At-Tanwir Law Review最新文献

{"title":"EFEKTIFITAS UNDANG-UNDANG NO.8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN (STUDI TERHADAP NASABAH PEMEGANG KARTU KREDIT BANK MANDIRI)","authors":"Muh. Amin Dali","doi":"10.31314/atlarev.v2i2.2029","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31314/atlarev.v2i2.2029","url":null,"abstract":"Secara umum tujuan penelitian dimaksudkan untuk mendeskripsikan secara analitis tentang perlindungan hukum terhadap nasabah pemegang kartu kredit, sedangkan secara khusus tujuan penelitian adalah Mengetahui & menganalisa efektifitas hukum terhadap nasabah kartu kredit ditinjau dari UUPK No. 8 Tahun 1999 serta mengetahui faktor-faktor yang menjadi kendala dalam perlindungan nasabah kartu kredit. Melalui metode pendekatan normative yuridis penulis mencoba untuk menjawab permasalahan yang ada hubungan hukum antara bank sebagai pemberi jasa kartu kredit terhadap nasabahnya, serta faktor–factor penghambat terhadap perlindungan nasabah kartu kredit. Berdasarkan pada hasil penelitian perlindungan hukum terhadap nasabah kartu kredit belum berjalan sebagaimana mestinya. Pemberian informasi melalui media cetak maupun elekronik tersebut ternyata tidak menguntungkan nasabah kartu kredit khususnya pada saat penandatangan aplikasi, hubungan hukum yang timbul tidak seimbang, demikian juga terhadap faktor – factor penghambat dari perlindungan hukum terhadap nasabah kartu kredit ternyata lebih menguntungkan pihak bank. Upaya Perlindungan hukum terhadap nasabah kartu kredit hanya dapat terwujud dengan adanya partisipasi dari berbagai pihak. Pihak nasabah harus bersikap lebih proaktif untuk mengetahui hak dan kewajibannya dan juga pihak bank hendaknya lebih bersikap terbuka dan memperbaiki kinerjanya. Dengan adanya kondisi yang seimbang baik bank maupun nasabah maka perlindungan akan berjalan sebagaimana diharapkan. Meskipun sekarang ini Pemerintah telah mensahkan Undang – undang No. 11 Tahun 2003 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elekronik namun pada kenyataannya peran dari UU tersebut dirasakan belum efisien. Hal ini dirasakan belum cukup untuk melindungi masyarakat dan pihak – pihak yang berkepentingan, masih diperlukan perumusan yang lebih representatif yang dapat menjangkau semua bentuk kejahatan dengan menggunakan kartu kredit.","PeriodicalId":337072,"journal":{"name":"At-Tanwir Law Review","volume":"79 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128704671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Hukum Harta Bersama Dalam Nikah Siri","authors":"Muh. Amin Dali","doi":"10.31314/atlarev.v1i2.1647","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31314/atlarev.v1i2.1647","url":null,"abstract":"One of the polemics that remains interesting to study is unregistered marriage and its implications. Every marriage event should be recorded in front of the marriage registrar. Marriages that are not recorded are included in unregistered marriages, so they have quite large implications, one of which is the difficulty of dividing joint property in marriage. In this study, it will be discussed how the arrangement of joint assets of unregistered married couples after divorce according to Islamic families. The purpose of this study is to know the arrangement of joint property after divorce for unregistered married couples according to Islamic law, and to know the arrangement of joint property after divorce for unregistered married couples according to Islamic families. This research was conducted with a literature study approach, in which the data were analyzed by means of normative analysis. The results show that Islamic law does not regulate the distribution of joint property in marriage. However, from the point of view of the discovery of the law, joint property is included in 'urf which does not conflict with Islamic law. Shared assets also contain benefits and benefits for husband and wife. According to Islamic law which refers to the urf and maṣlaḥah mursalah methods, joint property must be divided after a divorce occurs, even if the divorce is from an unregistered marriage. The arrangement of the distribution follows customary law (urf) in one particular area. Joint assets of a married couple can be divided after a divorce occurs. However, the arrangement for the distribution of assets must go through the following procedures: First, married couples who are already divorced (divorced) must first apply for marriage isbat. Second, after the application is granted and a marriage certificate is obtained, the couple must apply for a divorce certificate through the Court. Third, after a divorce has been determined between the two, only then can the two spouses settle the joint property, and the distribution is equal. For unregistered married couples who are divorced due to death, there are no strict rules regarding the procedures and methods of dividing assets with unregistered married couples.","PeriodicalId":337072,"journal":{"name":"At-Tanwir Law Review","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127920823","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Peran Advokat Dalam Proses Pendampingan Hukum Ditingkat Penyidikan Ditinjau Dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana","authors":"Suslianto Suslianto","doi":"10.31314/atlarev.v1i2.1644","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31314/atlarev.v1i2.1644","url":null,"abstract":"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami Peran Advokat Dalam Proses Pendampingan Hukum Ditingkat Penyidikan Ditinjau Dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. Hasil penelitian ini, Terhadap peran advokat dalam melakukan pendampingan hukum ditingkat penyidikan yang ditinjau dari ketentuan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana khususnya dalam ketentuan Pasal 115 KUHAP, dimana advokat hanya dapat mengikuti jalannya pemeriksaan, tetapi hanya melihat saja, mendengar jalannya pemeriksaan, karena dalam hal ini penasehat hukum yang peranannya pasif dalam proses penyidikan dikurangi lagi semakin pasif dalam hal tindak pidana terhadap keamanan negara. Dengan pembatasan di dalam ketentuan Pasal 115 KUHAP bahwa peranan advoakat atau penasehat hukum hanya melihat dan mendengar jalannya proses penyidikan.","PeriodicalId":337072,"journal":{"name":"At-Tanwir Law Review","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126288718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"ANALISIS YURIDIS UJARAN KEBENCIAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH JERINX KEPADA IKATAN DOKTER INDONESIA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE","authors":"Ginanjar Rizki Danang Prasetyo","doi":"10.31314/atlarev.v1i2.2353","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31314/atlarev.v1i2.2353","url":null,"abstract":"This writing aims to find out how the development of technology and digital information has doubled the acceleration of messages through electronics, thus giving rise to practices and values in various content in digital media. In this era of progress, it is undeniable that all forms of technology are increasingly developing rapidly every day, one of which is social media, social media brings users to facilitate all forms of activities in daily life and even makes users feel dependent on social media. It is undeniable that with the development of technology and information there are various problems, which are known as Cyber Crime. Cybercrime is an act where someone misuses digital technology or commits a crime not directly but through the intermediary of electronic devices such as cellphones, tablets, computers, etc. and is used on internet technology digitally and with the intention of violating the law. One of the forms of crime is hate speech, which is a crime nowadays that many people violate language politeness. Hate speech is an action taken by one or more people in the form of incitement, provocation, or insult to others in several aspects such as ethnicity, religion, race, gender, skin color, disability, sexual orientation.","PeriodicalId":337072,"journal":{"name":"At-Tanwir Law Review","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122539815","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"PENGADAAN TANAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM DALAM PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG PENGADAAN TANAH BAGI PEMBANGUNAN UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM","authors":"Warsito Kasim","doi":"10.31314/atlarev.v1i2.2354","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31314/atlarev.v1i2.2354","url":null,"abstract":"Pelaksanaan pembebasan hak atas tanah untuk kepentingan umum belum sesuai dengan tehnis dan prosedur yang harus dilakukan, terutama pada pemberian ganti rugi. Masyarakat merasa nilai ganti rugi belum sesuai seperti yang mereka harapkan, hal ini merupakan salah satu penghambat proyek pembangunan baik infrastruktur maupun fasilitas umum lainnya. Hal tersebut disebabkan Kurangnya pemahaman masyarakat tentang mekanisme dan prinsip-prinsip pengadaan tanah untuk pembangunan bagi kepentingan umum serta kurangnya sosialisasi terhadap perhitungan nilai ganti rugi oleh tim apresur, selanjutnya Konsep pembebasan tanah untuk kepentingan umum tidak cukup hanya berdasarkan undang-undang nomor 2 tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah bagi pembangunan untuk kepentingan umum, namum harus memperhatikan konsep 3 in 1 in the Land Acquisition yakni Keadilan, Kepastian dan Kemanfaatan serta terhadap permasalahan ganti rugi perlu melakukan pendekatan terhadap masyarakat melalui lembaga adat.","PeriodicalId":337072,"journal":{"name":"At-Tanwir Law Review","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130941863","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}