UIR Law Review最新文献

{"title":"Perlindungan Hukum Pejabat Notaris Di Pekanbaru Ditinjau Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris","authors":"Yulfita Rahim, Syafrinaldi Syafrinaldi, Thamrin S","doi":"10.25299/uirlrev.2021.vol5(2).7890","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25299/uirlrev.2021.vol5(2).7890","url":null,"abstract":"Notaris dalam menjalankan profesinya memberikan jasa dan pengabdian hukum kepada masyarakat perlu mendapatkan perlindungan dan jaminan demi tercapainya kepastian hukum. Jaminan perlindungan dan jaminan tercapainya kepastian hukum terhadap pelaksanaan tugas dan fungsi Notaris telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Perubahan dasar hukum ini dimaksudkan untuk lebih menegaskan dan memantapkan tugas, fungsi, dan kewenangan Notaris sebagai pejabat yang menjalankan pelayanan publik, sekaligus sinkronisasi dengan undang-undang lain. Peran dari Jabatan Notaris di Indonesia demikian juga di Kota Pekanbaru sangat penting bagi masyarakat dalam penyelesaian berbagai permasalahan hokum yang dihadapi oleh masyarakat, salah satunya adalah dalam menerbitkan akta otentik. Hak-hak profesi Jabatan Notaris terutama mengenai hak keperdataannya, idealnya harus mendapatkan perlindungan hukum dalam menjalankan profesinya, tetapi nyatanya Notaris dalam menjalankan tugasnya tersebut sering pula tidak mendapatkan perlindungan hokum sebagaimana mestinya, akibatnya Notaris dihadapkan dengan proses hokum perdata atau pidana.","PeriodicalId":32475,"journal":{"name":"UIR Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48098014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Problematika Kebijakan Penegakan Hukuman Pidana Mati Untuk Koruptor Pada Masa Pandemi Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19)","authors":"Wildan Tantowi, Natasya Saraswati, Viola Sekarayu Gayatri","doi":"10.25299/UIRLREV.2021.VOL5(1).6123","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25299/UIRLREV.2021.VOL5(1).6123","url":null,"abstract":"This research examines the problems arising from the criminal law policy of imposing the death penalty for corruptors during the Covid-19 pandemic. C. Law Number 31 of 1999 which has been amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes is one of the weapons to fight corruption in Indonesia, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic as a national non-natural disaster which has been a serious concern of the government.  In the event of corruption cases occur during the Covid-19 pandemic, such criminal cases should be tackled in an extraordinary and special way because the impact of Covid-19 pandemic has affected all sectors of life, one of which is the economy. Considering the Covid-19 pandemic, it is appropriate if Indonesia is currently categorized under certain conditions. It means that this condition implies that if a criminal act of corruption occurs during the Covid-19 pandemic, law enforcers can prosecute or impose a death penalty for corruption perpetrators as stipulated in Article 2 paragraph (1) and (2) of the Corruption Eradication Law. This research used the normative legal method which is carried out through literature study with the aim of writing the article to find out what weaknesses can lead to juridical problems with the enforcement of the death penalty against corruptors in Indonesia and to analyze the urgency of criminal law policy n the imposition of the death penalty for corruptors during the Covid-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":32475,"journal":{"name":"UIR Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44112929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Living Law Transplantation in Construction Criminal Medical Law","authors":"Juliana Susanti Gunawan","doi":"10.25299/UIRLREV.2020.VOL4(2).5325","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25299/UIRLREV.2020.VOL4(2).5325","url":null,"abstract":"Laws live and develop from patterns of behavior in society, laws are not free of values, between legality and justice are inseparable. Laws made by the authority of sovereign states that are regulated and have sanctions can work effectively if there is a relationship of moral values that provide essential justice. Medical Criminal Law (MCL) regarding medical action has not been comprehensively regulated in the legal subsystem in the health sector. The complexity of the problems that arise in society is always growing which is followed by rapid advances in medical science and technology so that MCL is needed for legal certainty for medical personnel and legal protection for the community. Literature study in normative analytical research with a conceptual approach offers the idea of moral transplantation in the construction of MCL can be built under the values that live and develop in society (living law) based on the principle of material legality","PeriodicalId":32475,"journal":{"name":"UIR Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44776553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"SOLUSI DALAM PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORPORASI DITINJAU DARI ASPEK KRITERIA DAN POLA PEMIDANAAN","authors":"Irfan Ardiansyah","doi":"10.25299/UIRLREV.2019.VOL3(01).2095","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25299/UIRLREV.2019.VOL3(01).2095","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":32475,"journal":{"name":"UIR Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"44107004","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Tinjauan Hukum Tentang Penjualan Aplikasi Berbayar Dengan Cara Pinjam Akun Pribadi (Apple Id)","authors":"Ika Ramadhani","doi":"10.25299/UIRLREV.2018.VOL2(02).1551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25299/UIRLREV.2018.VOL2(02).1551","url":null,"abstract":"The research was aimed at knowing the validity of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence and the legal impact of selling paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID). The research was a normative legal research. The approach used were statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal source used were primary, secondary, tertiary legal resources. Legal sources were collected by using literature study supplemented with interview. The collected legal sources were analyzed qualitatively. The research results indicate that the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence constitutes an illegal act because there is no right use transfer between Apple as the provider of apps that are available in App Store to the owner of Apple ID as the user of the application. The legal impact of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account constitutes branch of a contract which can be asked for liability based on Article 32 Law No 11 of 2008 concerning Information Electronic Transactions, Law No 28 of 2014 corcerning Copyright. And Terms and Condition provided by Apple Inc.The research was aimed at knowing the validity of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence and the legal impact of selling paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID). The research was a normative legal research. The approach used were statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal source used were primary, secondary, tertiary legal resources. Legal sources were collected by using literature study supplemented with interview. The collected legal sources were analyzed qualitatively. The research results indicate that the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence constitutes an illegal act because there is no right use transfer between Apple as the provider of apps that are available in App Store to the owner of Apple ID as the user of the application. The legal impact of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account constitutes branch of a contract which can be asked for liability based on Article 32 Law No 11 of 2008 concerning Information Electronic Transactions, Law No 28 of 2014 corcerning Copyright. And Terms and Condition provided by Apple Inc. \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":32475,"journal":{"name":"UIR Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"46398620","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Undang-Undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 Tentang Pernikahan (Perkawinan) di Tinjau dari Maqashid Syariah","authors":"N. Nurhadi","doi":"10.25299/UIRLREV.2018.VOL2(02).1841","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25299/UIRLREV.2018.VOL2(02).1841","url":null,"abstract":"Abstrak \u0000Zaman modern serta globalisasi digitalisasi mengantarkan manusia pada era baru, sehingga godaan demi godaan yang datang sebagai ujian dan kadang malapetaka bagi pelaku pernikahan. Sehingga tujuan pernikahan dalam Islam saat sekarang adalah sebagai upaya prefentif agar terpelihara dari perbuatan melanggar hukum (zina dan perbuatan keji).  Kelangsungan kehidupan manusia yang sehat sehingga rumah tangga dipenuhi kasih sayang serta saling membantu keduanya untuk kemashlahatan  dunia dan akhirat, juga upaya memelihara keutuhan manusia dari kerusakan akhlak dan moral (hifzh al-Nasl) dalam menjalani hidup saling berpasang sesuai fitrahnya. Peraturan hukum yang menentukan prosedur yang dilalui, juga ketentuan hukum dan akibat hukumnya disebut hukum perkawinan. Lalu bagaimana UU No.1 tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan di tinjau dari maqashid syariah. Metode Penelitian ini menggunakan konsep kualitatif, dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif secara in-concreto dan singkronisasi hukum, dengan memakai metode contents analisis serta alat ukurnya kemaslahatan (maqasid syariah). Maqashid syariah UUP memuat tiga subtansi yaitu: 1). Maqashid al-Ammah: Tujuan perkawinan membentuk keluarga bahagia (samara) berdasar Ketuhanan Maha Esa (Allah) dan perlunya pencatatan maqashidnya li hifzu al-Din wa al-Nasl wa al-Kitabah wa al-Mashlahah (memlihara agama, keturunan dan tercacat demi kemaslahatan). 2). Maqashid al-Khassah: Fungsinya li al-Bayan al-Shahah fi al-Aqdi fi syiasyah al-Dauliyah (penegasan legalitas akad perkawinan secara hukum kenegaraan). 3). Maqashid al-Juziyah: Keadilanya li al-Adalati wa al-Hukmi baina al-Nas wa al-Khusus fi al-Muslim (keadilan semua umat khususnya muslim). Maqashid Kulliyah li hifzi al-Din (agama) wa al-Nafsi (jiwa) wa al-Aqli (akal) wa al-Nasl (keturunan) wa al-Mall (harta) wa al-'ardh (harga diri) dan al-'adl (keadilan) disempurnakan dengan al-kitabah (tertulis atau tercatat) supaya al-Ikhtiyari (sukarela), al-Amanah (menepati janji), al-Ikhtiyati (kehati-hatian), al-Luzum (tidak berubah), al-Taswiyah (kesetaraan), transparaansi, al-Taysir (kemudahan) dan iktikad baik dalam akad perkawinan serta konsensualisme, tujuan akhirnya untuk ibadah dan kemaslahatan  yaitu Jalbul al-Mashalih wa Dar’ul al-Mafasid (menegakkan kemaslahatan dan menolak kemudratan).","PeriodicalId":32475,"journal":{"name":"UIR Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49305519","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}