2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference最新文献_第6页

Using an Automated Air Traffic Simulation Capability for a Parametric Study in Traffic Flow Management 利用自动空中交通模拟能力进行交通流管理参数化研究

2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference Pub Date : 2018-06-24 DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-3665

Heather M. Arneson, A. Evans, D. Kulkarni, Paul U. Lee, Jinhua Li, M. Wei

{"title":"Using an Automated Air Traffic Simulation Capability for a Parametric Study in Traffic Flow Management","authors":"Heather M. Arneson, A. Evans, D. Kulkarni, Paul U. Lee, Jinhua Li, M. Wei","doi":"10.2514/6.2018-3665","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-3665","url":null,"abstract":"Flight delays occur when demand for capacity-constrained airspace or airports exceeds predicted capacity. Demand for capacity-constrained airspace or airports can be controlled by a series of Traffic Management Initiatives (TMIs), which use departure and airborne delays, as well as pre-departure and airborne reroutes, to manage access to the constrained resources. Two systems exist in current and planned future operations to address imbalances between demand and capacity. The Collaborative Trajectory Options Program (CTOP) reduces demand to constrained resources by assigning strategic departure delay and pre-departure reroutes. Reroutes are selected from Trajectory Options Sets (TOSs) submitted by airlines. As flights approach the constrained resource, the Time-Based Flow Management System (TBFM) is used to assign tactical delay to satisfy constraints. This paper describes experiments performed to study the impact of varying levels of airline participation in CTOP via submission of TOSs on ground delay and flight time, and the impact of departure uncertainty on TBFM delays. Results suggest that as CTOP participation increases, average ground delays decrease for all airlines, but to the greatest extent for airlines participating in CTOP. A threshold in CTOP participation, which varies with the constraint capacity, is identified beyond which there is relatively little further reduction in average ground delays. Similarly, given the likely level of CTOP participation, the capacity reduction for which CTOP would be an appropriate TMI is also identified. Results also suggest that high average departure errors and high variability in departure error can make the prioritization of TBFM internal departures in TBFM metering and scheduling infeasible. Departure errors at current levels are, however, acceptable.","PeriodicalId":229151,"journal":{"name":"2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"123145092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

F-35 STOVL Performance Requirements Verification F-35 STOVL性能要求验证

2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference Pub Date : 2018-06-24 DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-3681

D. Levin, D. Parsons, David Panteny, Peter Wilson, M. Rask

引用次数: 1

Overview of NASA’s ATM-X Project NASA的ATM-X项目概述

2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference Pub Date : 2018-06-24 DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-3363

William N. Chan, B. Barmore, Jennifer L. Kibler, Paul U. Lee, N. O'Connor, Kee Palopo, David P. Thipphavong, S. Zelinski

引用次数: 9

Computational Methods for Flight Routing Costs in Collaborative Trajectory Options Programs 协同轨迹选择方案中飞行路线成本的计算方法

2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference Pub Date : 2018-06-24 DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-3352

Robert Hoffman, B. Hackney, R. Kicinger, M. Ball, Guodong Zhu

引用次数: 6

Integrated Modeling of Dynamic Airline Behavior in the Air Transport System 航空运输系统中动态航线行为的集成建模

2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference Pub Date : 2018-06-24 DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-3989

Marcia Urban, K. Ploetner, M. Hornung

引用次数: 0

Automatic Patrol Trajectory Control of UAV in A Forest Surveillance and Fires Detection Mission 森林监视与火灾探测任务中无人机自动巡逻轨迹控制

2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference Pub Date : 2018-06-24 DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-3260

Lidong Zhang, Zhixiang Liu, Yiqun Dong, Youmin Zhang, J. Ai

引用次数: 3

The Effects of Fixed Conical Spike Inlets on the Performance of Higher Bypass Ratio Engines 固定锥形尖顶进气道对大涵道比发动机性能的影响

2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference Pub Date : 2018-06-24 DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-3836

Spencer C. Cleary, Timothy T. Takahashi

引用次数: 3

Proximity versus dynamicity – an initial analysis at four European airports 邻近与动态——对四个欧洲机场的初步分析

2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference Pub Date : 2018-06-24 DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-3998

Pierrick Pasutto, K. Zeghal, E. Hoffman

引用次数: 0

Feasibility Study of Short Takeoff and Landing Urban Air Mobility Vehicles using Geometric Programming 基于几何规划的城市空中机动车辆短距起降可行性研究

2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference Pub Date : 2018-06-24 DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-4151

C. Courtin, Michael J. Burton, P. Butler, A. Yu, Parker D. Vascik, R. Hansman

引用次数: 30

Catalyzing Disruptive Mobility Opportunities through Transformational Aviation Power 通过转型航空动力催化颠覆性移动机会

2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference Pub Date : 2018-06-24 DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-3356

N. Borer

{"title":"Catalyzing Disruptive Mobility Opportunities through Transformational Aviation Power","authors":"N. Borer","doi":"10.2514/6.2018-3356","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-3356","url":null,"abstract":"Lightweight, efficient power production has been a pacing technology for aviation. Advances in airborne electric propulsion technology have enabled new aviation concepts in markets that previously were not dominated by aviation systems, largely because electric propulsion allows for efficient, integrated propulsion/aerodynamic/control solutions that were previously not practical with combustion-based power architectures. These new markets include automated package delivery, urban air mobility, and short-haul transportation. As these markets evolve, the impact of using electricity for airborne propulsion on an expanding mission set, as well as the sheer amount of energy consumed, will begin to challenge the energy harvesting and distribution paradigm as it exists today. Left unaddressed, these challenges could stymie the evolution of these new markets and mobility options. This paper identifies some of the potential systemic issues associated with the expanded use of electric propulsion and explores the requirements associated with alternate aviation power architectures. The recommended path includes the development of a new hybrid-electric aviation power architecture that can be used in conjunction with a portfolio of evolving battery-electric and combustion-based systems.","PeriodicalId":229151,"journal":{"name":"2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2018-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"133986049","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2