Jarosław Młot
{"title":"Relacja nauczania papieża Franciszka zawartego w adhortacji Amoris laetitia do dotychczasowego posoborowego Magisterium","authors":"Jarosław Młot","doi":"10.21697/im.2019.30.4.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The apostolic exhortation Amoris laetitia, issued by Pope Francis on April 8, 2016, is the fruit of as many as two synodal sessions. The great interest in the subject of these synods, not only in Church circles, resulted from the expectations of some for a change in the position of the Church's discipline in the admission of the divorced and remarried persons to Communion. \nThe publication of the exhortation caused a lot of discussion among scientists and priests alike. The article is only an attempt to indicate the subject of these discussions. \nThe statements of people regarding the relation of the teaching contained in Amoris laetitia to the current post-Conciliar Magisterium can be divided into those that express doubts about the texts of this document and those that read it in the key of the hermeneutics of continuity. The article attempts to show the most important directions of interpretation of the exhortation. \nThe Pope did not intend the exhortation as a document containing general norms applicable in all cases. That is why he set the bishops of individual regions of the world to create guidelines for this exhortation that would be adequate to the traditions and calls of their region. The article describes some sample local documents. \nThe discussion merely outlined in the article and the differences in the interpretation of the exhortation texts shown in it show the need for further study on it. \n ","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Matrimoniale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2019.30.4.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教宗方济各于2016年4月8日发表的劝谕《爱我的爱》(Amoris laetitia)是两次主教会议的成果。对这些主教会议主题的极大兴趣,不仅是在教会圈子里,源于一些人期望改变教会在允许离婚和再婚人士参加圣餐方面的纪律立场。这篇劝谕的发表在科学家和牧师之间引起了很多讨论。这篇文章只是试图指出这些讨论的主题。关于《爱的爱》所包含的教导与目前后大公会议训导的关系,人们的说法可以分为两种,一种是对这份文件的文本表示怀疑,另一种是用连续性解释学的关键来解读它。本文试图显示最重要的方向解释劝谕。教皇不打算把劝谕作为一份载有适用于所有情况的一般准则的文件。这就是为什么他让世界上各个地区的主教们为这次劝诫制定指导方针,以适应他们地区的传统和召唤。本文描述了一些示例本地文档。文章中所概述的讨论和其中所显示的劝诫文本解释的差异表明需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relacja nauczania papieża Franciszka zawartego w adhortacji Amoris laetitia do dotychczasowego posoborowego Magisterium
The apostolic exhortation Amoris laetitia, issued by Pope Francis on April 8, 2016, is the fruit of as many as two synodal sessions. The great interest in the subject of these synods, not only in Church circles, resulted from the expectations of some for a change in the position of the Church's discipline in the admission of the divorced and remarried persons to Communion. The publication of the exhortation caused a lot of discussion among scientists and priests alike. The article is only an attempt to indicate the subject of these discussions. The statements of people regarding the relation of the teaching contained in Amoris laetitia to the current post-Conciliar Magisterium can be divided into those that express doubts about the texts of this document and those that read it in the key of the hermeneutics of continuity. The article attempts to show the most important directions of interpretation of the exhortation. The Pope did not intend the exhortation as a document containing general norms applicable in all cases. That is why he set the bishops of individual regions of the world to create guidelines for this exhortation that would be adequate to the traditions and calls of their region. The article describes some sample local documents. The discussion merely outlined in the article and the differences in the interpretation of the exhortation texts shown in it show the need for further study on it.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信