{"title":"The Bootstrap Principle and the Uniqueness of the World","authors":"B. Nicolescu","doi":"10.1142/9789811219832_0023","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811219832_0023","url":null,"abstract":"The bootstrap hypothesis emerged first as a possible explanation of certain experimental data in particle physics. This hypothesis was formulated for the first time in 1959 by Geoffrey Chew (1959; Chew & Jacob, 1964), a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and was immediately used, for detailed physics calculations, by Chew and Mandelstam (1961). The word bootstrap itself is untranslatable. Indeed, bootstrap, in the proper sense laces, also means to levitate while dragging your boots. The most appropriate term in translation would be that of self-consistency. The bootstrap theory has emerged as a natural reaction against classical realism, which received a death blow, and against the idea, to which it was associated, of a need for equations of motion in space-time, during the formulation of quantum mechanics, around 1930. According to Newton, we learned about the existence of equations of motion, in order to describe physical reality: Newton’s equation regarding macroscopic bodies, Maxwell’s equations for electric and magnetic fields, and Schrödinger and Dirac’s equations for the movements of atomic systems. The movement described by these equations is that of certain entities considered as fundamental building blocks of physical reality, defined at each point of the space-time continuum. By definition, these equations possess an intrinsic deterministic character (the fact that, in some cases, large ensembles of objects can lead to a chaotic behavior does not alter the deterministic character of the basic equations of motion). Quantum entities are not subject to classical determinism. The bootstrap theory is just drawing the logical conclusions of this situation by proposing the abdication of any equation of motion. This attitude is consistent with the schedule of the matrix S (S is the initial for the English word scattering) initiated by Heisenberg in 1943: A realist theory must be expressed in terms of quantities directly related to experimental observation (Cushing, 1990). The abdication of any equation of motion has an immediate consequence: the absence of any fundamental brick of physical reality. In bootstrap, the part appears simultaneously as the whole. Nature is conceived as a global entity, inseparable at a fundamental level. The particle plays the role of a system in the irreducible interaction with other systems, which is a first rapprochement between the bootstrap theory and the current systemic thinking.","PeriodicalId":285339,"journal":{"name":"Cybern. Hum. Knowing","volume":"247 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122929214","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Societal Self-observation in the Time of Datafication: Interfunctional Analysis of the Chilean Open Data Web Portal","authors":"Maximilian Heimstädt","doi":"10.31235/osf.io/s7z8w","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/s7z8w","url":null,"abstract":"Datafication, the technological development that emerged out of computerization and global interconnectedness, has spawned new forms of societal self-observations. In the present article I turn to the example of Open Data web portals – specialized websites that make large amounts of governmental datasets publicly available – to show how they relate to the status quo of social research on functional differentiation. For my analysis of the Chilean Portal de Datos Públicos I developed a method to link metadata categories from the web portal to a hard-core list of ten function systems. My results confirm literature, which finds economized or politicized forms of societal self-description. Moreover the results are in line with studies that show the vanishing role of religion. Interestingly, my study finds health to be of high importance – I might even speak of a “healthized” self-observation – which I argue is at odds with a negligible representation of the function system “sport” within the self-observation. For future interfunctional social research in the time of datafication, I recommend sharpening the empirical approach by exploring emerging text-as-data methods.","PeriodicalId":285339,"journal":{"name":"Cybern. Hum. Knowing","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123620166","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Ten Systems: Toward a Canon of Function Systems","authors":"Steffen Roth, Anton Schütz","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2508950","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2508950","url":null,"abstract":"There is no description of modernity without functional differentiation. The distinction of function systems such as economy, science, art, or religion, is a key to modernity. Modern science, however, applies and implies rather than studies functional differentiation without providing exact definitions of function systems or investigating how many of these systems actually exist. The present article addresses these two issues focusing on the second. Test criteria for the distinction between function systems and systems other than function systems are developed and used to decide whether family, love, morality, culture, social work, and some more, actually are function systems. Subsequently, the article presents a list of 10 function systems and their corresponding media, codes, and programs. A final section suggests that a disciplined approach to functional differentiation opens up a horizon for interfunctional comparative social research.","PeriodicalId":285339,"journal":{"name":"Cybern. Hum. Knowing","volume":"255 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116250150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Be-ing of Objects","authors":"D. Baecker","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2557255","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2557255","url":null,"abstract":"The paper is a reading of Martin Heidegger's Contributions to Philosophy (Of the Even) by means of Ranulph Glanville's notions of black box, cybernetic control and objects as well as by George Spencer-Brown's notion of form and Fritz Heider's notion of medium. In fact, as Heidegger was among those who emphasized systems thinking as the epitome of modern thinking, did in his lecture on Schelling's Treatise on the Essence of Human Freedom a most thorough reading of this thinking, and considered cybernetics the very fulfilment of modern science it is interesting to know whether second-order cybernetics, as it was not known to Heidegger and as it delves into an understanding of inevitable complexity and foundational ignorance, falls within that verdict mere modernity or goes beyond it. If modern science in its rational understanding considers its subjects to be objects sitting still while being observed, then indeed second-order cybernetics is different. It looks into the observer's interactions with black boxes, radically uncertain of where to expect operations of a self, but certain that we cannot restrict it to human consciousness.","PeriodicalId":285339,"journal":{"name":"Cybern. Hum. Knowing","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2015-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"116123611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Aristotle and George Spencer-Brown","authors":"D. Baecker","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2073361","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2073361","url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with Aristotelian logic as the special case of more general epistemology and sociology of both science and common sense. The Aristotelian principles of identity, of noncontradiction, and of excluded middle are to be supplemented by the second-order cybernetic, or \"cybernethic\" principles of paradox, of ambivalence, and of control. In this paper we collect some ideas on how to evaluate the scope of Aristotelian logic with respect to the laws of thought they tried to determine and to do so within the historical moment of the impact of the invention of writing possibly triggering this determination. We look at some modern doubts concerning these laws and discovering an understanding of complexity that is not to be resumed under any principle of identity. The invention of sociology, epistemology, and the mathematics of communication follow suit in focusing not only on the observer but more importantly on the distinction between observers to further contextualize any talk of identities and operationalize both talk and fact of contradiction, paradox, and ambivalence.","PeriodicalId":285339,"journal":{"name":"Cybern. Hum. Knowing","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123924766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Dark Hero of the Information Age: In Search of Norbert Wiener, Father of Cybernetics","authors":"R. Glanville","doi":"10.5860/choice.42-6451","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-6451","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":285339,"journal":{"name":"Cybern. Hum. Knowing","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125577918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Quasi-Error of the External World an essay for Thomas A. Sebeok, in memoriam","authors":"J. Deely","doi":"10.5840/AJS200117464","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5840/AJS200117464","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":285339,"journal":{"name":"Cybern. Hum. Knowing","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"125231442","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Thinking Like a Computer","authors":"David Schmaltz","doi":"10.1511/2019.107.3.187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1511/2019.107.3.187","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":285339,"journal":{"name":"Cybern. Hum. Knowing","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130841506","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}