Intraoperative Direct Sonication Versus Conventional Sonication in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy and Time to Positivity of Fluid Culture.

Yicheng Li,Fei Wang,Tuerhongjiang Wahafu,Wenbo Mu,Baochao Ji,Abudousaimi Aimaiti,Xiaobin Guo,Haoyang Tian,Xiaogang Zhang,Li Cao
{"title":"Intraoperative Direct Sonication Versus Conventional Sonication in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy and Time to Positivity of Fluid Culture.","authors":"Yicheng Li,Fei Wang,Tuerhongjiang Wahafu,Wenbo Mu,Baochao Ji,Abudousaimi Aimaiti,Xiaobin Guo,Haoyang Tian,Xiaogang Zhang,Li Cao","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.24.00744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nConventional sonication is a recommended method in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but the accuracy of diagnosis is still not ideal. We have applied the use of a handheld ultrasonic device and the intraoperative direct sonication of prostheses and soft tissues retrieved during surgery to improve the efficacy of the microbiological diagnosis of PJI and the incubation time of pathogens.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis was a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with PJI or aseptic loosening who underwent revision, DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention), or resection, and for whom either sonication method was used between July 2017 and June 2023. Starting in August 2021, the removed implants and adjacent soft tissue were directly sonicated in a small metal container, and then the sonication fluid was incubated in blood culture bottles in the operating room under laminar air flow. Conventional sonication was continued through July 2021, and included vortex mixing for 30 seconds, sonication for 5 minutes, and additional vortex mixing for 30 seconds, as described by Trampuz et al. in 2007. The sensitivity, specificity, and time to positivity (TTP) of pathogen cultures were compared between intraoperative direct sonication and conventional sonication.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOf the 415 included patients, 266 had PJI and 149 had aseptic loosening. Fluid from intraoperative direct sonication and conventional sonication showed sensitivities of 88% and 69% (p < 0.001) and specificities of 84% and 93% (p = 0.105), respectively. Higher sensitivity was obtained by intraoperative direct sonication of only soft tissue than by direct sonication of only the prosthesis (80% versus 75%). Culture results from intraoperative direct sonication of soft tissue and the prosthesis were inconsistent in 55 cases (soft tissue plus prosthesis: 28 cases, soft tissue only: 17 cases, and prosthesis only: 10 cases). Gram-positive organisms grew significantly faster following direct sonication (median TTP for soft-tissue, 2.12 days [interquartile range (IQR), 1.40 to 3.16 days], and median TTP for the prosthesis, 2.02 days [IQR, 1.08 to 3.04 days]) compared with conventional sonication (median TTP, 2.92 days [IQR, 1.83 to 3.96 days]) (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIntraoperative direct sonication was more sensitive than conventional sonication for the microbiological diagnosis of PJI and slightly shortened the TTP of microorganisms.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nDiagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.24.00744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Conventional sonication is a recommended method in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), but the accuracy of diagnosis is still not ideal. We have applied the use of a handheld ultrasonic device and the intraoperative direct sonication of prostheses and soft tissues retrieved during surgery to improve the efficacy of the microbiological diagnosis of PJI and the incubation time of pathogens. METHODS This was a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with PJI or aseptic loosening who underwent revision, DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention), or resection, and for whom either sonication method was used between July 2017 and June 2023. Starting in August 2021, the removed implants and adjacent soft tissue were directly sonicated in a small metal container, and then the sonication fluid was incubated in blood culture bottles in the operating room under laminar air flow. Conventional sonication was continued through July 2021, and included vortex mixing for 30 seconds, sonication for 5 minutes, and additional vortex mixing for 30 seconds, as described by Trampuz et al. in 2007. The sensitivity, specificity, and time to positivity (TTP) of pathogen cultures were compared between intraoperative direct sonication and conventional sonication. RESULTS Of the 415 included patients, 266 had PJI and 149 had aseptic loosening. Fluid from intraoperative direct sonication and conventional sonication showed sensitivities of 88% and 69% (p < 0.001) and specificities of 84% and 93% (p = 0.105), respectively. Higher sensitivity was obtained by intraoperative direct sonication of only soft tissue than by direct sonication of only the prosthesis (80% versus 75%). Culture results from intraoperative direct sonication of soft tissue and the prosthesis were inconsistent in 55 cases (soft tissue plus prosthesis: 28 cases, soft tissue only: 17 cases, and prosthesis only: 10 cases). Gram-positive organisms grew significantly faster following direct sonication (median TTP for soft-tissue, 2.12 days [interquartile range (IQR), 1.40 to 3.16 days], and median TTP for the prosthesis, 2.02 days [IQR, 1.08 to 3.04 days]) compared with conventional sonication (median TTP, 2.92 days [IQR, 1.83 to 3.96 days]) (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative direct sonication was more sensitive than conventional sonication for the microbiological diagnosis of PJI and slightly shortened the TTP of microorganisms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
术中直接超声与常规超声诊断假体周围关节感染:液体培养阳性诊断准确性和时间的比较。
背景常规超声是诊断假体周围关节感染(PJI)的推荐方法,但诊断的准确性仍不理想。我们应用手持式超声设备,术中对术中取出的假体和软组织进行直接超声,以提高PJI的微生物诊断效率和病原菌的潜伏期。方法回顾性研究了2017年7月至2023年6月期间接受翻修、DAIR(清创、抗生素和植入物保留)或切除的诊断为PJI或无菌性松动的患者,并对其进行了超声检查。从2021年8月开始,移除的植入物和邻近软组织在一个小金属容器中直接超声,然后超声液在层流空气下在手术室的血培养瓶中孵育。按照Trampuz等人在2007年的描述,常规超声持续到2021年7月,包括30秒的涡旋混合、5分钟的超声和30秒的额外涡旋混合。比较术中直接超声与常规超声对病原菌培养的敏感性、特异性和阳性反应时间(TTP)。结果415例患者中,PJI 266例,无菌性松动149例。术中直接超声和常规超声液的敏感性分别为88%和69% (p < 0.001),特异性分别为84%和93% (p = 0.105)。术中仅对软组织直接超声比仅对假体直接超声获得更高的灵敏度(80%对75%)。术中直接超声软组织与假体培养结果不一致55例(软组织加假体28例,仅软组织17例,仅假体10例)。与常规超声(TTP中位数,2.92天[IQR, 1.83至3.96天])相比,直接超声(软组织TTP中位数,2.12天[四分位间距(IQR), 1.40至3.16天],假体TTP中位数,2.02天[IQR, 1.08至3.04天])后革兰氏阳性菌的生长速度显著加快(p = 0.003, p < 0.001)。结论术中直接超声对PJI的微生物学诊断较常规超声灵敏,并能略微缩短微生物的TTP。证据等级:诊断性三级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参见作者说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信