Argumentation and Advocacy最新文献_第7页

A city in ruins or a living city: spatial and temporal presence and visual refutation in representations of Detroit 废墟之城还是生机之城:底特律再现中的时空存在与视觉反驳

Argumentation and Advocacy Pub Date : 2020-10-22 DOI: 10.1080/10511431.2020.1829410

M. Yang

{"title":"A city in ruins or a living city: spatial and temporal presence and visual refutation in representations of Detroit","authors":"M. Yang","doi":"10.1080/10511431.2020.1829410","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2020.1829410","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract How can rhetors refute dehumanizing rhetoric regarding cities? To address this question, I analyze the argumentative clash between two photobooks: Yves Marchand and Romain Meffre’s The Ruins of Detroit and Dave Jordano’s Detroit Unbroken Down. I focus on strategies they use to create spatial and temporal presence in order to argue for how viewers ought to see Detroit. I find that Marchand and Meffre use the frame of abandonment and adhere to conventions of contemporary de-industrial ruin photography to argue that Detroit is an abandoned ruinscape. They relegate Detroit to the past and make Detroiters absent, thereby distancing viewers from the city’s residents. I find that Jordano refutes that view of Detroit by using the humanity frame and elements of portraiture photography to argue that Detroit is a living city. He situates the city in the present and makes Detroiters present, thereby highlighting residents’ agency and encouraging connection between viewers and residents. The analysis shows how visual arguments can make present the humanity of cities and their residents, thereby making it increasingly difficult to perpetuate dehumanizing discourse regarding cities.","PeriodicalId":29934,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Advocacy","volume":"20 1","pages":"174 - 194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"84545553","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Privilege in a place ballet: an incomplete argument of places and bodies 一个地方的特权芭蕾:一个地方和身体的不完整论证

Argumentation and Advocacy Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI: 10.1080/10511431.2020.1848337

Samantha Senda-Cook

{"title":"Privilege in a place ballet: an incomplete argument of places and bodies","authors":"Samantha Senda-Cook","doi":"10.1080/10511431.2020.1848337","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2020.1848337","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Like many neighborhoods in cities across the United States, Gifford Park—a neighborhood in Omaha, Nebraska—has been recreating itself through urban agriculture. Past research about urban agriculture reveals that it can operate as a material argument that resists negative characterizations and empowers residents, but this argument is incomplete. This case study extends the idea that places can function as spatial arguments and conceptualizes urban agriculture as a place ballet. Place ballets, which describe the interactions between places and bodies, offer a way of thinking about large-scale, slow-moving rhetorical action as well as demonstrating how economic and racial privilege manifest in the place and bodies—the material foundations of a place ballet. I argue that urban agriculture functions as a place ballet that reveals a complex, material argument about the positive impacts places and bodies can have on communities and community members while simultaneously overlooking the economic and racial privileges inherent in these efforts. Although the concept of a place ballet is a useful way to bring together two aspects of material rhetoric—place and bodies—it carries its own implications of economic and racial privilege.","PeriodicalId":29934,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Advocacy","volume":"1 1","pages":"205 - 222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82316029","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Contesting presidential masculinity: “fatherhood” as a rhetorical strategy in the 2012 general election debates 挑战总统的男子气概:在2012年大选辩论中，“父亲”是一种修辞策略

Argumentation and Advocacy Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI: 10.1080/10511431.2020.1847560

John M. Kephart

引用次数: 1

“This is who I am and this is what I’m carrying”: examining self-disclosure in forensics “这就是我，这就是我身上所携带的东西”:检视法医学中的自我表露

Argumentation and Advocacy Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI: 10.1080/10511431.2020.1847559

Kristopher Copeland, Anthony K Woodall

引用次数: 0

Not one more! feminicidio on the border, by nina maria lozano, columbus, the Ohio state university press, 2019, pp. 188, $29.95 (paperback) ISBN: 978-0-8142-5518-6 一个也不能再多了!《边境上的女性》，尼娜·玛丽亚·洛萨诺著，哥伦布，俄亥俄州立大学出版社，2019年，第188页，29.95美元(平装本)ISBN: 978-0-8142-5518-6

Argumentation and Advocacy Pub Date : 2020-09-08 DOI: 10.1080/10511431.2020.1803629

José Ángel Maldonado

引用次数: 0

Between history and philosophy: Anecdotes in early China 在历史与哲学之间:中国早期的轶事

Argumentation and Advocacy Pub Date : 2020-08-28 DOI: 10.1080/10511431.2020.1813370

Xing Lu

引用次数: 3

Arguing over texts: the rhetoric of interpretation 文本之争:解读的修辞

Argumentation and Advocacy Pub Date : 2020-08-13 DOI: 10.1080/10511431.2020.1807232

Jordan Loveridge

引用次数: 0

Defining the deadly: definitional argument and the assault weapons ban controversy 致命的定义:定义的争论和攻击性武器禁令的争议

Argumentation and Advocacy Pub Date : 2020-07-17 DOI: 10.1080/10511431.2020.1793276

Michael Pfau

引用次数: 1

Post-dialectics and fascistic argumentation in the global climate change debate 全球气候变化辩论中的后辩证法与法西斯论证

Argumentation and Advocacy Pub Date : 2020-07-14 DOI: 10.1080/10511431.2020.1790781

Nicholas S. Paliewicz, George F. (Guy) McHendry, Jr.

{"title":"Post-dialectics and fascistic argumentation in the global climate change debate","authors":"Nicholas S. Paliewicz, George F. (Guy) McHendry, Jr.","doi":"10.1080/10511431.2020.1790781","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2020.1790781","url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Argumentation is in the midst of a crisis that imperils deliberative rhetoric from working how it should when good arguments matter most. Rising trends of verbal aggression, hostility, and control in political contexts, which violate most argumentative norms but garner populistic adherence, are not only troubling for argumentation but also for the sustainability of life itself when it comes to the issue of global climate change. We argue that desires to control ideas and attitudes toward the environment demonstrate what we call fascistic argument—a form of argumentation that regales the domination of materialities, discourses, and bodies through nationalistic structures of feeling. Fascistic argument is one of many possible implications of a post-dialectical turn in argumentation, a perspective which understands argument as a constellation of assemblages, affects, and forces rather than a process of testing and contesting good reasons. We explore the rise of fascistic argument as an effect of the failure of reason to compel policy. This failure generates a contagion of affects and desires that control the argumentative process and infect dialectic debates aimed at achieving consensus.","PeriodicalId":29934,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Advocacy","volume":"1 1","pages":"137 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79593407","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

Politics for the love of fandom: Fan-based citizenship in a digital world, edited by Ashley Hinck and Baton Rouge, Louisiana State University Press, 2019, 264 pp., $45.00 (hardcover), ISBN: 978-0-807-17034-2 热爱粉丝的政治:数字世界中基于粉丝的公民身份，由阿什利·欣克和巴吞鲁日编辑，路易斯安那州立大学出版社，2019年，264页，45.00美元(精装)，ISBN: 978-0-807-17034-2

Argumentation and Advocacy Pub Date : 2020-07-14 DOI: 10.1080/10511431.2020.1793459

Jonathan S. Carter

引用次数: 0