{"title":"Appendix A","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9789048553426-012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048553426-012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":239203,"journal":{"name":"Sanctions with Chinese Characteristics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"129663661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Acknowledgments","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9789048553426-003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048553426-003","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":239203,"journal":{"name":"Sanctions with Chinese Characteristics","volume":"238 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"120838467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"8. China’s Sanctions Dilemma","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9789048553426-011","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048553426-011","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":239203,"journal":{"name":"Sanctions with Chinese Characteristics","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114811402","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"4. Stigmatising Sanctions and China’s Counter-Stigmatisation","authors":"","doi":"10.1515/9789048553426-007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048553426-007","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":239203,"journal":{"name":"Sanctions with Chinese Characteristics","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"126778559","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Stigmatising Sanctions and China’s Counter-Stigmatisation","authors":"A. Poh","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1bhg2w8.8","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bhg2w8.8","url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 4 explains the Chinese leadership’s impetus in using its sanctions\u0000 rhetoric and elaborates on the substance of such rhetoric. It suggests that\u0000 China’s experience of being a target of Western sanctions since its establishment\u0000 in 1949 had convinced its leaders that ‘the West’ was determined to\u0000 stigmatise China through various forms of economic punishment, with the ultimate\u0000 goal of undermining the Chinese government’s political legitimacy. The\u0000 Chinese political elite therefore engaged in a rhetorical counter-stigmatisation\u0000 strategy that sought to delegitimise the sanctions strategy of the US and its\u0000 allies by depicting them as imperialist and interventionist. China also sought\u0000 to gradually redefine, in the understanding of United Nations Member States,\u0000 the notion of when and how sanctions could legitimately be employed.","PeriodicalId":239203,"journal":{"name":"Sanctions with Chinese Characteristics","volume":"61 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"114032261","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"China and United Nations Security Council Sanctions","authors":"A. Poh","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1bhg2w8.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bhg2w8.9","url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 5 uses the dataset of sanctions-related resolutions tabled at the\u0000 UNSC from 1971 to 2016 to present a correlation analysis that examines the\u0000 extent to which expectations derived from the ‘rhetoric-based’ hypothesis\u0000 align with China’s voting behaviour at the UNSC. Thereafter, it examines\u0000 the backgrounds, debates, and outcomes concerning three case studies:\u0000 UN sanctions against the DPRK (2006-2016); Syria (2011-2016); and Guinea-\u0000 Bissau (2012). It examines whether the hypothesised constraining role\u0000 of China’s sanctions rhetoric or one of the competing explanations best\u0000 accounts for the outcomes in each case. It finds that China’s sanctions\u0000 rhetoric had frequently prompted its decision-makers to act or vote in\u0000 ways that were not the most favourable to China’s immediate political\u0000 and economic interests.","PeriodicalId":239203,"journal":{"name":"Sanctions with Chinese Characteristics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"130531854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Appendix B","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1bhg2w8.14","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bhg2w8.14","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":239203,"journal":{"name":"Sanctions with Chinese Characteristics","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"122436228","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Index","authors":"","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1bhg2w8.17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bhg2w8.17","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":239203,"journal":{"name":"Sanctions with Chinese Characteristics","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"128863160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Demystifying China’s Sanctions Behaviour","authors":"A. Poh","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1bhg2w8.11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bhg2w8.11","url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 7 examines which of the five competing hypotheses as detailed\u0000 in Chapters 2 and 3 best explains China’s puzzling sanctions behaviour.\u0000 It finds that China’s longstanding rhetoric against the use of unilateral\u0000 sanctions had resulted in China not being able to openly threaten or admit\u0000 to the use of such economic tools in its pursuit of political goals. China’s use\u0000 of unilateral sanctions under the period of examination (if at all present)\u0000 was therefore ambiguous and unofficial, targeted at narrowly specific\u0000 sectors, and limited in scope. Furthermore, China found itself having to\u0000 withdraw or further reduce the extent of sanctions when other parties\u0000 used rhetorical action such as shaming or flattery to draw international\u0000 attention to China’s behaviour.","PeriodicalId":239203,"journal":{"name":"Sanctions with Chinese Characteristics","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"131134611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：