Ius Matrimoniale最新文献

{"title":"Poprawna interpretacja kan. 538 § 3 i kan. 1110 z Kodeksu Jana Pawła II. Dwa zapytania z Krakowa do Papieskiej Rady ds. Tekstów Prawnych","authors":"Tomasz Rozkrut","doi":"10.21697/im.2020.31.2.01","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.01","url":null,"abstract":"This article presents two inquiries directed to the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts by canonists from Cracow. The presentation in question was preceded by synthetic indication of rules for performing interpretation of the Church’s law, specifically the role of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts. This special Dicastery of the Roman Curia also provides answers to numerous inquiries, thus providing assistance to various authorities and individual people of faith in interpreting norms that are, basically obvious, but that raise doubts. In such cases it is used to clarify the arose doubt and contributes to correct interpretation of the existing law in practice. It arises from the provided answers that the institution of parish priest is regarded as stable, which is clearly stated in can. 522 of the Code of Canon Law. One of the elements that are a guarantor of the parish priest institution, though not listed outright by the general legislator, is a possibility to remain in the position until one reaches seventy five years of age. This also confirms that this age, that is determined in the Code, cannot be changed by the particular legislator in any valid manner. Thus, also the possible customs in a given Diocese that were introduced after John Paul II promulgated the post-conciliar code in 1983 that are in contradiction to provisions included in that Code must be regarded as erroneous, as they are not in line with can. 26. Explanation provided by the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts in regards to the arose doubt of a possibility to grant delegation by a personal parish priest to bless canonical marriage also occurred to be important in practice. Likewise territorial parish priest, personal parish priest has identical authorizations in this matter. As it can be observed, the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts provides very useful and competent help in solving various legal doubts that are of great importance for functioning of the Church. If even before getting competent answers a large number of canonist had similar views to those presented in explanations, which was actually demonstrated, then the answers provided by the Vatican indicate a definitive solutions to the arose doubts and at the same time encourage those who – assuredly not out of ill will –succumbed to very subjective and erroneous interpretation, to correct it.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"121068950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Nieważność czynności prawnej na przykładzie małżeństwa kanonicznego","authors":"A. Bartczak","doi":"10.21697/IM.2020.31.1.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/IM.2020.31.1.06","url":null,"abstract":"Niniejszy artykuł prezentuje problematykę nieważności czynności prawnej na przykładzie małżeństwa kanonicznego. Punktem wyjścia stały się rozważania na temat małżeństwa kanonicznego jako aktu prawnego. Następnie, omówiona została problematyka nieważności aktu prawnego w prawie kanonicznym. W trzeciej części przedstawione zostały istotne przesłanki, które powodują, nieważność małżeństwa. Są to przeszkody małżeńskie, zgoda małżeńska i forma małżeńska. Na koniec zaprezentowano problematykę samej sankcji nieważności w odniesieniu do małżeństwa kanonicznego. Konkluzja wykazuje, że nieważność czynności prawnej w kanonicznym prawie małżeńskim różni się od koncepcji nieważności w prawie polskim.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114056053","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Instytucja zapowiedzi w aktualnym porządku prawnym Kościoła katolickiego w Polsce","authors":"Rafał Dappa","doi":"10.21697/IM.2020.31.1.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/IM.2020.31.1.03","url":null,"abstract":"Zgodnie z kan. 1067 KPK «Konferencja Episkopatu powinna wydać normy dotyczące egzaminu narzeczonych, zapowiedzi przedmałżeńskich oraz innych odpowiednich środków do przeprowadzenia badań przed zawarciem małżeństwa, aby proboszcz pilnie ich przestrzegając mógł przystąpić do asystowania przy małżeństwie». Mając na uwadze znowelizowane przez Konferencję Episkopatu Polski normy prawne dotyczące przygotowania do małżeństwa oraz ochrony danych osobowych niniejszy artykuł systematyzuje temat zapowiedzi przedmałżeńskich w aktualnym porządku prawnym Kościoła katolickiego w Polsce.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123435132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Joaquín Alberto Nieva García, «Conciencia del la nulidad matrimonial» y «nulidad de conciencia», Ediciones Universidad san Damaso, Madrid 2018, ss. 323","authors":"Ginter Dzierżon","doi":"10.21697/IM.2020.31.1.09","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/IM.2020.31.1.09","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"228 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114989626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Problem konwalidacji zwykłej w wyroku c. Caberletti z 18 stycznia 2008 roku","authors":"Ginter Dzierżon","doi":"10.21697/IM.2020.31.1.08","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/IM.2020.31.1.08","url":null,"abstract":"Zaprezentowane opracowanie jest komentarzem do wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Caberletti z 18 stycznia 2008 roku dotyczącym ważności konwalidacji w sprawie Brisbanen. Autor artykułu poddał szczegółowej analizie poszczególne segmenty rotalnego orzeczenia: przebieg sprawy oraz motywy prawne i faktyczne, ubogacając swe rozważania w przypisach stosowanymi publikacjami. Wykazał, iż w części doktrynalnej ponens bazował na teorii aktu prawnego oraz na publikacjach o charakterze teoretycznoprawnym, autorstwa Urbano Naverretego. Wskazał, iź turnus rotalny udowodnił ważność konwalidacji, gdyż dowiódł, iż pozwana miała wolę zawarcia prawdziwego małżeństwa.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122969564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Salvatori z 7 maja 2020 roku","authors":"W. Góralski","doi":"10.21697/im.2019.30.4.06","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2019.30.4.06","url":null,"abstract":"The negative sentence c. Salvatori in the case under the gravis defectus discretionis iudicii (can. 1095, n. 2 CIC) on both sides, taken in the second instance, when the first ruled positively in relation to both parties, is an example of a reliable assessment of the collected material evidence. \u0000In the sentence, quite a lot of space was devoted to the role and tasks of an expert in the cases of can. 1095, n. 1-3 CIC. It is worth emphasizing here that an opinion prepared solely on the basis of the case file is not a true expert opinion. Salvatori pointed to the practice developed in rotational jurisprudence, according to which a judge should reject an expert’s conclusions when they do not comply with the case files or violate the rules of logic or go beyond the premises on which they are based, or when they are inconsistent with Christian anthropology. \u0000Ponens convincingly demonstrated the groundlessness of prof. D. (with respect to the woman) grossly inconsistent with the case files and going far beyond the premises that served him to formulate such a thesis. \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132154288","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Пастырское служении для разведённых в „Amoris Laetitia”","authors":"Pavlo Basystyi","doi":"10.21697/im.2019.30.4.03","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2019.30.4.03","url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the author tried to present the topic of the pastoral ministry concept’s development for people living without Holy Matrimony by the example of the previous Code of Canon Law of 1917 and New Code of Canon Law of 1983. Influence on changing the situation of those living in a civil marriage or divorced and remarried poste-synodal Apostolic Exhortations „Familiaris Consortio” of 1981 and „Amoris Laetitia” of 2016. According to the author, the opportunity to join the Sacraments of the Church, prescribed in the last post-synodal Apostolic Exhortation are primarily a consequence of the evolutionary process rather than revolutionary innovations, although there are many different points of view on this topic. That is why the exhortation „Amoris Laetitia” talks about accompanying, discerning and integrating weakness, but in confidentiality. The important things, according to the author, are letters from individual bishops or Episcopal Conferences that have supported the Holy Father and have already taken advantage of the prescribed opportunities helping their parishioners to return to the church community and become actively involved in its life.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128922468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Ochrona danych osobowych świadków w sprawach o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa kanonicznego","authors":"M. Poniatowski","doi":"10.21697/im.2019.30.4.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2019.30.4.05","url":null,"abstract":"W artykule zostało przedstawione zagadnienie dotyczące ochrony danych osobowych świadków w sprawach o stwierdzenie nieważności małżeństwa kanonicznego. \u0000W pierwszej kolejności przedstawiono ochronę danych osobowych w Kościele. Ochrona ta może być regulowana prawnie w ramach autonomii Kościoła. Ochrona danych osobowych w Kościele ma charakter obowiązku i nie stanowi to novum w kościelnym porządku prawnym. \u0000W dalszej części artykuł przedstawiono problematykę uznania autonomii i niezależności Kościoła w zakresie przetwarzania danych osobowych. W tym zakresie wskazano na relację norm prawa kanonicznego i prawa świeckiego. \u0000Artykuł zawiera również przedstawienie ochrony danych osobowych świadków mając na uwadze to czy są oni członkami Kościoła czy też nie. Kwestia ta ma odpowiednie skutki prawne w zakresie ochrony danych osobowych. \u0000Najważniejsze wnioski przedstawiono w zakończeniu.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132731884","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Enrico Massignani, L’istituto della convalidazione automatica. Un confronto tra l’ordinamento canonico e quello statuale con speciale riguardo alla convalida del matrimonio, Gregorian & Biblical Press, Roma 2019, ss. 411","authors":"Ginter Dzierżon","doi":"10.21697/im.2019.30.4.07","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2019.30.4.07","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122726745","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Relacja nauczania papieża Franciszka zawartego w adhortacji Amoris laetitia do dotychczasowego posoborowego Magisterium","authors":"Jarosław Młot","doi":"10.21697/im.2019.30.4.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2019.30.4.04","url":null,"abstract":"The apostolic exhortation Amoris laetitia, issued by Pope Francis on April 8, 2016, is the fruit of as many as two synodal sessions. The great interest in the subject of these synods, not only in Church circles, resulted from the expectations of some for a change in the position of the Church's discipline in the admission of the divorced and remarried persons to Communion. \u0000The publication of the exhortation caused a lot of discussion among scientists and priests alike. The article is only an attempt to indicate the subject of these discussions. \u0000The statements of people regarding the relation of the teaching contained in Amoris laetitia to the current post-Conciliar Magisterium can be divided into those that express doubts about the texts of this document and those that read it in the key of the hermeneutics of continuity. The article attempts to show the most important directions of interpretation of the exhortation. \u0000The Pope did not intend the exhortation as a document containing general norms applicable in all cases. That is why he set the bishops of individual regions of the world to create guidelines for this exhortation that would be adequate to the traditions and calls of their region. The article describes some sample local documents. \u0000The discussion merely outlined in the article and the differences in the interpretation of the exhortation texts shown in it show the need for further study on it. \u0000 ","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132666894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}