盖尔·赫里奥特专员在美国民权委员会关于针对有色人种社区的针对性罚款和收费:民权和宪法影响的报告中的声明

Gail L. Heriot
{"title":"盖尔·赫里奥特专员在美国民权委员会关于针对有色人种社区的针对性罚款和收费:民权和宪法影响的报告中的声明","authors":"Gail L. Heriot","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3105612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In September of 2017, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights issued a report entitled, Targeted Fines and Fees. This Statement was part of that report. It supports some aspects of the report and critiques others. In particular, it agrees with the report that some cities and towns derive a substantial portion of their revenues from fines and fees rather than taxes and that this can be a formula for mischief, especially when those paying the fines and fees tend to be non-voters. The rural town with a speed trap designed to ensnare out-of-state drivers is the classic example of this, but there are other examples of cities and towns that have developed a “culture of revenue maximization” rather than a culture of just and fair law enforcement. Heriot also states that evidence that the cities and towns that engage in these practices are motivated by race is lacking.","PeriodicalId":368113,"journal":{"name":"State & Local Government eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statement of Commissioner Gail Heriot in the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights’ Report on Targeted Fines and Fees Against Communities of Color: Civil Rights and Constitutional Implications\",\"authors\":\"Gail L. Heriot\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3105612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In September of 2017, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights issued a report entitled, Targeted Fines and Fees. This Statement was part of that report. It supports some aspects of the report and critiques others. In particular, it agrees with the report that some cities and towns derive a substantial portion of their revenues from fines and fees rather than taxes and that this can be a formula for mischief, especially when those paying the fines and fees tend to be non-voters. The rural town with a speed trap designed to ensnare out-of-state drivers is the classic example of this, but there are other examples of cities and towns that have developed a “culture of revenue maximization” rather than a culture of just and fair law enforcement. Heriot also states that evidence that the cities and towns that engage in these practices are motivated by race is lacking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":368113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"State & Local Government eJournal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"State & Local Government eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3105612\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"State & Local Government eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3105612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

2017年9月,美国民权委员会发布《针对性罚款和费用》报告。本声明是该报告的一部分。它支持报告的某些方面,并对其他方面提出批评。特别值得一提的是,它同意报告的观点,即一些城市和城镇的大部分收入来自罚款和费用,而不是税收,这可能是一个恶作剧的公式,特别是那些支付罚款和费用的人往往不是选民。一个乡村小镇设置了一个速度陷阱,用来诱捕州外司机,这是一个典型的例子,但还有其他城镇的例子,它们发展了一种“收入最大化的文化”,而不是一种公正和公平的执法文化。赫里奥特还指出,缺乏证据表明,从事这些做法的城镇是由种族驱动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statement of Commissioner Gail Heriot in the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights’ Report on Targeted Fines and Fees Against Communities of Color: Civil Rights and Constitutional Implications
In September of 2017, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights issued a report entitled, Targeted Fines and Fees. This Statement was part of that report. It supports some aspects of the report and critiques others. In particular, it agrees with the report that some cities and towns derive a substantial portion of their revenues from fines and fees rather than taxes and that this can be a formula for mischief, especially when those paying the fines and fees tend to be non-voters. The rural town with a speed trap designed to ensnare out-of-state drivers is the classic example of this, but there are other examples of cities and towns that have developed a “culture of revenue maximization” rather than a culture of just and fair law enforcement. Heriot also states that evidence that the cities and towns that engage in these practices are motivated by race is lacking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信