JBJS Open Access最新文献

{"title":"A Comparison of PROMIS Scores of Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis and Polyvinyl Alcohol Hydrogel Implant Hemiarthroplasty for Hallux Rigidus.","authors":"Seif El Masry, Allison L Boden, Grace M DiGiovanni, Agnes D Cororaton, Scott J Ellis","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00158","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00158","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current literature shows similar clinical outcomes between first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthrodesis and synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of hallux rigidus; however, prior studies have not reported validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare PROMs using 6 domains of the validated Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in patients treated for hallux rigidus with MTP joint arthrodesis and with SCI hemiarthroplasty. In addition, this novel study provides comparative data on the complication and revision rates for each procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, retrospective registry search identified all patients with preoperative PROMIS scores who underwent MTP joint arthrodesis or SCI hemiarthroplasty for hallux rigidus between February 2016 and June 2021. The study aimed to determine if the 2 procedures showed statistically or clinically equivalent PROMIS scores in 6 domains: physical function, pain interference, pain intensity, global physical health, global mental health, and depression. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to compare adjusted 1-year postoperative PROMIS scores between the 2 cohorts. Complication and revision rates were also compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 82 patients who underwent SCI hemiarthroplasty and 101 who underwent MTP joint arthrodesis. Demographic data and preoperative hallux rigidus severity showed no significant differences between the cohorts. PROMIS scores were mostly comparable between the 2 groups, except for the pain intensity domain. The patients who underwent MTP joint arthrodesis exhibited significantly better pain relief at 1 and 2 years postoperatively, which was supported by adjusted postoperative PROMIS scores. At 2 years, the SCI group had worse pain intensity scores and lower global physical health scores. There were no differences between the cohorts in additional PROMIS scores or complication data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While outcomes in most of the domains were similar, MTP joint arthrodesis was more effective at mitigating pain intensity compared with SCI hemiarthroplasty. This information can guide patient counseling and decision-making when considering surgical intervention for hallux rigidus.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328988/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Radiographic Assessment of Pelvic Inlet and Outlet View Angles in the Ethiopian Population.","authors":"Solomon Melkamu, Gabriel Alemayehu, Samuel Hailu","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00015","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate radiographic assessment is pivotal in evaluating trauma patients with suspected pelvic ring disruptions. The conventional approach of using anteroposterior, 45° inlet, and 45° outlet radiographs for the evaluation of pelvic injury may not consistently align with varying lumbopelvic anatomy. This study aimed to determine the ideal pelvic inlet and outlet radiographic angles when there is limited access to advanced imaging (e.g., computed tomography [CT]) for assessing clinically relevant pelvic osseous landmarks and to investigate variations based on age, sex, and sacral dysmorphism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study investigated patients who were ≥18 years of age who had no traumatic injuries or pelvic ring pathology; we reviewed abdominopelvic CT scans that were obtained between January 1, 2023, and June 30, 2023. Midsagittal reconstruction and 3D rendering of 148 CT scans facilitated the measurement of pelvic inlet and outlet angles. Standard techniques that were based on previous studies were used to determine the ideal angles. Statistical analyses investigated mean pelvic inlet and outlet angles as well as correlations with age, sex, and sacral dysmorphism.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean pelvic inlet angle was 23.8° ± 8.4° (95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.4° to 25.2°), and the mean outlet angle was 40.1° ± 5.9° (95% CI: 39.2° to 41.1°). Male patients exhibited greater inlet angles (27° versus 20°), whereas female patients had greater outlet angles (41° versus 39°). Pelves with dysmorphism showed a 3.6° increase in outlet angles when compared with those with normal sacral anatomy. An inverse relationship between age and inlet angle was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights that the recommended 45° angle for pelvic inlet and outlet views may not optimally align with the anatomy of the Ethiopian population. The findings suggest that the ideal inlet and outlet angles for this population are 25° and 40°, respectively. Understanding these variations is crucial for optimizing pelvic radiographic views in trauma evaluation, potentially leading to more accurate assessments and improved patient care in this demographic.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328984/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Intra-Articular Corrective Osteotomy for Distal Radial Intra-Articular Malunion Using Patient-Matched Instruments: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial.","authors":"Kunihiro Oka, Satoshi Miyamura, Ryoya Shiode, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Norimasa Iwasaki, Daisuke Kawamura, Kazuki Sato, Takuji Iwamoto, Michiro Yamamoto, Keiichiro Nishida, Yasunori Shimamura, Tomomi Yamada, Seiji Okada, Tsuyoshi Murase","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00026","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00026","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Corrective osteotomy for intra-articular malunion is a challenging procedure. However, recent advancements, including patient-matched instruments created on the basis of preoperative computer simulation, enable accurate intra-articular correction. We hypothesized that intra-articular corrective osteotomy using patient-matched instruments for the treatment of distal radial intra-articular malunion would reduce intra-articular deformity and restore wrist function at 12 months of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 12 patients with distal radial intra-articular malunion who underwent intra-articular corrective osteotomy external to the joint using patient-matched instruments. The primary end point was the maximum step-off on the articular surface of the distal radius, measured with use of computed tomography (CT), with an expected postoperative value of ≤1.5 mm. The secondary end points included the gap of the articular surface; range of motion; grip strength; pain evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS); patient satisfaction; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score; and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score. A mean postoperative step-off of ≤1.5 mm for the primary end point was assessed with use of the 1-sample t test. The secondary end points were assessed with use of the Dunnett multiple comparison test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average step-off significantly improved from 3.75 ± 1.04 mm preoperatively to 0.51 ± 0.40 mm at the 52-week postoperative follow-up and was maintained within 1.5 mm. The average wrist and forearm range of motion, VAS score, grip strength, DASH score, and PRWE score significantly improved. Eleven patients were either very satisfied or satisfied with their outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of patient-matched instruments could contribute to improving postoperative outcomes of intra-articular corrective osteotomy procedures involving the distal radius.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11328987/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142005492","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Predictors Associated with the Need for Open Reduction of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures: A Meta-analysis of the Recent Literature.","authors":"M Bryant Transtrum, Diego Sanchez, Shauna Griffith, Brianna Godinez, Vishwajeet Singh, Kyle J Klahs, Amr Abdelgawad, Ahmed M Thabet","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00011","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00011","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures are some of the most common fractures in pediatric patients with surgery typically consisting of either open or closed reduction with internal fixation. The aim of this meta-analysis was to identify patient, injury, and administrative factors that are associated with treating pediatric SCH fractures with open techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, PubMed and CINAHL database searches were conducted for studies from 2010 to 2023 that made direct comparisons between open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP) for treating SCH fractures in the pediatric population. The search terms used were \"pediatric\" AND \"SCH fracture\" OR \"distal humerus fracture.\" Screening, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed by 4 reviewers. After testing for heterogeneity between studies, data were aggregated using random-effects model analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine clinical studies were included in the meta-analysis. Summated, there were 94,415 patients: 11,329 treated with ORIF and 83,086 treated with CRPP. Factors that were significantly associated with greater rates of ORIF included obesity (p = 0.001), Gartland type IV fractures (p < 0.001), general neurological deficits (p = 0.019), and ulnar nerve deficits (p = 0.003). Gartland type II (p = 0.033) and medially displaced fractures (p = 0.011) were significantly associated with lower rates of ORIF. Secondary analysis showed cross-pinning constructs (p = 0.033) and longer hospital stays (p = 0.005) are more likely to be observed in patients undergoing ORIF compared with CRPP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates that factors such as obesity, fracture displacement, and concomitant nerve deficits are more likely to require ORIF as opposed to CRPP.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299990/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141898534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Revisiting Differences in Fourth-Year Orthopaedic Away Rotation Opportunities and Fees Among Allopathic and Osteopathic Medical Students.","authors":"Anthony Modica, Adam Kazimierczak, Brandon J Klein, Peter B White, Adam D Bitterman, Randy M Cohn","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00041","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00041","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fourth-year away rotations are an important modifiable variable proven to increase students' opportunities to match into orthopaedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in away rotation eligibility requirements and cost of rotation between allopathic and osteopathic students during the 2023 application cycle. Eligibility requirements and fees were then compared with the 2021 application cycle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed during the 2023 application cycle of all nonmilitary, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency programs (n = 194). Each program's website, affiliated school of medicine's website, visiting student application service portal, and Residency Explorer tool were searched for eligibility criteria, associated rotation fees, and other rotation requirements. Two-sample Z tests for proportions were utilized to compare differences in programs with differing requirements for students based on academic degree type. Data were compared statistically with previously reported data from the 2021 application cycle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 2023, there were more programs that restricted osteopathic medical students from away rotations than programs that restricted allopathic medical students (12/194, 6.2% vs. 0/194, 0.0%; p < 0.001). All 12 programs were formerly ACGME-accredited before the integration into a single accreditation system. There was a decrease in the number of programs restricting osteopathic medical students from away rotations compared with the 2021 application cycle (18/194, 9.3% vs. 12/194, 6.2%; p = 0.254). Fees associated with away rotations ranged from $25 to $4,000 for both allopathic and osteopathic students. The number of programs that charged osteopathic medical students higher rotation fees than programs that charged allopathic students when compared with the 2021 application cycles decreased (1/194, 0.5% vs. 5/194, 2.6%; p = 0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While some programs continue to have away rotation eligibility requirements that prohibit osteopathic medical students from rotating, only one residency program currently charges osteopathic medical students a higher fee to rotate than allopathic medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11296481/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141894519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Thompson Versus Judet Techniques for Quadricepsplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes and Complications.","authors":"Caroline T Gutowski, Kathryn Hedden, Parker Johnsen, John E Dibato, Christopher Rivera-Pintado, Kenneth Graf","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00040","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quadricepsplasty has been used for over half a century to improve range of motion (ROM) in knees with severe arthrofibrosis. Various surgical techniques for quadricepsplasty exist, including Judet and Thompson, as well as novel minimally invasive approaches. The goal of this review was to compare outcomes between quadricepsplasty techniques for knee contractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Available databases were queried for all articles on quadricepsplasty. Outcomes included postoperative ROM, outcome scores, and complication rates. Secondarily, we summarized rehabilitation protocols and descriptions of all modified and novel techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three articles comprising 797 patients were included in final analysis. Thirty-five percent of patients underwent Thompson quadricepsplasty, 36% underwent Judet, and 29% underwent other techniques. After Judet and Thompson quadricepsplasty, patients achieved a mean postoperative active flexion of 92.7° and 106.4°, respectively (p < 0.01). Complication rates after Judet and Thompson were 17% and 24%, respectively. Wound infection was the most frequently recorded complication after Judet, whereas extension lag predominated for Thompson.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the Thompson and Judet quadricepsplasty techniques offer successful treatment options to restore functional knee ROM. Although the Thompson technique resulted in greater postoperative knee flexion compared with the Judet, the difference may be attributable to differences in preoperative flexion and time from injury to quadricepsplasty. Overall, the difference in flexion gained between the 2 techniques is comparable and clinically negligible.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11286254/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141856697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Gender Disparity in Authorship Among Orthopaedic Surgery Residents.","authors":"Elizabeth Cho, Mary V McCarthy, Victoria Hodkiewicz, Mia V Rumps, Mary K Mulcahey","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00061","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00061","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gender disparity remains pervasive in orthopaedic surgery, which affects the research pursuits of orthopaedic surgeons. The purpose of this study was to characterize gender-related authorship trends of orthopaedic surgery residents, including evaluation of gender-concordant publication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cross-sectional analysis of US orthopaedic surgery residency programs was performed. Information on residency programs and demographics of each cohort was collected. Publication metrics consisting of number of first and non-first author publications and H-indices were manually obtained for PGY-3 to PGY-5 residents attending the 25 programs ranked the highest for research output by Doximity. Gender of each resident and senior author was determined from institutional websites using photos, biographies, and preferred pronouns when available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 532 residents, 169 (31.8%) female and 363 (68.2%) male, were included for authorship analysis. Of them, 415 (78%) had at least one first author publication, which did not vary significantly by gender. Female residents had disproportionately fewer first author publications compared with their representation (22% vs. 31.8%, p < 0.00001). Female residents averaged fewer first and non-first author publications compared with male residents (2.8 vs. 4.6, p = 0.0003; 6.4 vs. 10, p = 0.0001 respectively). Despite fewer publications overall, a greater subset of publications by female residents were written in collaboration with a female senior author compared with publications by male residents (p < 0.0001). Male residents had a higher average H-index of 5.4 vs. 3.9 among female residents (p = 0.00007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite similar rates of first author publication among male and female residents, female residents had fewer publications overall, lower H-indices, and disproportionately fewer first author publications than would be expected given their representation. Findings from this study suggest that gender disparity in orthopaedic surgery extends to differences in research productivity as early as in residency. This may have negative implications on the career advancement of female orthopaedic surgeons. Additional work is needed to identify and understand biases in research productivity and career advancement, to promote more equitable strategies for academic achievement.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262817/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141753025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Quantification of Radiation Exposure in Canadian Orthopaedic Surgery Residents.","authors":"","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00170","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00170","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Natural radiation exposure in the general population averages 3 milliSieverts (mSv) annually; however, radiation exposure in orthopaedic residents is not well defined. Despite protective measures, evidence of radiation-related diseases in orthopaedic surgeons is increasing. The purpose of this study was to quantify radiation exposure in orthopaedic residents and to determine the variability of exposure among post graduate year (PGY) of residency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Monthly radiation exposure was measured prospectively over a 12-month period in orthopaedic surgery residents from a single program. Participants wore dosimeters above (\"exposed\") and beneath (\"shielded\") protective lead. The primary outcome measure was the absolute value of radiation exposure in mSv. Repeated measures analysis was used to assess exposure with age, sex, year of training, operating room (OR) days, and height.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean annual occupational radiation exposure was 3.30 ± 0.64 mSv over an average of 107 ± 38 OR days. Mean exposure per OR day was 0.033 ± 0.008 mSv. PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents had the highest cumulative exposure, and PGY-5 residents had the highest mean exposure per OR day (0.044 ± 0.009 mSv/d). Number of OR days per month and PGY level were significant predictors of radiation exposure (p < 0.05). Sex, age, and height were not significant in predicting radiation of the exposed dosimeter.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Orthopaedic residents' exposure to radiation is nearly twice the general population's exposure. Given that yearly radiation exposure was highest during early residency years, but exposure based on number of OR days was highest in the final year of training, it is essential for resident education regarding radiation safety and safe clinical practices throughout their training.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257669/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Current Procedural Terminology Code Selection, Attitudes, and Practices of the Orthopaedic Surgery Resident Case Log: A Survey of Residents and Program Directors.","authors":"Matthew Dulas, Thomas J Utset-Ward, Jason A Strelzow, Tessa Balach","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00176","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00176","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Resident Case Log is one of the primary tools used to track surgical experience. Owing to the self-reported nature of case logging, there is uncertainty in the consistency and accuracy of case logging. The aims of this study are two-fold: to assess current resident case log Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code selection and practices across orthopaedic surgery residencies and to understand current attitudes of both program directors (PD) and residents surrounding case logging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Residents and PDs from 18 residency programs received standardized, consensus-built surveys distributed through the Collaborative Orthopaedic Educational Research Group. Resident surveys additionally contained clinical orthopaedic subspecialties vignettes on sports, trauma, and spine. Each subspecialty section contained 4 clinical vignettes with stepwise increases in complexity/CPT coding procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixteen residents (response rate: 28.4%) and 16 PDs (response rate: 88.9%) participated. Formal case log training was reported by 53.0% of residents and 56.3% of PDs. A total of 7.8% of residents rated themselves \"excellent\" at applying CPT codes for the case log, while 0.0% PDs rated their residents' ability as \"excellent.\" In total, 40.9% of residents and 81.3% of PDs responded that it was \"extremely important\" or \"very important\" to code accurately (p = 0.006). Agreement between resident CPT code selection and number of cases and procedures logged for each clinical vignette was conducted using Fleiss' kappa. As the clinical vignettes increased in complexity, there was a decreasing trend in kappa values from the first (least complex) to the last (most complex) clinical vignette.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The inconsistent case logging practices, dubious outlook on case log accuracy and resident case logging ability and attitude, and lack of formal training signals a need for formal, standardized case log training. Enhanced case logging instruction and formalized educational training for PDs and residents would be a meaningful step toward capturing true operative experience, which would have a substantial impact on orthopaedic surgery resident education and assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257661/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141735242","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Surgical Skills Rotation for Mid-Level Residents.","authors":"Lanchi B Nguyen, Steven A Long, Ericka A Lawler, Matthew D Karam","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00036","DOIUrl":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00036","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The University of Iowa orthopaedic residency previously designed a month-long surgical skill rotation for postgraduate year (PGY)-1 residents. This successful initiative has become a model of interest for other teaching institutions. In addition to the intern year, an important phase in residency occurs during the transition from PGY2 to PGY3, when residents assume greater responsibility and autonomy in leading surgical procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To directly address this transition and assess residents' readiness, our residency program established a week-long PGY2 surgical skills rotation. This rotation serves as a training checkpoint and focuses on both training and evaluation of level-appropriate skills in joint arthroplasty, trauma, arthroscopy, and wire navigation. The primary objective of the PGY2 surgical skills rotation is to enhance orthopaedic residents' operative skills and experience by providing increased exposure and practice of requisite technical skills. Similar to the Orthopedic In-Training Examinations that assess residents' knowledge, this week-long program, aimed at assessing residents' proficiency in fundamental orthopaedic technical skills, occurs before their PGY3 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Faculty-led training and assessment sessions in each area offer residents many opportunities for dedicated practice and improvement. Transferring these acquired skills from the laboratory to the operating room is essential for a training program. To confirm improvement, the final day of the surgical skills rotation was exclusively dedicated to structured performance evaluations, with a specific emphasis on establishing proficiency benchmarks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We herein describe the University of Iowa's PGY2 surgical skills rotation, providing insights into its development, implementation, and outcomes. By sharing our experience, we offer a framework for other academic departments seeking to optimize surgical skills education and ensure the successful transition of mid-level residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11251679/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141634821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}