Ryszard Sztychmiler
{"title":"Praca i honoraria adwokatów kościelnych","authors":"Ryszard Sztychmiler","doi":"10.21697/im.2020.31.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work of ecclesiastical advocates depends on themselves, but also on certain working conditions in the ecclesiastical courts, shaped by diocesan bishops, judical vicars and all court staff. In the analysis of certain aspects of the work and remuneration of ecclesiastical advocates, I have distinguished issues on which solutions and proposals are unanimously accepted by the authors, then proposals that are unjustified or inconsistent with the facts, and finally I have drawn attention to debatable proposals. \nIn the first part of the article, among the issues similarly assessed by both authors, I addressed the following issues: the importance of good cooperation between judges and advocates, court fees, the benefits of advocate's participation in proceedings and advocate's tasks. In the second part, in the face of some of Dr. Gałązka's misjudgements and unjustified proposals, I presented my separate opinions on various aspects concerning court fees, the need for advocates, the level of their work, further training of advocates and judges, advocate’s working time and their remuneration. In the third part, I presented some issues that should be elaborated upon in further discussions. These include, inter alia, certain aspects of court fees, their exemption or reduction, the nature and conditions of a advotace’s service and his/her participation in interrogations.","PeriodicalId":287198,"journal":{"name":"Ius Matrimoniale","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Matrimoniale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

教会倡导者的工作取决于他们自己,但也取决于教会法庭的某些工作条件,这些条件由教区主教、司法代表和所有法庭工作人员塑造。在分析教会倡导者的工作和报酬的某些方面时,我区分了作者一致接受的解决方案和建议的问题,然后是不合理或与事实不符的建议,最后我提请注意有争议的建议。在文章的第一部分,在两位作者所评估的类似问题中,我讨论了以下问题:法官与辩护人良好合作的重要性、法庭费用、辩护人参与诉讼的好处以及辩护人的任务。第二部分,面对Gałązka博士的一些误判和不合理的建议,我从法庭费用、对辩护人的需求、辩护人的工作水平、辩护人和法官的进一步培训、辩护人的工作时间和报酬等方面分别提出了自己的看法。在第三部分,我提出了一些应在进一步讨论中加以阐述的问题。其中包括,除其他外,法庭费用的某些方面,其豁免或减少,辩护律师服务的性质和条件以及他/她参与审讯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Praca i honoraria adwokatów kościelnych
The work of ecclesiastical advocates depends on themselves, but also on certain working conditions in the ecclesiastical courts, shaped by diocesan bishops, judical vicars and all court staff. In the analysis of certain aspects of the work and remuneration of ecclesiastical advocates, I have distinguished issues on which solutions and proposals are unanimously accepted by the authors, then proposals that are unjustified or inconsistent with the facts, and finally I have drawn attention to debatable proposals. In the first part of the article, among the issues similarly assessed by both authors, I addressed the following issues: the importance of good cooperation between judges and advocates, court fees, the benefits of advocate's participation in proceedings and advocate's tasks. In the second part, in the face of some of Dr. Gałązka's misjudgements and unjustified proposals, I presented my separate opinions on various aspects concerning court fees, the need for advocates, the level of their work, further training of advocates and judges, advocate’s working time and their remuneration. In the third part, I presented some issues that should be elaborated upon in further discussions. These include, inter alia, certain aspects of court fees, their exemption or reduction, the nature and conditions of a advotace’s service and his/her participation in interrogations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信