Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia最新文献_第5页

Where Is the Archeological Evidence of the Existence of a Khazar State? 可萨国家存在的考古证据在哪里?

Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611959.2018.1513287

G. E. Afanas’ev

{"title":"Where Is the Archeological Evidence of the Existence of a Khazar State?","authors":"G. E. Afanas’ev","doi":"10.1080/10611959.2018.1513287","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2018.1513287","url":null,"abstract":"The role of archeology in solving issues of Khazar history is evident. Khazar cultural heritage in Eastern Europe should be discussed through reliance on archaeological material of reliably established Khazar cultural attribution. While searching for such material one sometimes is faced with curious cases far from science, as well as scientific guesswork. Such free interpretations of the archaeological sources, ignoring known methodical procedures and attributing Saltovo archaeological culture and its variants too loosely has resulted in discrediting the very existence of Khazar cultural heritage in Eastern Europe. This particularly relates to the attribution of certain tribal entities to the Khazars. Khazar antiquities do exist in South Russia, but they are not represented by Saltovo culture in any strict classical meaning of the term. The territory of the Khazar domain may be archeologically marked by meticulous analysis and historical interpretation of three categories of archeological sources dated from the second half of the 8 th - first half of the 10 th centuries: 1) spatial distribution of fortresses of the Byzantine type that guarded the Khazar borders; 2) three directions of migrations marked by catacomb burial rites of Alan tribes settled along the Khazar frontier for its protection; 3) geographical spread of burial sites displaying kurgan burials encircled with square-shaped ditches - the monuments left by the Khazar tribes proper.","PeriodicalId":35495,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","volume":"57 1","pages":"166 - 189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611959.2018.1513287","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43890333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Editor’s Introduction: The Khazar Khanate Revisited 编者简介：哈扎尔汗国再访

Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611959.2018.1531672

M. Balzer

引用次数: 0

Semikarakory: The Tower on the North Wall and a Relative Chronology of the Lower Don Khazar Forts 塞米喀喇昆仑：北墙上的塔和下唐哈扎尔要塞的相对年代

Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611959.2018.1513294

Valerii S. Flërov

引用次数: 0

A Catacomb of Khazar Times from the Dargavs Burial Site in North Ossetia 北奥塞梯达尔加夫斯墓葬遗址的哈扎尔时代地下墓穴

Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611959.2018.1513296

R. G. Dzattiaty, P. S. Uspenskii

引用次数: 0

The Ethnopolitical Situation in Khazaria in the 830s–850s 830 - 850年代可萨里亚的民族政治形势

Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611959.2018.1513286

Igor G. Semenov

引用次数: 0

Horsemen’s Burials on the Territory of the Northwestern Caucasus (Based on the Materials of Eighth–Thirteenth Century Cremation Necropolises) 西北高加索地区骑兵的墓葬(基于8 - 13世纪火葬墓地的资料)

Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Pub Date : 2018-07-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611959.2018.1513295

P. S. Uspenskii

引用次数: 1

Transcarpathia Judaizers: Religious Dynamism and Confessional Identity 跨喀尔巴阡山犹太教徒：宗教动力与忏悔身份

Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Pub Date : 2018-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611959.2018.1495925

A. Lvov

引用次数: 0

Verbal Clichés of Followers in the “Anastasia” New Religious Movement “阿纳斯塔西娅”新宗教运动追随者的言语陈词滥调

Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Pub Date : 2018-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611959.2018.1488451

J. Andreeva

引用次数: 0

Editor’s Introduction: New and Old Religious Movements: Christian and Judaic Diversity in Eurasia 编者简介:新旧宗教运动:欧亚大陆基督教和犹太教的多样性

Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Pub Date : 2018-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611959.2018.1506211

M. Balzer

{"title":"Editor’s Introduction: New and Old Religious Movements: Christian and Judaic Diversity in Eurasia","authors":"M. Balzer","doi":"10.1080/10611959.2018.1506211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2018.1506211","url":null,"abstract":"Official Russian Orthodoxy recently memorialized the centenary of the assassinations of the last Russian Tsar Nicholas II and his Romanov family in Ekaterinburg, with Patriarch Kirill leading thousands of mourning Orthodox believers in a solemn icon-carrying procession for 21 kilometers. It was a well-publicized, vivid manifestation of how the official church has attempted to revitalize itself, even as competition from “usual suspect” Protestant Evangelicals and less familiar sources has flourished throughout Eurasia. This issue explores some of the more obscure yet fascinating dynamics of religious fermentation and competition, on the peripheries of Russian religious practice and in one of its cultural centers, St. Petersburg. In the post-Soviet period, from Transcarpathia in the mountains of Ukraine to Far Eastern Mongolia, and everywhere in between, new thirst for spirituality in diverse contexts has led to politically meaningful ritual reform as well as textual reinterpretations emerging out of the biblical traditions of Russian Orthodoxy and other Christianities. In some cases, this has resulted in new creative versions of Judaism, while in others it has linked with world trends vaguely termed “New Age” spirituality. Such processes are characterized under the rubric of “desecularization” by the talented researchers of Russia who study it. Our lead article is by Julia Andreeva, a field-based, deeply immersed researcher of a burgeoning new religious movement called “Anastasia” for its striking female prophet, or more conventionally called “Ringing Anthropology & Archeology of Eurasia, vol. 57, no. 2, 2018, pp. 83–87. © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1061-1959 (print)/1558-092X (online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2018.1506211","PeriodicalId":35495,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","volume":"57 1","pages":"83 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45295361","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Russian Diaspora in Mongolia: Stages of the Formation of Frontier Religiosity 旅居蒙古的俄罗斯人:边疆宗教形成的几个阶段

Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia Pub Date : 2018-04-03 DOI: 10.1080/10611959.2018.1470428

A. Mikhalev

{"title":"The Russian Diaspora in Mongolia: Stages of the Formation of Frontier Religiosity","authors":"A. Mikhalev","doi":"10.1080/10611959.2018.1470428","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611959.2018.1470428","url":null,"abstract":"This article, on the problem of religiosity in frontier communities, examines the transformation of ethnic Russian religiosity in Mongolia. In tracing how change in borders can affect religious identity, we find that a community existing under conditions of a constantly changing border most likely cannot preserve a religious tradition. With the end of the imperial period in Russia’s history, Orthodoxy became simply an element of collective memory, determining identity for ethnic Russians permanently residing in Mongolia. For this reason, the author introduces for scholarly circulation the concept of “memory of Orthodoxy.” It assumes a set of commemorative practices without church-going and without the church as a formal institution. Such lacuna led to a specific type of frontier religiosity, reliant on two or three traditions. Dual-faith and triple-faith are widespread phenomena among peoples of Inner Asia, often expressed as a combination of Buddhism and shamanism. Ethnic Russian colonization of Mongolia, launched from eastern Siberia where such practices were widely prevalent, led to their entrenchment. Cultural borrowings from the Mongols were not limited to religion alone; they involved language and everyday life. Russian identity was refined, as Russians became “local Russians” and then simply “locals.” The tie to local traditions and to the border as a resource opened new opportunities for a broader choice of confessions. The chronological span of the research encompasses the ethnic Russian diaspora in Mongolia from the late nineteenth century to the early twenty-first.","PeriodicalId":35495,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology and Archeology of Eurasia","volume":"57 1","pages":"128 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10611959.2018.1470428","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46777151","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0