{"title":"Journal of Interpretation Research: Research Is Necessary to Underpin the Field in Evidence","authors":"R. B. Powell, M. Stern","doi":"10.1177/10925872211067833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872211067833","url":null,"abstract":"Over the years practitioners have asked us: why is research necessary for the field? As the Journal of Interpretation Research reaches its 25th year, we thought it was fitting to answer this question. The practice of interpretation is grounded in the seminal works of Mills (1920) and Tilden (1957), which laid out the vision, mission, and principles for the fledgling field and profession. The art of interpretation and these principles for practice were largely developed from their many years of practice and observation. Over the ensuing decades, the philosophy and principles underlying the profession of interpretation were largely followed based on faith and anecdotal observation by practitioners. In other words, practitioners largely based the practice of interpretation on their judgement regarding the audiences’ enjoyment of their interpretive efforts. As a practitioner, you may ask, what is wrong with that? It is true that one of the key outcomes of interpretation is “enjoyment,” or that a program holds an individual’s attention in noncaptive settings (where the audience can simply walk away). However, if the profession of interpretation is to be based on more than anecdote and accomplish more than mere “enjoyment” (or persistence), research is needed to provide evidence to examine other outcomes, improve practice, support informed decision-making, adapt to changing audiences and social conditions, and justify investments in programming. In its 25th year, the Journal of Interpretation Research stands on the shoulders of the great work of Mills and Tilden, but also dozens of more recent researchers that have advanced our field (we refrain from naming names for fear of leaving anyone out). We are now at another crossroads as interpretation is redefined for a new generation. As the field seeks to “facilitate meaningful, relevant, and inclusive experiences that deepen understanding, broaden perspectives, and inspire engagement with the world around us” (NAI, 2021), research is increasingly important to ensure we meet our mission.","PeriodicalId":364431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpretation Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115393371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Empirical Knowledge About Person-Led Guided Tours in Museums: A Scoping Review","authors":"Inga Specht, Franziska Loreit","doi":"10.1177/10925872211065653","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872211065653","url":null,"abstract":"Person-led guided tours play an important role in museums’ educational programs. With this scoping review, we take a critical look at existing knowledge based on empirically-based primary studies to shed light on the practices of person-led guided tours in museums, focusing on the tour leader and his/her work practice. Our review included 39 peer-reviewed papers from 1978 to 2018. Results indicate that the research landscape is scattered across different disciplines. We specified three main research topics (docent training, professionalism/expertise, tour performance) to which the reviewed papers could be assigned and made cross-references between studies. Consequently, the review reveals the very complex practice of person-led guided tours in museums. Our review closes with the discussion of implications for practice and further research, with the intention of advancing multidisciplinary empirical research on the guiding practice in museums and person-led museum guided tours.","PeriodicalId":364431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpretation Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133183915","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Place of Inspiration in Heritage Interpretation: Views From the Field","authors":"Jacquline Gilson, R. Kool","doi":"10.1177/10925872211063832","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872211063832","url":null,"abstract":"While the idea of inspiration spans the history of the field, inspiration as a topic has been an under-studied phenomenon in the interpretation field. Thirty-three professional interpreters from 21 agencies across North America participated in dialog on the topic of inspiration in interpretation through Internet-based World Café sessions. The dialog was rich and thoughtful, and revealed that these interpreters believed that inspiration is the goal of interpretation and that the nine characteristics of inspiration identified in the literature and reviewed in our prior publication were relevant to interpretation: that inspiration is two-sided, transmissible, positive, individual, transcendent, unexpected, holistic, requires receptivity, and receptivity may be cultivated. Identified barriers to using an inspiration-based approach in interpretation included meeting the needs of agencies, and particularly the agency’s needs for quantitative measurements of attendance and impacts.","PeriodicalId":364431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpretation Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116487040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Matthew Minarchek, Jeffrey C. Skibins, Jerry F. Luebke
{"title":"The Impact of Interpretive Messaging and Animal Handling on Visitors’ Perceptions of Animal Welfare and Empathic Reactions","authors":"Matthew Minarchek, Jeffrey C. Skibins, Jerry F. Luebke","doi":"10.1177/10925872211042936","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872211042936","url":null,"abstract":"Zoos are increasingly turning to ambassador animal programs to address animal welfare issues and visitors’ empathic responses. However, little is known, if or how, animal handling practices and interpretation impact attendees’ perceptions of animal welfare and/or empathy. To evaluate these effects, eight ambassador animal program videos were created employing varying combinations of animal handling (traditional/free choice), interpretive messaging (traditional/empathy-based), and choice and control language (present/absent). Online questionnaires (N = 1,185) were used to assess participants’ environmental and empathic predispositions before viewing and perceptions of animal welfare and empathic reactions immediately after viewing a video. Results revealed that empathic reactions were moderately correlated with perceptions of animal welfare (r = .53, p < .001) and mean empathic responses were higher for free choice handling and empathic messaging videos versus traditional handling and messaging. Programming recommendations are discussed that can improve visitors’ perceptions of animal care and elicit strong empathic reactions.","PeriodicalId":364431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpretation Research","volume":"308 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116365461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Categorizing Online Climate Change Interpretation Across the National Park System","authors":"R. Roberts, Matt Holly, Larry Perez","doi":"10.1177/10925872211042935","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872211042935","url":null,"abstract":"Climate change effects are evident across the National Park System, and units are encouraged to provide proactive, meaningful interpretation on the issue to cultivate informed partners and encourage collaborative stewardship. But climate change is not currently interpreted across all units of the National Park System. Anecdotal observations suggest some units highly prioritize the topic, while others do not. Thus, we conducted an assessment of current online climate change interpretation across the National Park System as one means of quantifying park engagement. Results suggest that—of the 391 units included in the analysis—37% interpreted climate change in some manner online as of February, 2019. Though our method of analysis does not fully describe park interpretive efforts, our findings provide a baseline measure of online interpretation and help to prioritize future training and support. Furthermore, our work provides a minimally intensive approach for future assessment of online climate change interpretation.","PeriodicalId":364431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpretation Research","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125540336","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Supporting Broad Access to High Quality Research in Interpretation","authors":"M. Stern, R. Powell","doi":"10.1177/10925872211058604","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872211058604","url":null,"abstract":"Having worked intensively (primarily as outside researchers and consultants) with interpreters and other nonformal educators for the past two decades, we have become accustomed to calls by managers at all levels for evidence that clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of different interpretive approaches as well as the value of the field’s collective work to various stakeholders. Oftentimes, these calls are based on the perceived needs to base training and programmatic decisions on the best available science as well as justify budget allocations, to generate sustainable financial support, or to make inroads or strengthen commitments with new or existing audiences. The research literature is littered with empirical articles and reviews that can speak to the value of various educational experiences (see Ardoin et al., 2018, 2020; Stern et al., 2014; Stern and Powell, 2021 for key reviews in the fields of environmental education and heritage interpretation). Within the field of interpretation, the most recent systematic literature review identified 41 articles published within the Journal of Interpretation Research (JIR) alone that measured outcomes of specific interpretive interventions between 2010 and 2019 (Stern and Powell, 2021). So why are managers still asking for evidence when it already exists? We believe one answer lies in the accessibility of the research. Accessibility can be both physical, in terms of ability to obtain reports and articles, and cognitive, in terms of the ability of researchers and practitioners to effectively communicate evidence. JIR is available to all members of the National Association for interpretation. Moreover, authors are always at liberty to share their articles directly with anyone who asks for them. This latter element of physical accessibility is often unknown by practitioners in the field. While authors cannot broadly re-publish a peer-reviewed journal article (e.g., on a website of their own), they can share their manuscripts directly with individuals and make pre-prints (unformatted versions) of their manuscripts available elsewhere.","PeriodicalId":364431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpretation Research","volume":"255 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120868106","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Brian A. Peterson, R. Sharp, Jessica P. Fefer, Michael A. Brunson
{"title":"The Utility of GIS for Identifying Areas of Recreation Conflict for Targeted Interpretive Messaging","authors":"Brian A. Peterson, R. Sharp, Jessica P. Fefer, Michael A. Brunson","doi":"10.1177/10925872211019731","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872211019731","url":null,"abstract":"Past research has extensively studied interpretive messaging and visitor conflict within parks and protected areas. However, comprehensive understanding of how to identify trailside interpretive sign locations is lacking. The purpose of this study was to introduce an approach using geographic information systems (GIS) that supplements decision-making regarding sign placement. The study site was Grand Canyon National Park’s Rim to Rim (R2R) corridor. To identify sign placement locations, two analytical phases were conducted. First, GPS data loggers were distributed to visitors and their travel patterns were analyzed for spatial behaviors and spatial interactions that are known to influence the likelihood of recreation conflict. Specifically, locations with a high variance of visitor travel speeds and locations with concentrated visitor use were identified. Second, geographic data were analyzed to identify locations for a combination of features that together influence the likelihood of recreation conflict. Specifically, popular bidirectional trail segments with significant elevation change were identified. We reported these locations and areas using GPS coordinates for evaluation by future research. This research was a necessary step towards comprehensively understanding how to identify locations for interpretive signs.","PeriodicalId":364431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpretation Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115442425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Journal of Interpretation Research: Continuing Our Commitment to Ensure Research Provides Practical Results","authors":"R. Powell, M. Stern","doi":"10.1177/10925872211028572","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872211028572","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":364431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpretation Research","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"115303462","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Britta R. Baechler, E. Granek, Kerry A. Carlin-Morgan, Tina E. Smith, Max Nielsen-Pincus
{"title":"Aquarium Visitor Engagement with an Ocean Plastics Exhibit: Effects on Self-Reported Intended Single-Use Plastic Reductions and Plastic-Related Environmental Stewardship Actions","authors":"Britta R. Baechler, E. Granek, Kerry A. Carlin-Morgan, Tina E. Smith, Max Nielsen-Pincus","doi":"10.1177/10925872211021183","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872211021183","url":null,"abstract":"Plastic pollution requires, among a suite of other interventions, education to inspire behavioral change and reduce consumption of single-use items. We designed and installed an ocean plastics exhibit at the Oregon Coast Aquarium in Newport, Oregon, USA. We evaluated visitor engagement and the effects of the exhibit on their reported single-use plastic and plastic-related environmental stewardship intentions. Timed interaction observations (n = 317) revealed children (0–17 years) engaged more with interactive elements than adults (18–80+ years). Ten single-use plastic reduction and plastic stewardship intentions were evaluated through structured questionnaires; the top three behaviors visitors intended to change were: using a reusable straw (37.4%), cleaning the beach (37.4%), and bring-your-own bag to the store or market (33.0%). 18 to 29 year olds had the highest change in desire to address the ocean plastics problem before and after seeing the exhibit, but the lowest likelihood of engaging in either single-use plastics reduction or plastic stewardship actions of all age groups.","PeriodicalId":364431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpretation Research","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122506297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Taking Stock of Interpretation Research: Where Have We Been and Where are We Heading?","authors":"M. Stern, R. Powell","doi":"10.1177/10925872211023205","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10925872211023205","url":null,"abstract":"We reviewed all manuscripts published within the Journal of Interpretation Research from 2010 to 2019 to identify lessons learned from the past decade and to propose future directions to advance the field. The last decade of the Journal featured a wide diversity of studies, including evaluations of interpretive programs and trainings, examinations of specific interpretive techniques, and various other related topics. We summarize the decade’s contributions and share lessons learned associated with interpretive techniques; organizational practices; professional development; diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice; visitor characteristics; and motivating attendance at interpretive programs. We then identify eight areas for future research, including: (1) measuring more ambitious outcomes; (2) identifying effective practices for diverse audiences; (3) studying innovations through adaptive management; (4) examining intergenerational learning; (5) evaluating professional development; (6) conducting organizational studies; (7) investigating the politics of interpretation and sensitive topics; and (8) partnering on research for diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice.","PeriodicalId":364431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpretation Research","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"134367307","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}