私人账户(Apple Id)应付应用程序销售

Ika Ramadhani
{"title":"私人账户(Apple Id)应付应用程序销售","authors":"Ika Ramadhani","doi":"10.25299/UIRLREV.2018.VOL2(02).1551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research was aimed at knowing the validity of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence and the legal impact of selling paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID). The research was a normative legal research. The approach used were statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal source used were primary, secondary, tertiary legal resources. Legal sources were collected by using literature study supplemented with interview. The collected legal sources were analyzed qualitatively. The research results indicate that the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence constitutes an illegal act because there is no right use transfer between Apple as the provider of apps that are available in App Store to the owner of Apple ID as the user of the application. The legal impact of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account constitutes branch of a contract which can be asked for liability based on Article 32 Law No 11 of 2008 concerning Information Electronic Transactions, Law No 28 of 2014 corcerning Copyright. And Terms and Condition provided by Apple Inc.The research was aimed at knowing the validity of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence and the legal impact of selling paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID). The research was a normative legal research. The approach used were statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal source used were primary, secondary, tertiary legal resources. Legal sources were collected by using literature study supplemented with interview. The collected legal sources were analyzed qualitatively. The research results indicate that the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence constitutes an illegal act because there is no right use transfer between Apple as the provider of apps that are available in App Store to the owner of Apple ID as the user of the application. The legal impact of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account constitutes branch of a contract which can be asked for liability based on Article 32 Law No 11 of 2008 concerning Information Electronic Transactions, Law No 28 of 2014 corcerning Copyright. And Terms and Condition provided by Apple Inc. \n ","PeriodicalId":32475,"journal":{"name":"UIR Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tinjauan Hukum Tentang Penjualan Aplikasi Berbayar Dengan Cara Pinjam Akun Pribadi (Apple Id)\",\"authors\":\"Ika Ramadhani\",\"doi\":\"10.25299/UIRLREV.2018.VOL2(02).1551\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research was aimed at knowing the validity of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence and the legal impact of selling paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID). The research was a normative legal research. The approach used were statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal source used were primary, secondary, tertiary legal resources. Legal sources were collected by using literature study supplemented with interview. The collected legal sources were analyzed qualitatively. The research results indicate that the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence constitutes an illegal act because there is no right use transfer between Apple as the provider of apps that are available in App Store to the owner of Apple ID as the user of the application. The legal impact of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account constitutes branch of a contract which can be asked for liability based on Article 32 Law No 11 of 2008 concerning Information Electronic Transactions, Law No 28 of 2014 corcerning Copyright. And Terms and Condition provided by Apple Inc.The research was aimed at knowing the validity of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence and the legal impact of selling paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID). The research was a normative legal research. The approach used were statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal source used were primary, secondary, tertiary legal resources. Legal sources were collected by using literature study supplemented with interview. The collected legal sources were analyzed qualitatively. The research results indicate that the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence constitutes an illegal act because there is no right use transfer between Apple as the provider of apps that are available in App Store to the owner of Apple ID as the user of the application. The legal impact of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account constitutes branch of a contract which can be asked for liability based on Article 32 Law No 11 of 2008 concerning Information Electronic Transactions, Law No 28 of 2014 corcerning Copyright. And Terms and Condition provided by Apple Inc. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":32475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UIR Law Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UIR Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25299/UIRLREV.2018.VOL2(02).1551\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UIR Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25299/UIRLREV.2018.VOL2(02).1551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在了解基于软件许可证的通过出借个人账户(Apple ID)销售付费应用程序的有效性,以及通过出借个人帐户(苹果ID)销售收费应用程序的法律影响。这项研究是一项规范性的法律研究。所采用的方法是法定方法和概念方法。所使用的法律资源包括第一、第二和第三法律资源。采用文献资料法和访谈法相结合的方法收集法律资料。对收集到的法律来源进行了定性分析。研究结果表明,基于软件许可通过出借个人账户(Apple ID)销售付费应用程序构成违法行为,因为苹果作为应用商店中可用应用程序的提供商,与苹果ID的所有者作为应用程序的用户之间没有权利使用权转让。通过出借个人账户销售付费应用程序的法律影响构成了合同的一部分,根据2008年关于信息电子交易的第11号法律第32条和2014年关于版权的第28号法律,可以要求承担责任。以及由苹果股份有限公司提供的条款和条件。该研究旨在了解基于软件许可证通过出借个人账户(Apple ID)销售付费应用程序的有效性,以及通过出借个人帐户(Apple ID。这项研究是一项规范性的法律研究。所采用的方法是法定方法和概念方法。所使用的法律资源包括第一、第二和第三法律资源。采用文献资料法和访谈法相结合的方法收集法律资料。对收集到的法律来源进行了定性分析。研究结果表明,基于软件许可通过出借个人账户(Apple ID)销售付费应用程序构成违法行为,因为苹果作为应用商店中可用应用程序的提供商,与苹果ID的所有者作为应用程序的用户之间没有权利使用权转让。通过出借个人账户销售付费应用程序的法律影响构成了合同的一部分,根据2008年关于信息电子交易的第11号法律第32条和2014年关于版权的第28号法律,可以要求承担责任。以及苹果股份有限公司提供的条款和条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tinjauan Hukum Tentang Penjualan Aplikasi Berbayar Dengan Cara Pinjam Akun Pribadi (Apple Id)
The research was aimed at knowing the validity of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence and the legal impact of selling paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID). The research was a normative legal research. The approach used were statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal source used were primary, secondary, tertiary legal resources. Legal sources were collected by using literature study supplemented with interview. The collected legal sources were analyzed qualitatively. The research results indicate that the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence constitutes an illegal act because there is no right use transfer between Apple as the provider of apps that are available in App Store to the owner of Apple ID as the user of the application. The legal impact of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account constitutes branch of a contract which can be asked for liability based on Article 32 Law No 11 of 2008 concerning Information Electronic Transactions, Law No 28 of 2014 corcerning Copyright. And Terms and Condition provided by Apple Inc.The research was aimed at knowing the validity of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence and the legal impact of selling paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID). The research was a normative legal research. The approach used were statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal source used were primary, secondary, tertiary legal resources. Legal sources were collected by using literature study supplemented with interview. The collected legal sources were analyzed qualitatively. The research results indicate that the sales of paid apps by lending personal account (Apple ID) based on software lisence constitutes an illegal act because there is no right use transfer between Apple as the provider of apps that are available in App Store to the owner of Apple ID as the user of the application. The legal impact of the sales of paid apps by lending personal account constitutes branch of a contract which can be asked for liability based on Article 32 Law No 11 of 2008 concerning Information Electronic Transactions, Law No 28 of 2014 corcerning Copyright. And Terms and Condition provided by Apple Inc.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信