Campbell Systematic Reviews最新文献

{"title":"Campbell title registrations to date – August 2024, and discontinued protocols","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70015","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cl2.70015","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Details of new titles for systematic reviews or evidence and gap maps that have been accepted by the Editor of a Campbell Coordinating Group are published in each issue of the journal. If you would like to receive a copy of the approved title registration form, please <i>send an email</i> to the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group.</p><p>A list of discontinued protocols appears below these new titles. If you are interested to continue a project, please get in touch with the Managing Editor of the relevant Coordinating Group or email <span>[email protected]</span>.</p><p>Long distance walking and well-being: A scoping review</p><p>Hind Sabri, Elizabeth Ghogomu, Victoria Barbeau, Tracey Howe, Howard White, Yanfei Li, Qian Liu, Weize Kong, Nina Cruz, Vivian Welch</p><p>6 November 2024</p><p>Effects of long-term care interventions for older adults: An evidence and gap map</p><p>Elizabeth Tanjong-Ghogomu, Nadisha Ratnasekera, Paul Hebert, Vivian Welch</p><p>30 October 2024</p><p>Data pricing: An evidence and gap map</p><p>Yufeng Wen, Yajie Zhou, Liping Guo, Wenjie Zhou, Yueyan Zhao, Weijie Lin,</p><p>4 November 2024</p><p>What are the reasons mothers choose human milk as their method of infant nutrition? A mixed methods systematic review</p><p>Niamh Ryan, Patricia Leahy-Warren, Siobhain O'Mahony, Helen Mulcahy, Lloyd Philpott</p><p>9 October 2024</p><p>Determinants of student well-being and perceived social support in higher education: A systematic literature review</p><p>Dawei Li, Farhana Kamarul Bahrin</p><p>23 September 2024</p><p>The interventions for Youth Employment in China: A country evidence map</p><p>Xiya Shao, Liping Guo, Wenjie Zhou, Yufeng Wen, Weijie Lin, Yueyan Zhao, Yang Yang, Hongli Shang, Yajie Zhou, Yijie Zhang</p><p>23 September 2024</p><p>The impact of relocation processes on people facing socio-territorial iniquities: A scoping review</p><p>Pascale Chagnon, Pierre Paul Audate, Geneviève Cloutier</p><p>23 August 2024</p><p>Understanding the structure, content, and impact of far-right extremist propaganda disseminated online: A systematic review</p><p>Mia Doolan, Kiran Sarma</p><p>25 October 2024</p><p>Strategies to enhance inclusion in informed consent practice for people with sensory impairment: A systematic literature review</p><p>Fleur O'Hare, Sujani Thrimawithana, Aimee Clague, Camille Paynter, David Foran, Caroline Ondracek, Eden Robertson, Tessa Saunders, Lauren Ayton</p><p>24 October 2024</p><p>Evidence and gap map of climate change adaptation interventions for enhancing food security and livelihoods in sub-Saharan Africa</p><p>David Sarfo Ameyaw, Kwadwo Danso-Mensah, Joseph Clottey, Clarice Panyin Nyan, Sheila Agyemang Oppong, Miriam Oppong, Nana Esi Badu-Ansah, Desmond Kaledzi, Isaac Letsa</p><p>29 August 2024</p><p>Randomized controlled trials for poverty alleviation and environmental conservation in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review</p><p>Adriana Molina Garzon, Aemro Worku, Andres R","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11632157/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142814404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Medical-financial partnerships for improving financial and medical outcomes for lower-income Americans: A systematic review","authors":"Julie Birkenmaier, Brandy R. Maynard, Harly M. Blumhagen, Hannah Shanks","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70008","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cl2.70008","url":null,"abstract":"<div>\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Background</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Poverty is considered one of the social determinants of health (i.e., a range of social and environmental conditions that affect health and well-being) because of its association with significant health problems. In recent years, healthcare settings have emerged as focal points for poverty interventions with direct health implications. Medical institutions are increasingly implementing financial partnerships to provide interventions targeted at improving the financial well-being of patients with the dual objective of boosting appointment attendance rates and alleviating financial burdens on patients. While medical-financial partnerships (MFPs) appear to be growing in popularity, it is unclear if these interventions positively impact financial and/or health outcomes.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Objectives</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>The purpose of this review is to inform policy and practice relevant to MFPs by analyzing and synthesizing empirical evidence related to their health and financial outcomes. The primary objectives of this review is to answer the following research questions: (1) What is the extent and quality of MFP intervention research? (2) What are the effects on financial outcomes of financial services embedded within healthcare settings? (3) What are the effects on health-related outcomes of financial services embedded within healthcare settings?</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Search Methods</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>We conducted a comprehensive search for published and gray literature from September to December 2023. We searched for and retrieved published studies from Google, Google Scholar, and 10 Electronic databases. We also searched five relevant websites and two trial registries for registered studies. We harvested from the reference lists of included studies and conducted forward citation searching using Google Scholar. Lastly, we contacted the first authors of the four included studies and requested information about unpublished studies, studies in progress, and published studies potentially missed in the other search activities.</p>\u0000 </section>\u0000 \u0000 <section>\u0000 \u0000 <h3> Selection Criteria</h3>\u0000 \u0000 <p>Studies eligible for this review met the following criteria. First, studies must have used a prospective randomized controlled trial or quasi-experimental (QED) research design with parallel cohorts. Second, studies must have involved an intervention that provides financial services on-site within a healthcare setting. Third, the studies must have measured a financial outcome. Fourth, to meet the criteria for on-site financial services, in","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621975/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142802577","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Protocol: Complementarity between informal care and formal care to adults: Knowledge mapping through a scoping review of the literature","authors":"Marta Osório de Matos,&nbsp;Elzbieta Bobrowicz-Campos,&nbsp;Rosa Silva,&nbsp;Francisca Castanheira,&nbsp;Diana Santos","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70004","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The aim of this scoping review is to map, describe and characterize the available evidence on the role that formal care might have in complementing informal caregivers role – romantic partners, parallel family members (e.g., [step]siblings, cousins or in-laws) or descendants (e.g., the care-receivers are [step]parents, [step]aunts/uncles, [step]grandparents or in-laws) – when providing care to adults with acquired diseases (physical or neurologic) in domestic settings and will set the ground for future research on this topic. The scoping review questions are the following: (i) What is the existing literature on the complementarity between formal and informal care? (ii) Which are the types of formal cares' services/interventions that have been described in the literature as complementary to informal care, provided to the informal caregiver and/or to the adult being cared for? (iii) Which outcomes have been assessed in the caregiver's physical, psychological, and social health domains, and how have they been measured?</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70004","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142759851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Guidance for engagement in health guideline development: A scoping review","authors":"Jennifer Petkovic,&nbsp;Alison Riddle,&nbsp;Lyubov Lytvyn,&nbsp;Joanne Khabsa,&nbsp;Elie A. Akl,&nbsp;Vivian Welch,&nbsp;Olivia Magwood,&nbsp;Pearl Atwere,&nbsp;Ian D. Graham,&nbsp;Sean Grant,&nbsp;Denny John,&nbsp;Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi,&nbsp;Etienne V. Langlois,&nbsp;Reem A. Mustafa,&nbsp;Alex Todhunter-Brown,&nbsp;Holger Schünemann,&nbsp;Airton T. Stein,&nbsp;Thomas W. Concannon,&nbsp;Peter Tugwell","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70006","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Background&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;Health guideline developers engage with interested people and groups to ensure that guidelines and their recommendations are relevant and useful to those who will be affected by them. These ‘interest-holders’ include patients, payers/purchasers of health services, payers of health research, peer review editors, product makers, programme managers, policymakers, providers, principal investigators, and the public. The Guidelines International Network (GIN) and McMaster University Guideline Development Checklist describes 146 steps of the guideline process organized into 18 topics. While one topic focuses on engagement, it does not describe how to engage with interest-holders. In addition, interest-holder input could be sought throughout the guideline development process. This scoping review is part of a series of four related reviews. The three other reviews address barriers and facilitators to engagement in guideline development, managing conflicts of interest in guideline development, and assessing the impact of interest-holder engagement on guideline development. The four reviews will inform the development of guidance for multi-interest-holder engagement in guideline development; the GIN-McMaster Guideline Development Checklist Extension for Engagement.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Objectives&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;The objective of this scoping review is to identify, describe, and summarise existing guidance and methods for multi-interest-holder engagement throughout the health guideline development process.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Search Methods&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;p&gt;We conducted one comprehensive search for studies of engagement in guidelines to meet the inclusion criteria of one or more of the four systematic reviews in this series. We searched MEDLINE (OVID), CINAHL (EBSCO), EMBASE (OVID), PsycInfo (OVID) and SCOPUS databases up to September 2022. We did not include limits for date, study design, or language. We searched websites of agencies and organizations that engage interest-holder groups, such as the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), CIHR Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR), National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Be Part of Research, Guidelines International Network (G-I-N), the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and the PatientCentred Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). We handsearched the websites of guideline producing agencies. We solicited additional grey literature from the members of the MuSE Consortium.&lt;/p&gt;\u0000 &lt;/section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;section&gt;\u0000 \u0000 &lt;h3&gt; Selection Criteria&lt;/h3&gt;\u0000 \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70006","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142708288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Protocol: What works to increase the use of evidence for policy decision-making: A systematic review","authors":"Promise Nduku,&nbsp;John Ategeka,&nbsp;Andile Madonsela,&nbsp;Tanya Mdlalose,&nbsp;Jennifer Stevenson,&nbsp;Shannon Shisler,&nbsp;Suvarna Pande,&nbsp;Laurenz Mahlanza-Langer","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1435","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1435","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows: Our aim is to collect, assess, and synthesise all the available empirical evidence on what works to support evidence-informed decision-making by policymakers. In doing so, we will aim to answer the following research questions: What are the impacts of interventions to support evidence-informed decision-making by policymakers? What are the factors which have influenced the impact of these interventions, and their design and implementation in low- and middle-income countries? In answering these questions, our goal is to estimate the overall impact and relative effectiveness of different interventions, identify factors or configurations of factors that support or hinder their effectiveness in low- and middle-income countries and to identify gaps and areas for future primary research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.1435","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142708368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Protocol: Proactive resilience programmes for improving resilience and psychological adaptation in employees in high-risk occupations: A systematic review","authors":"Trine Filges,&nbsp;Anja Bondebjerg Mølgaard,&nbsp;Geir Smedslund,&nbsp;Malene W. Kildemoes,&nbsp;Elizabeth Bengtsen","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70007","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The objectives are as follows: What are the effects of proactive resilience programmes offered to employees in high-risk occupations on resilience and psychological adaptation?</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142708315","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"SHOW ME the evidence: Features of an approach to reliably deliver research evidence to those who need it","authors":"John N. Lavis,&nbsp;Jeremy M. Grimshaw,&nbsp;Ruth Stewart,&nbsp;Julian Elliott,&nbsp;Will Moy,&nbsp;Joerg J. Meerpohl","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70010","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cl2.70010","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;The world is poised for a step-change improvement in how we use evidence to address societal challenges.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Given the speed at which plans are being made to support this once-in-a-generation transformation, the Implementation Council of the Global Commission on Evidence to Address Societal Challenges developed a working version of the features of an approach to reliably getting research evidence to those who need it and achieved consensus among leaders from the Implementation Council, as well as the Alliance for Living Evidence (Alive) Council and Evidence Synthesis International (ESI).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The 100+ contributing authors from across the ‘evidence synthesis and support’ world want to ensure that our future plans are firmly rooted in an agreed-upon summary of all we have learned together over these past four or so years, and to signal a mutual accountability among many of the key players involved in providing evidence support that we will each do our part in delivering on the promise that motivates these plans.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Given that much of the momentum for transformation is currently focused on living evidence syntheses and the infrastructure needed to support them, we give this form of evidence disproportionate focus here.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Actions speak louder than words. If we are to deliver on the promise of a step-change improvement in how we use evidence to address societal challenges, then each of us needs to do our part to put in place the features of an approach to reliably getting research evidence to those who need it. Funding can enable it. Coordination can facilitate it. Reporting can celebrate it (and shame a go-it-alone ethos). Evaluation of our approaches can support continuous improvement. But only our actions can make it happen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You may already be doing great work. Please keep it up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you want to embrace a new approach and don't know where you can best fit in, check out the Global Evidence Commission's work in formalizing and strengthening national (and subnational) evidence support systems, enhancing and leveraging the global evidence architecture, and putting evidence at the centre of everyday life. Or approach one of the Implementation Council members who you see doing exemplary work in your part of the world, in your type of role, in your sector, with your form of evidence, or with an innovation like AI-powered living evidence synthesis or storytelling that draws on both research evidence and Indigenous ways of knowing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;JL and JG are co-leads of the Global Commission on Evidence to Address Societal Challenges. All authors are members of its Implementation Council. JL is council chair, RS is director, JE is treasurer and founder of the host entity, and WM is council member at the Alliance for Living Evidence (Alive). JG is cochair and RS and WM are members of the executive committee of Evidence Synthesis International. All authors are affiliated with its partner organizations. RS is a Fiduciary Officer for the South ","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562649/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142629905","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of social accountability interventions in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence and gap map","authors":"Mirza Hassan,&nbsp;Howard White,&nbsp;Iffat Zahan,&nbsp;Ashrita Saran,&nbsp;Shamael Ahmed,&nbsp;Semab Rahman,&nbsp;Shabnaz Zubaid","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1430","DOIUrl":"10.1002/cl2.1430","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This is the protocol for an evidence and gap map, which aims to map the existing evidence on the effectiveness of social accountability interventions in low- and middle-income countries. This map will help users identify the size and quality of the evidence base, guide strategic program development, and highlight gaps for future research. The map will cover studies published after 2000, including systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, non-experimental designs, and before-after designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538311/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142591840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"New search guidance for Campbell systematic reviews","authors":"Heather MacDonald,&nbsp;Sarah Young","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70005","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;Searching for studies in systematic reviews is a critical step that lays the foundation for the remaining stages of the review and synthesis. Searching in the social sciences and other disciplines covered by the Campbell Collaboration comes with added complexities and challenges related to finding and organizing evidence across a rich diversity of sources. To assist Campbell authors and information specialists supporting Campbell reviews in this process, we recently published new guidance (MacDonald et al., &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;) based on the previous guidance document originally published in 2010 and updated in 2017. The guide was revised to reflect current Campbell Collaboration areas of practice and recommendations in the recently updated Methodological Expectations of Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MECCIR) (Dewidar et al., &lt;span&gt;2024&lt;/span&gt;), capture evolving practice and strategies for searching, and update links and descriptions of individual bibliographic and other resources. It includes helpful templates, lists, and checklists to assist authors in meeting the expectations for conduct and reporting of Campbell systematic review searches. Here, we provide an overview and highlight some of the key changes and new additions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The new guidance includes several new sections. The &lt;i&gt;Section 1.0 About this Guide&lt;/i&gt; describes who this guide is for: both review authors and information specialists. Also new is the section &lt;i&gt;2.0 Working with an Information Specialist&lt;/i&gt; which explains the role of the information specialist in the systematic review process. Searching for and retrieving information is a key component of systematic reviews and information specialists, as experts in search, can play a supporting or collaborative role in the production of these reviews.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the section on &lt;i&gt;4.0 Sources to Search&lt;/i&gt;, the list of sources has been placed in an Appendix which can be found on the Open Science Framework (OSF). The list can now be updated frequently so that accurate and up-to-date information is available to researchers. As well in this edition preprint repositories have been added to the list of potential sources of studies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;5.0 Planning the Search&lt;/i&gt; has a new section on using seed articles, or benchmarking studies, to help in the construction and validation of the search strategy. Using a seed article set can help identify search terms and ensure the search strategy finds relevant studies. Also new to the &lt;i&gt;5.3 Search updates&lt;/i&gt; subsection, is the practice of checking for retracted studies. While the guidance on how to deal with retracted studies is still under debate (Faggion, &lt;span&gt;2019&lt;/span&gt;), checking for retractions, corrections, errata and other areas of concern related to included studies should be a routine step in any review.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The author team updated the &lt;i&gt;6.0 Designing Search Strategies&lt;/i&gt; section with a new subsection on identifying search terms (both controlled vocabulary and keyword","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142579673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"PROTOCOL: Is the CEO/employee pay ratio related to firm performance in publicly traded companies?","authors":"Denise M. Rousseau,&nbsp;Cédric Velghe,&nbsp;Ryan Splenda,&nbsp;Byeong Jo Kim,&nbsp;Jangbum Lee","doi":"10.1002/cl2.70003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.70003","url":null,"abstract":"<p>One goal of this systematic review is to assess whether the pay ratio, that is, the relative difference between the compensation a firm's CEO receives and that of its nonmanagerial employees, is related to subsequent firm performance. A second goal is to identify factors influencing this relationship across publicly traded firms, including the pay ratio's perceived fairness by employees, the firm's business strategy, and related factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":"20 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cl2.70003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142579672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}