Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Decision letter for "Contact, threat, and prejudice: A test of intergroup threat theory across three samples and multiple measures of prejudice" “接触、威胁和偏见:跨三个样本和多种偏见衡量标准的群体间威胁理论测试”的决定书
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-05-23 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/4rxas
C. Aberson
{"title":"Decision letter for \"Contact, threat, and prejudice: A test of intergroup threat theory across three samples and multiple measures of prejudice\"","authors":"C. Aberson","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/4rxas","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4rxas","url":null,"abstract":"Across three studies we applied predictions from Intergroup Contact Theory and Intergroup Threat Theory to an examination of the role of contact and threats in predicting prejudice toward three outgroups. Reactions to African Americans (n = 227), Hispanic Americans (n = 155), and gay men (n = 217), largely supported predictions. Positive contact experiences consistently related to more favorable evaluations and reduced perceptions of threats. Each study largely supported ITT’s proposition that threats indirectly influence the contact-prejudice relationship, with the most consistent findings found for negative contact. We found little support for relationships between contact, threats, and implicit preferences or for positive-negative asymmetry effects.","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47893963","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
How knowing others makes us more inclusive: Social identity inclusiveness mediates the effects of contact on out-group acceptance 了解他人如何使我们更具包容性:社会身份包容性介导接触对群体外接受的影响
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.60
Marija Branković, Iris Žeželj, Vladimir Turjačanin
{"title":"How knowing others makes us more inclusive: Social identity inclusiveness mediates the effects of contact on out-group acceptance","authors":"Marija Branković,&nbsp;Iris Žeželj,&nbsp;Vladimir Turjačanin","doi":"10.1002/jts5.60","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.60","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intergroup contact is repeatedly proven to lead to better intergroup attitudes. We sought to explore a new path through which this happens. We propose that contact can enhance inclusiveness of social identity, the recognition of common features needed to perceive someone as an in-group member even though not all characteristics are shared. This, in turn, leads to more favorable attitudes. We investigated this among young people from majority and minority ethnic groups from two Western Balkans countries with a recent history of conflict: Bosnia and Herzegovina and Serbia. The relation between the frequency and quality of contact and prejudice reduction was partially mediated by social identity inclusiveness. We discuss the opportunities and pitfalls related to constructing inclusive social identities in post-conflict societies, as well as the similarities and differences between minority and majority perspectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"4 3","pages":"95-106"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.60","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"72334261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A traumatic dissonance theory of perpetrator-related distress 肇事者相关痛苦的创伤性失调理论
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-03-10 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.59
Rachel E. Williamson, David E. Reed II, Robert E. Wickham
{"title":"A traumatic dissonance theory of perpetrator-related distress","authors":"Rachel E. Williamson,&nbsp;David E. Reed II,&nbsp;Robert E. Wickham","doi":"10.1002/jts5.59","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts5.59","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The evolving conceptualization of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) reflects ongoing debate regarding the development and manifestation of symptoms related to psychological trauma. The most recent iteration of the disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) broadened Criteria A’s definition of an index trauma, making possible its application to individuals experiencing symptoms related to their own act of perpetration. The current research aims to develop a theoretical basis for understanding the mechanism of psychological distress resulting from perceived perpetration. It is hypothesized that unresolved dissonance relating to a violation of one's symbolic source of self-esteem and meaning (i.e., one's belief system) represents a traumatic experience that can produce significant psychological distress. This hypothesis forms the basis of the Traumatic Dissonance Scale (TDS), which contains three facets required to meet the criteria for a traumatic perpetrator experience: (a) the act must clearly violate one's belief system, (b) the belief system must be important to one's identity, and (c) there must be no perceived way of atoning for one's actions. Participants (<i>N</i> = 429) were recruited online and include subsamples of military, police, and civilian participants. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesized 3-factor model, and latent profile analysis identified four respondent classes that differ in mean responses to the three TDS dimensions. Class membership was used as a predictor of PTSD symptoms, and results demonstrated that elevation on all three factors was significantly related to increased PTSD symptom severity compared to those in classes not reporting traumatic dissonance experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"4 2","pages":"75-91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.59","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"95314411","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
How to capture leader's vision articulation? Development and validation of the Vision Articulation Questionnaire (VAQ) 如何捕捉领导者的愿景清晰度?视觉清晰度问卷(VAQ)的开发和验证
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-03-05 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.67/v1/review1
Henning Krug, Steffen E. Schummer, Kathleen Otto
{"title":"How to capture leader's vision articulation? Development and validation of the Vision Articulation Questionnaire (VAQ)","authors":"Henning Krug, Steffen E. Schummer, Kathleen Otto","doi":"10.1002/jts5.67/v1/review1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.67/v1/review1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41423096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Religiosity, motivations, and volunteering: A test of two theories of religious prosociality 宗教性、动机和志愿服务:对宗教亲社会性两种理论的检验
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-02-24 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.68/v1/review1
Katja Petrovic, A. Stukas, M. Marques
{"title":"Religiosity, motivations, and volunteering: A test of two theories of religious prosociality","authors":"Katja Petrovic, A. Stukas, M. Marques","doi":"10.1002/jts5.68/v1/review1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.68/v1/review1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44752729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Considering class: Comparing the relative effects of personal vs. systemic conceptions of inequality 考虑阶级:比较个人与系统不平等概念的相对影响
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-02-22 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.57
Lucas A. Keefer, Laura Van Berkel
{"title":"Considering class: Comparing the relative effects of personal vs. systemic conceptions of inequality","authors":"Lucas A. Keefer,&nbsp;Laura Van Berkel","doi":"10.1002/jts5.57","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts5.57","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Past research in social psychology has explored the effects of considering a given policy or issue from different perspectives. In the case of political information, for example, this might mean thinking about broad systemic factors or values that cause an outcome or alternatively focusing on the local actors who are responsible for and/or affected by that system. In the present studies, we explore whether beliefs about systemic (vs. personal) features of social class are more effective at predicting their positions about policies or norms that change inequality. Results consistently showed that system-level perceptions of social class were more predictive of support for social change than perceptions of personal disadvantage. We discuss the implications of these findings for work on the psychology of inequality.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"4 2","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.57","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"108050161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Beyond stereotypes: The complexity of attention to racial out-group faces 超越刻板印象:关注种族外群体面孔的复杂性
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-02-22 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.58
Steffanie Guillermo, Joshua Correll
{"title":"Beyond stereotypes: The complexity of attention to racial out-group faces","authors":"Steffanie Guillermo,&nbsp;Joshua Correll","doi":"10.1002/jts5.58","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts5.58","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current paper seeks to integrate social and cognitive psychological literature to provide a multifaceted understanding of attention to race. Social psychological studies show that participants demonstrate attentional bias to racial out-group versus in-group faces. Most of this research utilizes White participants and examines the attentional bias to Black faces, concluding that threat stereotypes or negative racial attitudes underlie attentional bias. However, visual processing research demonstrates that various stimulus- and perceiver-driven processes impact attention, suggesting that mechanisms other than racial stereotypes may underlie race-based attention. We propose a framework of attention that accounts not only for direct influences of the stimulus and perceiver but also perceiver-stimulus interactions that emerge iteratively over time. We apply this framework to existing research on attention to race, elucidating various processes that can explain the attention to racial out-groups. We propose that our framework can account for attention to race more generally, beyond the oft-used Black versus White paradigm. We argue that mechanisms underlying attentional bias to race encompass complex factors beyond stereotypes and that our framework can account for stimulus, perceiver, and iterative processes that impact attention to race.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"4 2","pages":"55-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.58","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"97304889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Collective narcissism as a framework for understanding populism 集体自恋作为理解民粹主义的框架
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-02-20 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.69/v1/decision1
Agnieszka Golec de Zavala, O. Keenan
{"title":"Collective narcissism as a framework for understanding populism","authors":"Agnieszka Golec de Zavala, O. Keenan","doi":"10.1002/jts5.69/v1/decision1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.69/v1/decision1","url":null,"abstract":"Research on national collective narcissism, the belief and resentment that a nation's exceptionality is not sufficiently recognized by others, provides a theoretical framework for understanding the psychological motivations behind the support for right-wing populism. It bridges the findings regarding the economic and sociocultural conditions implicated in the rise of right-wing populism and the findings regarding leadership processes necessary for it to find its political expression. The conditions are interpreted as producing violations to established expectations regarding self-importance via the gradual repeal of the traditional criteria by which members of hegemonic groups evaluated their self-worth. Populist leaders propagate a social identity organized around the collective narcissistic resentment, enhance it, and propose external explanations for frustration of self and in-group-importance. This garners them a committed followership. Research on collective narcissism indicates that distress resulting from violated expectations regarding self-importance stands behind collective narcissism and its narrow vision of “true” national identity (the people), rejection and hostility toward stigmatized in-group members and out-groups as well as the association between collective narcissism and conspiratorial thinking.","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47186024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Power to the people: Disidentification with the government and the support for populism 权力归国民:对政府的不认同和民粹主义的支持
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-02-04 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/h7wbc
Karolina Urbanska, Samuel Pehrson, S. Guimond
{"title":"Power to the people: Disidentification with the government and the support for populism","authors":"Karolina Urbanska, Samuel Pehrson, S. Guimond","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/h7wbc","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h7wbc","url":null,"abstract":"Populist attitudes have been shown to predict voting behaviour. These attitudes consist of a belief that everyday citizens are better judges of what is best for their own country than politicians and that the political elites are corrupt. As such, a clear ‘us’ (pure and good everyday citizens) and ‘them’ (the evil political elite) rhetoric is present. In the present research, we propose that identification with the government may predict whether people would vote for, and whether they have voted in the past for, a populist party (either from the political left or the political right). The present research (N = 562), carried out among French citizens, showed that lower government identification related to past voting behaviour, current voting intentions and likelihood to switch from a non-populist to a populist party. Identification with the government was also negatively associated to intention to abstain from voting. Moreover, government identification was a stronger predictor of these voting-related outcomes than the recently developed populist attitudes measures. Unexpectedly, national identification was a not a significant predictor of voting behaviour. In conclusion, the present research suggests that the extent to which citizens identify and feel represented by the government should be considered on par with populist attitudes in understanding support for populist parties. Perceiving that the government does not represent everyday people may be sufficient to abandon support for mainstream (non-populist) political parties.","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"5 1","pages":"79-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48174871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Self-interest or joint welfare? Person and situation factors in interpersonal decisions about time 自利还是共同福利?人际时间决策中的个人和情境因素
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-01-16 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.56
Johannes Leder, Philina Bartkowiak, Laura K. Niedermanner, Astrid Schütz, Katrin Rentzsch
{"title":"Self-interest or joint welfare? Person and situation factors in interpersonal decisions about time","authors":"Johannes Leder,&nbsp;Philina Bartkowiak,&nbsp;Laura K. Niedermanner,&nbsp;Astrid Schütz,&nbsp;Katrin Rentzsch","doi":"10.1002/jts5.56","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts5.56","url":null,"abstract":"<p>While previous research on interpersonal decisions has focused on individual differences or situational determinants, in this paper, we looked at the interplay of situation and personality in decisions that are characterized by a conflict between self-interest and joint welfare. In an online experiment, 185 participants made decisions about the allocation of their own work time and the work time of another anonymous participant. Agency and uncertainty were manipulated between subjects, and social value orientation as well as dispositional envy were assessed. Participants chose between an option that maximized participants' joint welfare and an option that maximized personal payoffs. The results pointed to an interaction between personality and situational forces: Uncertainty moderated the effect of social value orientation, and agency moderated the effect of envy on decisions. Taken together, the results provide evidence that the effect of individual differences in interpersonal decisions depends on the situation. Implications for team work are discussed in situations where a group potentially benefits disproportionally more from an individual's relatively higher effort than the individual who exerts the effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"4 1","pages":"32-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.56","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"95482487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信