集体自卫或区域执法行动:南部非洲发展共同体在德尔加多角进行干预的合法性和莫桑比克同意的问题

Q3 Social Sciences
M. Svicevic
{"title":"集体自卫或区域执法行动:南部非洲发展共同体在德尔加多角进行干预的合法性和莫桑比克同意的问题","authors":"M. Svicevic","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2021.1987071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Since the emergence of an ISIS-linked armed group in Mozambique’s Cabo Delgado province, questions of a regional military response by the Southern African Development Community (SADC) have arisen. Although the organisation’s existing security framework is elaborate, it remains unclear as to whether any intervention in Mozambique may take place in the absence of its consent. Reliance on the SADC Mutual Defence Pact as a potential legal basis for a military response neglects to consider that collective self-defence can only be taken in response to an armed attack and at the request of the victim state. In the absence of either, a SADC intervention would likely resemble enforcement action and may instead be based on the SADC Protocol on Politics, Defence and Security Co-operation. In addition, for such enforcement action to be legal, it would require the authorisation of the United Nations Security Council.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"138 - 170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collective self-defence or regional enforcement action: the legality of a SADC intervention in Cabo Delgado and the question of Mozambican consent\",\"authors\":\"M. Svicevic\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20531702.2021.1987071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Since the emergence of an ISIS-linked armed group in Mozambique’s Cabo Delgado province, questions of a regional military response by the Southern African Development Community (SADC) have arisen. Although the organisation’s existing security framework is elaborate, it remains unclear as to whether any intervention in Mozambique may take place in the absence of its consent. Reliance on the SADC Mutual Defence Pact as a potential legal basis for a military response neglects to consider that collective self-defence can only be taken in response to an armed attack and at the request of the victim state. In the absence of either, a SADC intervention would likely resemble enforcement action and may instead be based on the SADC Protocol on Politics, Defence and Security Co-operation. In addition, for such enforcement action to be legal, it would require the authorisation of the United Nations Security Council.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"138 - 170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2021.1987071\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2021.1987071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自莫桑比克德尔加多角省出现与伊斯兰国有关的武装组织以来,南部非洲发展共同体(SADC)的区域军事反应问题已经出现。尽管该组织现有的安全框架是精心设计的,但仍不清楚是否会在未经其同意的情况下对莫桑比克进行任何干预。依赖《南部非洲发展共同体共同防御条约》作为军事反应的潜在法律基础,忽视了集体自卫只能在对武装攻击作出反应时并应受害国的要求而采取。在两者都不存在的情况下,南共体的干预很可能类似于执法行动,而可能基于南共体政治、防务和安全合作议定书。此外,要使这种强制行动合法,就需要得到联合国安全理事会的授权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collective self-defence or regional enforcement action: the legality of a SADC intervention in Cabo Delgado and the question of Mozambican consent
ABSTRACT Since the emergence of an ISIS-linked armed group in Mozambique’s Cabo Delgado province, questions of a regional military response by the Southern African Development Community (SADC) have arisen. Although the organisation’s existing security framework is elaborate, it remains unclear as to whether any intervention in Mozambique may take place in the absence of its consent. Reliance on the SADC Mutual Defence Pact as a potential legal basis for a military response neglects to consider that collective self-defence can only be taken in response to an armed attack and at the request of the victim state. In the absence of either, a SADC intervention would likely resemble enforcement action and may instead be based on the SADC Protocol on Politics, Defence and Security Co-operation. In addition, for such enforcement action to be legal, it would require the authorisation of the United Nations Security Council.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信