First Amendment Studies最新文献_第7页

Libel by the numbers: The use of public opinion polls in defamation lawsuits 数字诽谤:在诽谤诉讼中使用民意调查

First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2017-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/21689725.2017.1422987

Eric P. Robinson

引用次数: 0

The reputation-management industry and the prospects for a “right to be forgotten” in the US 声誉管理行业与美国“被遗忘权”的前景

First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21689725.2017.1308262

Ben Medeiros

{"title":"The reputation-management industry and the prospects for a “right to be forgotten” in the US","authors":"Ben Medeiros","doi":"10.1080/21689725.2017.1308262","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21689725.2017.1308262","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Online speech platforms present novel risks to privacy and reputation. There are situations in which unique kinds of harm can indeed occur but where the law applies imperfectly. Yet legal expansions like the European “Right to Be Forgotten” would contradict several well-established tenets of American free speech law. This paper argues that the reputation-management industry (RMI) represents one set of solutions in the absence of an American Right to Be Forgotten. The RMI counsels assiduous self-monitoring, search engine optimized promotion of one’s own preferred content, and negotiation for voluntary removal by content hosts. This approach arguably helps to address the informational distortions than can be created by true accounts of unseemly conduct and mob-like expressions of vitriolic opinion online. It likewise helps to mitigate the concern that readers will form inaccurate or unduly harsh judgments based on cursory examination of search results.The RMI thus in some ways addresses the underlying gaps between legal protection and perceived harm in a manner that accords better with the emphasis on “counterspeech” in the American free speech tradition. At the same time, the article concludes by addressing some limitations that are necessary to keep the industry from threatening free-speech principles itself.","PeriodicalId":37756,"journal":{"name":"First Amendment Studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"14 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21689725.2017.1308262","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47815583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Student cyberbullying inside the digital schoolhouse gate: Toward a standard for determining where a “School” is 数字校舍大门内的学生网络欺凌:探讨确定“学校”在哪里的标准

First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21689725.2016.1278177

Alvin J. Primack, Kevin A. Johnson

引用次数: 7

Political cartoons as epideictic: Rhetorical analysis of two of the Charlie Hebdo political cartoons* 政治漫画的流行:两幅查理周刊政治漫画的修辞分析*

First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21689725.2017.1301264

M. Bezanson

{"title":"Political cartoons as epideictic: Rhetorical analysis of two of the Charlie Hebdo political cartoons*","authors":"M. Bezanson","doi":"10.1080/21689725.2017.1301264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21689725.2017.1301264","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract On January 7, 2015, 12 people were killed during the bombing of the Charlie Hebdo offices. What makes this especially chilling was that the attack was launched against a newspaper for publishing images of Muhammad used for satiric commentary. The following day, CNN’s Nick Thompson posted a series of political cartoons responding to the attack. Many employed the idiom, “The pen is mightier than the sword.” This analysis focuses on two of the cartoons using that idiom: Linus MacLeod’s “Powerful, More Powerful” and James Walmesley’s “Pencil and Eraser.” MacLeod’s cartoon maintains a fidelity to the adage, in that he employs the image of a pen, while Walmseley instead depicts a pencil, the writing instrument more typically associated with a cartoonist’s work. After a discussion of the history and nature of the idiom, this piece analyzes the comics by using the construction of narrative by Barry Brummett, and the construction of image offered by Molly Bang. The piece argues that the images function epideictically by praising freedom of speech and blaming terrorists.","PeriodicalId":37756,"journal":{"name":"First Amendment Studies","volume":"51 1","pages":"1 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21689725.2017.1301264","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45652422","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

Trigger warnings, the organic classroom, and civil discourse 触发警告、有机课堂和公民话语

First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2016-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/21689725.2016.1219270

M. E. Thorpe

引用次数: 8

The academically destructive nature of trigger warnings 触发警告在学术上的破坏性

First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2016-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/21689725.2016.1230508

R. E. Vatz

引用次数: 10

Re-focusing the debate on trigger warnings: Privilege, trauma, and disability in the classroom 重新聚焦于触发警告的辩论:课堂上的特权、创伤和残疾

First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2016-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/21689725.2016.1224677

Logan Rae

引用次数: 12

Exempting the university: Trigger warnings and intellectual space 免除大学:触发警告和知识空间

First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2016-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/21689725.2016.1233073

Jeremiah Hickey

引用次数: 8

Why trigger warnings are beneficial, perhaps even necessary 为什么触发警告是有益的，甚至是必要的

First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2016-07-02 DOI: 10.1080/21689725.2016.1232623

E. Lockhart

引用次数: 26

Words that wound, bodies that shield: Corporeal responses to Westboro Baptist Church’s hate speech 伤人的言语，保护的身体:对威斯特布路浸信会仇恨言论的身体反应

First Amendment Studies Pub Date : 2016-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/21689725.2016.1189345

Billie Murray

引用次数: 4