胫骨外侧平台骨折钢板后外固定钉钉孔骨折的风险:不同螺钉配置的生物力学比较。

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2025-02-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00094
Patrick A Massey, Wayne Scalisi, Chloe Duval, Michael Lowery, Brad Chauvin, Giovanni F Solitro
{"title":"胫骨外侧平台骨折钢板后外固定钉钉孔骨折的风险:不同螺钉配置的生物力学比较。","authors":"Patrick A Massey, Wayne Scalisi, Chloe Duval, Michael Lowery, Brad Chauvin, Giovanni F Solitro","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>External fixation of tibial plateau fractures commonly provides temporary stabilization before definitive fixation with plate and screws. The purpose of this study was to determine if an external fixator pin hole distal to a tibial plate in a synthetic fracture model would increase the risk of fracture after fixation. Another objective was to determine the ideal configuration when placing tibial plate screws near an external fixator pin hole.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty synthetic tibiae were tested and evenly divided into 5 groups. Tibial plateau plates were placed with 4 different screw configurations for the distal-most screw near the external fixator pin hole. The 5 groups tested were control (fixation with no external fixator hole), unicortical (distal fixation with a unicortical locking screw), bicortical (distal fixation with a bicortical locking screw), oblique (distal fixation with an oblique cortical screw angled 30° proximally from the external fixator hole), and hole-bridging (hole-bridging fixation in which the plate was placed bridging the external fixator hole). The bone surrogates were potted and tested using an Instron 8874 Testing System.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in failure load among the 5 groups (p = 0.005). The mean peak loads were 1,259 N (control), 835 N (unicortical), 831 N (bicortical), 943 N (oblique), and 993 N (hole-bridging). There was a higher failure load in the control group compared with the bicortical group (p = 0.007) and the unicortical group (p = 0.007). There was no difference in failure load between the control group and the hole-bridging group (p = 0.16) and the oblique group (p = 0.067).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>External fixator pin holes distal to a tibial plateau plate may increase the risk of tibial fracture through the pin hole. This risk may be mitigated by placing the distal screw oblique and angled proximally away from the external fixator pin hole or by placing the external fixator pin proximally with subsequent bridging of the external fixator pin hole with the plate.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11778079/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of Fracture at External Fixator Pin Hole After Lateral Tibial Plateau Fracture Plating: A Biomechanical Comparison of Different Screw Configurations.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick A Massey, Wayne Scalisi, Chloe Duval, Michael Lowery, Brad Chauvin, Giovanni F Solitro\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>External fixation of tibial plateau fractures commonly provides temporary stabilization before definitive fixation with plate and screws. The purpose of this study was to determine if an external fixator pin hole distal to a tibial plate in a synthetic fracture model would increase the risk of fracture after fixation. Another objective was to determine the ideal configuration when placing tibial plate screws near an external fixator pin hole.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty synthetic tibiae were tested and evenly divided into 5 groups. Tibial plateau plates were placed with 4 different screw configurations for the distal-most screw near the external fixator pin hole. The 5 groups tested were control (fixation with no external fixator hole), unicortical (distal fixation with a unicortical locking screw), bicortical (distal fixation with a bicortical locking screw), oblique (distal fixation with an oblique cortical screw angled 30° proximally from the external fixator hole), and hole-bridging (hole-bridging fixation in which the plate was placed bridging the external fixator hole). The bone surrogates were potted and tested using an Instron 8874 Testing System.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in failure load among the 5 groups (p = 0.005). The mean peak loads were 1,259 N (control), 835 N (unicortical), 831 N (bicortical), 943 N (oblique), and 993 N (hole-bridging). There was a higher failure load in the control group compared with the bicortical group (p = 0.007) and the unicortical group (p = 0.007). There was no difference in failure load between the control group and the hole-bridging group (p = 0.16) and the oblique group (p = 0.067).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>External fixator pin holes distal to a tibial plateau plate may increase the risk of tibial fracture through the pin hole. This risk may be mitigated by placing the distal screw oblique and angled proximally away from the external fixator pin hole or by placing the external fixator pin proximally with subsequent bridging of the external fixator pin hole with the plate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBJS Open Access\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11778079/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBJS Open Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.24.00094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胫骨平台骨折的外固定通常在钢板和螺钉固定前提供暂时的稳定。本研究的目的是确定在合成骨折模型中胫骨钢板远端的外固定钉钉孔是否会增加固定后骨折的风险。另一个目的是确定在靠近外固定架销孔放置胫骨钢板螺钉时的理想配置。方法:将30块人工胫骨随机分为5组。胫骨平台板放置4种不同的螺钉配置,用于最远端靠近外固定架销孔的螺钉。5组分别为对照组(无外固定架孔固定)、单皮质(远端使用单皮质锁定螺钉固定)、双皮质(远端使用双皮质锁定螺钉固定)、斜向(远端使用斜向皮质螺钉与外固定架孔近端成30°角固定)和孔桥式固定(将钢板置于桥接外固定架孔的孔桥式固定)。用Instron 8874测试系统对骨替代物进行罐装和测试。结果:5组患者失效负荷差异有统计学意义(p = 0.005)。平均峰值负荷为1259 N(对照)、835 N(单皮质)、831 N(双皮质)、943 N(斜皮质)和993 N(孔桥)。与双皮质组(p = 0.007)和单皮质组(p = 0.007)相比,对照组的故障负荷更高。对照组与孔桥组(p = 0.16)和斜牙组(p = 0.067)在失稳负荷上无差异。结论:胫骨平台钢板远端的外固定架销孔可能增加胫骨通过销孔骨折的风险。通过将远端螺钉斜置并向近端倾斜,远离外固定钉销孔,或将外固定钉销近端放置,随后将外固定钉销孔与钢板桥接,可减轻这种风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk of Fracture at External Fixator Pin Hole After Lateral Tibial Plateau Fracture Plating: A Biomechanical Comparison of Different Screw Configurations.

Background: External fixation of tibial plateau fractures commonly provides temporary stabilization before definitive fixation with plate and screws. The purpose of this study was to determine if an external fixator pin hole distal to a tibial plate in a synthetic fracture model would increase the risk of fracture after fixation. Another objective was to determine the ideal configuration when placing tibial plate screws near an external fixator pin hole.

Methods: Thirty synthetic tibiae were tested and evenly divided into 5 groups. Tibial plateau plates were placed with 4 different screw configurations for the distal-most screw near the external fixator pin hole. The 5 groups tested were control (fixation with no external fixator hole), unicortical (distal fixation with a unicortical locking screw), bicortical (distal fixation with a bicortical locking screw), oblique (distal fixation with an oblique cortical screw angled 30° proximally from the external fixator hole), and hole-bridging (hole-bridging fixation in which the plate was placed bridging the external fixator hole). The bone surrogates were potted and tested using an Instron 8874 Testing System.

Results: There was a significant difference in failure load among the 5 groups (p = 0.005). The mean peak loads were 1,259 N (control), 835 N (unicortical), 831 N (bicortical), 943 N (oblique), and 993 N (hole-bridging). There was a higher failure load in the control group compared with the bicortical group (p = 0.007) and the unicortical group (p = 0.007). There was no difference in failure load between the control group and the hole-bridging group (p = 0.16) and the oblique group (p = 0.067).

Conclusions: External fixator pin holes distal to a tibial plateau plate may increase the risk of tibial fracture through the pin hole. This risk may be mitigated by placing the distal screw oblique and angled proximally away from the external fixator pin hole or by placing the external fixator pin proximally with subsequent bridging of the external fixator pin hole with the plate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信