{"title":"Skriving i naturfag : En analyse av nettbaserte undervisningsressurser fra to nasjonale sentre","authors":"Vibeke Lorentzen, Mari-Ann Igland, Randi Solheim","doi":"10.23865/NJLR.V6.2072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23865/NJLR.V6.2072","url":null,"abstract":"Denne artikkelen er basert pa en studie av et utvalg ressurser om skriving i naturfag, hentet fra nettsidene til Skrivesenteret og Naturfagsenteret. I Laereplanverket for Kunnskapsloftet inngar skriving som grunnleggende ferdighet i alle fag, som en gjennomgaende og tverrfaglig kompetanse. De nasjonale sentrene skal, ifolge sine mandat, stotte skolene i arbeidet med a implementere de grunnleggende ferdighetene. Sporsmalet vi soker svar pa i denne artikkelen, er hvordan fagrelevant skriving og skriveopplaering er forstatt og formidlet i nettressurser fra de to sentrene. Analysene viser at faginnhold og faglige uttrykk vektlegges pa ulike mater, noe som kan knyttes til ulike syn pa faglig literacy. Mens Naturfagsenterets skrivedidaktiske ressurser primaert presenterer fagovergripende perspektiver pa skriving i naturfag, legger Skrivesenteret i storre grad vekt pa fagspesifikke spraktrekk og uttrykksmater. Disse funnene blir droftet i lys av literacy-forskning og utdanningspolitiske endringer. \u0000English abstract \u0000English title: Writing in science education: An analysis of web-based resources from two national centres \u0000This article is based on a study of web-based resources for writing in science education, published by The Norwegian Centre for Science Education and the Norwegian Centre for Writing Education and Research. The Norwegian Curriculum includes writing as a basic skill in all subjects, as a comprehensive and interdisciplinary competence. The national centres should, according to their mandates, support schools in their efforts to implement the statutory basic skills. The question we seek answer to in this article, is how disciplinary writing and writing education is understood and communicated in the two centres’ web resources. The analysis shows that subject content and subject discourse are emphasized in different ways. This can be related to different perspectives on academic literacy. While the Norwegian Centre for Science Education’s writing resources primarily present generic perspectives on writing, the Writing Centre places greater emphasis on linguistic and textual features of scientific texts. These findings are discussed against a backdrop of literacy research and educational policies.","PeriodicalId":315285,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Literacy Research","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128894360","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Literacy practices in co-taught early years classrooms. Study protocol: The seaside case","authors":"Å. K. H. Wagner, Atle Skaftun, Erin M. McTigue","doi":"10.23865/NJLR.V6.2212","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23865/NJLR.V6.2212","url":null,"abstract":"The present protocol describes the background, theoretical framework and methods for a qualitative study of co-taught, Norwegian, L1 classrooms—The Seaside case. The participants are six classes and their teachers from six different schools in the Seaside municipality. All classes had one extra teacher in all 8 L1 Norwegian lessons each week, in Year One and Year Two. Co-teaching provides pedagogic potential and flexibility and can enhance students’ learning. However, evidence from teacher–student ratio research is inconsistent across contexts (Solheim et al., 2017; Solheim & Opheim, 2018), and there is also a need for studies exploring connections specifically in the Norwegian school context. Our overarching research questions are: (1) What characterizes literacy practices in L1 initial co-taught literacy lessons? (2) How is the extra teacher resource utilized in L1 initial co-taught literacy lessons, and what characterizes interaction, patterns of discourse, organization and roles in the classroom (teachers and students)? (3) What are the students’ conditions for participation, engagement and dialogue in L1 initial co-taught literacy lessons?","PeriodicalId":315285,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Literacy Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130305143","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Kritisk lesing i høyere utdanning: Hvordan forholder lærerstudenter seg til tekster som krever kritisk lesing?","authors":"Lisbeth Elvebakk, Marte Blikstad-Balas","doi":"10.23865/njlr.v8.3347","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23865/njlr.v8.3347","url":null,"abstract":"readers","PeriodicalId":315285,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Literacy Research","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116241864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Editorial: A Five-Year Update","authors":"P. H. Uppstad, Atle Skaftun, O. Solheim","doi":"10.23865/njlr.v6.2662","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23865/njlr.v6.2662","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":315285,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Literacy Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128308255","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Litteracitetspraktiker i vardags- och samhällsliv: Skriftspråksvanor hos svenska sfi-elever med kort eller ingen tidigare studiebakgrund","authors":"Åsa Wedin, Annika Norlund Shaswar","doi":"10.23865/njlr.v7.2797","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23865/njlr.v7.2797","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":315285,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Literacy Research","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114388409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christine B. Østbø Munch, Marit Semundseth, Marit Holm Hopperstad
{"title":"Barnehagens garderobe som semiotisk landskap – og et sted for barns literacy?","authors":"Christine B. Østbø Munch, Marit Semundseth, Marit Holm Hopperstad","doi":"10.23865/njlr.v8.3841","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.23865/njlr.v8.3841","url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the ECEC’s changing room as a semiotic landscape. The material consists of a total of 1,101 photographs of texts in thirteen ECEC changing rooms and conversations with the various departments’ ECEC teachers about these texts. The study has two purposes: The first is to contribute to the development of knowledge about the changing rooms as a semiotic landscape. The second is to discuss how this semiotic landscape can have a didactic potential for the development of children’s literacy. The study is placed within a social semiotic framework (Halliday, 1998; Halliday & Matthiessen, 2014; Kress, 2010). We analyze and discuss the ECEC changing room as a complex semiotic landscape (Jarowsky & Thurlow, 2010) consisting of different text producers, variation in the design of the texts and with texts performing various communicative acts. In addition, we discuss how this semiotic landscape can contribute to spontaneous and exploratory literacy in ECEC institutions, how ECEC teachers can involve children in text production, and how children’s texts can be included within the semiotic landscape of the changing room.","PeriodicalId":315285,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Literacy Research","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121742890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}