Local Population Studies最新文献_第10页

Maternal Mortality: Sources and Methods 产妇死亡率:来源和方法

Local Population Studies Pub Date : 2014-12-31 DOI: 10.35488/lps93.2014.68

C. Galley, A. Reid

引用次数: 0

LPSS Spring Conference Report 2014. Populations in Crisis: from Medieval to Modern LPSS春季会议报告2014。危机中的人口:从中世纪到现代

Local Population Studies Pub Date : 2014-12-31 DOI: 10.35488/lps93.2014.4

L. Boothman, R. Burgess, Mary M. Cook

引用次数: 0

Cottage and Squatter Settlement and Encroachment on Common Waste in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: Some Evidence from Shropshire 16和17世纪的平房和棚户区以及对公共废弃物的侵占:来自什罗普郡的一些证据

Local Population Studies Pub Date : 2014-12-31 DOI: 10.35488/lps93.2014.11

J. Bowen

引用次数: 0

'Indeed a health resort'? Mortality at the Leamington Provident Dispensary, 1869–1913 “真的是疗养胜地吗?”利明顿普罗维登特药房的死亡率，1869-1913

Local Population Studies Pub Date : 2014-12-31 DOI: 10.35488/lps93.2014.54

J. Wilmot

引用次数: 0

Workhouse Populations of the Preston Union, 1841–61 普雷斯顿联盟济贫院人口，1841-61

Local Population Studies Pub Date : 2014-12-31 DOI: 10.35488/lps93.2014.33

L. Darwen

引用次数: 2

London's changing ethnic landscape, 2001-2011: a cartographic exploration. 伦敦不断变化的民族景观，2001-2011:地图探索。

Local Population Studies Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI: 10.35488/LPS92.2014.38

R. Johnston, M. Poulsen, J. Forrest

引用次数: 10

Assessing an early modern Fenland population: Whittlesey (Cambridgeshire). 评估早期现代芬兰人口:惠特尔西(剑桥郡)。

Local Population Studies Pub Date : 2014-01-01

Heather Falvey

引用次数: 0

Yet another inquiry into the trustworthiness of eighteenth-century Bills of Mortality: the Newcastle and Gateshead Bills, 1736-1840. 这是对18世纪死亡账单可信度的另一项调查:纽卡斯尔和盖茨黑德账单，1736-1840。

Local Population Studies Pub Date : 2014-01-01 DOI: 10.35488/LPS92.2014.58

G. Butler

{"title":"Yet another inquiry into the trustworthiness of eighteenth-century Bills of Mortality: the Newcastle and Gateshead Bills, 1736-1840.","authors":"G. Butler","doi":"10.35488/LPS92.2014.58","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.35488/LPS92.2014.58","url":null,"abstract":"This note is a preliminary analysis of the Newcastle and Gateshead Bills of Mortality, a hitherto unused source for understanding some of the most significant aspects of vital registration and burial practices in the North East's capital, c. 1736-1840. The Bills are annual totals of the number of burials and baptisms which took place in all of the ancient Anglican parishes in Newcastle and Gateshead. One of the most lucid aspects of the Bills is that they recorded the number of burials which took place in the 'infamous' un-consecrated burial ground of Ballast Hills located on the outskirts of the east-end of the town. Attention here is given to the initial accuracy of the Bills by focusing upon All Saints parish in Newcastle which accounted for approximately 50 per cent of the town's total population over the entire period. Here the data revealed in the Bills are compared directly with the burials which were registered by the parish clerk in All Saints. The major finding of this preliminary study is the huge discrepancy between the number of reported burials and the number of baptisms which took place in All Saints over time. The Bills also provide a fully documented account of the impact of Ballast Hills and the apparent \"export in corpses\" which was clearly taking place on a large scale. By the 1770s-1790s, this one burial ground alone, was consuming roughly 60-70 per cent of the town's dead population. The reasons behind this phenomenon are discussed by looking specifically at the possible impact of religious dissent, burial costs and burial space in the town. The note concludes that while this preliminary analysis is revealing, more work needs to be done which would involve a fuller analysis of all of the parishes recorded in the Bills as well as looking more closely at the registration of baptisms, stillbirths and the heavy \"traffic in corpses\" which was clearly a major defect of vital registration in Georgian Newcastle.","PeriodicalId":35497,"journal":{"name":"Local Population Studies","volume":"92 1","pages":"58-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69842597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Yet another inquiry into the trustworthiness of eighteenth-century Bills of Mortality: the Newcastle and Gateshead Bills, 1736-1840. 这是对18世纪死亡账单可信度的另一项调查:纽卡斯尔和盖茨黑德账单，1736-1840。

Local Population Studies Pub Date : 2014-01-01

Graham Butler

{"title":"Yet another inquiry into the trustworthiness of eighteenth-century Bills of Mortality: the Newcastle and Gateshead Bills, 1736-1840.","authors":"Graham Butler","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This note is a preliminary analysis of the Newcastle and Gateshead Bills of Mortality, a hitherto unused source for understanding some of the most significant aspects of vital registration and burial practices in the North East's capital, c. 1736-1840. The Bills are annual totals of the number of burials and baptisms which took place in all of the ancient Anglican parishes in Newcastle and Gateshead. One of the most lucid aspects of the Bills is that they recorded the number of burials which took place in the 'infamous' un-consecrated burial ground of Ballast Hills located on the outskirts of the east-end of the town. Attention here is given to the initial accuracy of the Bills by focusing upon All Saints parish in Newcastle which accounted for approximately 50 per cent of the town's total population over the entire period. Here the data revealed in the Bills are compared directly with the burials which were registered by the parish clerk in All Saints. The major finding of this preliminary study is the huge discrepancy between the number of reported burials and the number of baptisms which took place in All Saints over time. The Bills also provide a fully documented account of the impact of Ballast Hills and the apparent \"export in corpses\" which was clearly taking place on a large scale. By the 1770s-1790s, this one burial ground alone, was consuming roughly 60-70 per cent of the town's dead population. The reasons behind this phenomenon are discussed by looking specifically at the possible impact of religious dissent, burial costs and burial space in the town. The note concludes that while this preliminary analysis is revealing, more work needs to be done which would involve a fuller analysis of all of the parishes recorded in the Bills as well as looking more closely at the registration of baptisms, stillbirths and the heavy \"traffic in corpses\" which was clearly a major defect of vital registration in Georgian Newcastle.</p>","PeriodicalId":35497,"journal":{"name":"Local Population Studies","volume":" 92","pages":"58-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32550587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Migrants and the media in nineteenth-century Liverpool. 19世纪利物浦的移民与媒体。

Local Population Studies Pub Date : 2014-01-01

Colin G Pooley

引用次数: 0