopelvic parameters were measured before initial total hip arthroplasty, and acetabular component position was measured following the index and revision procedures. Most operations employed either computer navigation or robotic assistance (94%). Surgical approaches included both anterior and posterior techniques. Utilizing our recently developed patient-specific safe-zone calculator, theoretical intraoperative positions were calculated and compared to true component positions before and after revision.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 33 patients who underwent revision, none dislocated at an average follow-up of 5.1 years. In the external validation cohort, the average absolute differences between the patient-specific safe-zone and the median hip-spine classification recommendation were 3.8° ± 2.1° inclination and 5.0° ± 3.2° version. For the pooled cohort, the absolute differences between the patient-specific safe-zone targets and the prerevision component positions were 7.9° ± 5.1° inclination and 11.4° ± 6.9° version. After revision, the mean absolute differences decreased to 3.6° ± 3.1° inclination and 5.8° ± 3.5° version (<em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A patient-specific approach improved acetabular component positioning accuracy within 6° of version and 4° of inclination of stable, revised hips. Patient-specific safe zones provide quantitative targets for nuanced spinopelvic preoperative planning that may mitigate risk of instability and may indicate use of assisted technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142441238","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}