发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Journal on the Use of Force and International Law最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Digest of state practice: 1 July – 31 December 2021 国家实践摘要：2021年7月1日至12月31日
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2066347
P. Butchard, Jasmin Johurun Nessa
{"title":"Digest of state practice: 1 July – 31 December 2021","authors":"P. Butchard, Jasmin Johurun Nessa","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2066347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2066347","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"171 - 228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48024686","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The 25 February 2021 military strikes and the ‘armed attack’ requirement of self-defence: from ‘sina qua non’ to the point of vanishing? 2021年2月25日的军事打击和自卫的“武装攻击”要求:从“必要条件”到消失点?
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2029022
C. Henderson
{"title":"The 25 February 2021 military strikes and the ‘armed attack’ requirement of self-defence: from ‘sina qua non’ to the point of vanishing?","authors":"C. Henderson","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2029022","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2029022","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Following a rocket attack that occurred at Erbil airport in Iraq, President Biden authorised the first use of military force since becoming President on 25 February 2021. This was legally justified on the basis of self-defence. On the face of it this seemed an innocuous justification. Yet, this article argues that through both downplaying the treaty source of the right of self-defence and its express requirement for an armed attack, as well as promoting a contextual and enabling form of necessity, the Biden administration’s military action and ensuing strategy of legal justification place question marks over the meaning of, and even the requirement for, an armed attack. However, seeing the 25 February incident in the context of broader US and other state practice, while various attempts at diluting this requirement and the interpretation provided to it by the International Court of Justice have been sustained, others have clearly not.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"55 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42707833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Forever air wars and the lawful purpose of self-defence 永远的空战与自卫的合法目的
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2029020
M. O’Connell
{"title":"Forever air wars and the lawful purpose of self-defence","authors":"M. O’Connell","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2029020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2029020","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The 20-year Afghanistan conflict was called a ‘forever war’ but another significant use of military force has lasted much longer. Since 1986, US presidents have authorised air attacks beyond armed conflict zones. President Biden continued the practice beginning with a strike on Syria and later on Iraq, Somalia, and Afghanistan, where a drone cost the lives of seven children. US air wars are explained more by a policy of deterrence, than the lawful purpose of self-defence as permitted under international law. UN Charter Article 51 restricts force to when an armed attack occurs. The general principles of necessity, proportionality, and attribution provide further restrictions. The US has tried for 35-years to alter this law in line with deterrence policy but doing so is difficult under the doctrine of positive law. It is impossible under the doctrine of jus cogens that includes the prohibition on force and the exception for self-defence.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"33 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45888156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The crime of aggression as a violation of the rights of one’s own population 侵略罪侵犯本国人民权利的侵略罪行
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2059155
Frédéric Mégret, C. Redaelli
{"title":"The crime of aggression as a violation of the rights of one’s own population","authors":"Frédéric Mégret, C. Redaelli","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2059155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2059155","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In its traditional understanding, aggression is a crime against state. A number of scholars have, by contrast, increasingly framed the wrong of aggression as lying in its devastating consequences for the populations affected. That emergent human rights framing, however, has largely focused on the population of the other state. This article seeks to go beyond this nascent human rights framing of aggression, by looking at the possibility that waging an illegal war can also be interpreted as a violation of the rights of a state’s own population, including both combatants and non-combatants. In doing so, we seek to reconnect the argument against aggression to domestic human rights themes involving the responsibility of the sovereign towards persons within its jurisdiction. We suggest that this approach can help produce a more normatively grounded and textured account of the grounds for proscribing war that better connects both domestic and international legal conversations.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"99 - 137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46148231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Russia’s attack on Ukraine and the jus ad bellum 俄罗斯对乌克兰的攻击和战时法
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2056803
James A. Green, C. Henderson, T. Ruys
{"title":"Russia’s attack on Ukraine and the jus ad bellum","authors":"James A. Green, C. Henderson, T. Ruys","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2056803","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2056803","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The 24 February 2022 Russian invasion of – or ‘special military operation’ in – Ukraine has sent shock waves across the globe. In this editorial the Editors-in-Chief of JUFIL examine in detail the legal justifications advanced by President Putin for Russia’s use of military force and subject them to scrutiny. Doing so highlights just how devoid of substance and credibility they are within the context of the jus ad bellum as it exists today. Furthermore, the Editors reflect on some of the broader questions that this use of military force poses for the jus ad bellum, including what the invasion of Ukraine says about the efficacy of the contemporary jus ad bellum and what is – or what might be – the ultimate impact upon the rules and norms governing the use of force.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"4 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43222543","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
Symposium: old wine in new bottles? – US President Biden’s first encounter with the jus ad bellum 研讨会:新瓶装陈酒?——美国总统拜登首次遭遇“战争正义”
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2029019
T. Ruys
{"title":"Symposium: old wine in new bottles? – US President Biden’s first encounter with the jus ad bellum","authors":"T. Ruys","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2029019","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2029019","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"31 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41870497","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introduction to issue 9(1) 文档9(1)简介
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2066348
James A. Green
{"title":"Introduction to issue 9(1)","authors":"James A. Green","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2066348","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2066348","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45846015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
February 2021 American airstrikes in Syria: necessary and proportionate acts of self-defence or unlawful armed reprisals? 2021年2月美国对叙利亚的空袭：必要和相称的自卫行为还是非法的武装报复？
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2029021
C. O’Meara
{"title":"February 2021 American airstrikes in Syria: necessary and proportionate acts of self-defence or unlawful armed reprisals?","authors":"C. O’Meara","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2029021","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2029021","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the jus ad bellum necessity and proportionality requirements pertaining to the American airstrikes on 25 February 2021 against alleged Iran-supported non-state militia groups in Syria. From the limited publicly available information, the February airstrikes appear to be punitive rather than defensive. Consequently, this author concludes that the airstrikes were likely unnecessary as there was no situation of genuine emergency that required the USA to act when and where it did or else lose the ability to defend itself effectively. The necessity of targeting the militiamen in Syrian territory is also highly questionable. If not necessary, the airstrikes constitute unlawful armed reprisals. The proportionality of the airstrikes is moot, therefore, although the article proceeds to articulate certain challenges to assessing such proportionality if the necessity of the American response against an ongoing threat could be hypothetically established.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"78 - 98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47532499","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Collective self-defence or regional enforcement action: the legality of a SADC intervention in Cabo Delgado and the question of Mozambican consent 集体自卫或区域执法行动:南部非洲发展共同体在德尔加多角进行干预的合法性和莫桑比克同意的问题
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2021-10-06 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2021.1987071
M. Svicevic
{"title":"Collective self-defence or regional enforcement action: the legality of a SADC intervention in Cabo Delgado and the question of Mozambican consent","authors":"M. Svicevic","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2021.1987071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2021.1987071","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the emergence of an ISIS-linked armed group in Mozambique’s Cabo Delgado province, questions of a regional military response by the Southern African Development Community (SADC) have arisen. Although the organisation’s existing security framework is elaborate, it remains unclear as to whether any intervention in Mozambique may take place in the absence of its consent. Reliance on the SADC Mutual Defence Pact as a potential legal basis for a military response neglects to consider that collective self-defence can only be taken in response to an armed attack and at the request of the victim state. In the absence of either, a SADC intervention would likely resemble enforcement action and may instead be based on the SADC Protocol on Politics, Defence and Security Co-operation. In addition, for such enforcement action to be legal, it would require the authorisation of the United Nations Security Council.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"138 - 170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"60042439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The use of force against non-state actors: all over the map 对非国家行为者使用武力：到处都是
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2021.1992915
Adil Ahmad Haque
{"title":"The use of force against non-state actors: all over the map","authors":"Adil Ahmad Haque","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2021.1992915","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2021.1992915","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\u0000 This short article considers the informal ‘Arria formula’ meeting of the United Nations Security Council convened by Mexico in February 2021. It offers a compressed analysis of many of the statements made during that meeting regarding the substantive issue of inter-state force against non-state actors, identifies important areas of disagreement, and concludes with some observations on the current state of the law and the path forward.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"8 1","pages":"278 - 290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48097150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信