Ius Matrimoniale最新文献_第7页

Parafilia a nieważność małżeństwa kanonicznego w wybranych publikacjach 部分出版物中的性变态与教规婚姻的无效性

Ius Matrimoniale Pub Date : 2021-06-15 DOI: 10.21697/im.2021.32.1.04

Kinga Szymańska

{"title":"Parafilia a nieważność małżeństwa kanonicznego w wybranych publikacjach","authors":"Kinga Szymańska","doi":"10.21697/im.2021.32.1.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2021.32.1.04","url":null,"abstract":"Z przeprowadzonych analiz wynika, że przedstawiciele doktryny prawa kanonicznego traktują parafilie jako zagrożenie dla małżeństwa i rodziny, traktując je jako przykład dezintegracji psychoseksualnej danej osoby. Zdaniem kanonistów omawiane odstępstwa mogą uniemożliwić zawarcie ważnego przymierza małżeńskiego ze względu na niezdolność parafilika do podjęcia i wypełnienia istotnych obowiązków małżeńskich, takich jak: ustanowienie małżeńskiej wspólnoty życia, ustanowienie więzi międzyosobowej między małżonkami, utrzymanie stałego, wiernego, wzajemnego i długotrwałego związku w celu utrzymania wspólnoty heteroseksualnej, urodzenia i wychowania potomstwa lub urzeczywistnienia współżycia intymnego humano modo. Jednak sama obecność parafilii nie przesądza o niezdolności osoby do zawarcia małżeństwa. W tym zakresie kanoniści zalecają uwzględnienie stopnia nasilenia danej anomalii, odwołując się tym samym do badań Urbano Navarrete i włoskiego psychiatry Gianfrancesco Zuanazziego. Jednocześnie należy unikać pochopnej oceny wagi danej parafilii i uważnie oceniać każdą przedstawioną sprawę, biorąc pod uwagę rodzaj odchylenia, jego cechy, a także osobowość kontrahenta.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"151 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133988619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Praca i honoraria adwokatów kościelnych

Ius Matrimoniale Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI: 10.21697/im.2020.31.2.04

Ryszard Sztychmiler

{"title":"Praca i honoraria adwokatów kościelnych","authors":"Ryszard Sztychmiler","doi":"10.21697/im.2020.31.2.04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.04","url":null,"abstract":"The work of ecclesiastical advocates depends on themselves, but also on certain working conditions in the ecclesiastical courts, shaped by diocesan bishops, judical vicars and all court staff. In the analysis of certain aspects of the work and remuneration of ecclesiastical advocates, I have distinguished issues on which solutions and proposals are unanimously accepted by the authors, then proposals that are unjustified or inconsistent with the facts, and finally I have drawn attention to debatable proposals. \u0000In the first part of the article, among the issues similarly assessed by both authors, I addressed the following issues: the importance of good cooperation between judges and advocates, court fees, the benefits of advocate's participation in proceedings and advocate's tasks. In the second part, in the face of some of Dr. Gałązka's misjudgements and unjustified proposals, I presented my separate opinions on various aspects concerning court fees, the need for advocates, the level of their work, further training of advocates and judges, advocate’s working time and their remuneration. In the third part, I presented some issues that should be elaborated upon in further discussions. These include, inter alia, certain aspects of court fees, their exemption or reduction, the nature and conditions of a advotace’s service and his/her participation in interrogations.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"117158564","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Caberletti z 20 listopada 2018 roku

Ius Matrimoniale Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI: 10.21697/im.2020.31.2.05

W. Góralski

{"title":"Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego (kan. 1095, n. 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Caberletti z 20 listopada 2018 roku","authors":"W. Góralski","doi":"10.21697/im.2020.31.2.05","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.05","url":null,"abstract":"The sentence of the Roman Rota, c. Caberletti, concerns the marriage of a 34-year-old man, which was concluded in a certain haste. Therefore, from the very beginning the parties lived side by side, and after less than two years they broke up. The immediate reason for the claimant's departure was the defendant's infertility. The case for nullity was initiated by a man pointing to two grounds of nullity: a mistake as to the attribute of a woman intended directly and principally (can. 1097 § 2 CIC) and the exclusion of the indissolubility of marriage by the woman (can. 1101 § 2 CIC). After the handing down (in 2006) of a negative verdict on both headings, the man resigned from the appeal. However, wishing to regulate his civil status, after eight years (in 2014) he applied for the nullity of his marriage to another Tribunal – this time due to a grave defect of discretion of judgment the essential matrimonial tights and duties mutually to be handed over and accepted (can. 1095, n. 2 CIC). Two years later, nullity of the marriage had not been ruled, and the man appealed against it to the Roman Rota, where a positive decision was made. \u0000The opinion of an expert in a rotating instance played a significant role in the positive outcome of the case.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123452613","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Interes prawny a proces kościelny. Glosa aprobująca do wyroku Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 08 maja 2015 r., II OSK 2416/13

Ius Matrimoniale Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI: 10.21697/im.2020.31.2.08

Dawid Niemczycki

引用次数: 1

Robert Gołębiowski, Il curatore processuale nelle causa di nullità matrimoniali secondo giurisprudenza rotale: funzione e costituzione, Gregorian & Biblical Press, Roma 2018, ss. 301. 罗伯特·Gołębiowski,婚姻无效的案件在策展人根据判例法):和宪法,Gregorian & 301 Biblical出版社,2018年,罗马等。。

Ius Matrimoniale Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI: 10.21697/im.2020.31.2.09

Ginter Dzierżon

引用次数: 0

"Ne bis in eadem" based on the judgement of the Tribunal of the Rota of the Apostolic Nunciature in Spain coram Carlos Morán Bustos of 15th June 2007 根据2007年6月15日宗座驻西班牙大使馆裁判所(coram Carlos Morán Bustos)的判决，“我是主权者”

Ius Matrimoniale Pub Date : 2020-12-15 DOI: 10.21697/im.2020.31.2.07

Robert Kantor