Tanggung Jawab Penjamin Pada Kredit Macet Dalam Sistem Borgtocht Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19

Indra Muchlis Adnan, T. Syahfitri, Muannif Ridwan
{"title":"Tanggung Jawab Penjamin Pada Kredit Macet Dalam Sistem Borgtocht Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19","authors":"Indra Muchlis Adnan, T. Syahfitri, Muannif Ridwan","doi":"10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study discusses the legal responsibilities of guarantors for non-performing loans in the borgtocht system during the Covid-19 Pandemic. The research method used is normative juridical. The research concludes that the guarantor's responsibility for non-permorfing loans in banks under the borgtocht system during the Covid-19 Pandemic era is in accordance with Article 1831 of the Civil Code, namely the guarantor is not required to pay the creditor, unless the debtor is negligent, while the debtor's assets must first be confiscated and auctioned to pay off the debt, but the guarantor cannot ask the creditor to confiscate the goods belonging to the debtor first, before the collateral belonging to the guarantor debtor (borg) is confiscated, if the guarantor releases his privileges through a borgtocht deed, it is regulated in Article 1832 of the Civil Code that the guarantor cannot demand that the debtor’s property be confiscated and sold first to pay off his debt if he has waived his privilege to demand that the borrower's property be confiscated/auctioned first. Settlement efforts in the event of non-performing credit involving the guarantor debtor (borg) during the Covid-19 Pandemic include the debtor has the right to apply for credit restructuring if in fact the debtor has defaulted in making debt payments. Other efforts are by peaceful means such as deliberations or negotiations, so that there is no confiscation of the collateral belonging to the guarantor debtor, and the settlement through legal channels is submitted to the Court to be executed on the guarantee and then auctioned off.","PeriodicalId":239318,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study discusses the legal responsibilities of guarantors for non-performing loans in the borgtocht system during the Covid-19 Pandemic. The research method used is normative juridical. The research concludes that the guarantor's responsibility for non-permorfing loans in banks under the borgtocht system during the Covid-19 Pandemic era is in accordance with Article 1831 of the Civil Code, namely the guarantor is not required to pay the creditor, unless the debtor is negligent, while the debtor's assets must first be confiscated and auctioned to pay off the debt, but the guarantor cannot ask the creditor to confiscate the goods belonging to the debtor first, before the collateral belonging to the guarantor debtor (borg) is confiscated, if the guarantor releases his privileges through a borgtocht deed, it is regulated in Article 1832 of the Civil Code that the guarantor cannot demand that the debtor’s property be confiscated and sold first to pay off his debt if he has waived his privilege to demand that the borrower's property be confiscated/auctioned first. Settlement efforts in the event of non-performing credit involving the guarantor debtor (borg) during the Covid-19 Pandemic include the debtor has the right to apply for credit restructuring if in fact the debtor has defaulted in making debt payments. Other efforts are by peaceful means such as deliberations or negotiations, so that there is no confiscation of the collateral belonging to the guarantor debtor, and the settlement through legal channels is submitted to the Court to be executed on the guarantee and then auctioned off.
在Covid-19大流行期间,博尔托希特体系的信用额度被冻结
本研究探讨了新冠肺炎疫情期间担保制度下担保人对不良贷款的法律责任。使用的研究方法是规范法学。研究认为,新冠肺炎疫情时期保证人对银行非质押贷款的责任符合《民法典》第1831条,即保证人不需要向债权人支付债务,除非债务人有过失,而债务人的资产必须先被没收拍卖以清偿债务,但保证人不能要求债权人先没收属于债务人的货物。在属于保证人债务人(担保人)的担保物被没收之前,保证人通过财产契据解除其特权的,《民法典》第1832条规定:保证人放弃要求先没收/拍卖债务人财产的特权的,保证人不得要求先没收/拍卖债务人的财产以清偿债务。在新冠肺炎大流行期间,涉及担保债务人(borg)的不良信贷的解决措施包括,如果债务人实际上已经违约,债务人有权申请信用重组。其他努力是通过和平手段,例如审议或谈判,以便不没收属于担保债务人的抵押品,并通过法律渠道将解决办法提交法院在担保上执行,然后拍卖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信