叙利亚阿夫林地区的“橄榄枝行动”:对自卫权的新解释?

Q3 Social Sciences
Fatima Mashi, Sofie Hamdi, Mohammad Salman
{"title":"叙利亚阿夫林地区的“橄榄枝行动”:对自卫权的新解释?","authors":"Fatima Mashi, Sofie Hamdi, Mohammad Salman","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2022.2097418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Turkey’s ‘Operation Olive Branch’, carried out in Syria’s northern Afrin District in 2018, fuelled a debate around Turkey’s right to invoke Article 51 of the UN Charter against the Yekîneyên Parastina Gel (YPG). This article analyses whether ‘Operation Olive Branch’ is to be considered as an extensive interpretation of Article 51 of the UN Charter, given the absence of an agreement within the international community on the matter. On the basis of states’ positions regarding the Turkish military action in the Afrin District, on the one hand, and the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice regarding the right of self-defence, the UN Charter, state practice and legal doctrine, on the other, this study will demonstrate that Turkey’s argument of preventively operating according to the right of self-defence is not compatible with international law, and consequently constitutes a violation of the Article 2(4) prohibition on the use of force.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"324 - 351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Operation Olive Branch’ in Syria’s Afrin District: towards a new interpretation of the right of self-defence?\",\"authors\":\"Fatima Mashi, Sofie Hamdi, Mohammad Salman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20531702.2022.2097418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Turkey’s ‘Operation Olive Branch’, carried out in Syria’s northern Afrin District in 2018, fuelled a debate around Turkey’s right to invoke Article 51 of the UN Charter against the Yekîneyên Parastina Gel (YPG). This article analyses whether ‘Operation Olive Branch’ is to be considered as an extensive interpretation of Article 51 of the UN Charter, given the absence of an agreement within the international community on the matter. On the basis of states’ positions regarding the Turkish military action in the Afrin District, on the one hand, and the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice regarding the right of self-defence, the UN Charter, state practice and legal doctrine, on the other, this study will demonstrate that Turkey’s argument of preventively operating according to the right of self-defence is not compatible with international law, and consequently constitutes a violation of the Article 2(4) prohibition on the use of force.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"324 - 351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2097418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2022.2097418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要土耳其于2018年在叙利亚北部阿夫林区开展的“橄榄枝行动”引发了一场关于土耳其有权援引《联合国宪章》第五十一条反对Yekîneyên Parastina Gel(YPG)的辩论。这篇文章分析了“橄榄枝行动”是否应被视为对《联合国宪章》第五十一条的广泛解释,因为国际社会内部没有就此达成协议。根据各国对土耳其在阿夫林地区军事行动的立场,以及国际法院关于自卫权的判例、《联合国宪章》、国家实践和法律学说,这项研究将表明,土耳其根据自卫权进行预防性行动的论点不符合国际法,因此违反了禁止使用武力的第2条第4款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Operation Olive Branch’ in Syria’s Afrin District: towards a new interpretation of the right of self-defence?
ABSTRACT Turkey’s ‘Operation Olive Branch’, carried out in Syria’s northern Afrin District in 2018, fuelled a debate around Turkey’s right to invoke Article 51 of the UN Charter against the Yekîneyên Parastina Gel (YPG). This article analyses whether ‘Operation Olive Branch’ is to be considered as an extensive interpretation of Article 51 of the UN Charter, given the absence of an agreement within the international community on the matter. On the basis of states’ positions regarding the Turkish military action in the Afrin District, on the one hand, and the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice regarding the right of self-defence, the UN Charter, state practice and legal doctrine, on the other, this study will demonstrate that Turkey’s argument of preventively operating according to the right of self-defence is not compatible with international law, and consequently constitutes a violation of the Article 2(4) prohibition on the use of force.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信