Religie & Samenleving最新文献_第9页

Hellemans, Staf & Peter Jonkers (red.) (2015), A Catholic Minority Church in a World of Seekers Hellemans, staff和Peter Jonkers(红色)(2015)，一个寻求者世界中的天主教少数派教会

Religie & Samenleving Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.54195/rs.12220

Maarten Van den Bos

引用次数: 0

Godsdienstsociologie: een cumulatief overzicht 宗教社会学:一个累积的概述

Religie & Samenleving Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.54195/rs.12219

D. Hak, L. Jansma

引用次数: 0

Bernts, Ton & Joantine Berghuijs (2016), God in Nederland 1966-2015

Religie & Samenleving Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.54195/rs.12221

Loek Halman

引用次数: 0

Lima, Luís Filipe Silvério & Anna Paula Torres Megiani (eds.) (2016), Visions, Prophecies and Divinations. Early Modern Messianism and Millenarianism in Iberian America, Spain and Portugal 利马，Luís Filipe silv<s:1>和Anna Paula Torres Megiani(编)(2016)，《幻象、预言和占卜》。伊比利亚美洲、西班牙和葡萄牙的早期现代弥赛亚主义和千禧年派

Religie & Samenleving Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.54195/rs.12222

L. Jansma

引用次数: 0

Dierickx, Guido (2015), Religie als sociale constructie. Een menswetenschappelijke rondleiding Dierickx, Guido(2015)，宗教作为社会建构。人文之旅

Religie & Samenleving Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.54195/rs.12223

E. Sengers

引用次数: 0

Wat telt als godsdienstsociologie? 什么是宗教社会学?

Religie & Samenleving Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.54195/rs.12217

Kees De Groot, E. Sengers

{"title":"Wat telt als godsdienstsociologie?","authors":"Kees De Groot, E. Sengers","doi":"10.54195/rs.12217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54195/rs.12217","url":null,"abstract":"In 1960, the Dutch journal of the Catholic Social-Ecclesial Institute (Kaski) Sociaal Kompas became Social Compass. This shift rounded off a period now considered as the heyday of Dutch sociology of religion. Ironically, in those years, Catholic sociologists in particular contested the legitimacy of taking religion as an object of sociological study. Each period in the history of sociology of religion appears to present a different face of it due to the interplay between the political field, the religious field, and the academic field, while the self-identification of its practitioners as sociologists of religion is far from self-evident. After 1980, further secularization resulted in a subsequent decline of chairs in sociology of religion. As direct, competitive government funding of academic research gained traction, the social-scientific study of religion continues to be funded. In so far as politicians and religious professionals continue to be concerned about issues such as the rise of Islam and new spirituality, the call for the social-scientific study of religion remains. The identification of these researchers with sociology of religion as a specialty, however, is less self-evident. What makes a sociologist of religion?","PeriodicalId":286339,"journal":{"name":"Religie & Samenleving","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128494985","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Post, Henk & Gerhard van der Schyff (red.) (2014), Godsdienstvrijheid in de Nederlandse rechtsorde. Nationale en Europese perspectieven Post, Henk & Gerhard van der Schyff (ed.)(2014)，《荷兰法律秩序中的宗教自由》。国家和欧洲的观点

Religie & Samenleving Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.54195/rs.12224

J. Snel

引用次数: 0

Actualiteit en relevantie van de Nederlandse godsdienstsociologie

Religie & Samenleving Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI: 10.54195/rs.12218

K. Groot, E. Sengers

{"title":"Actualiteit en relevantie van de Nederlandse godsdienstsociologie","authors":"K. Groot, E. Sengers","doi":"10.54195/rs.12218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54195/rs.12218","url":null,"abstract":"In a secular society, as is the Netherlands, the position of religions and religious organisations is a theme of controversial debates. Curiously enough, sociologists of religion do not play a prominent role in these debates. The question of this article is, what the contribution of contemporary Dutch sociology of religion is to science and society. The article starts with several characteristics of Dutch sociology of religion: it is connected with the emancipation of religious minorities, it was at the service of governmental planning (church buildings as well as social and welfare organizations), sociology of religion was located at theological faculties, thus it was mainly oriented at mainline Christianity and not at world religions, and finally sociology of religion is being replaced by more anthropological studies. The thesis of the article is that sociologists of religion stuck to these characteristics for too long, not being able to react to the changing religious context in time. The second part of the article focuses on the contemporary situation of sociology of religion. Starting with active emeriti, the paper discusses the academic departments, research institutes, and professional associations. The article concludes that sociology of religion remains relevant in research about the social-cultural consequences of secularisation and about the position of religion in hyper-diverse societies. To take that role, sociology of religion should become more sociological, focus on sociological methods and theories, and the social and political consequences and impact of religion.","PeriodicalId":286339,"journal":{"name":"Religie & Samenleving","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114492147","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Bezield door gedeelde afkeer 被共同的厌恶所鼓舞

Religie & Samenleving Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI: 10.54195/rs.12208

Jolanda Van der Lee

{"title":"Bezield door gedeelde afkeer","authors":"Jolanda Van der Lee","doi":"10.54195/rs.12208","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.54195/rs.12208","url":null,"abstract":"On an international conference in Amsterdam in 1901, criminologist Arnold Aletrino explained the newest theory on homosexuality, which stated that it was not a disease or perversion, but an innate, ‘natural’ phenomenon. This theory shocked important politicians among whom Dutch prime minister Abraham Kuyper, who therefore started a political debate on legislation on homosexuality. Ultimately this debate led to art. 248 bis of the Dutch Penal Code in 1911 that prohibited – under certain circumstances – ‘indecency’ between people of the same sex. In this article I discuss how between 1901 and 1911 the aversion to homosexuality was so obvious in the Netherlands for almost everyone, that right-wing politicians could deploy the existence of the new theory on homosexuality as a stick to beat the left-wing dog. Confessional politicians used it as a means to prove that the Christian ‘Free University’ should be entitled to award academic degrees and to illustrate the dangers of public libraries and of the plans for change in the judicial system. Socialists and Liberals had no defence against this weapon, because they shared the moral judgment on homosexuality with the right-winged politicians. Therefore, in the political debate on the ‘anti-gay-article’, the dispute was not about what Troelstra called “the abhorrence of homosexuality that we all share”, but whether legislation on homosexuality was appropriate.","PeriodicalId":286339,"journal":{"name":"Religie & Samenleving","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130797217","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Hoe homo’s en moslims iets met elkaar kregen 同性恋和穆斯林是如何相处的

Religie & Samenleving Pub Date : 2016-09-01 DOI: 10.54195/rs.12213

D. Bos

引用次数: 0

Religie &amp; Samenleving最新文献

Religie & Samenleving最新文献