发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Journal of Social Ontology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
How to Project a Socially Constructed Sexual Orientation 如何投射社会建构的性取向
Journal of Social Ontology Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1515/jso-2021-0005
P. Finocchiaro
{"title":"How to Project a Socially Constructed Sexual Orientation","authors":"P. Finocchiaro","doi":"10.1515/jso-2021-0005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2021-0005","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Was bisexuality a widespread feature of ancient Greek society? This question is an instance of cross-cultural projection -- of taking the means through which people are categorized in one culture and applying it to members of another. It’s widely held by those who think that sexual orientation is socially constructed that its projection poses a problem. In this paper, I offer a more careful analysis of this alleged problem. To analyze projection, I adapt Iris Einheuser’s substratum-carving model of conventionalism to fit the specific needs of social construction (and social metaphysics more broadly). Using this model, I show that projection is conceptually coherent, and so does not for that reason pose any problem. Along the way, I identify some of the epistemic difficulties facing projection. While these difficulties are formidable, they are not substantially affected by the constructivist claim. I therefore conclude that there is no unique problem facing the projection of a socially constructed sexual orientation.","PeriodicalId":37042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Ontology","volume":"7 1","pages":"173 - 203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43769242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
The Social Construction of Perceptual Categories 感知范畴的社会建构
Journal of Social Ontology Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1515/jso-2020-0058
F. Consiglio
{"title":"The Social Construction of Perceptual Categories","authors":"F. Consiglio","doi":"10.1515/jso-2020-0058","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0058","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article I shall argue that the categories a subject employs to codify her perceptions are emergent elements of the social niche her community inhabits. Hence, I defend the claim that categories are primarily elements of the social ontology a certain subject experiences. I then claim that public representations (e.g. icons) shared in a social niche play a crucial regulative role for the members of that community: in fact, they offer a rule (a canon) to conceive a certain type or a certain category, e.g. ‘movement’, ‘time’ or ‘space’. In this sense, categories function as normative elements.","PeriodicalId":37042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Ontology","volume":"7 1","pages":"205 - 232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47250262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unplanned Coordination: Ensemble Improvisation as Collective Action 计划外的协调:合奏即兴作为集体行动
Journal of Social Ontology Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1515/jso-2020-0004
Ali Hasan, Jennifer Kayle
{"title":"Unplanned Coordination: Ensemble Improvisation as Collective Action","authors":"Ali Hasan, Jennifer Kayle","doi":"10.1515/jso-2020-0004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0004","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The characteristic features of ensemble dance improvisation (EDI) make it an interesting case for theories of intentional collective action. These features include the high degree of freedom enjoyed by each individual, and the lack of fixed hierarchical roles, rigid decision procedures, or detailed plans. We present a “reductive” approach to collective action, apply it to EDI, and show how the theory enriches our perspective on this practice. We show, with the help of our theory of collective action, that EDI (as typically practiced) constitutes a significant collective achievement, one that manifests an impressive, spontaneous, jointly cooperative and individually highly autonomous activity that meets demanding aesthetic standards. Its being good in this way is not a mere extrinsic feature of the artwork, but part of its aesthetic value. We end by discussing how this value is easily missed by classic aesthetics, but is revealed by more contemporary frameworks like social aesthetics.","PeriodicalId":37042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Ontology","volume":"7 1","pages":"143 - 172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44539619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Patriarchy as Institutional 父权制作为制度
Journal of Social Ontology Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI: 10.1515/jso-2021-0033
Johan Brännmark
{"title":"Patriarchy as Institutional","authors":"Johan Brännmark","doi":"10.1515/jso-2021-0033","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2021-0033","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In considering patriarchy as potentially institutional and as a characteristic also of contemporary Western societies, a fundamental issue concerns how to make sense of largely informal institutions to begin with. Traditional accounts of institutions have often focused on formalized ones. It is argued here, however, that the principal idea behind one commonly accepted conception of institutions can be developed in a way that better facilitates an explication of informal institutions. When applied to the phenomenon of patriarchy, such an approach can then also allow us to ontologically make sense of gray areas and hierarchies of authority, as well as the intersectionality of social positions.","PeriodicalId":37042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Ontology","volume":"7 1","pages":"233 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48931142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Why They Know Not What They Do: A Social Constructionist Approach to the Explanatory Problem of False Consciousness 为什么他们不知道自己在做什么:假意识解释问题的社会建构主义方法
Journal of Social Ontology Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.1515/jso-2020-0012
Lee Wilson
{"title":"Why They Know Not What They Do: A Social Constructionist Approach to the Explanatory Problem of False Consciousness","authors":"Lee Wilson","doi":"10.1515/jso-2020-0012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0012","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract False consciousness requires a general explanation for why, and how, oppressed individuals believe propositions against, as opposed to aligned with, their own well-being in virtue of their oppressed status. This involves four explanatory desiderata: belief acquisition, content prevalence, limitation, and systematicity. A social constructionist approach satisfies these by understanding the concept of false consciousness as regulating social research rather than as determining the exact mechanisms for all instances: the concept attunes us to a complex of mechanisms conducing oppressed individuals to mistake social understandings of themselves as natural self-understandings—the limits lie where these overlap, or are entirely absent.","PeriodicalId":37042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Ontology","volume":"7 1","pages":"45 - 72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jso-2020-0012","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42186237","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
We in Me or Me in We? Collective Intentionality and Selfhood 我们在我里面还是我在我们里面?集体意向性和自我
Journal of Social Ontology Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.1515/jso-2020-0076
D. Zahavi
{"title":"We in Me or Me in We? Collective Intentionality and Selfhood","authors":"D. Zahavi","doi":"10.1515/jso-2020-0076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0076","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article takes issue with the proposal that dominant accounts of collective intentionality suffer from an individualist bias and that one should instead reverse the order of explanation and give primacy to the we and the community. It discusses different versions of the community first view and argues that they fail because they operate with too simplistic a conception of what it means to be a self and misunderstand what it means to be (part of) a we. In presenting this argument, the article seeks to demonstrate that a thorough investigation of collective intentionality has to address the status and nature of the we, and that doing so will require an analysis of the relation between the we and the I, which in turn will call for a more explicit engagement with the question of selfhood than is customary in contemporary discussions of collective intentionality.","PeriodicalId":37042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Ontology","volume":"7 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jso-2020-0076","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42753442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16
Joint Improvisation, Minimalism and Pluralism about Joint action 关于联合行动的联合即兴、极简主义与多元主义
Journal of Social Ontology Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.1515/jso-2020-0068
Pierre Saint-Germier, C. Paternotte, C. Canonne
{"title":"Joint Improvisation, Minimalism and Pluralism about Joint action","authors":"Pierre Saint-Germier, C. Paternotte, C. Canonne","doi":"10.1515/jso-2020-0068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0068","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper introduces freely improvised joint actions, a class of joint actions characterized by (i) highly unspecific goals and (ii) the unavailability of shared plans. For example, walking together just for the sake of walking together with no specific destination or path in mind provides an ordinary example of FIJAs, along with examples in the arts, e.g., collective free improvisation in music, improv theater, or contact improvisation in dance. We argue that classic philosophical accounts of joint action such as Bratman’s rule them out because the latter require a capacity for planning that is idle in the case of FIJAs. This argument is structurally similar to arguments for minimalist accounts of joint action (e.g., based on joint actions performed by children before they develop a full-fledged theory of mind), and this invites a parallel minimalist account, which we provide in terms of a specific kind of shared intentions that do not require plan states. We further argue that the resulting minimalist account is different in kind from the sort of minimalism suggested by developmental considerations and conclude in favor of a pluralistic minimalism, according to which there are several ways for an account of joint action to be minimal.","PeriodicalId":37042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Ontology","volume":"7 1","pages":"97 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jso-2020-0068","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49558968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Feeling Joint Ownership of Agency: The Normative Aspect of Agency Transformation 代理共有感：代理转型的规范性方面
Journal of Social Ontology Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.1515/jso-2020-0060
Jonas Faria Costa
{"title":"Feeling Joint Ownership of Agency: The Normative Aspect of Agency Transformation","authors":"Jonas Faria Costa","doi":"10.1515/jso-2020-0060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0060","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Team reasoning is the idea that we can think as a ‘we’ and this can solve some coordination dilemmas, such as Hi-Lo. However, team reasoning can only solve the dilemmas it is intended to solve if the conditions for team reasoning warrant the belief that others will also perform team reasoning and these conditions cannot render team reasoning otiose. In this paper, I will supplement the theory of team reasoning by explaining how agency transformation also involves a change in the normative attitude. To do this, I will use the theory of affordances, which is the idea that the environment provides ways to interact with it. I will argue that when a person perceives as a group member, she associates herself and the other members with the group’s mosaic of affordances. This triggers a feeling of joint ownership of the agency. It is the feeling that it is up to us to deal with the situation, so we feel entitled to demand each other to cooperate. It warrants the belief that others are team-reasoners without rendering team reasoning otiose. This means that the agency transformation (from I to we) involves a change in the normative attitude.","PeriodicalId":37042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Ontology","volume":"7 1","pages":"21 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jso-2020-0060","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41429401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Beliefs-Rules-Equilibrium Account of Institutions: A Contribution to a Naturalistic Social Ontology 制度的信念-规则-均衡解释:对自然主义社会本体论的贡献
Journal of Social Ontology Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.1515/jso-2020-0001
Cyril Hédoin
{"title":"The Beliefs-Rules-Equilibrium Account of Institutions: A Contribution to a Naturalistic Social Ontology","authors":"Cyril Hédoin","doi":"10.1515/jso-2020-0001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0001","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper pursues a naturalist endeavor in social ontology by arguing that the Beliefs-Rules-Equilibrium account of institutions can help to advance the debate over the nature of social kinds. This account of institutions emerges from a growing number of works in economics that use game theory to study the role and the functioning of institutions in human societies. I intend to show how recent developments in the economic analysis of rules and institutions can help solve issues that are generally considered constitutive of any ontological inquiry. I argue that the Beliefs-Rules-Equilibrium account of institutions can contribute to advancing the debate on an issue of particular importance, regarding the specific form of dependence characterizing the relation between institutions and individuals’ attitudes about them. I tackle this issue by taking Francesco Guala's claims about the nature of institutions made in his book “Understanding Institutions” as a point of departure. In particular, I reject Guala’s functionalism about institutions. On the basis of the Beliefs-Rules-Equilibrium account, I claim that it is futile to search for constitutive features of general institutions (money, property rights, family…) and that the best we can have is a knowledge of what are the rules within a specific institution, which the agents consider to be essential in their institutional practice.","PeriodicalId":37042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Ontology","volume":"7 1","pages":"73 - 96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jso-2020-0001","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46507192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Collective Action and Social Ontology in Thomas Aquinas 集体行动与托马斯·阿奎那的社会本体论
Journal of Social Ontology Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI: 10.1515/jso-2020-0065
Joshua Harris
{"title":"Collective Action and Social Ontology in Thomas Aquinas","authors":"Joshua Harris","doi":"10.1515/jso-2020-0065","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2020-0065","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper I argue that there are resources in the work of Thomas Aquinas that amount to a unique approach to what David P. Schweikard and Hans Bernhard Schmid’s call the “Central Problem” facing theorists of collective intentionality and action. That is to say, Aquinas can be said to affirm both (1) the “Individual Ownership Claim” and (2) the “Irreducibility Claim,” coherently and compellingly. Regarding the Individual Ownership Claim, I argue that Aquinas’s concept of “general virtue” (virtus generalis) buttresses an account of the way in which individuals act collectively qua individuals, i.e., without invoking hive minds or other scientifically problematic phenomena. Further, with respect to the Irreducibility Claim (2), I argue that Aquinas’s concept of “common good” (bonum commune) offers an account of the way in which some powers and acts of social groups are importantly irreducible to those of their members. Considered together, I argue that these two positions in Aquinas are correlative, and therefore amount to a coherent account of collective action and group agency, respectively.","PeriodicalId":37042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Ontology","volume":"7 1","pages":"119 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jso-2020-0065","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43185745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信