Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
How to capture leader's vision articulation? Development and validation of the Vision Articulation Questionnaire (VAQ) 如何捕捉领导者的愿景清晰度?视觉清晰度问卷(VAQ)的开发和验证
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-03-05 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.67/v1/review1
Henning Krug, Steffen E. Schummer, Kathleen Otto
{"title":"How to capture leader's vision articulation? Development and validation of the Vision Articulation Questionnaire (VAQ)","authors":"Henning Krug, Steffen E. Schummer, Kathleen Otto","doi":"10.1002/jts5.67/v1/review1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.67/v1/review1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41423096","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Religiosity, motivations, and volunteering: A test of two theories of religious prosociality 宗教性、动机和志愿服务:对宗教亲社会性两种理论的检验
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-02-24 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.68/v1/review1
Katja Petrovic, A. Stukas, M. Marques
{"title":"Religiosity, motivations, and volunteering: A test of two theories of religious prosociality","authors":"Katja Petrovic, A. Stukas, M. Marques","doi":"10.1002/jts5.68/v1/review1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.68/v1/review1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44752729","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Considering class: Comparing the relative effects of personal vs. systemic conceptions of inequality 考虑阶级:比较个人与系统不平等概念的相对影响
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-02-22 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.57
Lucas A. Keefer, Laura Van Berkel
{"title":"Considering class: Comparing the relative effects of personal vs. systemic conceptions of inequality","authors":"Lucas A. Keefer,&nbsp;Laura Van Berkel","doi":"10.1002/jts5.57","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts5.57","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Past research in social psychology has explored the effects of considering a given policy or issue from different perspectives. In the case of political information, for example, this might mean thinking about broad systemic factors or values that cause an outcome or alternatively focusing on the local actors who are responsible for and/or affected by that system. In the present studies, we explore whether beliefs about systemic (vs. personal) features of social class are more effective at predicting their positions about policies or norms that change inequality. Results consistently showed that system-level perceptions of social class were more predictive of support for social change than perceptions of personal disadvantage. We discuss the implications of these findings for work on the psychology of inequality.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"4 2","pages":"45-54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.57","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"108050161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Beyond stereotypes: The complexity of attention to racial out-group faces 超越刻板印象:关注种族外群体面孔的复杂性
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-02-22 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.58
Steffanie Guillermo, Joshua Correll
{"title":"Beyond stereotypes: The complexity of attention to racial out-group faces","authors":"Steffanie Guillermo,&nbsp;Joshua Correll","doi":"10.1002/jts5.58","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts5.58","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current paper seeks to integrate social and cognitive psychological literature to provide a multifaceted understanding of attention to race. Social psychological studies show that participants demonstrate attentional bias to racial out-group versus in-group faces. Most of this research utilizes White participants and examines the attentional bias to Black faces, concluding that threat stereotypes or negative racial attitudes underlie attentional bias. However, visual processing research demonstrates that various stimulus- and perceiver-driven processes impact attention, suggesting that mechanisms other than racial stereotypes may underlie race-based attention. We propose a framework of attention that accounts not only for direct influences of the stimulus and perceiver but also perceiver-stimulus interactions that emerge iteratively over time. We apply this framework to existing research on attention to race, elucidating various processes that can explain the attention to racial out-groups. We propose that our framework can account for attention to race more generally, beyond the oft-used Black versus White paradigm. We argue that mechanisms underlying attentional bias to race encompass complex factors beyond stereotypes and that our framework can account for stimulus, perceiver, and iterative processes that impact attention to race.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"4 2","pages":"55-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.58","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"97304889","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Collective narcissism as a framework for understanding populism 集体自恋作为理解民粹主义的框架
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-02-20 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.69/v1/decision1
Agnieszka Golec de Zavala, O. Keenan
{"title":"Collective narcissism as a framework for understanding populism","authors":"Agnieszka Golec de Zavala, O. Keenan","doi":"10.1002/jts5.69/v1/decision1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.69/v1/decision1","url":null,"abstract":"Research on national collective narcissism, the belief and resentment that a nation's exceptionality is not sufficiently recognized by others, provides a theoretical framework for understanding the psychological motivations behind the support for right-wing populism. It bridges the findings regarding the economic and sociocultural conditions implicated in the rise of right-wing populism and the findings regarding leadership processes necessary for it to find its political expression. The conditions are interpreted as producing violations to established expectations regarding self-importance via the gradual repeal of the traditional criteria by which members of hegemonic groups evaluated their self-worth. Populist leaders propagate a social identity organized around the collective narcissistic resentment, enhance it, and propose external explanations for frustration of self and in-group-importance. This garners them a committed followership. Research on collective narcissism indicates that distress resulting from violated expectations regarding self-importance stands behind collective narcissism and its narrow vision of “true” national identity (the people), rejection and hostility toward stigmatized in-group members and out-groups as well as the association between collective narcissism and conspiratorial thinking.","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47186024","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Power to the people: Disidentification with the government and the support for populism 权力归国民:对政府的不认同和民粹主义的支持
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-02-04 DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/h7wbc
Karolina Urbanska, Samuel Pehrson, S. Guimond
{"title":"Power to the people: Disidentification with the government and the support for populism","authors":"Karolina Urbanska, Samuel Pehrson, S. Guimond","doi":"10.31234/osf.io/h7wbc","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h7wbc","url":null,"abstract":"Populist attitudes have been shown to predict voting behaviour. These attitudes consist of a belief that everyday citizens are better judges of what is best for their own country than politicians and that the political elites are corrupt. As such, a clear ‘us’ (pure and good everyday citizens) and ‘them’ (the evil political elite) rhetoric is present. In the present research, we propose that identification with the government may predict whether people would vote for, and whether they have voted in the past for, a populist party (either from the political left or the political right). The present research (N = 562), carried out among French citizens, showed that lower government identification related to past voting behaviour, current voting intentions and likelihood to switch from a non-populist to a populist party. Identification with the government was also negatively associated to intention to abstain from voting. Moreover, government identification was a stronger predictor of these voting-related outcomes than the recently developed populist attitudes measures. Unexpectedly, national identification was a not a significant predictor of voting behaviour. In conclusion, the present research suggests that the extent to which citizens identify and feel represented by the government should be considered on par with populist attitudes in understanding support for populist parties. Perceiving that the government does not represent everyday people may be sufficient to abandon support for mainstream (non-populist) political parties.","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"5 1","pages":"79-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48174871","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Self-interest or joint welfare? Person and situation factors in interpersonal decisions about time 自利还是共同福利?人际时间决策中的个人和情境因素
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-01-16 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.56
Johannes Leder, Philina Bartkowiak, Laura K. Niedermanner, Astrid Schütz, Katrin Rentzsch
{"title":"Self-interest or joint welfare? Person and situation factors in interpersonal decisions about time","authors":"Johannes Leder,&nbsp;Philina Bartkowiak,&nbsp;Laura K. Niedermanner,&nbsp;Astrid Schütz,&nbsp;Katrin Rentzsch","doi":"10.1002/jts5.56","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts5.56","url":null,"abstract":"<p>While previous research on interpersonal decisions has focused on individual differences or situational determinants, in this paper, we looked at the interplay of situation and personality in decisions that are characterized by a conflict between self-interest and joint welfare. In an online experiment, 185 participants made decisions about the allocation of their own work time and the work time of another anonymous participant. Agency and uncertainty were manipulated between subjects, and social value orientation as well as dispositional envy were assessed. Participants chose between an option that maximized participants' joint welfare and an option that maximized personal payoffs. The results pointed to an interaction between personality and situational forces: Uncertainty moderated the effect of social value orientation, and agency moderated the effect of envy on decisions. Taken together, the results provide evidence that the effect of individual differences in interpersonal decisions depends on the situation. Implications for team work are discussed in situations where a group potentially benefits disproportionally more from an individual's relatively higher effort than the individual who exerts the effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"4 1","pages":"32-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.56","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"95482487","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
How knowing others makes us more inclusive: Social identity inclusiveness mediates the effects of contact on out‐group acceptance 了解他人如何使我们更具包容性:社会身份包容性在接触对群体外接受的影响中起中介作用
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2020-01-07 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.60/v2/response1
M. Branković, I. Žeželj, Vladimir Turjačanin
{"title":"How knowing others makes us more inclusive: Social identity inclusiveness mediates the effects of contact on out‐group acceptance","authors":"M. Branković, I. Žeželj, Vladimir Turjačanin","doi":"10.1002/jts5.60/v2/response1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.60/v2/response1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2020-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49029439","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Outcome-based dissonance and Morton's Fork: Evaluative consequences of unfavorable alternatives in the 2016 U.S. presidential election 基于结果的失调和莫顿叉:2016年美国总统大选中不利选择的评估后果
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2019-09-30 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.55
Austin D. Eubanks, Scott Eidelman, Derrick F. Till, David Sparkman, Patrick Stewart, Robert H. Wicks
{"title":"Outcome-based dissonance and Morton's Fork: Evaluative consequences of unfavorable alternatives in the 2016 U.S. presidential election","authors":"Austin D. Eubanks,&nbsp;Scott Eidelman,&nbsp;Derrick F. Till,&nbsp;David Sparkman,&nbsp;Patrick Stewart,&nbsp;Robert H. Wicks","doi":"10.1002/jts5.55","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts5.55","url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present research investigates outcome-based dissonance in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election, a context where a significant number of citizens had unfavorable opinions of both candidates. When one is faced with a choice between two unfavorable alternatives, the outcome will be the same (i.e., unfavorable) regardless of the choice. This dilemma of having multiple alternatives leading to the same unfavorable outcome is known as Morton's Fork. Our results, using a national online sample (<i>n = </i>247) suggest that when given the opportunity to choose between a favorable and unfavorable alternative, outcome-based dissonance occurs when the preferred (chosen) alternative is inconsistent with the outcome and dissonance reduction proceeds by reducing the “evaluative spread” (i.e., decreasing evaluations of the chosen/losing alternative and/or increasing evaluations of the rejected/winning alternative). In contrast, outcome-based dissonance is diminished (or nonoccurring) when one chooses between unfavorable choice alternatives. These results suggest that valence of choice alternatives is a relevant factor in the production of outcome-based dissonance. Implications are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"4 1","pages":"21-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.55","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"50763681","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
How group goal setting mediates the link between individual-level emotion-related factors and team performance 群体目标设定如何中介个体层面情绪相关因素与团队绩效之间的关系
IF 1.8
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Pub Date : 2019-09-13 DOI: 10.1002/jts5.54
Laura Petitta, Lixin Jiang
{"title":"How group goal setting mediates the link between individual-level emotion-related factors and team performance","authors":"Laura Petitta,&nbsp;Lixin Jiang","doi":"10.1002/jts5.54","DOIUrl":"10.1002/jts5.54","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Goal setting theory states that its principles (i.e., specific, difficult goals lead to higher performance than general tasks) and the four mediating factors (i.e., attention, strategies, effort, and persistence) of the goal–performance link can be generalized to the workgroup level. However, less is known about individual-level emotional dynamics within a team that shape team-level motivation and strategies and subsequent team performance. Using multisource data, we tested a multilevel mediation model that posits fear of dominance among the fellow teammates and emotional contagion of fear as individual-level predictors of the group goal setting (GGS) mechanisms (i.e., directions, effort and persistence, strategies), which in turn simultaneously but differentially predict subsequent team performance. Surveys were administered to 315 athletes nested in 38 sport teams. Performance was measured objectively via team rank. Results suggest that fear of dominance was negatively related to group direction and effort and persistence. More interestingly, emotional contagion of fear negatively predicted strategies, which in turn positively predicted team performance. We add to the literature by demonstrating the cross-level mediating role of GGS factors in the relationship between individual-level emotional contagion of fear and the team-level performance outcome. Our study also contributes to contagion and dominance literatures as well as GGS theorizing, thus bridging the two disparate research fields of individual-level emotion-related processes and GGS. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in light of the relevance of successful performance management as well as of preventing the adverse effects of individual-level dysfunctional affective experience on teamwork motivation and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"4 1","pages":"3-20"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8,"publicationDate":"2019-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.54","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46671598","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信