发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 11 DE JULIO DE 2018 (432/2018) 对2018年7月11日最高法院判决的评论(432/2018)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil Pub Date : 2019-09-27 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.22
Mariano Yzquierdo Tolsada
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 11 DE JULIO DE 2018 (432/2018)","authors":"Mariano Yzquierdo Tolsada","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.22","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":345465,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129986946","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 18 DE JULIO DE 2018 (453/2018) 对2018年7月18日最高法院判决的评论(453/2018)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil Pub Date : 2019-09-27 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.11
B. Abad
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 18 DE JULIO DE 2018 (453/2018)","authors":"B. Abad","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.11","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":345465,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130227263","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 30 DE MAYO DE 2018 (316/2018) 对2018年5月30日最高法院判决的评论(316/2018)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil Pub Date : 2019-09-27 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.35
F. D. P. B. Gascó
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 30 DE MAYO DE 2018 (316/2018)","authors":"F. D. P. B. Gascó","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.35","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.35","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":345465,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122955818","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 19 DE FEBRERO DE 2018 (89/2018) 对2018年2月19日最高法院判决的评论(89/2018)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil Pub Date : 2019-09-27 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.23
Javier Mendieta Grande
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 19 DE FEBRERO DE 2018 (89/2018)","authors":"Javier Mendieta Grande","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.23","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.23","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":345465,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125866480","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 7 DE FEBRERO DE 2018 (67/2018) 对2018年2月7日最高法院判决的评论(67/2018)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil Pub Date : 2019-09-27 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.14
Carmen Otero García-Castrillón
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 7 DE FEBRERO DE 2018 (67/2018)","authors":"Carmen Otero García-Castrillón","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.14","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":345465,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122363424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LAS SENTENCIAS DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 20 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2018 (671/2018) Y 22 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2018 (661/2018) 对最高法院2018年11月20日(671/2018)和2018年11月22日(661/2018)判决的评论
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil Pub Date : 2019-09-27 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.29
J. P. Hereza
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LAS SENTENCIAS DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 20 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2018 (671/2018) Y 22 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2018 (661/2018)","authors":"J. P. Hereza","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.29","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.29","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":345465,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124527037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 20 DE JULIO DE 2018 (473/2018) 对2018年7月20日最高法院判决的评论(473/2018)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil Pub Date : 2019-09-27 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.18
R. T. Arregui
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 20 DE JULIO DE 2018 (473/2018)","authors":"R. T. Arregui","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.18","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":345465,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130566401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO 对最高法院判决的评论
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil Pub Date : 2019-09-27 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.28
R. Trejo
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO","authors":"R. Trejo","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.28","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":345465,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil","volume":"11 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132398244","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 28 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2018 (671/2018) 对2018年11月28日最高法院判决的评论(671/2018)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil Pub Date : 2019-09-27 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.8
F. Lanzón
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 28 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2018 (671/2018)","authors":"F. Lanzón","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.8","url":null,"abstract":"Asunto: En una escritura de préstamo hipotecario se fija como interés de demora el 25%. El Tribunal Supremo resuelve que es una cláusula abusiva por exceder en más de dos puntos el interés remuneratorio, reiterando doctrina del propio tribunal que ha ratificado el TJUE. La consecuencia de esa abusividad es que es cláusula es nula y no puede integrarse por la vía de moderar el porcentaje, sino que queda sin aplicación. Ello no obstante, eso no significa que no se aplique ningún interés al préstamo, sino que queda vigente el interés remuneratorio.","PeriodicalId":345465,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125796293","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 17 DE ABRIL DE 2018 (2058/2017) 对2018年4月17日最高法院判决的评论(2058/2017)
Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil Pub Date : 2019-09-27 DOI: 10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.20
Alfonso Luis Calvo Caravaca, Javier Carrascosa González
{"title":"COMENTARIO DE LA SENTENCIA DEL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE 17 DE ABRIL DE 2018 (2058/2017)","authors":"Alfonso Luis Calvo Caravaca, Javier Carrascosa González","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvr7f9dp.20","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":345465,"journal":{"name":"Comentarios a las Sentencias de Unificación de Doctrina. Civil y Mercantil","volume":"110 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122571286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信