{"title":"Terorizmus – zločin podľa medzinárodného práva?","authors":"Lukáš Mareček","doi":"10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-16","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-16","url":null,"abstract":"Terrorism is a fenomena that is seriously threatening values and interests of the international community. Despite of that the international community was not able to settle its definition yet. If the definition is absent then supression of terorizm by means of international criminal law is in conflict with the principle of legality. Solving of this question is a precondition for evental creation of international criminal organs. In spite of that the issue was not settled the Special Tribunal for Lebanon was created which had crime of terrorism in its jurisdiction ratione materiae. The aims of this paper is to analyse how the Special Tribunal for Lebanon dealt with this problem and to evaluate soundness of its argumentation.","PeriodicalId":356552,"journal":{"name":"Anti-state offences yesterday and today","volume":"154 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127338675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Protistátní trestné činy v islámském právu","authors":"Petr Osina","doi":"10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-20","url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on the opinion of the jurists about the concept of rebellion (baghy) and its significance in Islamic law. The objective is to provide a short review of the issue. The article starts with a brief explanation of the lexical meaning of baghy and its position in classical texts. It attempts to shed some light on the issue of rebellion against unjust or corrupt imams, and what is the relationship between them from the perspective of the two prime sources of Islam: the Qur’an and hadith. The last part of the paper discusses the relationship between Islamic rebellion law and international law.","PeriodicalId":356552,"journal":{"name":"Anti-state offences yesterday and today","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127029504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Dr. Korbuly Pál, sudca Štátneho súdu v Bratislave","authors":"František Neupauer","doi":"10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-10","url":null,"abstract":"The history of law indeed refers to persons handing down judgments and often offers interesting stories, such as the story of a judge working under various political regimes Dr. Pavel Korbuly (1906–1970). On May 4, 1934, Korbuly was appointed a single judge in criminal matters, after 1948 he became an instrument of justice under the communist regime and was one of the most active judges of the State Court in Bratislava. Prior to the Vienna Arbitration, he was a judge in the Czechoslovak Republic, then in Hungary, and after 1948 he was one of the judges who tried and sentenced victims of the communist regime (more than 500 people) in Slovakia. By the same communist regime, however, Korbuly was later prosecuted due to his active support of the anti-communist uprising in Hungary in 1956. Unlike others, he was one of the judges who had realized their responsibility for convicting the innocent and committed public repentance. From this perspective, his life story is unique in Central Europe as well as worldwide.","PeriodicalId":356552,"journal":{"name":"Anti-state offences yesterday and today","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128505234","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Poválečné perzekuce příslušníků armády a přijetí zákona na ochranu lidově demokratické republiky","authors":"Tomáš Řepa","doi":"10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-12","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-12","url":null,"abstract":"After the end of the Second World War, Czechoslovakia was a country at a crossroads. The communists tried to take control of key institutions of the state, including the army. In doing so, a number of illegalities were committed. After the coup in February 1948, this was followed by the adoption of legislation by the already totalitarian state. A striking example was Law No. 231/1948 on the Protection of the People’s Democratic Republic, adopted in October 1948. On the basis of this law, many thousands of people were convicted for alleged anti-State acts.","PeriodicalId":356552,"journal":{"name":"Anti-state offences yesterday and today","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129175528","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Protistátní trestné činy v moderních kodifikacích","authors":"David Kolumber","doi":"10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-4","url":null,"abstract":"The contribution “Anti-state Crimes in Modern Codifications” deals with the topic of anti-state crimes during centuries. Firstly, legal concepts in the pre-state period are mentioned. Then the attention is paid on the evolution of this institute in the Euro-Atlantic area. From this point of view, there are mentioned mainly regulations from England (1351), France (1810), Germany (1871) and Soviet Union (1958) which could be remarked as the most important for the development of other countries. On the other hand, it also reminds the development of codifications in Czechoslovakia, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, which were affected by the Austro-Hungarian legislations as well as German and Soviet approaches. The Czech current arrangement generally does not depart from the other European samples, but it cannot be omitted that in the Czech Republic it is distinguished the penal concept of the high treason (Landesverrat, vlastizrada) from the constitutional concept (Hochverrat, velezrada) which is dedicated to the presidential anti-state activities. The contribution also indicates that the concept of anti-state crimes in countries has not been unified and it has been varying according to various experiences and attitudes.","PeriodicalId":356552,"journal":{"name":"Anti-state offences yesterday and today","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130153574","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Urážka prezidenta republiky v meziválečném období","authors":"Daniel Kadlec","doi":"10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-6","url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the § 11 of the Act of the Protection of the Republic, which in the interwar period regulated the criminal offence of the Defamation of President of the Republic. The article discusses the origin and historical sequence of the crime of the Defamation of the Head of State. In the article, the author explains, with the help of case law, some terms from the text of § 11 of the Act of the Protection of the Republic, as well as the meaning of individual paragraphs or facts as a whole. In the article author presents a few very specific cases he found in the collections of the Moravian Provincial Archive.","PeriodicalId":356552,"journal":{"name":"Anti-state offences yesterday and today","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133366768","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Trestný čin nedovoleného opuštění republiky v kontextu vývoje protistátních trestných činů od roku 1948","authors":"Josef Kuchta","doi":"10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-13","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-13","url":null,"abstract":"The Article solves Purposes, Object and Reasons of Filing of the subversive Crimes in the Territorium of the Czech Republic from the Year 1948 up to the Prezent. It consists in two parts – the historical and the juristic Parts. In the first Part it is described the short Knowledge in the Czech Penal Legislatur from the Year 1948 up to the present. On that Background is the Public introduced with the Adjustment of the Crime of the Unlegitimate Leaving of the Republic. The Article concerns its basic Principles and Problems, it shows Deficiences in The Legislatur and Problems with its Realisation in the Practice. It is showed its antidemocratic Character too. On the Base of Statistic this Crime was out of the historical point of view very frequent in the Practice. At the present is its Regulation out of Czech Penal Code, that is in the opposite to Basic Human Rights and it had political and ideological Charakter. It must be but observed, that any subversive Crimes must be maintained in modern democratic States.","PeriodicalId":356552,"journal":{"name":"Anti-state offences yesterday and today","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117128535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Velezrada v uhorskom stredovekom práve","authors":"Vladimír Segeš","doi":"10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-3","url":null,"abstract":"Treason, or crime of unfaithfulness (nota infidelitatis) was considered as the most serious crime in Hungarian legislation and it included several crimes. It is first mentioned in a law enacted by king Matthias in 1462 that lists approximately 20 crimes. In the 1514 Tripartitum lists more than 30 crimes in 18 points which could be subdivided into 6 subgroups: malice against property (meaning the sovereign), treason and rebellion, violence against authorities and officials, heresy, forging of official documents and money, murder and defilement of relatives. Treason was punished by head and property of the perpetrator. Eventual granting of mercy by the ruler was usually related to the capital punishment but not confiscation of property.","PeriodicalId":356552,"journal":{"name":"Anti-state offences yesterday and today","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122739725","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Trestné činy ohrozujúce zvrchovanosť v podmienkach Slovenskej republiky","authors":"Jaroslav Klátik, Jozef Michalko","doi":"10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-18","url":null,"abstract":"Criminal offenses threatening sovereignty in the conditions of the Slovak Republic are regulated in the seventh chapter of a special part of the Criminal Code as Crimes against the Republic. Criminal offenses threatening sovereignty in the conditions of the Slovak Republic are particularly dangerous for their effects on society and therefore, despite their very small occurrence, it is important that the security forces in the Slovak Republic sufficiently monitor the proceedings that could fulfill the factual nature of the crimes threatening sovereignty. The fact that these crimes, threatening sovereignty, do not occur in society makes them all the more dangerous.","PeriodicalId":356552,"journal":{"name":"Anti-state offences yesterday and today","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122820761","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Trestný čin poburovania ako nástroj politickej perzekúcie do roku 1989","authors":"Ondrej Podolec","doi":"10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-14","url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the formation, legislation, and the development of the application of the „encouraging revolt“ crimes. The charge for those verbal crime was used by the Czechoslovak communist regime as a tool of the politically motivated judicial repression since 1989 up to half of 1980s.","PeriodicalId":356552,"journal":{"name":"Anti-state offences yesterday and today","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128092484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}