The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery最新文献

{"title":"Workplace Culture-A Different Look at the Perspective of Orthopaedic Women Faculty Members: Commentary on an article by Katherine M. Gerull, MD, et al.: \"Addressing Issues of Inclusive Workplace Culture for Women Orthopaedic Surgeons in Academia. A Qualitative Investigation\".","authors":"J L Marsh","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.25.00087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.25.00087","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"40 1","pages":"e55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144103549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A Too-Long Anterior Process of the Calcaneus: Defining Normative Values for the Calcaneonavicular Distance Using MRI in a Pediatric Population.","authors":"Nastassia Pralong-Guanziroli,Blaise Cochard,Elvin Gurbanov,Anne Tabard-Fougère,Nathaly Gavira,Silvia Valisena,Romain Dayer,Dimitri Ceroni","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.01096","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01096","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDThe calcaneonavicular distance has yet to be definitively defined on the basis of morphological studies and thus remains a somewhat elusive value for orthopaedists. The purposes of the present study were to measure the calcaneonavicular distance with use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a control pediatric population and to assess whether sex and age affected this distance.METHODSWe retrospectively reviewed 363 MRI scans of the feet of healthy controls and measured calcaneonavicular distances (i.e., the distance between the bone margins of the anterior process of the calcaneus and the navicular and the distance between the cartilaginous margins of the anterior process of the calcaneus and the navicular) in the axial and sagittal planes.RESULTSInterobserver and intraobserver agreements were better for the bone measurements than for the cartilaginous measurements. The mean calcaneonavicular distance was 5.6 mm for values based on bone margins and 4.5 mm for those based on cartilaginous margins. On the basis of current criteria, the distributions of these distances were such that 41% to 46% of participants presented with values that defined them as having a too-long anterior process of the calcaneus. Furthermore, age seemed to play a major role in males, with calcaneonavicular distances narrowing with bone maturation.CONCLUSIONSThe mean physiological calcaneonavicular distances measured in healthy pediatric controls are much shorter than reported previously. In almost 50% of cases, the calcaneonavicular distance measurements between the bone margins presented values that defined them as having a too-long anterior process of the calcaneus. Age played a major role in the calcaneonavicular distances in males, and we hypothesize that the calcaneonavicular distance narrows with bone maturation. We believe that it is essential to establish normative calcaneonavicular distance values based on sex and age so that they can be used as guidelines when diagnosing and treating patients suspected of having a too-long anterior process of the calcaneus.LEVEL OF EVIDENCEPrognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144066854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Intraoperative Direct Sonication Versus Conventional Sonication in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy and Time to Positivity of Fluid Culture.","authors":"Yicheng Li,Fei Wang,Tuerhongjiang Wahafu,Wenbo Mu,Baochao Ji,Abudousaimi Aimaiti,Xiaobin Guo,Haoyang Tian,Xiaogang Zhang,Li Cao","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.00744","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.00744","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDConventional sonication is a recommended method in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but the accuracy of diagnosis is still not ideal. We have applied the use of a handheld ultrasonic device and the intraoperative direct sonication of prostheses and soft tissues retrieved during surgery to improve the efficacy of the microbiological diagnosis of PJI and the incubation time of pathogens.METHODSThis was a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with PJI or aseptic loosening who underwent revision, DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention), or resection, and for whom either sonication method was used between July 2017 and June 2023. Starting in August 2021, the removed implants and adjacent soft tissue were directly sonicated in a small metal container, and then the sonication fluid was incubated in blood culture bottles in the operating room under laminar air flow. Conventional sonication was continued through July 2021, and included vortex mixing for 30 seconds, sonication for 5 minutes, and additional vortex mixing for 30 seconds, as described by Trampuz et al. in 2007. The sensitivity, specificity, and time to positivity (TTP) of pathogen cultures were compared between intraoperative direct sonication and conventional sonication.RESULTSOf the 415 included patients, 266 had PJI and 149 had aseptic loosening. Fluid from intraoperative direct sonication and conventional sonication showed sensitivities of 88% and 69% (p < 0.001) and specificities of 84% and 93% (p = 0.105), respectively. Higher sensitivity was obtained by intraoperative direct sonication of only soft tissue than by direct sonication of only the prosthesis (80% versus 75%). Culture results from intraoperative direct sonication of soft tissue and the prosthesis were inconsistent in 55 cases (soft tissue plus prosthesis: 28 cases, soft tissue only: 17 cases, and prosthesis only: 10 cases). Gram-positive organisms grew significantly faster following direct sonication (median TTP for soft-tissue, 2.12 days [interquartile range (IQR), 1.40 to 3.16 days], and median TTP for the prosthesis, 2.02 days [IQR, 1.08 to 3.04 days]) compared with conventional sonication (median TTP, 2.92 days [IQR, 1.83 to 3.96 days]) (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively).CONCLUSIONSIntraoperative direct sonication was more sensitive than conventional sonication for the microbiological diagnosis of PJI and slightly shortened the TTP of microorganisms.LEVEL OF EVIDENCEDiagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143945296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"What's Important (Arts & Humanities): Scars of Courage.","authors":"Harjot Uppal","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.25.00071","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.25.00071","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143945249","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Colorado Limb Donning-Timed Up and Go (COLD-TUG) Test in Lower-Extremity Amputation: Less Donning Time with Osseointegrated Bone-Anchored Prosthetic Limb.","authors":"Mohamed E Awad,Guy Lev,Danielle H Melton,Kylie G Shaw,Peter B Thomsen-Freitas,Brecca M M Gaffney,Cory L Christiansen,Jason W Stoneback","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.00871","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.00871","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDOsseointegration of a bone-anchored limb (BAL) establishes a direct skeletal interface for prosthesis attachment, simplifying the donning/doffing process. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test reliably assesses mobility in individuals with lower-extremity amputation who use socket prostheses, but it does not account for the time required to don a prosthetic limb. The aim of this study was to develop and examine the reliability and validity of the Colorado Limb Donning-Timed Up and Go (COLD-TUG) test. This test combines the time required for donning a prosthesis with the time to complete the TUG test in lower-extremity amputees using a prosthesis.METHODSParticipants with a unilateral lower-extremity amputation were enrolled in this study; participants were divided into 2 groups: socket prosthesis users (n = 15) and BAL users (n = 22). The COLD-TUG test measured the time (in seconds) required to don the prosthesis, get up from a standard chair, walk 3 m, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down again. Group differences as well as the intrarater reliability and concurrent validity of the test were analyzed.RESULTSThere were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of baseline characteristics. The intrarater reliability of the COLD-TUG test was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.94; p = 0.001). The concurrent validity between the COLD-TUG test and the TUG test in BAL patients was good (r = 0.712; p = 0.006). Participants in the BAL group had a significantly shorter mean COLD-TUG time (16.6 ± 5.6 seconds) compared with participants in the socket-prosthesis group (85.3 ± 61.4 seconds) (p < 0.001).CONCLUSIONSThe COLD-TUG test accurately measures prosthesis-donning burden in the context of functional mobility, thus providing valuable insights into functional abilities and quality of life. Use of a BAL was associated with a shorter donning time compared with use of a socket prosthesis.LEVEL OF EVIDENCEPrognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143945253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"The Future of Private Equity in Orthopaedics.","authors":"Sudheer C Reddy,Gary Herschman","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.00937","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.00937","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143932418","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Kienböck Disease: Recent Advances in Understanding and Management.","authors":"David M Lichtman,William F Pientka","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.01090","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01090","url":null,"abstract":"➢ An at-risk lunate (due to anatomic factors) subjected to a trigger event (axial load, embolism, hypercoagulability) leads to the development of lunate osteonecrosis.➢ Children, adolescents, and elderly patients with Kienböck disease respond well to nonoperative treatments, and this should be considered before any surgical intervention.➢ For disease limited to the lunate, treatment decisions should be driven by the condition of the cartilage; intact lunate cartilage can be treated with joint leveling or core decompression, whereas disrupted cartilage surfaces should be bypassed with scaphocapitate or scaphotrapeziotrapezoid arthrodesis. Newer surgical procedures such as wrist arthroscopy and the introduction of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging have expanded the treatment options for these patients.➢ Once disease extends outside of the lunate, reconstruction with proximal row carpectomy or partial or total wrist arthrodesis should be considered on the basis of which articular surfaces are affected.➢ The new unified classification system and treatment are applicable to almost all patients with Kienböck disease.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143926296","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"A New High-Tech, Low-Calorie Adventure in Joint Arthroplasty: Commentary on an article by Michael W. Seward, MD, et al.: \"Weight Loss Before Total Joint Arthroplasty Using a Remote Dietitian and a Mobile Application. A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial\".","authors":"Philippe Hernigou","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.01576","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01576","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"25 1","pages":"e44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143914997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Re-Evaluating the Impact of Including Patients with Bilateral Conditions in Orthopaedic Clinical Research Studies: When 1 + 1 Does Not Equal 2.","authors":"Patrick M Carry,Carson Keeter,Harry Smith,Kaleb Taylor,Nancy Hadley-Miller,David R Howell","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.01234","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01234","url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDOrthopaedic studies frequently include subjects with bilateral conditions. Failure to account for bilateral conditions can lead to spurious associations. The performance of different methods for addressing this issue, especially in populations that include subjects with unilateral and bilateral conditions, has not been rigorously evaluated. The purpose of the present study was to test 3 different methods for analyzing bilateral data: (1) analyzing all limbs as independent subjects (naïve), (2) randomly selecting 1 limb per subject (random), and (3) accounting for correlation between limbs with use of a linear mixed model (LMM).METHODSWe simulated a hypothetical randomized controlled trial in which Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were collected at a baseline and a 2-year visit. We simulated 2 scenarios: Scenario 1 (in which there was truly no difference between groups [mean difference = 0]) and Scenario 2 (in which there was truly a difference between groups [mean difference = 10]). We varied the prevalence of bilateral involvement from 10% to 100% within each scenario. We evaluated method performance on the basis of bias (difference from the simulated true effect), power (1 - type-II error), type-1 error rate, and 95% confidence interval (CI) coverage.RESULTSBias (difference from simulated true effect) was similar across all methods. In Scenario 2 (true difference between groups), CI coverage was lowest with use of the naïve method (median, 87.8%; range, 85.3% to 93.5%) relative to the random method (median, 95.1%; range, 94.5% to 95.6%) and the LMM method (median, 95.1%; range, 94.5% to 95.5%). In Scenario 1 (no difference between groups), the type-1 error rate was highest for the naïve method (median, 11.3%; range, 6.7% to 14.7%) relative to the LMM method (median, 4.9%; range, 4.5% to 5.3%) and the random method (median, 5.0%; range, 4.5% to 5.2%).CONCLUSIONSFailure to account for bilateral conditions led to biased CIs and an increased type-1 error rate. Due to the fact that bias was similar across the methods, decreased model performance using the naïve method was likely attributable to underestimation of the standard error. Orthopaedic studies involving subjects with bilateral conditions warrant special considerations that can be addressed using simple (random) or more complex (LMM) methods.CLINICAL RELEVANCEAdherence to robust methodological practices is an essential but underappreciated component of the translation of evidence into clinical practice. Our work is meant to be educational, providing clinical researchers with the knowledge and skills to address a common challenge within the field.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"58 1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143921119","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}

{"title":"Boosting Endogenous BMP2 Levels Accelerates Fracture Healing: Commentary on an article by Govindaraj Ellur, PhD, et al.: \"4-Aminopyridine Promotes BMP2 Expression and Accelerates Tibial Fracture Healing in Mice\".","authors":"Elizabeth W Bradley","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.01528","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.01528","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"e45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143915001","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}