{"title":"Pengaruh Implementasi Kebijakan Proteksionisme Melalui Tingkat Komponen Dalam Negeri Terhadap Tender/Seleksi Internasional","authors":"Alif Duta Hardenta, Shafira Dinda Ariefti, Wiweko Rahadian Abyapta","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art6","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art6","url":null,"abstract":"The policy of protectionism has been adopted by a number of countries including Indonesia with the aim of protecting and improving the quality of domestic products. One form of the protectionism policy is through the Local Content Requirement which is realized by the Domestic Component Level (TKDN) policy. This policy affects the implementation of international selection process process (popularly known as ‘tenders’) which are a special form of government procurement of goods/services. This procurement is guaranteed by regulations due to the involvement of foreign parties in the selection process which can determine the outcome of the procurement. This research departs from the problem of international trade protectionism policies and the influence of TKDN policies in the regulations of the government procurement of goods/services which governs the international selection process. The research method used is normative juridical along with non-interactive qualitative. The results of the research conclude that the protectionism policy adopted by Indonesia encourages TKDN obligations in the procurement of government goods/services as one of the considerations to become one of the determining factors in the passage of international selection. This policy creates space for the use of domestic products to be applied in the process of government procurement of goods/services. Nonetheless, the TKDN policy on the one hand impedes the smooth running of the international selection process by limiting potential foreign participants in the international procurement mechanism. In addition, this research also concludes that in practice through cases there are conflicts with obligations regarding TKDN which are not fully considered in government goods/services procurement activities.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123222586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Tanggung Jawab Penjamin Pada Kredit Macet Dalam Sistem Borgtocht Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19","authors":"Indra Muchlis Adnan, T. Syahfitri, Muannif Ridwan","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art8","url":null,"abstract":"This study discusses the legal responsibilities of guarantors for non-performing loans in the borgtocht system during the Covid-19 Pandemic. The research method used is normative juridical. The research concludes that the guarantor's responsibility for non-permorfing loans in banks under the borgtocht system during the Covid-19 Pandemic era is in accordance with Article 1831 of the Civil Code, namely the guarantor is not required to pay the creditor, unless the debtor is negligent, while the debtor's assets must first be confiscated and auctioned to pay off the debt, but the guarantor cannot ask the creditor to confiscate the goods belonging to the debtor first, before the collateral belonging to the guarantor debtor (borg) is confiscated, if the guarantor releases his privileges through a borgtocht deed, it is regulated in Article 1832 of the Civil Code that the guarantor cannot demand that the debtor’s property be confiscated and sold first to pay off his debt if he has waived his privilege to demand that the borrower's property be confiscated/auctioned first. Settlement efforts in the event of non-performing credit involving the guarantor debtor (borg) during the Covid-19 Pandemic include the debtor has the right to apply for credit restructuring if in fact the debtor has defaulted in making debt payments. Other efforts are by peaceful means such as deliberations or negotiations, so that there is no confiscation of the collateral belonging to the guarantor debtor, and the settlement through legal channels is submitted to the Court to be executed on the guarantee and then auctioned off.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132240747","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Strategi Pemberantasan Praktik Penangkapan Ikan Secara Ilegal di Wilayah Laut Indonesia","authors":"Muhammad Rafi Darajati, M. Syafei","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art7","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art7","url":null,"abstract":"Maritime security in Indonesia is still vulnerable because of the high level of violations at sea such as illegal fishing, as well as various threats and other problems. The practice of illegal fishing, which remains a common issue in Indonesian territorial waters has made it difficult for Indonesia to realize itself as a maritime nation. Therefore, the author intends to discuss how are the appropriate efforts to eradicate illegal fishing practices in order to create a sovereign Indonesian state. The type of research used is normative juridical. In addition, this research has an analytical descriptive nature. This research concludes that to maximize the eradication of illegal fishing practices in Indonesia is to strengthen its maritime security system. There are two indicators, namely the optimization of maritime security institutions and strengthening legal products in the form of the Maritime Security Law to be able to realize Indonesia as a maritime country.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"6 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"132007311","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, Zamroni Abdussamad, Zainal Abdul Aziz Hadju
{"title":"Studi Perbandingan Penanganan Pengungsi Luar Negeri Di Indonesia, Australia, Dan Thailand","authors":"Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar, Zamroni Abdussamad, Zainal Abdul Aziz Hadju","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art2","url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia specifically addresses the refugee issues in Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016 on the Handling of Foreign Refugees. The handling of refugee status in Indonesia is handed over to UNHCR considering that Indonesia is not a party to the 1951 Refugee Convention or the 1967 Protocol. Besides Indonesia, Australia and Thailand are also not parties to the convention. Therefore it is important to see a comparative study of policies between countries. This study also aims to find out whether Presidential Decree No. 125 of 2016 can resolve the problem of refugees in Indonesia and what is the policy comparison between Indonesia, Australia and Thailand. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach. The results of the study concluded that Presidential Decree No. 125 of 2016 has adequately accommodated arrangements for overseas refugees, but there are still several provisions that have multiple interpretations, such as arrangements regarding \"foreigners\", Rudenim arrangements, and the principle of \"local integration\" that has not been regulated. The implementation in Australia is firmer compared to Thailand and Indonesia. Australia itself emphasizes forced repatriation if it is detected as threatening the country's sovereignty. Meanwhile, Thailand provides access to foreign refugees to submit applications so they can live and settle.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124549890","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Kepemilikan Hak Milik Atas Satuan Rumah Susun Warga Asing dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja","authors":"Sapto Hermawan, Dimas P. Setyo Wibowo","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art9","url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze the characteristics of certificates of ownership of flats owned by foreign citizens and its implementation as regulated under the Job Creation Law from a social justice perspective. This article uses normative legal research methods. The sources of data used are secondary sources of data which include primary and secondary legal materials. The method of collecting legal materials is carried out by means of a literature study. The analysis of legal materials used is carried out prescriptively through a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study concluded that the characteristics of flat ownership certificates by foreign nationals are regulated in the Basic Agrarian Law whose regulation cannot be separated from the principle of land attachment, besides that it is also regulated in the Law on Flat Units. The implementation of certificates of ownership rights to apartment units built on state land for foreign nationals as regulated by the Job Creation Law is not in accordance with the principle of fair distribution of land.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122028947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Alternatif Penghukuman Selain Penjara: Analisis Hermeneutika Kritis Dan Critical Legal Studies","authors":"Murdoko Murdoko, Mohammad Syifa Amin Widigdo","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art5","url":null,"abstract":"The prison model as a form of punishment and retribution for acts and perpetrators of crimes has received criticism from some scientists and legal activists. Critical Legal Studies (CLS) personnel criticize the model of punishment by imprisonment because of its positivistic nature. The norm of applying prison law is considered universal without regard to the relativity and particularity of facts which cannot be separated from various social contexts. For this reason, this research examines and considers alternative models of punishment outside prison institutions that accommodate the particularity of facts and cases in order to obtain a model of punishment that is not only retaliatory for the perpetrators of crimes, but also educational in nature while respecting their right to freedom. By using a critical hermeneutic approach combined with CLS, this study concludes that supervision as punishment can be applied as an alternative model of punishment beyond imprisonment that is deemed to be more humane and effective.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114754199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Demokratisasi Internal Partai Politik Era Reformasi: Antara Das Sollen dan Das Sein","authors":"Jamaludin Ghafur","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art1","url":null,"abstract":"Political parties as the main feature of representative democracy may only be able to function optimally in upholding the principles of democratic government if they are managed internally in a democratic manner. It is impossible for a democratic program to be developed by a non-democratic political party. This paper aims to comprehensively analyze the development of arrangements and practices of internal democratization of political parties in Indonesia during the reform era, especially in the context of leadership succession. This is a doctrinal legal research using primary, secondary and non-legal sources of law. The most important finding from this research is that the rules regarding the internal democratization of political parties are still very general and abstract, giving rise to many interpretations. In addition, there are no provisions for strict sanctions against political parties that do not heed these rules. As a result, most political parties often ignore orders or obligations to carry out the succession of their leaders in a democratic manner as mandated by law.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114878716","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Peran Dan Tanggung Jawab Organisasi Bantuan Hukum Dalam Memberikan Akses Keadilan Secara Prodeo Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta","authors":"B. Sutiyoso, Atqo Darmawan Aji, Guntar Mahendro","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art10","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art10","url":null,"abstract":"Legal aid is a crucial instrument in the justice system as it serves the part in the protection of human rights for every citizen, including people who cannot afford it. This study examines and analyzes the roles and responsibilities of legal aid organizations (OBH) in providing access to justice for free legal services in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY), as well as the obstacles that occur in providing the free legal services. The type of research used is empirical juridical, supported by primary, secondary and tertiary data sources. The method used comprises of sociological, statutory, and conceptual approaches. The results of the study concluded that the role of OBH in DIY in providing free legal services has been carried out in accordance with the provisions of the law. The procedure for providing legal aid on a free basis is still based on several requirements, including that the applicant must apply for legal aid on a free basis, including a Certificate of Disadvantage (SKTM) from the village administration. The provision of legal assistance by OBH is carried out through litigation and non-litigation. There are two responsibilities of OBH in providing legal assistance on a free basis, namely responsibility to institutions/foundations and responsibilities as an advocate so that in providing legal assistance must be professional. Obstacles faced by OBH are both in juridical and non-juridical barriers.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"162 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124528995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Peran Teknologi Finansial Dalam Pencegahan Pendanaan Terorisme","authors":"Clarisa Permata Hariono Putri, Go Lisanawati","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art4","url":null,"abstract":"Financial technology (fintech) has the potential to become a new means and threat to finance terrorism. This study aims to provide an analysis regarding the concrete role that can be played by financial technology in preventing the financing of terrorism. This is a normative legal research that uses statutory and conceptual approaches. The results of this study conclude that financial technology is related to and poses a new threat to financing terrorism, so that financial technology can play a role in preventing the financing of terrorism by implementing various actions that support anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism, identify profiles of funders to develop principles of recognizing users of financial services and joined the Indonesian Joint Funding Fintech Association. This study concludes that there is a link between and the use and position of fintech as a new threat to terrorism financing. In this regard, it turns out that fintech can prevent the financing of terrorism by implementing various actions that have been stipulated in normative law as well as new forms of developing the role of fintech.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126435756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Jabatan Rangkap Dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat","authors":"S. Anisah","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art3","url":null,"abstract":"Under the Indonesian Competition Law, interlocking directorate in companies is not absolutely prohibited. This is in contrast to the US Competition Law which prohibits it per se. Nevertheless, the enforcement of competition law for cases relating to interlocking directorate held in the two countries have similarities, namely that it is necessary to prove should there be any impacts on competition. For this reason, this research was conducted by proposing two questions, namely, first, how is the regulation of interlocking directorate in Indonesian and the US Competition Law? Second, how is the enforcement of competition law in regards to interlocking directorate in Indonesia and the US? This normative legal research uses statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative law approaches to answer the question. This study concludes that the US applies the per se illegal approach, whereas Indonesian Competition Law applies the rule of reason approach. However, in the application of the rule of reason approach in Indonesia, it was identified that there was a non-uniformity in the considerations of the Commission Council and KPPU's Decisions for cases of interlocking directorate. The non-uniformity referred to is related to whether or not there has been a violation of the prohibition of interlocking directorate and its impact on unfair competition. Even though the US uses the per se illegal approach, its application still causes controversy because there is a court opinion stating that proof of impact or contrary to all provisions of competition law is required for a violation of interlocking directorate.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"416 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"124476309","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}