Yet another inquiry into the trustworthiness of eighteenth-century Bills of Mortality: the Newcastle and Gateshead Bills, 1736-1840.

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Local Population Studies Pub Date : 2014-01-01
Graham Butler
{"title":"Yet another inquiry into the trustworthiness of eighteenth-century Bills of Mortality: the Newcastle and Gateshead Bills, 1736-1840.","authors":"Graham Butler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This note is a preliminary analysis of the Newcastle and Gateshead Bills of Mortality, a hitherto unused source for understanding some of the most significant aspects of vital registration and burial practices in the North East's capital, c. 1736-1840. The Bills are annual totals of the number of burials and baptisms which took place in all of the ancient Anglican parishes in Newcastle and Gateshead. One of the most lucid aspects of the Bills is that they recorded the number of burials which took place in the 'infamous' un-consecrated burial ground of Ballast Hills located on the outskirts of the east-end of the town. Attention here is given to the initial accuracy of the Bills by focusing upon All Saints parish in Newcastle which accounted for approximately 50 per cent of the town's total population over the entire period. Here the data revealed in the Bills are compared directly with the burials which were registered by the parish clerk in All Saints. The major finding of this preliminary study is the huge discrepancy between the number of reported burials and the number of baptisms which took place in All Saints over time. The Bills also provide a fully documented account of the impact of Ballast Hills and the apparent \"export in corpses\" which was clearly taking place on a large scale. By the 1770s-1790s, this one burial ground alone, was consuming roughly 60-70 per cent of the town's dead population. The reasons behind this phenomenon are discussed by looking specifically at the possible impact of religious dissent, burial costs and burial space in the town. The note concludes that while this preliminary analysis is revealing, more work needs to be done which would involve a fuller analysis of all of the parishes recorded in the Bills as well as looking more closely at the registration of baptisms, stillbirths and the heavy \"traffic in corpses\" which was clearly a major defect of vital registration in Georgian Newcastle.</p>","PeriodicalId":35497,"journal":{"name":"Local Population Studies","volume":" 92","pages":"58-72"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local Population Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This note is a preliminary analysis of the Newcastle and Gateshead Bills of Mortality, a hitherto unused source for understanding some of the most significant aspects of vital registration and burial practices in the North East's capital, c. 1736-1840. The Bills are annual totals of the number of burials and baptisms which took place in all of the ancient Anglican parishes in Newcastle and Gateshead. One of the most lucid aspects of the Bills is that they recorded the number of burials which took place in the 'infamous' un-consecrated burial ground of Ballast Hills located on the outskirts of the east-end of the town. Attention here is given to the initial accuracy of the Bills by focusing upon All Saints parish in Newcastle which accounted for approximately 50 per cent of the town's total population over the entire period. Here the data revealed in the Bills are compared directly with the burials which were registered by the parish clerk in All Saints. The major finding of this preliminary study is the huge discrepancy between the number of reported burials and the number of baptisms which took place in All Saints over time. The Bills also provide a fully documented account of the impact of Ballast Hills and the apparent "export in corpses" which was clearly taking place on a large scale. By the 1770s-1790s, this one burial ground alone, was consuming roughly 60-70 per cent of the town's dead population. The reasons behind this phenomenon are discussed by looking specifically at the possible impact of religious dissent, burial costs and burial space in the town. The note concludes that while this preliminary analysis is revealing, more work needs to be done which would involve a fuller analysis of all of the parishes recorded in the Bills as well as looking more closely at the registration of baptisms, stillbirths and the heavy "traffic in corpses" which was clearly a major defect of vital registration in Georgian Newcastle.

这是对18世纪死亡账单可信度的另一项调查:纽卡斯尔和盖茨黑德账单,1736-1840。
这篇笔记是对纽卡斯尔和盖茨黑德死亡记录的初步分析,这是迄今为止未被使用的资料,可以用来了解1736-1840年间东北首都生命登记和埋葬实践的一些最重要方面。这些账单是每年在纽卡斯尔和盖茨黑德所有古老的圣公会教区举行的葬礼和洗礼的总数。《账单》中最清晰的一个方面是,它们记录了在该镇东端郊区“臭名昭著的”非圣化墓地——压载山——举行的葬礼的数量。在这里,通过关注纽卡斯尔的众圣徒教区来关注账单的最初准确性,该教区在整个时期约占该镇总人口的50%。在这里,账单上显示的数据直接与教区办事员在万圣区登记的埋葬情况进行了比较。这项初步研究的主要发现是,随着时间的推移,据报道的葬礼数量与在万圣区举行的洗礼数量之间存在巨大差异。法案还提供了关于压载山的影响和明显的“尸体出口”的充分记录,这显然是大规模发生的。到18世纪70年代至90年代,仅这一块墓地就消耗了该镇大约60%至70%的死亡人口。这一现象背后的原因是通过具体观察宗教异议、埋葬成本和埋葬空间在城镇的可能影响来讨论的。该报告的结论是,虽然初步的分析是有意义的,但还需要做更多的工作,包括对法案中记录的所有教区进行更全面的分析,以及更仔细地研究洗礼、死产和大量“尸体交易”的登记,这显然是格鲁吉亚纽卡斯尔生命登记的主要缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Local Population Studies
Local Population Studies Social Sciences-Demography
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: The journal Local Population Studies was first published as a newsletter and magazine in 1968. Since then it has become a more formal journal. It is published bi-annually and is the world"s only journal on matters relating to population within a local or community context. Its emphasis is on Great Britain, but occasional articles about other local communities are published. Subscription to Local Population Studies is included within membership of the LPSS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信