Environmental Science & Policy最新文献

{"title":"Assessing UNCCD’s role in advancing social learning for combating desertification, land degradation, and drought","authors":"Laurent-Charles Tremblay-Lévesque ,&nbsp;Daniel Tsegai ,&nbsp;Jeroen Warner ,&nbsp;Jaime Hoogesteger ,&nbsp;Birguy Lamizana Diallo ,&nbsp;Gergana Majercakova","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104330","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104330","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Addressing the challenges of desertification, land degradation and drought (DLDD) requires exchanging knowledge and practices across diverse actors, institutions, disciplines, and regions. Established in 1994 as one of the three Rio Conventions, the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) functions not only as a legally binding international agreement but also as a global collaborative platform for deepening knowledge and technical expertise on tackling DLDD. This paper examines the extent to which UNCCD has contributed to advancing social learning in the field of DLDD. Drawing from Wenger’s theoretical framework on social learning, we argue that UNCCD operates as a global transdisciplinary community of practice, enabling stakeholders to “learn together how to do things better together” in addressing DLDD-related challenges. Based on data from semi-structured interviews with UNCCD National Focal Points, Science and Technology Correspondents, and other experts engaged in UNCCD processes, this research explores and illustrates the relational, technical, and transformational outcomes generated through the Convention. It highlights current gaps in the social learning dynamics within UNCCD processes and offers suggestions for enhancing meeting formats, inclusivity, and the integration of science, policy, and practice. Conceptualizing UNCCD as a platform for co-learning, this study uncovers its broader contribution to environmental governance – offering insights into how multilateral environmental agreements can drive change through shared knowledge, relationships, and adaptive practice, not just political or financial commitments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104330"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146171781","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Data sharing dynamics in the Caspian sea: Assessing the impact of the Tehran Convention","authors":"Lavinia Colantoni ,&nbsp;Matteo Tarantino ,&nbsp;Alexandre Babak Hedjazi","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104331","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104331","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents an assessment of the Tehran Convention’s influence on environmental data-sharing practices in the Caspian Sea region. The Caspian Sea, a distinct ecological system shared by Azerbaijan, Iran, Kazakhstan, Russia, and Turkmenistan, faces environmental challenges such as pollution, biodiversity loss, and climate change impacts. Through a multi-method approach, combining document analysis and qualitative interviews with key stakeholders, the study investigates the dynamics, determinants, and implications of data sharing for regional cooperation. The Caspian Environmental Information Center (CEIC), an online platform established by the Tehran Convention to facilitate information exchange, serves as a case study to analyze the factors shaping data-sharing practices. The sociology of technology is applied to explore the role of technical infrastructure and platforms in mediating data exchange, while the sociology of information sheds light on the management and dissemination of environmental data. Findings reveal that CEIC’s effectiveness is shaped by a complex interplay of technical, political, and social factors, including disparities in technological capacity among littoral states and political tensions. Despite these challenges, the CEIC’s flexible and consensus-driven approach has proven instrumental in fostering collaboration and identifying pathways for improving data-sharing mechanisms in a controversial geopolitical landscape. The paper concludes by advocating alternative data-sharing strategies that prioritize trust-building and incremental progress toward cooperative governance. It highlights the need to adapt data-sharing frameworks to the specific geopolitical and environmental contexts of transboundary regions, challenging traditional models that prioritize open access to raw data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104331"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146171785","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Enabling cross-sectoral transformation for coastal climate adaptation in Europe: Four directions for interdisciplinary efforts","authors":"Kristof Tomej ,&nbsp;Carla Garcia-Lozano ,&nbsp;Josep Vila-Subiros ,&nbsp;Alberto Innocenti ,&nbsp;Emil Juvan ,&nbsp;Olivier Le Pape ,&nbsp;Niels Tobias Arnoldussen ,&nbsp;Jonathan Verschuuren ,&nbsp;Tim Taylor ,&nbsp;Gesche Huebner ,&nbsp;Nicola Tollin ,&nbsp;Sebastian Mernild","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104334","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104334","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Coastal areas in Europe are of immense value – not only to their residents but also to communities further inland. At the same time, they are particularly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. The current pace of coastal climate adaptation remains slow, constrained by underfunding and the fragmented, sectoral nature of many initiatives. This calls for radically new yet practical approaches. In this perspective, a group of European researchers from diverse disciplines explores what cross-sectoral transformation could mean in the context of coastal climate adaptation. Drawing on expertise in environmental science, spatial planning, law, ecology, health, and tourism, we propose four directions for interdisciplinary research to enable such transformation: (1) developing dynamic and holistic understandings of climate impacts and adaptation responses; (2) establishing shared adaptation objectives and priorities across sectors; (3) promoting ecosystem-based development; and (4) adapting legal and institutional systems to support integration and flexibility. We invite scholars and practitioners to engage with these interdependent directions to advance adaptation efforts for European coasts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104334"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146171793","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Governing water in multi-functional landscapes: Coordination, collaboration and networks","authors":"Claudia Pahl-Wostl ,&nbsp;Philipp Gorris","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104343","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104343","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Prevailing governance systems fail in addressing the complex and systemic challenges in human-environment relations. Climate change is exacerbating this situation. Whereas resource problems such as water scarcity are characterized by a complex web of interdependencies in human-environment relations, governance is fragmented. Despite efforts for integration such as the Water-Energy-Food Nexus, policies, regulatory frameworks and administrative structures are largely organized according to resources and sectors. We argue for a systemic governance of multi-functional landscapes to address water issues. Theoretical arguments and empirical evidence suggest that polycentric governance systems have higher capacities to address complex governance challenges such as landscape governance. However, major knowledge gaps exist about processes and structures that lead to and sustain such capacities. Attention has mainly focused on how to achieve cross-sectoral coordination in formal policy processes and largely formal governance networks. We suggest to extend the focus on issue-based collaboration in largely informal actor networks and on the interplay between these different networks to open new avenues for strengthening the capacity needed to achieve transformative change. A network lens to analyse distinct relational patterns among actors involved in environmental governance and social dynamics in associated group processes in detail has offered intriguing insights in recent years. The article summarizes recent conceptual and methodological developments and discusses promising areas for new research on how to reduce misfit in social-ecological networks, how to support collaboration and how to build transformative capacity for addressing water issues in multi-functional landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104343"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147400483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Fostering sustainable and resilient coastal communities through combining Nature-based Solutions and empowerment tools: A review","authors":"Ina M. Sieber ,&nbsp;A. Rita Carrasco ,&nbsp;Cecilia Gañán de Molina ,&nbsp;Mia Cassidy Prall ,&nbsp;Ananya Tiwari ,&nbsp;Marcello Graziano ,&nbsp;Vilja Larjosto ,&nbsp;Spyridoula Ntemiri ,&nbsp;Nils Bunnefeld ,&nbsp;Simo Sarkki ,&nbsp;Candice Pouget ,&nbsp;José Pontón-Cevallos","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104326","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104326","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nature-based Solutions (NbS) have proven successful to address major coastal environmental challenges. Participatory approaches to NbS planning, design and implementation are increasing, yet community empowerment remains an underexplored aspect of NbS. This paper aims to assess the current state of knowledge on the contribution of community empowerment in NbS approaches to address coastal challenges and to build more resilient communities. Building upon an Eklipse<span><span>¹</span></span> evidence need from the Horizon Europe project EmpowerUs, this study reviews 218 publications on NbS and empowerment in relation to coastal communities across Europe, including its Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories, as well as OECD countries. By applying a Rapid Evidence Assessment methodology, this paper identifies prerequisite conditions for participation levels in NbS projects, categorises empowerment, and identifies challenges and opportunities for integrating these strategies into policy and practice. Results show that 60 % of reviewed studies combine NbS and Empowerment Tools, while 9 % focus on empowerment only. The remaining 31 % were devoted to the operationality of NbS planning, development and assessment, without describing empowerment aspects. Most records addressed low levels of participation, ranging from informing stakeholders to involving them through collecting their preferences. Only few studies provide evidence of long-term community empowerment through e.g., shared ownership. Standardized approaches to assess empowerment processes and outcomes were often lacking in the literature. Combining, NbS and Empowerment Tools can foster to strengthening the social-ecological resilience of coastal areas. Based on their focus and participation level, six distinct categories of Empowerment Tools for NbS planning and coastal resilience were identified: Education and awareness-raising tools, Knowledge tools, Platform/Dialogue tools, Governance tools, Co-creation tools and Community-led NbS.</div><div>Challenges linked to Empowerment Tools persist related to the absence of clear definitions, the lack of standardized approaches for measuring empowerment, and the need for interpretation in categorising tools. Future research should focus on the longitudinal trajectory of community empowerment, including participation and co-creation as a precondition for NbS projects, in order to balance social and governance objectives. The findings provide a pathway for fostering sustainable and resilient coastal development through NbS and Empowerment Tools.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104326"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147400533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Muddling through: A typology of interdisciplinary research practices in environmental sciences","authors":"Jana Thierfelder ,&nbsp;Blake Matthews ,&nbsp;Anita C. Risch ,&nbsp;Sabine Hoffmann","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104342","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104342","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Interdisciplinary research (IDR) is vital for tackling complex global challenges such as climate change and biodiversity loss. Despite its prominence as a research approach, both expertise and experience in IDR are often lacking in projects or programs aiming to address these challenges. This results in a gap between an ideal type of doing IDR and the actual implementation of IDR in practice. This paper addresses this disconnect, drawing on insights from an IDR program, the Blue-Green Biodiversity (BGB) Initiative, in Switzerland. We propose a typology of IDR practices based on our case study: (1) Ideal IDR, where experience in ID practice and expertise in ID scholarship are both leveraged and ID scholars are fully integrated throughout the whole duration of an IDR project; (2) Pragmatic IDR, where experience in ID practice is leveraged by scholars who have conducted IDR in the past, but have only minimal or no formal training and thus only minimal or no expertise in ID scholarship; (3) On-the-go IDR, where emerging ID challenges are tackled, often mid-project, by consulting ID experts or relevant ID scholarship, thus counteracting missing experience in ID practice; and (4) Muddle through IDR, where upcoming ID challenges are addressed ad hoc with no experience in ID practice and only little or no formal training or expertise in ID scholarship. By contrasting empirical practices drawn from our case study with ideal types from IDR scholarship, we provide actionable guidance for more effective IDR, fostering better alignment between the theory and practice of IDR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104342"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147400481","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Towards operationalising climate resilient development pathways","authors":"Anna Steynor ,&nbsp;Cathryn Fox ,&nbsp;Pete Falloon ,&nbsp;Jennifer Weeks ,&nbsp;Richard Jones ,&nbsp;Edward Pope","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104338","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104338","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The concept of climate resilient development pathways (CRDPs), introduced through the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, presents a transformative framework for integrating climate adaptation, mitigation, and sustainable development. Despite its potential, practical guidance for implementing CRDPs remains limited. This study addresses a significant gap in practical implementation by developing and testing an operational approach to CRDPs within a bounded system—the UK wheat supply sector. While CRDPs offer a comprehensive way of orienting development towards climate resilience, the operationalisation of the concept requires pragmatic choices appropriate to the participants and context, which revealed several learning points. The mapping of multiple future pathways, as advocated in the literature, was constrained by decision-makers’ limited tolerance for uncertainty and their need for actionable policy recommendations. In addition, the process necessarily assumed the continuity of a market-led system, which constrained the range of potential directions of change. Key domestic and global system interconnections could not be fully accounted for because of the study’s bounded scope. Finally, fragmented ownership of required actions across the system highlighted a lack of guidance on mechanisms for ongoing monitoring and re-orientation within dispersed management systems. The developed methodology proposes a transferable approach for participatory pathway design that integrates stakeholder visioning, iterative co-production, and reflexive engagement. While the documentation of the unresolved challenges provides new insights into the realities of operationalising CRDPs, highlighting that operationalisation is not just a methodological challenge, but also a governance and system challenge.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104338"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147400596","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Human interventions and climate change trigger water crisis in the Tigris and Euphrates Basin","authors":"Ali Darvishi Boloorani ,&nbsp;Ramin Papi ,&nbsp;Masoud Soleimani ,&nbsp;Najmeh Neysani Samany ,&nbsp;Ali Al-Hemoud ,&nbsp;Mohsen Bakhtiari ,&nbsp;Nastaran Nasiri ,&nbsp;Saham Mirzaei ,&nbsp;Alfredo Huete","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104300","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104300","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Tigris and Euphrates Basin (TEB), shared by Iraq, Turkey, Syria, and Iran, faces an escalating water crisis driven by both climate change and human interventions. This study introduces an integrative, cause-oriented approach to quantify the relative contributions of these drivers using long-term multi-source satellite data (1984–2022), hydroclimatic analysis, and water depletion equations. Results indicate that average precipitation across the basin decreased by 9.6 %, while evaporation increased by 6.3 % over the last four decades. Upstream dam reservoirs expanded by more than 100 %, creating 9500 km² of evaporative water surfaces, and agricultural development under the GAP project required 7.2 BCM of water annually. Consequently, permanent and seasonal surface waters in the Mesopotamian marshes declined by 76 % and 63 %, respectively. Quantitative analysis shows that human interventions have contributed to 39.3 % of renewable water depletion, compared to 13.6 % contribution of long-term hydroclimatic trends consistent with climate change, highlighting the dominant anthropogenic role. The novelty of this work lies in integrating multi-source remote sensing observations with water depletion modeling to deliver the first basin-wide quantitative assessment of these drivers. These findings provide a robust scientific basis for transboundary cooperation and sustainable water management policies in the TEB.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104300"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146171406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Sustainability transition frameworks: Integrating space, scale, nature, power, and justice","authors":"Chloé Nicolas-Artero ,&nbsp;Jampel Dell'Angelo","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104327","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104327","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper advances scholarship in sustainability transition studies (STS), a field concerned with understanding how sociotechnical systems evolve in response to pressing sustainability challenges. It presents a systematic and comparative assessment of eight major analytical frameworks commonly employed within STS, with the aim of uncovering their theoretical foundations, shared commonalities, and key points of divergence. To deepen this evaluation, the paper integrates insights from critical geography and political ecology, foregrounding the socio-spatial and political dimensions of transition processes. Particular attention is paid to how concepts such as space, scale, nature, power, and justice are incorporated—or overlooked—within existing frameworks. The findings reveal significant variation in how these dimensions are theorised and operationalised, highlighting a persistent gap in the treatment of spatial justice. The paper argues that engaging more explicitly with socio-spatial inequalities and power relations can enhance both the analytical robustness and practical relevance of sustainability transition research.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104327"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146076692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Where to start? – The interplay of what, who and where in phase-0 of transdisciplinary research","authors":"I. Arts ,&nbsp;A. Horn ,&nbsp;J.P.G.M. Cromsigt ,&nbsp;M.A.M. Drenthen ,&nbsp;G. Schouten ,&nbsp;I. Dorresteijn","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104344","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104344","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Transdisciplinary research (TDR) is increasingly recognized as an important approach to make research on complex environmental and sustainability issues such as climate risks and biodiversity loss more societally relevant and actionable. Deliberately designing early stages of TDR– phase-0 – is considered essential to its overall success. However, limited knowledge is available about how to shape and undertake phase-0 of TDR. We provide a detailed account of TDR processes in the WildlifeNL project, which were designed with explicit and extensive attention to phase-0. We saw that designing and shaping the project was a constant process of decision-making about delineation; defining consortium composition and participation of others outside the consortium (‘who’), selecting cases and sites (‘where’), and determining model systems, questions, and approaches (‘what’). We demonstrate the interwovenness and interdependency between these dimensions based on several examples from WildlifeNL. The WildlifeNL team primarily focused on diverse stakeholder representation and building on existing partnerships. They thereby prioritized the ‘who’ dimension, while leaving ‘what’ and ‘where’ more flexible to adapt. The interconnectedness and interdependency confront those designing and implementing TDR with the question how to balance and prioritize the different dimensions, which defines how they make decisions on who, where and what are included and excluded in their TDR. We advocate for reflection and transparency about these messy and power-laden processes and suggest our framework as a structure for doing this. We argue that different TDR objectives and impact orientations (‘why’) may also prompt assigning different relative weight to the ‘who’, ‘where’ and ‘what’ dimensions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 104344"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147400534","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}