{"title":"Coherence in technology law","authors":"Michael Guihot","doi":"10.1080/17579961.2019.1665792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Technology law is emerging as a distinct field of law among the canon of more established law subjects. This paper examines the requirements for coherence in law subjects and begins the process of classifying the field of technology law. It examines historical struggles for coherence in health law and environmental law in order to distil a methodology that will guide the analysis. The paper sets out a menu approach that refines some of the unifying principles of technology law that mark it out as a distinct field. The methodology is then tested against the ostensibly disparate papers that can all be said to be on ‘technology law’ in the Oxford Handbook on Law, Regulation and Technology. The paper concludes by directing further work to more fully classify this emerging field.","PeriodicalId":37639,"journal":{"name":"Law, Innovation and Technology","volume":"11 1","pages":"311 - 342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17579961.2019.1665792","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Innovation and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2019.1665792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
ABSTRACT Technology law is emerging as a distinct field of law among the canon of more established law subjects. This paper examines the requirements for coherence in law subjects and begins the process of classifying the field of technology law. It examines historical struggles for coherence in health law and environmental law in order to distil a methodology that will guide the analysis. The paper sets out a menu approach that refines some of the unifying principles of technology law that mark it out as a distinct field. The methodology is then tested against the ostensibly disparate papers that can all be said to be on ‘technology law’ in the Oxford Handbook on Law, Regulation and Technology. The paper concludes by directing further work to more fully classify this emerging field.
技术法作为一个独特的法律领域,在众多成熟的法律学科中崭露头角。本文考察了法律学科对连贯性的要求,并开始对技术法领域进行分类。它审查了卫生法和环境法一致性的历史斗争,以便提炼出一种指导分析的方法。这篇论文提出了一种菜单式的方法,提炼了一些技术法的统一原则,这些原则将其标记为一个独特的领域。然后,将这种方法与《牛津法律、法规和技术手册》(Oxford Handbook on law, Regulation and technology)中看似完全不同的论文进行对比,这些论文都可以说是关于“技术法”的。论文的结论是指导进一步的工作,以更全面地分类这一新兴领域。
期刊介绍:
Stem cell research, cloning, GMOs ... How do regulations affect such emerging technologies? What impact do new technologies have on law? And can we rely on technology itself as a regulatory tool? The meeting of law and technology is rapidly becoming an increasingly significant (and controversial) topic. Law, Innovation and Technology is, however, the only journal to engage fully with it, setting an innovative and distinctive agenda for lawyers, ethicists and policy makers. Spanning ICTs, biotechnologies, nanotechnologies, neurotechnologies, robotics and AI, it offers a unique forum for the highest level of reflection on this essential area.