{"title":"Markov-Switching Models with Evolving Regime-Specific Parameters: Are Post-War Booms or Recessions All Alike?","authors":"Yunjong Eo, Chang‐Jin Kim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1971169","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1971169","url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we relax the assumption of constant regime-specific mean growth rates in Hamilton's (1989) two-state Markov-switching model of the business cycle. We first present a benchmark model, in which each regime-specific mean growth rate evolves according to a random walk process over different episodes of booms or recessions. We then present a model with vector error correction dynamics for the regime-specific mean growth rates, by deriving and imposing a condition for the existence of a long-run equilibrium growth rate for real output. In the Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach developed in this paper, the counterfactual priors, as well as the hierarchical priors for the regime-specific parameters, play critical roles. By applying the proposed approach to postwar U.S. real GDP growth (1947:Q4-2011:Q3), we uncover the evolving nature of the regime-specific mean growth rates of real output in the U.S. business cycle. An additional feature of the postwar U.S. business cycle that we uncover is a steady decline in the long-run equilibrium output growth. The decline started in the 1950s and ended in the 2000s. Our empirical results also provide partial, if not decisive, evidence that the central bank may have been more successful in restoring the economy back to its long-run equilibrium growth path after unusually severe recessions than after unusually good booms.","PeriodicalId":379040,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Business Cycles (Topic)","volume":"185 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116380680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Some International Aspects of Business Cycles: Neisser, Haberler and Modern Open Economy Macroeconomics","authors":"Hans‐Michael Trautwein","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2557938","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2557938","url":null,"abstract":"Despite the transnational character of the Great Depression of the years 1929-33, there are few works in the inter-war literature that deal in depth with the propagation of business cycles across national borders and systemic risks of depression in the world economy. Two notable exceptions are Hans Neisser’s monograph on Some International Aspects of the Business Cycle (1936) and chapter 12 in Gottfried Haberler’s Prosperity and Depression (1937), which carries the heading “International Aspects of Business Cycles”. Both works differ substantially from each other and from the modern way of thinking about international business cycles in Open Economy Macroeconomics. This paper argues that Neisser’s and Haberler’s approaches provide more straightforward routes to capturing some of the transnational aspects of the recent Great Recession (of 2008/09) than the modern standard approach. At the first stage, the two older approaches are presented and compared with each other. At the second stage, they are contrasted with the current state of open-economy macroeconomics, as represented by Uribe & Schmitt-Grohe (2014), a textbook in the making that puts international macro in a business cycle framework. Since Haberler’s account accentuates the role of transport costs, imperfections of capital markets and monetary policies, it can be used as a catalogue of criteria for checking what modern attempts to connect international trade, international finance and economic growth have got (back) in sight. More importantly, both Haberler’s and Neisser’s approach also serve to identify what has been lost out of sight.","PeriodicalId":379040,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Business Cycles (Topic)","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116430403","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Grown-Up Business Cycles","authors":"B. Pugsley, A. Sahin","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2548579","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2548579","url":null,"abstract":"We document two striking facts about U.S. firm dynamics and interpret their significance for employment dynamics. The first is the dramatic decline in firm entry and the second is the gradual shift of employment toward older firms since 1980. We show that despite these trends, the lifecycle dynamics of firms and their business cycle properties have remained virtually unchanged. Consequently, aging is the delayed effect of accumulating startup deficits. Together, the decline in the employment contribution of startups and the shift of employment toward more mature firms contributed to the emergence of jobless recoveries in the U.S. economy.","PeriodicalId":379040,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Business Cycles (Topic)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114552702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Collateral Constraints and State-Contingent Contracts","authors":"M. Dmitriev, J. Hoddenbagh","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2443522","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2443522","url":null,"abstract":"It is commonly assumed that binding collateral constraints amplify the impact of aggregate shocks on the economy. However, we show that when firms can hedge against aggregate risk with state-contingent lending contracts, binding collateral constraints no longer amplify shocks relative to the basic New Keynesian model. We embed state-contingent lending contracts in a quantitative business cycle model in the spirit of Kiyotaki and Moore (1997) and Iacoviello (2005) and find that in general equilibrium unconstrained lenders sell insurance against aggregate risk to constrained borrowers. The provision of insurance against aggregate risk prevents the usual tightening of collateral constraints during downturns and leads to relatively mild recessions.","PeriodicalId":379040,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Business Cycles (Topic)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123740226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Business Cycles Synchronicity and Income Levels: Has Globalisation Brought Us Closer than Ever?","authors":"Rosmy Jean Louis, Daniel N. Simons","doi":"10.1111/twec.12074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12074","url":null,"abstract":"Research on business cycle linkages shows a tendency to model countries of relatively the same income levels jointly. However, the issue of whether these countries move along the same business cycles has not been formally investigated in the literature. In this paper, we take this approach and investigate whether each group of countries follows its own dynamics and is therefore subjected to the same business cycle and whether these cycles are independent of each other across income groups. Results indicate that high income per capita countries (HICs) tend to be guided by stronger similarity in business cycles than countries in the middle (MICs) and low income (LICs) groups. In search for an explanation of the business cycles synchronicity observed, panel data analysis was explored. The results from the robust fixed effects estimation show neither trade openness nor shocks to consumption underlie international business cycle synchronization, but rather shocks to oil prices.","PeriodicalId":379040,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Business Cycles (Topic)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125532464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Effects of Business Cycle and Debt Maturity on a Firm's Investment and Default Decisions","authors":"Haejun Jeon, M. Nishihara","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2441033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2441033","url":null,"abstract":"We propose a model that jointly determines the capital structure and investment decisions taking business cycle and debt maturity into account. It endogenously determines the triggers of investment/disinvestment and default, which depend on the state of the economy. The investment triggers can be unimodal or bimodal with respect to debt maturity depending on the volatility of the growth opportunities. The optimal leverage ratio tends to increase as recession shortens, which induces higher yield spreads for short-term debt; but long-term debt is more affected by increase of expected cash flow, and thus the yield spreads decrease.","PeriodicalId":379040,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Business Cycles (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128694846","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Does Interbank Market Matter for Business Cycle Fluctuation? An Estimated DSGE Model with Financial Frictions for the Euro Area","authors":"Federico Giri","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2443873","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2443873","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to assess the impact of the interbank market on the business cycle fluctuations. In order to do that, we build a DSGE model with heterogeneous households and banks. The surplus bank can allocate its resources between interbank lending and risk free government bonds. This portfolio choice is affected by an exogenous counterpart risk shock on the interbank lending. An increase of the counterpart risk diverts funds from the interbank markets toward the risk free market. This mechanism allow us to capture the collapse of the interbank market and the fly to quality mechanism underlying the 2007 financial crisis. The main result is that an interbank riskiness shock seems to explain part of the 2007 downturn and especially the rise of the interest rates on the credit market during and just after the financial turmoil.","PeriodicalId":379040,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Business Cycles (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122239807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Klaus Abberger, M. Graff, Boriss Siliverstovs, J. Sturm
{"title":"The KOF Economic Barometer, Version 2014: A Composite Leading Indicator for the Swiss Business Cycle","authors":"Klaus Abberger, M. Graff, Boriss Siliverstovs, J. Sturm","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2408944","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2408944","url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a composite leading indicator for the Swiss business cycle corresponding to the growth rate cycle concept. It is the result of a complete overhaul of the KOF Economic Barometer that has been published by the KOF Swiss Economic Institute on a monthly basis since 1976. In line with this tradition, the calculation of the new KOF Barometer comprises two main stages. The first consists of the variable selection procedure; and in the second stage these variables are subsequently transformed into one leading indicator. Whereas in the previous versions of the KOF Barometer six to 25 variables survived the first stage, the new – less discretionary and more automated – version of the first stage is much more generous. Currently, out of a set of 476 variables resulting in 4356 transformations thereof that are tested in the first stage, 219 variables manage to enter the second stage. The increased number of variables underlying the second stage allows a relatively stable and robust KOF Barometer – compared to its previous versions – that has hence no longer to rely on filtering techniques to reduce the noise in the final indicator. In a (pseudo-) real-time analysis the characteristics of the new KOF Barometer are compared to the previous versions and other alternatives.","PeriodicalId":379040,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Business Cycles (Topic)","volume":"108 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120910228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Return Decomposition Over the Business Cycle","authors":"Tolga Cenesizoglu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2398028","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2398028","url":null,"abstract":"To analyze the determinants of the observed variation in stock prices, Campbell and Shiller (1988) have suggested decomposing unexpected stock returns into unexpected changes in investors’ beliefs about future cash flows (cash flow news) and discount rates (discount rate news). Based on a generalization of this approach to a framework with regime-switching parameters and variances, we analyze the decomposition of the conditional variance of returns on the S&P 500 index over the business cycle. The cash flow news is relatively more important than discount rate news in determining the conditional variance of returns in expansions. The conditional variances of returns and its components increase in recessions. However, the conditional variance of discount rate news increases more than that of cash flow news and, thus, the discount rate news becomes relatively more important than cash flow news in determining the conditional variance of returns in recessions. In contrast to the standard Campbell and Shiller approach with constant parameters and variances, cash flow news becomes more important than discount rate news in determining the unconditional variance of returns when we allow parameters and variances to vary over the business cycle. We show that these results are broadly consistent with the implications of a stylized asset pricing model in which the growth rates of dividends and consumption take on different values depending on the underlying state of the economy.","PeriodicalId":379040,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Business Cycles (Topic)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124845718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"A New Macroeconomic Structural Model Reveals the Economic Law of Inertia and Simulates the Housing Bubble","authors":"Tomohide Yasuda","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2397316","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2397316","url":null,"abstract":"Since Adam Smith, economic thought has maintained that the economy has an inherent tendency to reach an optimal equilibrium under perfect competition. I demonstrate, contrary to this orthodoxy, that the economy constituted with Homo economicus under perfect competition continues its predetermined oscillatory motion perpetually as a frictionless oscillator. With this Economic Law of Inertia, we recognize orderly motion beneath the apparently disorderly motion of the real-life economy. Any discrepancy between the orderly motion and the observed motion is considered to be the result of a disturbance, or an economic force, being applied to the real-life economy. I introduce several economic forces such as static friction, productivity changes, changes in investment and speculative demand to explain key macroeconomic phenomena including the business cycle and the housing bubble. In principle, we can simulate the motion of the real-life economy with a detailed knowledge of its initial conditions and all the forces acting on it.","PeriodicalId":379040,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Business Cycles (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129994550","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}