Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology最新文献_第2页

The impact of the coronavirus pandemic on interest in owning a firearm in the American public 冠状病毒大流行对美国公众拥有枪支兴趣的影响

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-01-10 DOI: 10.1080/23743603.2021.2018931

Stylianos Syropoulos, E. Puschett, B. Leidner

引用次数: 0

Preference for directive versus participative leadership: the role of regulatory mode and context quality definition 指示型领导与参与型领导的偏好:监管模式和情境质量定义的作用

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-12-20 DOI: 10.1080/23743603.2021.2001325

Magali Beylat, Karl-Andrew Woltin, K. Sassenberg, V. Yzerbyt

引用次数: 1

Downstream consequences of disclosing defaults: influences on perceptions of choice architects and subsequent behavior 披露默认值的下游后果:对选择架构师和后续行为感知的影响

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-12-05 DOI: 10.1080/23743603.2021.1983720

Patrik Michaelsen, Lina Nyström, Timothy J. Luke, Martin Hedesström

引用次数: 6

Revisiting the influence of regulatory focus on eagerness and vigilance in signal detection 重新审视监管焦点对信号检测中渴望和警惕的影响

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-10-28 DOI: 10.1080/23743603.2021.1983719

Anand Krishna

引用次数: 1

When more means less: the impact of instrumentality dilution on evaluations of romantic relationships 当更多意味着更少:工具稀释对浪漫关系评估的影响

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-10-28 DOI: 10.1080/23743603.2021.1983718

Jason Roberson, Stephanie S. Spielmann, Catalina H Kopetz

引用次数: 0

Introduction to the nudging special issue “轻推”特刊简介

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI: 10.1080/23743603.2021.2168425

K. Jonas, Joseph Cesario

引用次数: 0

When your goals inspire my goals: the role of effort, personal value, and inference in goal contagion. 当你的目标激励我的目标时:努力、个人价值和推理在目标传染中的作用。

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-06-08 DOI: 10.1080/23743603.2020.1767502

Katja Corcoran, Hilmar Brohmer, Lisa V Eckerstorfer, Silvia Macher

{"title":"When your goals inspire my goals: the role of effort, personal value, and inference in goal contagion.","authors":"Katja Corcoran, Hilmar Brohmer, Lisa V Eckerstorfer, Silvia Macher","doi":"10.1080/23743603.2020.1767502","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2020.1767502","url":null,"abstract":"Just observing other people can influence what we do. Under certain conditions, it inspires us to strive for the same goal as the other person. Such goal contagion occurs, because one first automatically infers the goal and then adopts it for oneself. In a series of three experiments (overall N = 840 university students), we investigated personal goal value and the observed person's effort as moderators of goal contagion, which is mediated by goal inference. In all three experiments, participants read a brief story about a student who either wants to earn money (target goal) or to do an internship (control) and expects to show much or little effort. In Studies 1a and b, goal inference was the dependent variable, whereas in Study 2, we considered the full moderated-mediation model and measured how strongly participants pursue the goal to earn money. We aimed at locating the moderators within this two-step process. We hypothesized that high effort increases goal inference, whereas personal goal value strengthens the relationship between goal inference and goal adoption. Across experiments, we did find evidence for explicit and spontaneous, but not for implicit goal inference. Furthermore, participants did not pursue to earn money to a different degree across conditions and different degrees of goal value. Taken together, neither the moderated-mediation process nor the basic goal contagion effect was supported. Results are discussed in the light of other published studies on goal contagion and the current Replication Crisis.","PeriodicalId":37202,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology","volume":"4 1","pages":"78-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23743603.2020.1767502","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25477903","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

Who are the opponents of nudging? Insights from moral foundations theory 谁是“助推”的反对者?来自道德基础理论的见解

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-05-13 DOI: 10.1080/23743603.2020.1756241

Artur Nilsson, Arvid Erlandsson, D. Västfjäll, G. Tinghög

引用次数: 2

Correction after misinformation: Does engagement in media multitasking affect attitude adjustment? 错误信息后的纠正:媒体多任务处理是否影响态度调整?

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI: 10.1080/23743603.2021.1884495

E. Szumowska, G. Czarnek, Piotr Dragon, J. De keersmaecker

引用次数: 3

Identifying the domains of ideological similarities and differences in attitudes 识别意识形态上的相似和态度上的不同

Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/wfbcv

Emily Kubin, M. Brandt

{"title":"Identifying the domains of ideological similarities and differences in attitudes","authors":"Emily Kubin, M. Brandt","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/wfbcv","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wfbcv","url":null,"abstract":"Liberals and conservatives disagree, but are there some domains where we are more or less likely to observe ideological differences? To map the types of attitudes where we may be more or less likely to observe ideological differences, we draw on two approaches, the elective affinities approach, which suggests individual differences explains differences between liberals and conservatives, and the divergent content approach, which posits the key distinction between ideologues are their value orientations. The goal of the current research was to explore when and why liberals and conservatives disagree. We tested whether ideological differences are more likely to emerge in attitudes characterized by threat, complexity, morality, political ideology, religious ideology, or harm (as compared to objects not characterized by these domains) using both explicit and implicit measures of 190 attitude objects. While all domains predicted ideological differences, the political domain was the only significant predictor of ideological differences when controlling for the other domains. This study provides insight into which attitudes we are most and least likely to find ideological differences.","PeriodicalId":37202,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"80430565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1