{"title":"Pennsylvania Supreme Court Invalidates Test for Constitutionality of Commonwealth Environmental Actions and Applies Private Trust Law, Leaving Many Unanswered Questions","authors":"Kevin Barley","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3056782","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3056782","url":null,"abstract":"On June 20, 2017, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Environmental Defense Foundation v. Commonwealth, 161 A.3d 911 (Pa. 2017) (“PEDF”), injected substantial uncertainty into environmental jurisprudence in Pennsylvania for the foreseeable future. For 44 years, Commonwealth courts and administrative bodies, including the Environmental Hearing Board, evaluated the constitutionality of Commonwealth actions under a three-part test established in Payne v. Kassab, 312 A.2d 86. The Payne Test has been under attack in recent years as groups challenged the constitutionality of various Commonwealth acts under Article I, Section 27 of the Pennsylvania Constitution (the Environmental Rights Amendment or “ERA”). Recent challenged acts include PADEP decisions to issue drill permits, ESCGP-2 permits and NPDES permits; municipal decisions to permit oil and gas development activity; and, at issue in PEDF, the broader use of royalties and other proceeds derived from leasing Commonwealth property for oil and gas development.","PeriodicalId":368113,"journal":{"name":"State & Local Government eJournal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126940878","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Statement of Commissioner Gail Heriot in the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights’ Report on Targeted Fines and Fees Against Communities of Color: Civil Rights and Constitutional Implications","authors":"Gail L. Heriot","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3105612","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3105612","url":null,"abstract":"In September of 2017, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights issued a report entitled, Targeted Fines and Fees. This Statement was part of that report. It supports some aspects of the report and critiques others. In particular, it agrees with the report that some cities and towns derive a substantial portion of their revenues from fines and fees rather than taxes and that this can be a formula for mischief, especially when those paying the fines and fees tend to be non-voters. The rural town with a speed trap designed to ensnare out-of-state drivers is the classic example of this, but there are other examples of cities and towns that have developed a “culture of revenue maximization” rather than a culture of just and fair law enforcement. Heriot also states that evidence that the cities and towns that engage in these practices are motivated by race is lacking.","PeriodicalId":368113,"journal":{"name":"State & Local Government eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122493729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Experts Speak - Incorrectly - On Internet Gambling in New Jersey","authors":"Bennett Liebman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3023400","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3023400","url":null,"abstract":"The New jersey legislature authorized Internet gambling in 2013. This paper reviews the financial predictions about the impact of Internet gambling in the state of New Jersey and the realities of Internet gambling in New Jersey.","PeriodicalId":368113,"journal":{"name":"State & Local Government eJournal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134643388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Defining North Carolina's Public Records and Open Meetings Fee-Shifting Provisions in the Larger National Context","authors":"E. Engstrom","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3066152","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3066152","url":null,"abstract":"North Carolina’s Public Records and Open Meetings laws both provide for awards of attorney’s fees in certain situations. The Public Records law awards fees to a plaintiff who “substantially prevails” and a government defendant who is sued in bad faith or on a frivolous basis. The Open Meetings law awards fees to any party that “prevails.” These fee awards act as an incentive (or disincentive) for litigants to pursue these “open government” cases. Such awards are the exception to the general North Carolina rule that a party bears the burden of paying its own attorney’s fees. There is very limited appellate case law interpreting when a party should receive such an award of attorney’s fees. This limited case law is exacerbated by the recent modification of the plaintiffs’ fee-shifting provision in the Public Records law. While appellate treatment of this issue is limited, there is a larger body of trial court decisions and persuasive case law on point. There are also materially similar fee-shifting provisions elsewhere in the North Carolina General Statutes that can provide guidance on how North Carolina courts treat fee shifting. This Article examines these and other sources in pursuit of a better understanding of when a plaintiff or defendant in an open government case might expect to receive an award of attorney’s fees and, when appropriate, makes recommendations about how courts and practitioners should treat these provisions moving forward.","PeriodicalId":368113,"journal":{"name":"State & Local Government eJournal","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122277338","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"New York Compassionate Care Act","authors":"Robert L. Greenberg","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3049948","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3049948","url":null,"abstract":"Few people seem to know that medical marijuana is legal in the State of New York. The Compassionate Care Act was passed in June of 2014 and since then there have been 24,555 patients and 1,123 doctors approved as of July 17, 2017. By way of comparison, California has 1,526,250 registered card holders in its program, and its population is almost forty million. \u0000There are a number of reasons why this is a relatively low number in a state with a population of 8.652 Million. The confused legal status of medical marijuana in the United States is a big part of this, but the difficult regulatory scheme imposed by the New York Compassionate Care Act is a large part as well.","PeriodicalId":368113,"journal":{"name":"State & Local Government eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114444034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Whether to Approve an Education Savings Account Program in Texas: Preventing Crime Does Pay","authors":"Corey A. DeAngelis, Patrick J. Wolf","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2887173","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2887173","url":null,"abstract":"Decision-makers in Texas have proposed an Education Savings Account (ESA) that would allow all families to take a fraction of their public education financing to a school of their choice. If the ESA funding amount exceeds the school tuition level, families would be able to use these funds for other educational expenses such as tutoring, textbooks, educational therapy, online learning, and college costs. While this is may be viewed as obvious benefits to individual children and their families, the impacts on society overall are less clear.We estimate the impact of the proposed ESA on criminality from 2016 to 2035. We use crime reduction estimates from our previous study of the impact of the longest-standing private school voucher program in the United States, along with existing estimates of the social costs of misdemeanors and felonies, in order to monetize and forecast impacts for the ESA in Texas. We find that a universally-accessible ESA could have large benefits to the state of Texas through reduced crime over the first 20 years of the program. Specifically, we estimate that the first cohort of high school students to experience four years of a universal ESA program in Texas would produce 749 fewer felonies and misdemeanors by the time they become 22 years old, resulting in about $7 million in benefits to society by 2025. The cumulative social benefits would amount to $74 million by the end of 2030 and $194 million by the end of 2035.","PeriodicalId":368113,"journal":{"name":"State & Local Government eJournal","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123225222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Unfunded Mandates and Fiscal Structure: Empirical Evidence from a Synthetic Control Model","authors":"J. Ross","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2870657","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2870657","url":null,"abstract":"An unfunded expenditure mandate occurs when a local government must provide a good or service by dictate of a higher level of government without an accompanying revenue source to fully finance it. This paper is the first to provide empirical evidence on the influence of local unfunded mandates by studying Florida’s 1990 constitutional Amendment 3, which sought to limit this power of the state. A synthetic control model is employed to derive the causal effects of the mandate limit on total state expenditures and state transfers to local governments. The results indicate that the additional barriers to imposing local mandates resulted in substantive changes to the fiscal structure of the state. First, state expenditures increased by an annual average of 9.5%. Second, while total state transfers to local governments are not altered, the mandate restrictions did impact which governments received transfers. Namely, the general purpose local governments protected by Amendment 3 saw 10% decreases in intergovernmental revenue from the state. The inference is that the mandate limit caused the state to take on new programs and spending that would otherwise have been shifted to the general purpose governments, and that remaining mandates were more likely to be directed at special districts.","PeriodicalId":368113,"journal":{"name":"State & Local Government eJournal","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126349449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Законодательное определение понятия муниципальной службы (Legislative Definition of Concept) Municipal Service","authors":"Виктор Борисович Муравченко","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2786480","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2786480","url":null,"abstract":"Russian Abstract: Аннотация:В статье рассматривается законодательное определение понятия муниципальная служба. Показано, что к муниципальным служащим относятся лица, непосредственно обеспечивающие полномочия органов местного самоуправления и их должностных лиц, вступающие в отношения с ними в процессе службы.English Abstract: In article legislative definition of concept municipal service is considered. It is shown that the persons who are directly providing the powers of local governments and their officials entering the relations with them in the course of service concern municipal employees.","PeriodicalId":368113,"journal":{"name":"State & Local Government eJournal","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133220029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Использование Геоинформационных Систем Как Основа Устойчивого Развития Территории (Using Geographic Information Systems as a Basis for Sustainable Development of the Territory)","authors":"S. Bachurina, M. D. Demchina","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2780428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2780428","url":null,"abstract":"Russian Abstract: В работе представлен анализ существующих подходов к созданию государственных информационных систем, законодательно закрепленных и призванных обеспечить формирование государственных информационных ресурсов в сфере градостроительства для принятия стратегических решений, разработки документов территориального планирования всех уровней государственного и муниципального управления, мониторинга реализации Генеральных планов, программ социально-экономического и отраслевого развития.English Abstract: The paper presents an analysis of the existing approaches to the creation of the state information systems, legislatively fixed, and to ensure the formation of state information resources in the field of urban planning to make strategic decisions, develop territorial planning documents of the state and municipal levels of government, monitoring the implementation of the master plan of socio-economic and sectoral development.","PeriodicalId":368113,"journal":{"name":"State & Local Government eJournal","volume":"277 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"113996760","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Future of the New York Racing Association Reorganization Board","authors":"Bennett Liebman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2753819","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2753819","url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the questions likely to be raised by the likely termination New York Racing Association Reorganization Board in the fall of 2016.","PeriodicalId":368113,"journal":{"name":"State & Local Government eJournal","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133502432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}