Stephanie E Hullmann, Stacy A Keller, Dustin O Lynch, Kelli Jenkins, Courtney Moore, Brandon Cockrum, Sarah E Wiehe, Aaron E Carroll, William E Bennett
{"title":"Phase I of the Detecting and Evaluating Childhood Anxiety and Depression Effectively in Subspecialties (DECADES) Study: Development of an Integrated Mental Health Care Model for Pediatric Gastroenterology.","authors":"Stephanie E Hullmann, Stacy A Keller, Dustin O Lynch, Kelli Jenkins, Courtney Moore, Brandon Cockrum, Sarah E Wiehe, Aaron E Carroll, William E Bennett","doi":"10.2196/10655","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/10655","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with gastrointestinal symptoms have a very high rate of anxiety and depression. Rapid identification of comorbid anxiety and depression is essential for effective treatment of a wide variety of functional gastrointestinal disorders.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of our study was to determine patient and parent attitudes toward depression, anxiety, and mental health screening during gastroenterology (GI) visits and to determine patient and parent preferences for communication of results and referral to mental health providers after a positive screen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We augmented standard qualitative group session methods with patient-centered design methods to assess patient and parent preferences. We used a variety of specific design methods in these sessions, including card sorting, projective methods, experience mapping, and constructive methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 11 families (11 patients and 14 parents) participated in 2 group sessions. Overall, patients and their parents found integrated mental health care to be acceptable in the subspecialty setting. Patients' primary concerns were for the privacy and confidentiality of their screening results. Patients and their parents emphasized the importance of mental health services not interfering with the GI visit and collaboration between the GI physician, psychologist, and primary care provider.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients and their families are open to integrated mental health care in the pediatric subspecialty clinic. The next phase of the DECADES study will translate patient and parent preferences into an integrated mental health care system and test its efficacy in the pediatric GI office.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"10 3","pages":"e10655"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434069/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38485105","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Yen-Yuan Chen, Yu-Fang Cheng, Chau-Chung Wu, T. Chu
{"title":"The usage of social media encouraged patients' active participation in medical decision-making: cross-sectional survey (Preprint)","authors":"Yen-Yuan Chen, Yu-Fang Cheng, Chau-Chung Wu, T. Chu","doi":"10.2196/11828","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/11828","url":null,"abstract":"\u0000 BACKGROUND\u0000 The rapid advance of information technology since the end of twentieth century has deeply influenced the ways people gather health information to use as references for medical decision-making. Studies have overwhelmingly been focused on the association between health information in the media and the usage of medical care, nevertheless, none of them have examined the association between the usage of social media for gathering health information and patients’ active participation in medical decision-making.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 OBJECTIVE\u0000 The objective of this study was to examine the influence of the health information obtained from social media has on patients’ preference to actively participate in medical decision-making.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 METHODS\u0000 The participants in this study were openly recruited from the patients who were admitted to the cardiology inpatient unit in the Department of Internal Medicine with an admission diagnosis of coronary artery disease. We used Control Preference Scale to estimate each patient’s preference to play an active role, a collaborative role, or a passive role in medical decision-making. We conducted multivariate logistic regression for examining the association between “gathering health information from social media” and “playing an active role in medical decision-making”, by including the confounding variables which have an association with the outcome variable with a p value of less than .30.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 RESULTS\u0000 A total of 156 patients participated in this study. After adjusting for the confounding variables, patients who gathered health information related to coronary artery disease from social media were more likely to play an active role in medical decision-making (odds ratio = 2.85, p = 0.04). Furthermore, the odds of patients with one-year increment of their age for playing an active role in medical decision-making was decreased approximately by 6.20% (odds ratio = 0.94, p = 0.01), and patients cared for by Physician C preferred to play an active role as compared to other physicians (odds ratio = 5.37, p = 0.04).\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 CONCLUSIONS\u0000 Although health information gathered from social media may have been discussed and validated by one’s companions on social media, there is no guarantee that the health information is correct. If the health information gathered from social media is correct, patients’ active participation in medical decision-making is helpful in facilitating physician-patient communication towards that aim. Future studies may be focused on how information seekers use modern information technology to gather correct health information.\u0000 \u0000 \u0000 CLINICALTRIAL\u0000 N/A\u0000","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49040339","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Content-Sensitive Characterization of Peer Interactions of Highly Engaged Users in an Online Community for Smoking Cessation: Mixed-Methods Approach for Modeling User Engagement in Health Promotion Interventions.","authors":"Sahiti Myneni, Vishnupriya Sridharan, Nathan Cobb, Trevor Cohen","doi":"10.2196/jopm.9745","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/jopm.9745","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Online communities provide affordable venues for behavior change. However, active user engagement holds the key to the success of these platforms. In order to enhance user engagement and in turn, health outcomes, it is essential to offer targeted interventional and informational support.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this paper, we describe a content plus frequency framework to enable the characterization of highly engaged users in online communities and study theoretical techniques employed by these users through analysis of exchanged communication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied the proposed methodology for analysis of peer interactions within QuitNet, an online community for smoking cessation. Firstly, we identified 144 highly engaged users based on communication frequency within QuitNet over a period of 16 years. Secondly, we used the taxonomy of behavior change techniques, text analysis methods from distributional semantics, machine learning, and sentiment analysis to assign theory-driven labels to content. Finally, we extracted content-specific insights from peer interactions (n=159,483 messages) among highly engaged QuitNet users.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studying user engagement using our proposed framework led to the definition of 3 user categories-conversation initiators, conversation attractors, and frequent posters. Specific behavior change techniques employed by top tier users (threshold set at top 3) within these 3 user groups were found to be goal setting, social support, rewards and threat, and comparison of outcomes. Engagement-specific trends within sentiment manifestations were also identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of content-inclusive analytics has offered deep insight into specific behavior change techniques employed by highly engaged users within QuitNet. Implications for personalization and active user engagement are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"10 3","pages":"e9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434072/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38485103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Tamara S Hannon, Courtney M Moore, Erika R Cheng, Dustin O Lynch, Lisa G Yazel-Smith, Gina Em Claxton, Aaron E Carroll, Sarah E Wiehe
{"title":"Codesigned Shared Decision-Making Diabetes Management Plan Tool for Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Their Parents: Prototype Development and Pilot Test.","authors":"Tamara S Hannon, Courtney M Moore, Erika R Cheng, Dustin O Lynch, Lisa G Yazel-Smith, Gina Em Claxton, Aaron E Carroll, Sarah E Wiehe","doi":"10.2196/jopm.9652","DOIUrl":"10.2196/jopm.9652","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus have difficulty achieving optimal glycemic control, partly due to competing priorities that interfere with diabetes self-care. Often, significant diabetes-related family conflict occurs, and adolescents' thoughts and feelings about diabetes management may be disregarded. Patient-centered diabetes outcomes may be better when adolescents feel engaged in the decision-making process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of our study was to codesign a clinic intervention using shared decision making for addressing diabetes self-care with an adolescent patient and parent advisory board.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patient and parent advisory board consisted of 6 adolescents (teens) between the ages 12 and 18 years with type 1 diabetes mellitus and their parents recruited through our institution's Pediatric Diabetes Program. Teens and parents provided informed consent and participated in 1 or both of 2 patient and parent advisory board sessions, lasting 3 to 4 hours each. Session 1 topics were (1) patient-centered outcomes related to quality of life, parent-teen shared diabetes management, and shared family experiences; and (2) implementation and acceptability of a patient-centered diabetes care plan intervention where shared decision making was used. We analyzed audio recordings, notes, and other materials to identify and extract ideas relevant to the development of a patient-centered diabetes management plan. These data were visually coded into similar themes. We used the information to develop a prototype for a diabetes management plan tool that we pilot tested during session 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Session 1 identified 6 principal patient-centered quality-of-life measurement domains: stress, fear and worry, mealtime struggles, assumptions and judgments, feeling abnormal, and conflict. We determined 2 objectives to be principally important for a diabetes management plan intervention: (1) focusing the intervention on diabetes distress and conflict resolution strategies, and (2) working toward a verbalized common goal. In session 2, we created the diabetes management plan tool according to these findings and will use it in a clinical trial with the aim of assisting with patient-centered goal setting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus can be effectively engaged and involved in patient-centered research design. Teens with type 1 diabetes mellitus prioritize reducing family conflict and fitting into their social milieu over health outcomes at this time in their lives. It is important to acknowledge this when designing interventions to improve health outcomes in teens with type 1 diabetes mellitus.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"10 2","pages":"e8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434065/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9395818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marleen Mhj van Gelder, Lucien Jlpg Engelen, Thijs Sondag, Tom H van de Belt
{"title":"Utilizing Consumer Technology (Apple's ResearchKit) for Medical Studies by Patients and Researchers: Proof of Concept of the Novel Platform REach.","authors":"Marleen Mhj van Gelder, Lucien Jlpg Engelen, Thijs Sondag, Tom H van de Belt","doi":"10.2196/jopm.9335","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/jopm.9335","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical research suffers from declining response rates, hampering the quest for answers to clinically relevant research questions. Furthermore, objective data on a number of important study variables, such as physical activity, sleep, and nutrition, are difficult to collect with the traditional methods of data collection. Reassuringly, current technological developments could overcome these limitations. In addition, they may enable research being established by patients themselves provided that they have access to a user-friendly platform. Using the features of Apple's ResearchKit, an informed consent procedure, questionnaire, linkage with HealthKit data, and \"active tasks\" may be administered through a publicly available app. However, ResearchKit requires programming skills, which many patients and researchers lack. Therefore, we developed a platform (REach) with drag and drop functionalities producing a ready-to-use code that can be embedded in existing or new apps. Participants in the pilot study were very satisfied with data collection through REach and measurement error was minimal. In the era of declining participation rates in observational studies and patient involvement, new methods of data collection, such as REach, are essential to ensure that clinically relevant research questions are validly answered. Due to linkage with HealthKit and active tasks, objective health data that are impossible to collect with the traditional methods of data collection can easily be collected.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434096/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38485100","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Melissa Basile, Johanna Andrews, Sonia Jacome, Meng Zhang, Andrzej Kozikowski, Negin Hajizadeh
{"title":"A Decision Aid to Support Shared Decision Making About Mechanical Ventilation in Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients (InformedTogether): Feasibility Study.","authors":"Melissa Basile, Johanna Andrews, Sonia Jacome, Meng Zhang, Andrzej Kozikowski, Negin Hajizadeh","doi":"10.2196/jopm.9877","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/jopm.9877","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients are often unprepared to make decisions about accepting intubation for respiratory failure. We developed a Web-based decision aid, InformedTogether, to facilitate severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients' preparation for decision making about whether to accept invasive mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We describe feasibility testing of the InformedTogether decision aid.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed methods, pre- and postintervention feasibility study in outpatient pulmonary and geriatric clinics. Clinicians used InformedTogether with severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients. Patient-participants completed pre- and postassessments about InformedTogether use. The outcomes measured were the following: feasibility/acceptability, communication (Combined Outcome Measure for Risk Communication [COMRADE], Medical Communication Competency Scale [MCCS], Observing Patient Involvement [OPTION] scales), and effectiveness of InformedTogether on changing patients' knowledge, Decisional Conflict Scale, and motivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 11 clinicians and 38 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients at six sites. Feasibility/acceptability: Clinicians and patients gave positive responses to acceptability questions (mean 74.1/89 max [SD 7.24] and mean 59.63/61 [SD 4.49], respectively). Communication: 96% of clinicians stated InformedTogether improved communication (modified MCCS mean 44.54/49 [SD 2.97]; mean OPTION score 32.03/48 [SD 9.27]; mean COMRADE Satisfaction 4.31/5.0 [SD 0.58]; and COMRADE Confidence 4.18/5.0 [SD 0.56]). Preference: Eighty percent of patients discussed preferences with their surrogates by 1-month. Effectiveness: Knowledge scores increased significantly after using InformedTogether (mean difference 3.61 [SD 3. 44], <i>P</i>=.001) and Decisional Conflict decreased (mean difference Decisional Conflict Scale pre/post -13.76 [SD 20.39], <i>P</i>=.006). Motivation increased after viewing the decision aid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>InformedTogether supports high-quality communication and shared decision making among Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients, clinicians, and surrogates. The increased knowledge and opportunity to deliberate and discuss treatment choices after using InformedTogether should lead to improved decision making at the time of critical illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"10 2","pages":"e7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7251980/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"37982604","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Patient and Family Involvement: A Discussion of Co-Led Redesign of Healthcare Services.","authors":"Sarah Jane Prior, Steven Campbell","doi":"10.2196/jopm.8957","DOIUrl":"10.2196/jopm.8957","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The involvement of patients and their families in the redesign of healthcare services is an important option in providing a service that addresses the patients' needs and improves health outcomes. However, it is a resource-intensive approach, and it is currently not clear when it should be used, and what should be the reasoning behind this decision. Some health systems of international standing have created a patient engagement program as a selling point. This paper discusses how co-led redesign can be beneficial in improving health service and more effectively engaging patients. Potential barriers for patient involvement are discussed. Patient involvement can be integrated into the health system at three main levels of engagement: direct care, organizational design and governance, and policy-making. The aim of this paper is to describe how co-led redesign is compatible with different levels of patient involvement and to address the challenges in delivering a co-led redesign in healthcare. Co-led redesign not only involves the collection of quantitative data for assessing the current systems but also the collection of qualitative data through patient, family, and staff interviews to determine the barriers to patient satisfaction. Co-led redesign is a resource-rich process that requires expertise in data collection and a clinical group that is devoted to implementing recommended changes. Currently, a number of countries have utilized co-led redesign for many different types of healthcare services. Resource availability and cost, process time, and lack of outcome measures are three major limiting factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"e5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489197/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9731000","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sara Huston Katsanis, Mollie A Minear, Azita Sadeghpour, Heidi Cope, Yezmin Perilla, Robert Cook-Deegan, Nicholas Katsanis, Erica E Davis, Misha Angrist
{"title":"Participant-Partners in Genetic Research: An Exome Study with Families of Children with Unexplained Medical Conditions.","authors":"Sara Huston Katsanis, Mollie A Minear, Azita Sadeghpour, Heidi Cope, Yezmin Perilla, Robert Cook-Deegan, Nicholas Katsanis, Erica E Davis, Misha Angrist","doi":"10.2196/jopm.8958","DOIUrl":"10.2196/jopm.8958","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unlike aggregate research on groups of participants with a particular disorder, genomic research on discrete families' rare conditions could result in data of use to families, their healthcare, as well as generating knowledge on the human genome.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In a study of families seeking to rule in/out genetic causes for their children's medical conditions via exome sequencing, we solicited their views on the importance of genomic information. Our aim was to learn the interests of parents in seeking genomic research data and to gauge their responsiveness and engagement with the research team.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At enrollment, we offered participants options in the consent form for receiving potentially clinically relevant research results. We also offered an option of being a \"partner\" versus a \"traditional\" participant; partners could be re-contacted for research and study activities. We invited adult partners to complete a pre-exome survey, attend annual family forums, and participate in other inter-family interaction opportunities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 385 adults enrolled, 79% opted for \"partnership\" with the research team. Nearly all (99.2%) participants opted to receive research results pertaining to their children's primary conditions. A majority indicated the desire to receive additional clinically relevant outside the scope of their children's conditions (92.7%) and an interest in non-clinically relevant genetic information (82.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most participants chose partnership, including its rights and potential burdens; however, active engagement in study activities remained the exception. Not surprisingly, the overwhelming majority of participants-both partners and traditional-expected to receive all genetic information resulting from the research study.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"e2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7489233/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9400612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rachel L Berkowitz, Nimeka Phillip, Lyn Berry, Irene H Yen
{"title":"Patient Experiences in a Linguistically Diverse Safety Net Primary Care Setting: Qualitative Study.","authors":"Rachel L Berkowitz, Nimeka Phillip, Lyn Berry, Irene H Yen","doi":"10.2196/jopm.9229","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/jopm.9229","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The patient-centered medical home model intends to improve patient experience and primary care quality. Within an urban safety net setting in Northern California, United States, these desired outcomes are complicated by both the diversity of the patient community and the care continuity implications of a residency program.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of our study was to understand the patient experience beyond standardized satisfaction measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study, interviewing 19 patients from the clinic (English-, Spanish-, or Mien-speaking patients).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Some themes, such as the desire to feel confident in their doctor, emerged across language groups, pointing to institutional challenges. Other themes, such as distrust in care being provided, were tied distinctly to speaking a language different from one's provider. Still other themes, such as a sense of powerlessness, were related to cultural differences and to speaking a language (Mien) not spoken by staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings illuminate the need to understand cultural behaviors and interactional styles in a diverse patient population to create a high-quality medical home.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434056/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38487624","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Interventions to Improve Movement and Functional Outcomes in Adult Stroke Rehabilitation: Review and Evidence Summary.","authors":"Susan Hamady Lin, Timothy P Dionne","doi":"10.2196/jopm.8929","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2196/jopm.8929","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients who have had a stroke may not be familiar with the terminology nor have the resources to efficiently search for evidence-based rehabilitation therapies to restore movement and functional outcomes. Recognizing that a thorough systematic review on this topic is beyond the scope of this article, we conducted a rapid review evidence summary to determine the level of evidence for common rehabilitation interventions to improve movement/motor and functional outcomes in adults who have had a stroke.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to find evidence for common rehabilitation interventions to improve movement/motor and functional outcomes in adults who have had a stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medline Complete, PubMed, CINAHL Complete, Cochrane Database, Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine Source, Dissertation Abstracts International, and National Guideline Clearinghouse, from 1996 to April of 2016, were searched. From 348 articles, 173 met the following inclusion criteria: (1) published systematic reviews or meta-analyses, (2) outcomes target functional movement or motor skills of the upper and lower limbs, (3) non-pharmacological interventions that are commonly delivered to post-stroke population (acute and chronic), (4) human studies, and (5) English. Evidence tables were created to analyze the findings of systematic reviews and meta-analyses by category of interventions and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This rapid review found that the following interventions possess credible evidence to improve functional movement of persons with stroke: cardiorespiratory training, therapeutic exercise (ie, strengthening), task-oriented training (task-specific training), constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT), mental practice, and mirror therapy. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) (ie, functional electrical stimulation) shows promise as an intervention for stroke survivors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most commonly delivered therapeutic interventions to improve motor recovery after a stroke possess moderate quality evidence and are effective. Future research recommendations, such as optimal timing and dosage, would help rehabilitation professionals tailor interventions to achieve the best outcomes for stroke survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7434068/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"38485958","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}