发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
On Gadamer's Heteronomy Argument: The "Irruption" of Reality vs. its "Strategic Excision" 论伽达默尔的他律论:现实的“侵入”与“战略切割”
Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics Pub Date : 2022-09-03 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v24i1.281
J. M. Bech
{"title":"On Gadamer's Heteronomy Argument: The \"Irruption\" of Reality vs. its \"Strategic Excision\"","authors":"J. M. Bech","doi":"10.25180/lj.v24i1.281","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v24i1.281","url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to find out whether Gadamer is entitled to hold together his finitist commitment to the heteronomy of art and thought, and his advocacy of an \"endless conversation with itself\" of humankind. We focus on three texts: Gadamer’s dismis­sal of Carl Schmitt’s outside-in account of the heteronomy implied by the \"irrup­tion of reality\" in the play Hamlet and, as Archimedean point, Shakespeare’s \"excision of reality\" according to Stephen Greenblatt, and its inside-out heteronomic consequences. The results: Schmitt’s approach restricts Gadamer’s argument on the \"endless dialogue\", Gadamer’s rejoinder aggravates his own argumentative fragility, and Greenblatt’s perspectivation discloses a non-sequitur. The inspection of these texts attests that heteronomy per se does not entail any openness to \"creative\" interpretations, that a universalized logos endiéthetos is a chimera, and that there cannot be any \"infinite conversation\" which would sustain the Gadamerian interplay of question and answer.","PeriodicalId":32193,"journal":{"name":"Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"91093925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Wirkungsgeschichte and Background Metaphorics: A Reading of the Gadamer-Blumenberg Debate about Secularization
Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics Pub Date : 2022-09-03 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v24i1.278
M. Ruta
{"title":"Wirkungsgeschichte and Background Metaphorics: A Reading of the Gadamer-Blumenberg Debate about Secularization","authors":"M. Ruta","doi":"10.25180/lj.v24i1.278","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v24i1.278","url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is twofold: firstly, it aims to analyze the philosophical debate between Gadamer and Blumenberg concerning the notion of secularization, which, in the author's view, has received less attention than it deserves; secondly, it intends thereby to shed light on an ontological ambiguity in Gadamer's hermeneutics, unintentionally detected by Blumenberg in his reply to Gadamer's review of The Legitimacy of the Modern Age. The importance of the paper is both historical-philosophical and theoretical: it spells out different aspects of a philosophical discussion whose relevance concern not only the secularization debate, but more generally the philosophy of history and the role of metaphors in understanding. The most relevant original contribution consists in the usage of Blumenberg's notion of background metaphorics as a tool for interpreting the role of the notion of history of effects in Gadamer's hermeneutics.","PeriodicalId":32193,"journal":{"name":"Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77351069","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hans-Georg Gadamers Sprachlichkeit der hermeneutischen Erfahrung im Wechselspiel von Vernunft und Erfahrung, Wissenschaft und/oder soziale Vorstellungen, Tradition(en) und/oder Gemeinschaft am Beispiel von Thomas Morus' Utopia 汉斯格奥尔格·甘达默的进取心哲学与经验，科学和/或社会观念，传统(en)和/或集体，而汤玛斯·莫卢斯的理想就是如此
Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics Pub Date : 2022-09-03 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v24i1.288
U. Arnswald
{"title":"Hans-Georg Gadamers Sprachlichkeit der hermeneutischen Erfahrung im Wechselspiel von Vernunft und Erfahrung, Wissenschaft und/oder soziale Vorstellungen, Tradition(en) und/oder Gemeinschaft am Beispiel von Thomas Morus' Utopia","authors":"U. Arnswald","doi":"10.25180/lj.v24i1.288","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v24i1.288","url":null,"abstract":"Hermeneutics can be understood on the one hand as the art of interpretation, and on the other hand as a medium for dealing with the past, for conveying events, contexts or even writings in new ways of speaking for new recipients. The interpretation of writings, however, places special demands on hermeneutics: it does not take place in a sterile vacuum, but is rather embedded in a social and cultural context that shapes the interpretation or mediation and is an expression of a time, a fashion or a specific requirement of modernity. The question therefore arises as to what role reason and experience, science and/or social ideas, tradition(s) and/or community play in interpretation. \u0000Using Thomas More's masterpiece Utopia as an example, various resulting interpretative approaches to a concrete writing will be presented. Through the hermeneutic design of a historical horizon in relation to Thomas More's time as well as through the development of a historical awareness of the work, the possibility of an understanding of this world-famous, still controversial writing as well as the efficiency of Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics will become recognisable.","PeriodicalId":32193,"journal":{"name":"Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics","volume":"86 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85619822","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Modelling Speech and Speakers: Gadamer and Davidson on dialogue, agreement, and intelligible difference 建模演讲和演讲者:伽达默尔和戴维森关于对话，协议和可理解的差异
Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics Pub Date : 2022-09-03 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v24i1.280
Vladimir Lazurca
{"title":"Modelling Speech and Speakers: Gadamer and Davidson on dialogue, agreement, and intelligible difference","authors":"Vladimir Lazurca","doi":"10.25180/lj.v24i1.280","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v24i1.280","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines Gadamer's and Davidson's dialogical models of interpretation. It shows them to be comparable, but importantly dissimilar with respect to the kind of agreement they require for communication to be possible. It is argued that this difference entails different concepts of alterity: they model not only how we talk, but implicitly who we can intelligibly talk to. Another important contribution of this paper is to uncover a distinction in Gadamer between two kinds of agreement missed so far by all commentators. The final section of this paper defends a second thesis, namely that the degree of agreement required by the models is proportional to the conceptual difference it can make intelligible. Hence, the extent of graspable cultural difference is not only an empirical matter, but is entailed by our choice of model.","PeriodicalId":32193,"journal":{"name":"Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88372840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Geography of Boredom. On Bogomil Raynov's Travelling in Everyday Life 无聊地理学。论博戈米尔·雷诺夫的《日常生活中的旅行
Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics Pub Date : 2022-04-06 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v22i2.273
N. Stoyanova
{"title":"Geography of Boredom. On Bogomil Raynov's Travelling in Everyday Life","authors":"N. Stoyanova","doi":"10.25180/lj.v22i2.273","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v22i2.273","url":null,"abstract":"Thе aim of the paper is to present the problem of boredom in Bogomil Raynov’s fourth book Travelling in Everyday Life (1945). The interpretation of boredom in the novel is seen as based on the idea of a mismatch between expectation and experience. The expectation of the individual turns out to be modeled by the mass commercialization of the 20th century. The \"cultural industry\" replaces the sublime ideas of the romantic poetics with superfluous clichés, which deny the world its unpredictability, its unexpectedness. It is these kinds of clichés that are subject of irony in Bogomil Raynov's novel – false expectations create a false feeling of boredom. Boredom as a problem has been rarely discussed either by Bulgarian authors, or by Bulgarian literary historians, therefore this paper tries not only to focus scholars’ attention on it, but also to interprete it.","PeriodicalId":32193,"journal":{"name":"Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79763592","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What Is 'Victory' in the Orthodox Christian Ethics of War? 什么是东正教战争伦理中的“胜利”?
Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics Pub Date : 2021-12-29 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v23i2.269
P. Bojanić
{"title":"What Is 'Victory' in the Orthodox Christian Ethics of War?","authors":"P. Bojanić","doi":"10.25180/lj.v23i2.269","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v23i2.269","url":null,"abstract":"The text reconstructs the protocol of 'victory' as part of the interruption of enmity and establishment of temporary peace. Different understandings of the enemy and enmity imply that victory in war and cessation of conflict can essentially determine the way war is conducted, and that they follow rules of war. Victory is supposed to be a crucial moment that characterizes the ethics of war. Particular testimonies and thematizations of victory in the Orthodox Christian tradition can provide an intro-duction into a potential ethics of war that could ensure a new relationship towards the enemy and killing the enemy.","PeriodicalId":32193,"journal":{"name":"Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78965890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Contemporary Challenges for a Philosophical Theory of War. An Exposé 战争哲学理论的当代挑战。一个公开
Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics Pub Date : 2021-12-29 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v23i2.263
B. Liebsch, M. Staudigl
{"title":"Contemporary Challenges for a Philosophical Theory of War. An Exposé","authors":"B. Liebsch, M. Staudigl","doi":"10.25180/lj.v23i2.263","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v23i2.263","url":null,"abstract":"English Editorial of the special Issue on Philosophical Theories of War: Contemporary Challenges and Discussions giving an overview of the latest state of the debate. ","PeriodicalId":32193,"journal":{"name":"Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90341664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Im "Labyrinth der Legitimitäten" und Ethosanalyse. Carl Schmitt und Herfried Münkler über die neuen Kriege und Krieger 还有道德谜团和多丽分析请问卡尔史崔和赫尔弗里德
Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics Pub Date : 2021-12-29 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v23i2.266
R. Mehring
{"title":"Im \"Labyrinth der Legitimitäten\" und Ethosanalyse. Carl Schmitt und Herfried Münkler über die neuen Kriege und Krieger","authors":"R. Mehring","doi":"10.25180/lj.v23i2.266","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v23i2.266","url":null,"abstract":"In the \"Labyrinth of Legitimacy\" and Ethos Analysis. Carl Schmitt and Herfried Münkler on the New Wars and New Warriors \u0000 The article analyzes Münkler's continuation of Carl Schmitt's late work on international law in the book Kriegssplitter and emphasizes its divergent ethical approach.","PeriodicalId":32193,"journal":{"name":"Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76789131","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Rivalität, Affekt, Interesse. Ansatzpunkte einer materialistischen Kriegstheorie 对抗情感兴趣"唯心主义万岁
Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics Pub Date : 2021-12-29 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v23i2.264
C. Pollmann
{"title":"Rivalität, Affekt, Interesse. Ansatzpunkte einer materialistischen Kriegstheorie","authors":"C. Pollmann","doi":"10.25180/lj.v23i2.264","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v23i2.264","url":null,"abstract":"In debate with Bernhard H. F. Taureck, Burkhard Liebsch and other authors, we try to develop a materialistic theory of war. Central to this are the rivalries between sovereign states, which have extended and become more complex in the course of globalization. Both political-economic and symbolic-emotional interests are bundled in them. The competition between states, only partially curbed by supranational authorities, also reflects in so-called international law. In contrast to the domestic legal system, this has indeed only limited legal character, as Thucydides’ famous Melian dialogue shows.","PeriodicalId":32193,"journal":{"name":"Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics","volume":"291 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76878025","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Short Prolegomena to the Philosophy of War, in Four Problems 《四个问题》中的《战争哲学导论》
Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics Pub Date : 2021-12-29 DOI: 10.25180/lj.v23i2.267
James Dodd
{"title":"A Short Prolegomena to the Philosophy of War, in Four Problems","authors":"James Dodd","doi":"10.25180/lj.v23i2.267","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25180/lj.v23i2.267","url":null,"abstract":"Is something like a true \"philosophy of war\"—understood as a coherent system of ideas, or a clearly articulated theoretical posture adequate to fully addressing the enduring chal-lenges of war on a properly philosophical register—at all possible? What follows is an attempt to outline, in four problems, the parameters of any future critique of a philosophy of war: the problem of categories, the problem of representation, the problem of violence, and finally the problem of peace. It is argued that within each horizon delimited by these four problems philosophy encounters a potential limit, one that raises fundamental doubts regarding the cogency of any philosophy of war considered as a systematic enterprise.","PeriodicalId":32193,"journal":{"name":"Labyrinth An International Journal for Philosophy Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77989935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
首页 上一页 下一页 尾页
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书