发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Journal on the Use of Force and International Law最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Legal consequences of Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s unprecedented declaration attributing the instigation of the Eritrea-Ethiopia border war to Ethiopia’s previous ruling party 埃塞俄比亚总理阿比·艾哈迈德史无前例地宣布，埃塞俄比亚前执政党煽动了厄立特里亚-埃塞俄比亚边境战争，这将带来法律后果
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2023.2194721
Isaias T. Berhe, S. Andemariam
{"title":"Legal consequences of Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s unprecedented declaration attributing the instigation of the Eritrea-Ethiopia border war to Ethiopia’s previous ruling party","authors":"Isaias T. Berhe, S. Andemariam","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2023.2194721","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2023.2194721","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 2005, the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission decided in the Jus ad Bellum award that Eritrea unlawfully used force at the start of the border war between Eritrea and Ethiopia. In September 2021, Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed wrote a letter to United States’ President Joe Biden stating that the Tigray People’s Liberation Front, which was at the head of Ethiopia’s previous ruling coalition, instigated the war. This article examines the nature and legal effects of that letter under international law, especially its impact on the award and the yet-to-be-composed fact-finding body, and recommends steps in the context of strengthening the warming relations between the two states.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"10 1","pages":"74 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48810524","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unbound in war? International law in Canada and Britain’s participation in the Korean war and Afghanistan 在战争中不受束缚?加拿大的国际法以及英国参与朝鲜战争和阿富汗战争
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2023.2199503
Alexander Orakhelashvili
{"title":"Unbound in war? International law in Canada and Britain’s participation in the Korean war and Afghanistan","authors":"Alexander Orakhelashvili","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2023.2199503","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2023.2199503","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"10 1","pages":"153 - 158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45247722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The provision of weapons and logistical support to Ukraine and the jus ad bellum 向乌克兰提供武器和后勤支助以及战争法
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2023.2200321
James A. Green
{"title":"The provision of weapons and logistical support to Ukraine and the jus ad bellum","authors":"James A. Green","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2023.2200321","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2023.2200321","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This editorial considers the support currently being supplied to Ukraine following Russia’s ongoing full-scale invasion, which began in February 2022. Western states have provided significant aid to Ukraine in the form, inter alia, of modern weapons and training. This editorial asks whether that support is in itself a use of force in prima facie violation of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter and customary international law. A related question that is also considered is whether NATO member states (and others) are currently exercising the right of collective self-defence in relation to their support for Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"10 1","pages":"3 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42889784","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of the Security Council and its authorisation to use force to create normative markers in democratic governance discourses 安全理事会的作用及其授权使用武力在民主治理话语中创造规范性标志
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-11-14 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2144433
Işıl Aral
{"title":"The role of the Security Council and its authorisation to use force to create normative markers in democratic governance discourses","authors":"Işıl Aral","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2144433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2144433","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article investigates how international law scholars construct their argument when they argue for the emergence of a new customary norm. It focuses on scholarly writings discussing whether there is an emerging customary norm which requires states to legitimise their governance through democratic rule. By conceptualising international law as a set of narratives, the article concentrates on democratic governance discourses to analyse how scholars resort to the involvement of the Security Council as a narrative technique that provides persuasiveness to their argument. The article argues that international lawyers keep reproducing the same interpretation regarding the involvement of the Security Council in Haiti, Sierra Leone and Côte d’Ivoire, to the extent that these cases have become the normative markers of this narrative. The accretion of several writings upholding the same interpretation of these cases transforms them into normative markers of democratic governance discourses that help to prove an emerging customary norm.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"10 1","pages":"17 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49559835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Introduction to issue 9(2) 第9期导言（2）
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2150444
C. Henderson
{"title":"Introduction to issue 9(2)","authors":"C. Henderson","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2150444","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2150444","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"241 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49421532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Digest of State Practice: 1 January – 30 June 2022 国家实践摘要：2022年1月1日至6月30日
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2145004
P. Butchard, Jasmin Johurun Nessa
{"title":"Digest of State Practice: 1 January – 30 June 2022","authors":"P. Butchard, Jasmin Johurun Nessa","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2145004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2145004","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"423 - 479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42094324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
‘Operation Olive Branch’ in Syria’s Afrin District: towards a new interpretation of the right of self-defence? 叙利亚阿夫林地区的“橄榄枝行动”:对自卫权的新解释?
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2097418
Fatima Mashi, Sofie Hamdi, Mohammad Salman
{"title":"‘Operation Olive Branch’ in Syria’s Afrin District: towards a new interpretation of the right of self-defence?","authors":"Fatima Mashi, Sofie Hamdi, Mohammad Salman","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2097418","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2097418","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Turkey’s ‘Operation Olive Branch’, carried out in Syria’s northern Afrin District in 2018, fuelled a debate around Turkey’s right to invoke Article 51 of the UN Charter against the Yekîneyên Parastina Gel (YPG). This article analyses whether ‘Operation Olive Branch’ is to be considered as an extensive interpretation of Article 51 of the UN Charter, given the absence of an agreement within the international community on the matter. On the basis of states’ positions regarding the Turkish military action in the Afrin District, on the one hand, and the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice regarding the right of self-defence, the UN Charter, state practice and legal doctrine, on the other, this study will demonstrate that Turkey’s argument of preventively operating according to the right of self-defence is not compatible with international law, and consequently constitutes a violation of the Article 2(4) prohibition on the use of force.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"324 - 351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45024887","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reconceptualising the right of self-defence against ‘imminent’ armed attacks 重新定义针对“迫在眉睫”的武装袭击的自卫权
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2097618
C. O’Meara
{"title":"Reconceptualising the right of self-defence against ‘imminent’ armed attacks","authors":"C. O’Meara","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2097618","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2097618","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A state’s right to act in self-defence against ‘imminent’ armed attacks remains an unsettled question of international law. Yet, states persist in justifying military actions on this basis. Absent a common definition of imminence, assessing the legality of these operations is practically impossible. Although imminence is traditionally understood as referring solely to the temporal proximity of an armed attack, for some this approach is insufficient. This article examines scholarship and examples of state practice that indicate that imminence may be viewed as comprising several contextual indicators that determine whether states may have recourse to self-defence. This conception of imminence raises fears of an expansive right of self-defence. Yet, this author concludes that such ‘contextual imminence’ stands as a proxy for jus ad bellum necessity. This conflation is perhaps unfortunate, but an orthodoxy regarding all forms of self-defence is thereby maintained, subject to the enduring legacy of the Caroline formula.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"278 - 323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42395934","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The cross-strait relationship between China and Taiwan in light of international law: not quite a mere domestic affair …  从国际法看台湾两岸关系：不只是国内事务 …
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2083374
Antonio Bultrini
{"title":"The cross-strait relationship between China and Taiwan in light of international law: not quite a mere domestic affair … ","authors":"Antonio Bultrini","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2083374","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2083374","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Taiwan is one of the most critical questions in current international affairs. China’s tough interpretation of the ‘one-China policy’ (there is one China, Taiwan belongs to it and is bound to reunite under the sole legitimate government, i.e. Beijing), is at odds with Taiwan increasingly distancing itself from the mainland. China no longer hides its military plans to gain control of Taiwan, should the latter persist in its determination not to reunite or formally declare its independence. The present article looks at two issues that are crucial and intertwined: the much-debated question concerning the status of Taiwan under international law, and the much … less debated question of whether it would be lawful for China to resort to armed force to establish its rule over Taiwan. Recent state practice highlights a significant trend towards restricting resort to force against stabilised, post-conflict, de facto entities, with Taiwan representing a paradigmatic case.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"391 - 422"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49241833","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Mixing oil and water? The interaction between jus ad bellum and jus in bello during armed conflicts 把油和水混合?在武装冲突中，战时法与战时法之间的相互作用
Journal on the Use of Force and International Law Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI: 10.1080/20531702.2022.2059154
G. Cohen
{"title":"Mixing oil and water? The interaction between jus ad bellum and jus in bello during armed conflicts","authors":"G. Cohen","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2059154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2059154","url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article assesses the applicability of jus ad bellum rules during armed conflicts. It first presents the overlap between the jus ad bellum and jus in bello with respect to the use of armed interstate force, then rejects the ‘displacement’ approach, according to which jus ad bellum rules are inapplicable during armed conflicts, arguing for an interaction between the fields based on the facts prevailing before the launching of an attack. Such factual interaction could be determined pursuant to the intensity of the conflict, so that once a certain threshold is reached, the use of interstate force in self-defence is permissible, and jus ad bellum does not place any additional constraints on the attacker. The findings are applied to the alleged attacks by Israel on Syrian territory during the Syrian Civil War, with the author concluding that jus ad bellum fully applies due to the low intensity of the conflict.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"352 - 390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48890266","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信