Environmental Science & Policy最新文献

{"title":"What roles do governments play vis-à-vis niche actors? A typology illustrated with transition dynamics in the Dutch agri-food system","authors":"Hens Runhaar ,&nbsp;Sophie van Doorm ,&nbsp;Laura Bello Cartagena ,&nbsp;Sabine de Graaff ,&nbsp;Charlotte Offringa ,&nbsp;Laura van Oers ,&nbsp;Nataliia Pustilnik ,&nbsp;Evelien Remorie ,&nbsp;Willem Lageweg ,&nbsp;Rob Raven","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104206","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104206","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Regime change is considered essential for sustainability transitions. An important source of regime change is pressure from alternative innovations developed in niches and the actors involved. Governments often play an important role in such niche-regime interactions and affect whether, and how, this results in regime change. However, an overview of the various roles governments can play with respect to niche innovations and actors is lacking. In this paper, we identify a diversity of roles of governments vis-à-vis niche innovations and the actors involved. An iterative research design was employed that combines literature, team brainstorm sessions, interviews, and empirical analysis of dynamics in the Dutch agri-food system. We propose a typology consisting of 6 roles, ranging from facilitating regime change in favour of niche actors to actively defending incumbent regimes. The typology is a first attempt to enable the characterisation and analysis of governmental roles and their implications for regime change, either statically at a particular moment or dynamically in how roles evolve over time. We invite policy-makers and politicians to use the typology to reflect on their positionality in ongoing agri-food transitions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 104206"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144916943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Revisiting the challenges to monitoring, evaluation, reporting, and learning for climate adaptation","authors":"Sean Goodwin ,&nbsp;Marta Olazabal","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104199","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104199","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Monitoring, evaluation, reporting, and learning (MERL) is a key mechanism for advancing climate change adaptation by enabling reflection, preparation and improvement. While challenges to MERL are typically grouped into conceptual, empirical, and methodological categories, emerging issues demand attention as adaptation practice matures. These challenges are pressing for two reasons. First, the maturing field of adaptation introduces complex challenges beyond technical considerations, yet risks perpetuating structural problems seen in other MERL domains. Second, adaptation is inherently transversal, spanning multiple policy arenas—local to global, and across sectors such as environment, development, transport, water management, and education—further multiplying the diversity of challenges. Through a scoping review of scientific and grey literature, we synthesised a framework of emerging challenges to designing, implementing, and using MERL for adaptation. These include ontological challenges (how adaptation and related concepts are defined and contested), epistemological challenges (whose knowledge counts, and how it is valued), axiological challenges (nature and types of value being placed on MERL), social challenges (equity and justice aspects in MERL processes affecting effectiveness), material challenges (use of financial and human resources), political challenges (dynamics affecting transparent evaluation), and spatio-temporal challenges (integration of complex spatial and temporal dimensions). This framework highlights key gaps and needs in current MERL practices. By addressing these challenges, adaptation policy and science can advance in ways that are more grounded, equitable, and effective, enabling improved responses to the complex and evolving demands of climate change adaptation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 104199"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144912606","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A conceptual framework for knowledge integration in cross-disciplinary collaborations","authors":"Shruti Punjabi ,&nbsp;Shalini Misra ,&nbsp;Megan A. Rippy ,&nbsp;Stanley B. Grant ,&nbsp;Eranga Galappaththi ,&nbsp;Theodore Lim ,&nbsp;Thomas A. Birkland","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104197","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104197","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper synthesizes three domains of literature to develop a conceptual framework for knowledge integration in cross-disciplinary and cross-sectoral collaborations: (1) studies of inter- and transdisciplinarity, (2) studies of knowledge co-production in sustainability research, and (3) studies focusing on factors influencing knowledge integration in the Science of Team Science field. Combining a scoping review methodology with a cited reference search approach, we identify eight dimensions of knowledge integration: <em>types of knowledge integrated</em>, <em>competencies and education required to practice knowledge integration, organizational structure</em>, <em>types of actor involvement</em>, stages of <em>collaboration</em>, <em>contextual factors</em>, <em>processes and mechanisms of knowledge integration</em>, and <em>types of knowledge integration outcomes</em>. We structure these dimensions across four interconnected components of collaboration: knowledge gathering (inputs), structural dynamics and collaborative dynamics (processes), and integrative outcomes (outputs). We identify the different types of knowledge mobilized in cross-disciplinary collaborations – <em>epistemic</em>, <em>experiential</em>, <em>contextual</em>, <em>cultural</em>, <em>applied</em>, <em>specialized</em>, <em>knowledge for systemic change</em>, and <em>normative knowledge</em> - and link them to the structural features (e.g., team composition, governance) and collaborative dynamics (e.g., stakeholder engagement, interaction frequency, and roles) of cross-disciplinary teams that influence the processes and outcomes of knowledge integration. This framework is intended to function as a heuristic to prompt teams to adapt it to specific contexts, projects, and team configurations. It can also be used a scaffold for designing and evaluating knowledge integration efforts in diverse collaborative settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 104197"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144912605","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Investigating the extent and quality of health-focused climate adaptation planning: Insights from Western Canadian cities","authors":"Desiree Rose,&nbsp;S. Jeff Birchall","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104192","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104192","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Climate change is resulting in morbidity and mortality across all regions of the globe. As temperatures continue to rise, the threat to health grows. Regardless of potential mitigation measures, some degree of warming in the near future is unavoidable. As a result, climate adaptation strategies targeted to protecting human health are essential. Local governments have a key role to play in health-focused adaptation, given their strong understanding of local health impacts, knowledge of the local population, and ability to implement local interventions. However, research demonstrates that local governments struggle to make meaningful progress on health-focused adaptation, and are often underprepared to face climate-health risks. Set in the Western Canadian context, this study applies a case study methodology (plan content analysis and key actor interviews) to explore the extent and quality of health-focused climate adaptation planning in five case study cities. Results indicate that although health-focused adaptation planning has been initiated within case study cities, various weaknesses exist within plans. Key weaknesses include a lack of climate-health information, a narrow focus on heat, and missing implementation details. Ultimately, cities note that they are struggling to make progress on their health-focused adaptation agendas, and describe themselves as unprepared to face climate-related health risks. Recommendations to improve health-focused adaptation planning are provided.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 104192"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144903465","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Navigating justice tensions in managed retreat","authors":"Erica R. Bower ,&nbsp;A.R. Siders ,&nbsp;Caroline M. Kraan ,&nbsp;Katharine J. Mach ,&nbsp;Gabrielle Wong-Parodi","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104191","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104191","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Under intensifying climate change, purposeful permanent movement of people away from hazardous areas has gained salience as a possible – albeit controversial – adaptation strategy. Many people involved in this process, here called managed retreat, agree it should be “just”, yet agreeing on what justice means in practice is extremely difficult. Importantly, the researchers and practitioners framing, designing, and implementing retreat policies and programs have pluralistic visions on many issues relevant to procedural, distributive and recognition justice. To date, the resulting justice dilemmas have included five key tensions: whether retreat should always be voluntary or not, whether communities or governments should initiate, whether the most exposed or most historically marginalized should be prioritized, whether retreat is a net harm or benefit, and whether retreat should be a “measure of last resort” or not. Here we present the results of an empirical study of researcher and practitioner perspectives on these five justice tensions, drawing on focus groups, surveys, and discussions with 39 individuals professionally engaged in retreat research, policy, and practice. Participants’ views on justice tensions varied based on differences in moral reasoning, linked to personal traits (i.e., professional identities, knowledges, and values) and retreat imaginaries (i.e., the particular example a participant has in mind, including who and how wealthy a retreating person is, where and how they will retreat, and their historical relationship to place). We found researcher and practitioner views on justice in managed retreat are highly context specific, both temporally and spatially. We also found that when participants reflected on the context specificity of their retreat imaginaries and engage in dialogue about their moral reasoning with others, they become more open minded, see more nuance, and in some cases change their minds. Intentional reflection and dialogue making implicit perspectives visible can facilitate more transparent discussion of how to advance justice aims in retreat policy and practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 104191"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144903464","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The transition to an impact-based weather-health alerting system in England: An evaluation of stakeholder perspectives","authors":"Thomas Roberts ,&nbsp;Valentine Seymour ,&nbsp;Haeyoung Eun ,&nbsp;Sarah L. Bulloch ,&nbsp;Katya Brooks ,&nbsp;Ross Thompson","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104189","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104189","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, there has been a significant shift from threshold-based to impact-based weather alerting systems. This paper evaluates the impact of this transition within the Weather-Health Alerting (WHA) system in England, which is used to notify the health and social care sector about adverse weather events. The evaluation was conducted after the system's first year of operation to assess its effectiveness in supporting emergency planners and frontline health and social care staff. Findings show that the shift to an impact-based system has been broadly successful. Stakeholders reported that the most valuable component of the new system is the information provided on expected impacts, which has improved the relevance and utility of the alerts. However, the evaluation also identified several minor concerns, particularly around the clarity of distinctions between alert levels and the volume of information included in alerts. These issues may warrant further refinement in future iterations of the system. Overall, this paper situates the findings within the wider context of climate adaptation and public health resilience, highlighting the essential role of clear, actionable alerting systems in mitigating the health impacts of extreme weather.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 104189"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144903466","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Addressing gaps in integrative water-energy-food-forest (WEFF) nexus governance","authors":"HM Tuihedur Rahman,&nbsp;David Natcher","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104195","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104195","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Forests play a critical role in sustaining water, energy, and food (WEF) systems of communities. While the ecological interlinkages between WEF-forest (WEFF) systems are relatively evident, the management of these integrated systems is typically compartmentalized and centered around sector-specific rules and policies. In this paper, we employ a modified Inter-Institutional Gaps (IIG) framework to identify and characterize the governance gaps that may exist at different levels of WEFF governing institutions. We apply the framework to a case study of the Prince Albert Model Forest (PAMF), Saskatchewan, Canada to demonstrate how strategies that minimize governance gaps can bring about positive outcomes for WEFF sectors. The PAMF was one of the first Model Forests in Canada. Major socio-economic activities in the forest area involve mining, forest industries and the Indigenous uses of forest resources for cultural services and livelihood activities. The forest has a history of conflicting land use practices, water pollution and loss of wildlife and wild food. We collected data using multiple methods including interviews, participant observation, and systematic document analysis. Our analysis suggests that the PAMF has performed benefactor, facilitator, broker, advocate, and entrepreneurial roles to develop a partnership-based proto-institutional practice that helps to go beyond sectoral, scalar, and cultural boundaries for the integration of WEFF governing state and non-state institutions. These practices help mobilize knowledge and resources required for an effective WEFF nexus governance system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 104195"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144895992","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Trade-offs in expanding citizen participation in low-carbon transitions: Seven transition arena experiments","authors":"Jani P. Lukkarinen ,&nbsp;Satu Lähteenoja ,&nbsp;Sampsa Hyysalo ,&nbsp;Tatu Marttila ,&nbsp;Maija Faehnle ,&nbsp;Kaisa Korhonen-Kurki","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104198","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104198","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Amid the complex and persistent challenges of sustainability transitions, experimental governance has emerged as a way to foster reflexivity, learning, and policy innovation through diverse participatory practices. This paper examines the role of transition arena methodologies in expanding and deepening civic engagement in low-carbon transitions, specifically through seven experimental processes focused on \"climate-wise housing\" in Finland in 2023. These experiments combined digital and in-person facilitation in an attempt to involve citizens in co-producing actionable insights on climate-smart behaviors, building renovations, and renewable energy adoption, hitherto directing the envisioned transition. The research explores three “avenues” of widening participation in transition arenas, namely expanding, complementing, and opening such arenas to explore questions regarding the potential and limitations of widening transition arena participation and the impact of such breadth on the depth of citizen engagement. Findings highlight trade-offs between different scopes and modes of citizen participation and reveal how participatory processes shape public engagement and policy responsiveness. By suggesting four implications on designing and implementing citizen engagement processes, the study contributes to a nuanced understanding of participation in transition governance and its implications for sustainability transformations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 104198"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144895993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Exploring agricultural stakeholders’ mental models of the water-energy-food-ecosystems (WEFE) Nexus: Insights from Mediterranean case studies","authors":"Enrica Garau ,&nbsp;Gabriela de Abreu ,&nbsp;Irene Pérez-Ramírez ,&nbsp;Nora Schütze ,&nbsp;Yasmine Farhat ,&nbsp;Hala El Moussaoui ,&nbsp;Jessica Loureiro ,&nbsp;Olfa Mahjoub ,&nbsp;Abir Ben Slimane ,&nbsp;Hacib Amami ,&nbsp;Abdellaziz Zairi ,&nbsp;Andreas Thiel ,&nbsp;Antonio J. Castro","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104196","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104196","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Environmental crises, such as climate change, biodiversity loss, water scarcity, and food insecurity, pose global challenges that threaten ecosystems and human well-being. The water-energy-food-ecosystems (WEFE) Nexus concept advocates integrated resource management to optimize synergies, minimize trade-offs, and promote sustainability. Despite its prominence in policy and research, the WEFE Nexus often overlooks local socio-cultural contexts and stakeholder perspectives. This study addresses this gap by examining how stakeholders from the food sector conceptualize and value the WEFE Nexus across four Mediterranean case studies in Lebanon, Portugal, Spain, and Tunisia. Using a qualitative approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews alongside graphical visualization techniques, including hand-drawn illustrations and colored dot exercises, to explore agricultural stakeholders' mental models of the WEFE Nexus. The findings reveal significant variability in their perceptions of relationships among water, energy, food, and ecosystems, shaped by diverse socio-cultural, environmental, and economic contexts. Instrumental and relational values were most frequently identified, while intrinsic values were less commonly recognized. Agricultural stakeholders' interpretations ranged from a holistic framework of interconnected components to a narrower focus on specific elements like water or energy. Graphical representations generally aligned with oral descriptions, and four distinct patterns emerged between the identified relations among WEFE components: overlapping circular, overlapping linear, overlapping and separated, and ambiguous relations. This study underscores the importance of tailored, participatory approaches that incorporate stakeholders’ diverse perceptions into policy-making and resource management. By combining oral descriptions with visual representations, it provides an innovative framework for exploring the cognitive understandings and values that underpin the social-ecological dynamics shaping WEFE Nexus perspectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 104196"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144890253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"What is ‘good evidence’ for environmental decision making? Insights from professionals working at the science-policy interface","authors":"Elizabeth A. Nyboer ,&nbsp;Andrew N. Kadykalo ,&nbsp;Nathan Young ,&nbsp;Vivian M. Nguyen ,&nbsp;Trina Rytwinski ,&nbsp;John-Francis Lane ,&nbsp;Joseph R. Bennett ,&nbsp;Nathan Harron ,&nbsp;Susan M. Aitken ,&nbsp;Graeme Auld ,&nbsp;David Browne ,&nbsp;Aerin L. Jacob ,&nbsp;Kent Prior ,&nbsp;Paul Allen Smith ,&nbsp;Karen E. Smokorowski ,&nbsp;Steven Alexander ,&nbsp;Steven J. Cooke","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104176","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104176","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Effective protection and management of natural ecosystems demands policies and decisions that are based on the best available evidence. However, it remains unclear how policymakers define evidence and prioritize or neglect different evidence types in environmental decisions. Here we analyze perspectives and experiences of Canadian professionals working at the science-policy interface to develop a definition of “good evidence” for environmental policy, and assess the evidence types (e.g., peer reviewed science, Indigenous knowledge, expert consultation) used most frequently to inform environmental decisions. We derived a new definition of “good evidence” from the participant responses, as follows: <em>Good evidence for environmental policy is reliable, diverse <strong>information</strong> collected systematically through <strong>established methodologies</strong> (including Western social and natural science, Indigenous science, and place-based knowledge accumulated intergenerationally by close and continuous observation) that is <strong>credible</strong> and <strong>yields practical advice</strong> or relevant conclusions while being <strong>transparent</strong> about uncertainties.</em> We found that a majority of environmental policymakers use peer reviewed literature mostly from the natural sciences to guide policy decisions. Evidence arising from local knowledge, Indigenous knowledge, and the social sciences tends to be neglected. However, there was a sense that perceptions of what constitutes evidence is changing and that implicit biases that prioritize some types of information over others are being questioned. Different conceptions of the salience, credibility and legitimacy of information types fundamentally shape debates around best practices for evidence-informed decision making. We suggest several routes toward a more holistic framing of environmental policy problems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 104176"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144890254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}