合同解释自动化*

Q1 Social Sciences
Ryan Catterwell
{"title":"合同解释自动化*","authors":"Ryan Catterwell","doi":"10.1080/17579961.2020.1727068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper investigates whether the process of contract interpretation (also described as contract construction) can be automated. It approaches the task in two stages. The first part explains contract interpretation as a cognitive process. It demonstrates that interpretation involves: (i) the identification of arguments in favour of each interpretation; and (ii) the weighing and balancing of arguments to arrive at the construction that was probably intended. The second part of the paper explores the extent to which the process can be automated by logical design or through machine learning. It demonstrates that manual programming and data analytics can automate the interpretive process in different ways and to different extents: a machine can be manually programmed to formulate some interpretive arguments; relevant interpretive information can be identified, classified and extracted through machine learning; and data analytics can be applied to recognise argument patterns in interpretive disputes.","PeriodicalId":37639,"journal":{"name":"Law, Innovation and Technology","volume":"12 1","pages":"112 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17579961.2020.1727068","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automation in contract interpretation*\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Catterwell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17579961.2020.1727068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper investigates whether the process of contract interpretation (also described as contract construction) can be automated. It approaches the task in two stages. The first part explains contract interpretation as a cognitive process. It demonstrates that interpretation involves: (i) the identification of arguments in favour of each interpretation; and (ii) the weighing and balancing of arguments to arrive at the construction that was probably intended. The second part of the paper explores the extent to which the process can be automated by logical design or through machine learning. It demonstrates that manual programming and data analytics can automate the interpretive process in different ways and to different extents: a machine can be manually programmed to formulate some interpretive arguments; relevant interpretive information can be identified, classified and extracted through machine learning; and data analytics can be applied to recognise argument patterns in interpretive disputes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law, Innovation and Technology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"112 - 81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17579961.2020.1727068\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law, Innovation and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2020.1727068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Innovation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2020.1727068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文研究了合同解释过程(也称为合同构建)是否可以自动化。它分两个阶段处理这项任务。第一部分将合同解释解释为一个认知过程。它表明,解释涉及:(一)确定有利于每种解释的论点;以及(ii)对论点进行权衡和平衡,以得出可能的意图。论文的第二部分探讨了逻辑设计或机器学习在多大程度上可以实现流程自动化。它表明,手动编程和数据分析可以以不同的方式和不同的程度自动化解释过程:机器可以手动编程来制定一些解释论点;通过机器学习可以识别、分类和提取相关的解释信息;数据分析可以用于识别解释性纠纷中的争论模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Automation in contract interpretation*
ABSTRACT This paper investigates whether the process of contract interpretation (also described as contract construction) can be automated. It approaches the task in two stages. The first part explains contract interpretation as a cognitive process. It demonstrates that interpretation involves: (i) the identification of arguments in favour of each interpretation; and (ii) the weighing and balancing of arguments to arrive at the construction that was probably intended. The second part of the paper explores the extent to which the process can be automated by logical design or through machine learning. It demonstrates that manual programming and data analytics can automate the interpretive process in different ways and to different extents: a machine can be manually programmed to formulate some interpretive arguments; relevant interpretive information can be identified, classified and extracted through machine learning; and data analytics can be applied to recognise argument patterns in interpretive disputes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Law, Innovation and Technology
Law, Innovation and Technology Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Stem cell research, cloning, GMOs ... How do regulations affect such emerging technologies? What impact do new technologies have on law? And can we rely on technology itself as a regulatory tool? The meeting of law and technology is rapidly becoming an increasingly significant (and controversial) topic. Law, Innovation and Technology is, however, the only journal to engage fully with it, setting an innovative and distinctive agenda for lawyers, ethicists and policy makers. Spanning ICTs, biotechnologies, nanotechnologies, neurotechnologies, robotics and AI, it offers a unique forum for the highest level of reflection on this essential area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信