LSN: Judicial Review (Topic)最新文献

筛选

英文中文

What Comparativism Tells Us about Originalism 比较主义对原旨主义的启示

LSN: Judicial Review (Topic) Pub Date : 2013-07-23 DOI: 10.1093/ICON/MOT049

Lael K. Weis

引用次数: 5

Major Questions about the 'Major Questions' Doctrine 关于“大问题”主义的主要问题

LSN: Judicial Review (Topic) Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.36640/mjeal.5.2.major

Kevin O. Leske

{"title":"Major Questions about the 'Major Questions' Doctrine","authors":"Kevin O. Leske","doi":"10.36640/mjeal.5.2.major","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.36640/mjeal.5.2.major","url":null,"abstract":"After over a decade of hibernation, the United States Supreme Court has awoken the “major questions” doctrine, which has re-emerged in an expanded form. Under the doctrine, a court will not defer to an agency’s interpretation of a statutory provision in circumstances where the case involves an issue of deep economic or political significance or where the interpretive question could effectuate an enormous and transformative expansion of the agency’s regulatory authority. While the doctrine’s re-emergence in recent Supreme Court cases has already raised concerns, a subtle shift in its application has gone unnoticed. Unlike in earlier cases, where the Court invoked the major questions doctrine under Step One of the Chevron framework, the Court has recently applied the doctrine in other stages of the Chevron analysis. For instance, in Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, the Court first found that the statutory provision at issue was ambiguous under Chevron Step One. It then raised the major questions doctrine as part of its Step Two analysis to find that the agency’s interpretation was unreasonable. In stark contrast, the Court in King v. Burwell invoked the major questions doctrine at Chevron Step Zero and thereby declined to apply the Chevron framework altogether. The re-emergence of the major questions doctrine and its expanded application is significant and raises doctrinal and pragmatic concerns. Accordingly, this Essay seeks to re-introduce the doctrine to the legal community and explain the Court’s recent application of the doctrine to demonstrate how and why its newfound scope warrants further study.","PeriodicalId":227775,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Judicial Review (Topic)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"127533077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

首页上一页