发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Law, Innovation and Technology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Automation in contract interpretation* 合同解释自动化*
Law, Innovation and Technology Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2020.1727068
Ryan Catterwell
{"title":"Automation in contract interpretation*","authors":"Ryan Catterwell","doi":"10.1080/17579961.2020.1727068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2020.1727068","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper investigates whether the process of contract interpretation (also described as contract construction) can be automated. It approaches the task in two stages. The first part explains contract interpretation as a cognitive process. It demonstrates that interpretation involves: (i) the identification of arguments in favour of each interpretation; and (ii) the weighing and balancing of arguments to arrive at the construction that was probably intended. The second part of the paper explores the extent to which the process can be automated by logical design or through machine learning. It demonstrates that manual programming and data analytics can automate the interpretive process in different ways and to different extents: a machine can be manually programmed to formulate some interpretive arguments; relevant interpretive information can be identified, classified and extracted through machine learning; and data analytics can be applied to recognise argument patterns in interpretive disputes.","PeriodicalId":37639,"journal":{"name":"Law, Innovation and Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":"112 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17579961.2020.1727068","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47419708","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
3D bioprinting in a 2D regulatory landscape: gaps, uncertainties, and problems 2D监管环境中的3D生物打印：差距、不确定性和问题
Law, Innovation and Technology Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2020.1727054
P. Li, A. Faulkner, N. Medcalf
{"title":"3D bioprinting in a 2D regulatory landscape: gaps, uncertainties, and problems","authors":"P. Li, A. Faulkner, N. Medcalf","doi":"10.1080/17579961.2020.1727054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2020.1727054","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper we assess both the ex ante and the ex post dimensions of the regulatory landscape of 3D bioprinting governance. While the former is mainly concerned with the market approval and safety of 3D bioprinting, the latter is concerned with the matter of liability once bioprinting has been licensed or authorised for use. In this 2D landscape, we highlight three sets of choices: whether regulation should focus on the process, the product or both; whether to rely on existing regimes or create a new bespoke and distinct regulatory framework; and whether to employ top down, bottom up, or co-regulation. We identify a series of interpretative uncertainties as well as gaps in the current legal regimes. We consider an initial provisional ‘process-based’ approach and a co-regulation model for bioprinting governance. We anticipate that the study of the regulatory landscape will offer key insights in relation to other types of biofabrication.","PeriodicalId":37639,"journal":{"name":"Law, Innovation and Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":"1 - 29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17579961.2020.1727054","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41614892","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14
Teledildonics and rape by deception 恶作剧和欺骗强奸
Law, Innovation and Technology Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2020.1727097
R. Sparrow, Lauren Karas
{"title":"Teledildonics and rape by deception","authors":"R. Sparrow, Lauren Karas","doi":"10.1080/17579961.2020.1727097","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2020.1727097","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It is now possible to buy sex toys that connect to the user’s phone or computer via Bluetooth and can be controlled remotely. The use of such Internet-enabled haptic sex toys involves an ineliminable risk of being deceived about particular features of one’s sexual partner and/or about which person one was having ‘sex’ with. Where this occurs, it is possible that the user would become the victim of rape-by-deception. We argue that determining whether a person using an Internet-enabled haptic sex toy has been raped or not when they are involved in a sexual encounter with someone – or something – other than that they intended requires us to confront difficult questions about the definition and significance of sexual intercourse and about the nature and harm of rape. Our discussion of these topics suggests that the use of such devices is more ethically fraught than has been appreciated to date.","PeriodicalId":37639,"journal":{"name":"Law, Innovation and Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":"175 - 204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17579961.2020.1727097","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44428516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Correction 修正
Law, Innovation and Technology Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2020.1755082
{"title":"Correction","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/17579961.2020.1755082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2020.1755082","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37639,"journal":{"name":"Law, Innovation and Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":"(i) - (i)"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17579961.2020.1755082","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42870675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The age of remix and copyright law reform 混音时代与版权法改革
Law, Innovation and Technology Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2020.1727087
Yahong Li
{"title":"The age of remix and copyright law reform","authors":"Yahong Li","doi":"10.1080/17579961.2020.1727087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2020.1727087","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The remix has emerged as a dominant force of creation in the digital and Internet age. The solutions under current copyright law such as fair use as well as voluntary, compulsory and public licencing have failed to adequately protect remix works and remixers, and as a result hampered the creativity of remix artists. New approaches are needed to cope with the challenges. This article proposes to add remix as a protectable subject matter; create a right to remix and grant it to remixers; obligate remixers to attribute source works to copyright holders and remunerate them for remixing; require the same remix rights and obligations to be passed on to future remixers; and impose a statutory levy on social media for using remixes. It is argued that the proposed approach can better protect remix creation and help achieve an optimal balance of interests between copyright holders, social media and users.","PeriodicalId":37639,"journal":{"name":"Law, Innovation and Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":"113 - 155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17579961.2020.1727087","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48842675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
New non-validated practice: an enhanced definition of innovative practice for medicine 新的未经验证的实践:医学创新实践的强化定义
Law, Innovation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-10-29 DOI: 10.20944/preprints201905.0070.v2
Ignacio Mastroleo, F. Holzer
{"title":"New non-validated practice: an enhanced definition of innovative practice for medicine","authors":"Ignacio Mastroleo, F. Holzer","doi":"10.20944/preprints201905.0070.v2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints201905.0070.v2","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A significant part of the literature on innovative practice in medicine relates to seizing opportunities and curbing harms for patients in desperate situations. Unfortunately, the term innovation has multiple meanings and a rich rhetorical flourish that adds confusion and misunderstanding to an already difficult debate. This paper aims to enhance the current definition of innovative practice for medicine. First, we replace the term ‘innovation’ with the more literal ‘new non-validated practice’. To identify this meaning, we analyse the traditional research ethics’ distinction between research, validated practice, and innovation in the Belmont Report. Second, we propose the following explicit definition of new non-validated practice: the first or recent use of diagnostic, therapeutic or preventive interventions that introduce a significant change, with an insufficient level of evidence of safety or efficacy for regular healthcare, and with the main aim to benefit individual patients. This definition is a promising conceptual tool to inform empirical research, ethicists, and the harmonisation of regulation and legislation (e.g. right-to-try laws).","PeriodicalId":37639,"journal":{"name":"Law, Innovation and Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":"318 - 346"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41777994","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Defining the scope of AI regulations 确定人工智能法规的范围
Law, Innovation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-08-26 DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3453632
Jonas Schuett
{"title":"Defining the scope of AI regulations","authors":"Jonas Schuett","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3453632","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3453632","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\u0000 The paper argues that the material scope of AI regulations should not rely on the term ‘artificial intelligence (AI)’. The argument is developed by proposing a number of requirements for legal definitions, surveying existing AI definitions, and then discussing the extent to which they meet the proposed requirements. It is shown that existing definitions of AI do not meet the most important requirements for legal definitions. Next, the paper argues that a risk-based approach would be preferable. Rather than using the term AI, policy makers should focus on the specific risks they want to reduce. It is shown that the requirements for legal definitions can be better met by defining the main sources of relevant risks: certain technical approaches (e.g. reinforcement learning), applications (e.g. facial recognition), and capabilities (e.g. the ability to physically interact with the environment). Finally, the paper discusses the extent to which this approach can also be applied to more advanced AI systems.","PeriodicalId":37639,"journal":{"name":"Law, Innovation and Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":"60 - 82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88231773","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Controversy first: factors limiting the success of Directive (EU) 2015/412 for national decision-making on the cultivation of GM crops 争议首先:限制指令(EU) 2015/412对转基因作物种植的国家决策成功的因素
Law, Innovation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2019.1665794
R. Mampuys, L. Poort
{"title":"Controversy first: factors limiting the success of Directive (EU) 2015/412 for national decision-making on the cultivation of GM crops","authors":"R. Mampuys, L. Poort","doi":"10.1080/17579961.2019.1665794","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2019.1665794","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The cultivation of GM crops in Europe has a long history of disagreement. While the legal framework is based on a safety assessment, the disagreement goes beyond such risks and is rooted in political, social and cultural grounds. In 2015, with the discussion having become deadlocked—neither Member States (MS) who wanted to cultivate GM crops nor those who did not could have their way—Directive (EU) 2015/412 was adopted. This Directive which, in addition to the safety assessment, enables MS to prohibit the cultivation of GMOs in their territory based on non-safety considerations, was supposed to remove the deadlock and give MS autonomy to restrict cultivation. However, as of 2018, it seems that this approach has been only partially successful. In this article, we identify factors limiting the effective use of the new Directive; and, then using Poort’s model of interactive legislation combined with an ethos of controversies, we analyse the potential of the Directive.","PeriodicalId":37639,"journal":{"name":"Law, Innovation and Technology","volume":"11 1","pages":"175 - 202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17579961.2019.1665794","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49135628","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Seeing the whole picture: visualising socio-spatial power through augmented reality 看到全局:通过增强现实可视化社会空间权力
Law, Innovation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2019.1665800
Michael A. Katell, F. Dechesne, B. Koops, Paulus N. Meessen
{"title":"Seeing the whole picture: visualising socio-spatial power through augmented reality","authors":"Michael A. Katell, F. Dechesne, B. Koops, Paulus N. Meessen","doi":"10.1080/17579961.2019.1665800","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2019.1665800","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Augmented Reality (AR) will have important effects on the ways in which spaces and places take meaning for both users and non-users of AR. As the market penetration of AR increases, new claims will be made on certain spaces, superimposing AR contexts on the meanings and functions traditionally associated with these spaces, not only by AR users but also by AR designers and service providers, raising important and complex questions about regulatory approaches to mitigating information and power asymmetries. A regulatory strategy that promotes civil society and individual privacy requires that we thoroughly consider the implications of AR on the construction of public and private space. We employ a mix of real and fictional AR scenarios to interrogate the potential effects of AR use and design on the construction of spatial meaning, the orientation of social relations, and distributions of social power, and we make initial recommendations for regulation to address AR’s possible negative effects.","PeriodicalId":37639,"journal":{"name":"Law, Innovation and Technology","volume":"11 1","pages":"279 - 310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17579961.2019.1665800","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46621330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Coherence in technology law 技术法的一致性
Law, Innovation and Technology Pub Date : 2019-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/17579961.2019.1665792
Michael Guihot
{"title":"Coherence in technology law","authors":"Michael Guihot","doi":"10.1080/17579961.2019.1665792","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2019.1665792","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Technology law is emerging as a distinct field of law among the canon of more established law subjects. This paper examines the requirements for coherence in law subjects and begins the process of classifying the field of technology law. It examines historical struggles for coherence in health law and environmental law in order to distil a methodology that will guide the analysis. The paper sets out a menu approach that refines some of the unifying principles of technology law that mark it out as a distinct field. The methodology is then tested against the ostensibly disparate papers that can all be said to be on ‘technology law’ in the Oxford Handbook on Law, Regulation and Technology. The paper concludes by directing further work to more fully classify this emerging field.","PeriodicalId":37639,"journal":{"name":"Law, Innovation and Technology","volume":"11 1","pages":"311 - 342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17579961.2019.1665792","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48059984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
首页 上一页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信