Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo最新文献_第3页

Pushbacks of Migrants in the Mediterranean: Reconciling Border Control Measures and the Obligation to Protect Human Rights 地中海移民的遣返:协调边境控制措施和保护人权的义务

Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.21857/yvjrdcvpry

Petra Perišić, Paulina Ostojić

引用次数: 0

Teritorijalna i stvarna nadležnost Direkcije pomorskog saobraćaja u Splitu 《分割海运指令》的领土责任和实际责任

Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.21857/yrvgqtw249

Ante Vuković

引用次数: 0

Utvrđivanje granice pomorskog dobra de lege lata i de lege ferenda 确认拉脱维亚法律和会议法的海事利益

Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI: 10.21857/m16wjcngg9

Goran Vojković

引用次数: 0

Prolazak tjesnacima na primjeru rusko-ukrajinskih odnosa u Azovskom moru 塞尔维亚的旅行，例如俄罗斯和乌克兰在亚速尔海的关系

Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.21857/94kl4czr1m

Boren Petrinec, Leon Žganec-Brajša

{"title":"Prolazak tjesnacima na primjeru rusko-ukrajinskih odnosa u Azovskom moru","authors":"Boren Petrinec, Leon Žganec-Brajša","doi":"10.21857/94kl4czr1m","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21857/94kl4czr1m","url":null,"abstract":"The 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea was, inter alia , an attempt to create an integral system of rules governing passage through straits. Never-theless, straits that are entryways into pluri-state bays remain a controversial issue. An interesting example of this situation is the Kerch Strait leading into the Sea of Azov. These areas received more attention from the international community after 25 Novem-ber 2018, when three Ukrainian vessels were prevented from passing through the Kerch Strait by the authorities of the Russian Federation. The Sea of Azov is wide enough to accommodate maritime areas in which freedom of navigation exists. However, in 2003 its coastal states, the Russian Federation and Ukraine, concluded the Agreement on Coope-ration on the Use of the Sea of Azov and the Kerch Strait. In this Agreement, the coastal states proclaimed that the Sea of Azov and the Kerch Strait form part of their internal waters, citing historical reasons for doing so. Regulation concerning navigation rights contained in the Agreement is stricter than the rules governing transit passage, which would be applicable as general law. This paper addresses the question of the admissibility of applying the 2003 Agreement to its target maritime areas. Some aspects of the rights and duties of ships in passage according to the regimes of both the 2003 Agreement and transit passage contained in the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention are also considered. The reason for this examination is that both the Russian Federation and Ukraine claim that the other side failed to comply with its duties. Finally, conclusions are drawn as to which regime seems to be applicable.","PeriodicalId":32324,"journal":{"name":"Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68480103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

The Impact of the New Italian Security Regulation on the Search and Rescue of Migrants at Sea 意大利新安全条例对海上移民搜救的影响

Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.21857/y54jofkrqm

G. Marchiafava

引用次数: 0

The Prevention Principle and the Extension of Time Clauses in English Law Shipbuilding Contracts 英国法造船合同中的预防原则与延期条款

Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.21857/mnlqgc5egy

Z. Tasić

{"title":"The Prevention Principle and the Extension of Time Clauses in English Law Shipbuilding Contracts","authors":"Z. Tasić","doi":"10.21857/mnlqgc5egy","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21857/mnlqgc5egy","url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with a well-established English law principle known as the “prevention principle“ in the context of shipbuilding contracts. Under the principle, no party to a contract should benefit from its own failure to perform. In the context of shipbuilding contracts, this principle should give protection to a shipyard in the event of delays in delivery of the vessel that are caused by the buyer, and no liquidated damages should be payable by the shipyard, and the contractual delivery date should be replaced by a time reasonably required to complete the vessel. In other words, where the buyer’s default (such as delay in the buyer’s supplies, interfering with agreed modifications, failure to promptly provide and approve the vessel’s design and drawings, late payments of the contract price, etc.) affect the build schedule which results in a delay in construction and in the delivery of the vessel. Such ac-tions by the buyer might represent an act of prevention. In consequence, the delivery date set out in the shipbuilding contract should not be further binding on the builder and the contractual time for delivery of the vessel should become time at large. On the other hand, it is equally common that most shipbuilding contracts contain extension of time clauses granting shipyards an extension of the delivery period in certain events. However, pursuant to a number of English court cases, the prevention principle does not apply where the shipbuilding contract contains extension of time clauses governing permissible delays, and the liquidated damages shall still be payable, subject to extension of time clauses. This paper deals with a difficult question: if the shipyard fails (or is time barred) to claim the application of the extension of time clauses for delays caused by the buyer’s default(s), does the prevention principle still apply?","PeriodicalId":32324,"journal":{"name":"Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68484464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Primopredaja broda u gradnji u stranoj luci 在港口外的城市准备船只

Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.21857/yvjrdcl1ey

Amra Pende

引用次数: 0

Unmanned Ships: Coping in the Murky Waters of Traditional Maritime Law 无人船:应对传统海商法的浑水

Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI: 10.21857/y26kec4qd9

Damilola Osinuga

引用次数: 3

The Impact of Irregular Migrations, Smuggling and Human Trafficking on the Land Transport Industry: The Croatian Case 非正规移徙、偷运和贩运人口对陆路运输业的影响:克罗地亚案例

Poredbeno Pomorsko Pravo Pub Date : 2019-06-28 DOI: 10.21857/YRVGQTKQJ9

N. Radionov, Ivan Savić