{"title":"宾夕法尼亚州最高法院宣布联邦环境行动合宪性测试无效并适用私人信托法,留下许多悬而未决的问题","authors":"Kevin Barley","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3056782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On June 20, 2017, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Environmental Defense Foundation v. Commonwealth, 161 A.3d 911 (Pa. 2017) (“PEDF”), injected substantial uncertainty into environmental jurisprudence in Pennsylvania for the foreseeable future. For 44 years, Commonwealth courts and administrative bodies, including the Environmental Hearing Board, evaluated the constitutionality of Commonwealth actions under a three-part test established in Payne v. Kassab, 312 A.2d 86. The Payne Test has been under attack in recent years as groups challenged the constitutionality of various Commonwealth acts under Article I, Section 27 of the Pennsylvania Constitution (the Environmental Rights Amendment or “ERA”). Recent challenged acts include PADEP decisions to issue drill permits, ESCGP-2 permits and NPDES permits; municipal decisions to permit oil and gas development activity; and, at issue in PEDF, the broader use of royalties and other proceeds derived from leasing Commonwealth property for oil and gas development.","PeriodicalId":368113,"journal":{"name":"State & Local Government eJournal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pennsylvania Supreme Court Invalidates Test for Constitutionality of Commonwealth Environmental Actions and Applies Private Trust Law, Leaving Many Unanswered Questions\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Barley\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3056782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On June 20, 2017, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Environmental Defense Foundation v. Commonwealth, 161 A.3d 911 (Pa. 2017) (“PEDF”), injected substantial uncertainty into environmental jurisprudence in Pennsylvania for the foreseeable future. For 44 years, Commonwealth courts and administrative bodies, including the Environmental Hearing Board, evaluated the constitutionality of Commonwealth actions under a three-part test established in Payne v. Kassab, 312 A.2d 86. The Payne Test has been under attack in recent years as groups challenged the constitutionality of various Commonwealth acts under Article I, Section 27 of the Pennsylvania Constitution (the Environmental Rights Amendment or “ERA”). Recent challenged acts include PADEP decisions to issue drill permits, ESCGP-2 permits and NPDES permits; municipal decisions to permit oil and gas development activity; and, at issue in PEDF, the broader use of royalties and other proceeds derived from leasing Commonwealth property for oil and gas development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"State & Local Government eJournal\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"State & Local Government eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3056782\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State & Local Government eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3056782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2017年6月20日,宾夕法尼亚州最高法院在宾夕法尼亚州环境保护基金会诉联邦,161 A.3d 911 (Pa. 2017)(“PEDF”)一案中,在可预见的未来为宾夕法尼亚州的环境法学注入了实质性的不确定性。44年来,联邦法院和行政机构,包括环境听证委员会,根据Payne诉Kassab案(312 a .2d . 86)中确立的三部分标准来评估联邦行动的合宪性。佩恩检验法近年来一直受到攻击,因为一些团体根据宾夕法尼亚州宪法第1条第27节(环境权利修正案或“ERA”)质疑各种联邦法案的合宪性。最近受到质疑的行为包括:PADEP决定颁发钻探许可证、ESCGP-2许可证和NPDES许可证;允许油气开发活动的市政决定;在PEDF中存在争议的是,更广泛地使用从租赁联邦财产中获得的特许权使用费和其他收益用于石油和天然气开发。
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Invalidates Test for Constitutionality of Commonwealth Environmental Actions and Applies Private Trust Law, Leaving Many Unanswered Questions
On June 20, 2017, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Pennsylvania Environmental Defense Foundation v. Commonwealth, 161 A.3d 911 (Pa. 2017) (“PEDF”), injected substantial uncertainty into environmental jurisprudence in Pennsylvania for the foreseeable future. For 44 years, Commonwealth courts and administrative bodies, including the Environmental Hearing Board, evaluated the constitutionality of Commonwealth actions under a three-part test established in Payne v. Kassab, 312 A.2d 86. The Payne Test has been under attack in recent years as groups challenged the constitutionality of various Commonwealth acts under Article I, Section 27 of the Pennsylvania Constitution (the Environmental Rights Amendment or “ERA”). Recent challenged acts include PADEP decisions to issue drill permits, ESCGP-2 permits and NPDES permits; municipal decisions to permit oil and gas development activity; and, at issue in PEDF, the broader use of royalties and other proceeds derived from leasing Commonwealth property for oil and gas development.