Seminars in nephrology最新文献

筛选
英文 中文
Measuring Social Functioning in Chronic Kidney Disease 衡量慢性肾脏病患者的社会功能。
IF 2.8 3区 医学
Seminars in nephrology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151547
Amanda Sluiter MRMed , Anita van Zwieten PhD , Jenny I. Shen MD , Karine Manera PhD
{"title":"Measuring Social Functioning in Chronic Kidney Disease","authors":"Amanda Sluiter MRMed ,&nbsp;Anita van Zwieten PhD ,&nbsp;Jenny I. Shen MD ,&nbsp;Karine Manera PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151547","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151547","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social functioning is a key aspect of daily life and is important to patients living with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their caregivers. Many patients with CKD experience debilitating symptoms and treatment burden that can diminish their social functioning and thereby overall social health, which is the aspect of a person's well-being relating to their interactions and connections with others. In patients with CKD, symptoms (e.g., fatigue and pain), burden of ongoing treatments (including kidney replacement therapies), and medication side effects can impair social functioning. Having to manage responsibilities of self-management, which can include time-consuming and invasive treatments such as dialysis, can severely limit social functioning in patients with CKD. This can lead to poor social connections at many levels, including with family, friends, peers, and colleagues, and can hinder the development of new relationships. Patients with CKD with poorer social functioning have been reported to have worse quality of life and impaired mental health. Many patients with CKD rely on an informal caregiver—usually a family member or friend—to assist with management of their disease. This can place strain on the caregiver, further limiting opportunities for social connections for both the patient and caregiver. Although social functioning is critical for the overall well-being of patients with CKD, it remains underaddressed clinically, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess social functioning are limited. The objective of this article is to define social functioning, discuss the impacts of social functioning in patients with CKD and their caregivers, outline PROMs that have included assessment of social functioning, and discuss considerations in developing an appropriate PROM to measure social functioning in patients with CKD. This may help to inform the evaluation of interventions and care regarding social functioning within the CKD population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21756,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in nephrology","volume":"44 3","pages":"Article 151547"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142111919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Core Patient-Reported Outcomes for Trials in Nephrology 肾内科试验的核心患者报告结果。
IF 2.8 3区 医学
Seminars in nephrology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151549
Anastasia Hughes BPH , Nicole Scholes-Robertson PhD , Angela Ju PhD , Allison Jauré PhD
{"title":"Core Patient-Reported Outcomes for Trials in Nephrology","authors":"Anastasia Hughes BPH ,&nbsp;Nicole Scholes-Robertson PhD ,&nbsp;Angela Ju PhD ,&nbsp;Allison Jauré PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151549","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151549","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The outcomes reported in trials across all stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) are highly variable and often do not include outcomes that are directly relevant to patients and caregivers. Frequently, the outcomes reported in trials are often unvalidated surrogate biochemical end points. The omission of outcomes that are meaningful and important to patients can diminish the value of trials in supporting treatment decisions. In response, there have been increasing efforts across many health and medical disciplines to develop core outcome sets, defined as the minimum set of outcomes to be reported in all trials in a specific health area to improve the relevance and consistency of reporting trial outcomes. The international Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) initiative was established in 2014 and has since developed seven core outcome sets for different diagnosis and treatment stages of CKD. The core outcomes were based on consensus among patients, caregivers, and health professionals. Each core outcome set includes at least one patient-reported outcome, including fatigue (hemodialysis), life participation (kidney transplantation, peritoneal dialysis, early CKD not yet requiring kidney replacement therapy, children and adolescents, and glomerular disease), and pain (polycystic kidney disease). This article outlines how patient-reported outcomes are currently reported in trials, discusses core patient-reported outcomes that have been established for trials in kidney disease, and outlines strategies for implementing core patient-reported outcomes in trials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21756,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in nephrology","volume":"44 3","pages":"Article 151549"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142294950","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring Symptoms Across the Spectrum of Chronic Kidney Disease: Strategies for Incorporation Into Kidney Care 测量慢性肾脏病的各种症状:纳入肾脏护理的策略。
IF 2.8 3区 医学
Seminars in nephrology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151546
Sara N. Davison MD , Michelle M. Richardson PharmD , Glenda V. Roberts BSc
{"title":"Measuring Symptoms Across the Spectrum of Chronic Kidney Disease: Strategies for Incorporation Into Kidney Care","authors":"Sara N. Davison MD ,&nbsp;Michelle M. Richardson PharmD ,&nbsp;Glenda V. Roberts BSc","doi":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151546","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151546","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many people across the spectrum of chronic kidney disease (CKD) experience a large symptom burden. Measuring symptoms can be a way of responding to the concerns of patients and their priorities of care and may help to improve overall outcomes, including health-related quality of life. The objective of this article is to discuss approaches to measuring symptoms across the spectrum of CKD and to highlight strategies to facilitate the incorporation of routine symptom assessment into kidney care. Specifically, we discuss the use of validated patient-reported outcome measures in CKD as they relate to measuring symptoms, including their benefits and limitations, and describe commonly used patient-reported outcome measures. We discuss potential barriers that should be considered when contemplating the development of a program to routinely measure and address symptoms. Finally, we outline a systematic, stepwise approach to measuring symptoms with implementation strategies to address the common barriers. Although the principles outlined in this article can be applied to research and audit, the principal focus is on symptom measurement aimed at informing clinical practice and directly improving patient outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21756,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in nephrology","volume":"44 3","pages":"Article 151546"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142111920","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Navigating Choices in Nephrology: The Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Preferences in Economic Evaluations and Decisions in Health Care 肾脏病学中的导航选择:病人报告的结果和偏好在医疗保健的经济评估和决策中的作用》(The Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Preferences in Economic Evaluations and Decisions in Health Care)。
IF 2.8 3区 医学
Seminars in nephrology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151554
Chandana Guha MA , Colm O'Reilly MSc Epi , Javier Recabarren Silva PhD , Martin Howell PhD
{"title":"Navigating Choices in Nephrology: The Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Preferences in Economic Evaluations and Decisions in Health Care","authors":"Chandana Guha MA ,&nbsp;Colm O'Reilly MSc Epi ,&nbsp;Javier Recabarren Silva PhD ,&nbsp;Martin Howell PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151554","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151554","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the health care system highlights the need to prioritize services and manage the use of resources efficiently. Amid these financial constraints, key decision makers must weigh the impact of an intervention or program on health care expenditure when determining the allocation of limited resources. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are relevant in health economic decision-making within nephrology. Health-related quality of life, a patient-reported outcome, can provide data that inform economic evaluations of treatments for patients with CKD. PROMs help determine the value of different therapies by assessing their impact on patients’ daily lives beyond clinical outcomes and can help policymakers make decisions about funding and reimbursement that consider the priorities and preferences of patients. Economic evaluations often employ cost-utility analyses, which use quality-adjusted life years as a key metric. Quality-adjusted life years combine both the quality and quantity of life lived, allowing for comparison of the effectiveness of different interventions in a standardized manner. By integrating utilities derived from PROMs, these analyses quantify the benefits of CKD treatments in terms of how patients feel and function. Furthermore, PROMs contribute to quality improvement initiatives by identifying areas where patient care can be enhanced, guiding the implementation of programs that improve health-related quality of life while maintaining cost-effectiveness. In value-based financing environments, the integration of PROMs ensures that patient-centered outcomes are prioritized, leading to more effective and equitable health care delivery. In this article, we discuss the role of PROMs in economic evaluations in CKD and provide an overview of approaches for using PROMs in economic evaluations to inform decision-making in nephrology.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21756,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in nephrology","volume":"44 3","pages":"Article 151554"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142126626","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Electronic Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Improve Kidney Care: Benefits, Drawbacks, and Next Steps 电子收集患者报告结果以改善肾脏护理:益处、弊端和下一步措施。
IF 2.8 3区 医学
Seminars in nephrology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151552
Sabine N. van der Veer PhD , Nicola E. Anderson PhD , Rob Finnigan MSc , Derek Kyte PhD
{"title":"Electronic Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Improve Kidney Care: Benefits, Drawbacks, and Next Steps","authors":"Sabine N. van der Veer PhD ,&nbsp;Nicola E. Anderson PhD ,&nbsp;Rob Finnigan MSc ,&nbsp;Derek Kyte PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151552","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151552","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Kidney services worldwide are increasingly using digital health technologies to deliver care. This includes kidney electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems: ambulatory digital technologies that enable the capture of PRO data electronically from people with kidney disease remotely and in real time to be shared with their kidney care team. Current kidney ePRO systems commonly aim to support the monitoring and management of symptoms in patients with kidney disease. The majority have thus far only been implemented in research settings and are not yet routinely used in clinical practice, leaving their readiness for real-world implementation largely unknown. Compared with paper-based PRO collection, ePRO systems have certain advantages, which we categorize as efficiency benefits (e.g., lower administrative burden), direct patient care benefits (e.g., automated PRO-based patient education), and health system and research benefits (e.g., collecting ePRO data once for multiple purposes). At the same time, kidney ePRO systems come with drawbacks, such as their potential to exacerbate existing inequities in care and outcomes and to negatively affect staff burden and patients’ experience of kidney care. Areas that hold promise for expediting the development and uptake of kidney ePRO systems at the local, organizational, and national level include harnessing national kidney registries as enabling infrastructures; using novel data-driven technologies (e.g., computerized adaptive test systems, configurable dashboards); applying implementation science and action research approaches to enhance translation of ePRO research findings into clinical practice; and engaging stakeholders, including patients and carers, health care professionals, policymakers, payers, ePRO experts, technology providers, and organizations that monitor and improve the quality of kidney services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21756,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in nephrology","volume":"44 3","pages":"Article 151552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142009401","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-Reported Outcomes to Achieve Person-Centered Care for Aging People With Kidney Disease 通过患者报告结果,实现以人为本的老年肾病患者护理。
IF 2.8 3区 医学
Seminars in nephrology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151548
Claire T. Lo MD , Anoop Sheshadri MD, MAS , Larry Edmonson , Devika Nair MD, MSCI
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcomes to Achieve Person-Centered Care for Aging People With Kidney Disease","authors":"Claire T. Lo MD ,&nbsp;Anoop Sheshadri MD, MAS ,&nbsp;Larry Edmonson ,&nbsp;Devika Nair MD, MSCI","doi":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151548","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151548","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Person-centered care is a system of care delivery that supports effective patient-clinician communication and empowers patients to partner with their clinical providers to develop goal-concordant treatment plans. Models of person-centered care often involve the implementation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to measure patients’ symptoms and quality of life as they navigate complex chronic health conditions. Models of person-centered care have been particularly effective in improving the quality of care delivery for older adults as well as younger adults with aging-associated conditions such as physical function decline. Though PROs have been developed and validated in kidney disease, they are not routinely implemented in clinical practice. Most individuals with kidney disease are 65 and older, but many younger individuals with kidney disease also experience aging-associated conditions earlier than in the general population. Thus, PROs represent an important tool for achieving person-centered care in groups with kidney disease who are the most vulnerable to adverse health outcomes and excess health care utilization. In this article, we aim to move toward more routine implementation of PROs in kidney care for aging adults. To identify the most clinically relevant PROs for this group and understand the ideal mode and context in which to implement PROs, we will (1) provide an evidence-based summary of PROs with the greatest prognostic significance in the general population and in kidney disease, including those specific to older adults; (2) describe barriers to the implementation of PROs in kidney care with a special focus on the needs of older adults and younger adults with aging-associated conditions; and (3) conclude with our evidence-based recommendations for the content, time, and context in which PROs should be implemented to achieve person-centered kidney care for aging adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21756,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in nephrology","volume":"44 3","pages":"Article 151548"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456389/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142056468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Role of Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures in Kidney Health Equity-Oriented Quality Improvement 肾脏健康公平导向质量改进中的患者报告体验和结果测量的作用。
IF 2.8 3区 医学
Seminars in nephrology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151553
Shivani Sharma BSc, PhD, CPsychol , Emily Beadle BSc, MSc, PhD , Emma Caton BSc, MSc , Ken Farrington BSc, MD, FRCP , Zoe Radnor BSc, MSc, PhD, FAcSS, FBAM
{"title":"The Role of Patient-Reported Experience and Outcome Measures in Kidney Health Equity-Oriented Quality Improvement","authors":"Shivani Sharma BSc, PhD, CPsychol ,&nbsp;Emily Beadle BSc, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;Emma Caton BSc, MSc ,&nbsp;Ken Farrington BSc, MD, FRCP ,&nbsp;Zoe Radnor BSc, MSc, PhD, FAcSS, FBAM","doi":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151553","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151553","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Risk, prevalence, management, and outcomes in chronic kidney disease (CKD) are influenced by social and broader determinants of health. Consequently, there are wide-ranging kidney health inequities. As patients are key stakeholders, their perspectives on the care they receive and on health status are central in guiding health system improvement, particularly to reduce the impact of disadvantage. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important self-report tools in quality improvement, acting to guide initatives aimed at enhancing access to timely and relevant support. However, the extent to which PREMs and PROMs address the reduction of kidney health inequities is unclear. The aim of this review is to summarize how PREMs and PROMs are designed and implemented, highlighting key dimensions that are integral to health equity-oriented quality improvement in kidney care. There are several problems yet to be overcome so that such tools do not unintentionally reproduce kidney health gaps. Inclusive generation of the scope of tools, transparent reporting on attributes of patients who engage, and embedding PREMs and PROMs within a framework of value-based quality improvement is fundamental to their impact as part of equitable health system transformation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21756,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in nephrology","volume":"44 3","pages":"Article 151553"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142111921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluating Medical Devices in Nephrology Using Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures 使用患者报告的结果和体验指标评估肾脏病学中的医疗设备。
IF 2.8 3区 医学
Seminars in nephrology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151550
Amanda Grandinetti MPH , Michelle M. Richardson PharmD
{"title":"Evaluating Medical Devices in Nephrology Using Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures","authors":"Amanda Grandinetti MPH ,&nbsp;Michelle M. Richardson PharmD","doi":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151550","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151550","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Incorporating the patient's perspective into the entire product life cycle of medical device development is paramount for ensuring patient-centric evaluation. By prioritizing patient-centric evaluation, medical device developers can better address patient needs and enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care solutions. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), patient preference information (PPI), and qualitative inquiry are methodologies to incorporate and amplify the patient's voice. In nephrology, unlike in other clinical domains, the utilization of PROs, PPI, and qualitative inquiry in medical device development has been notably sparse. Consequently, a glaring absence of patient involvement in the development of devices leaves the impact of these devices on patient well-being and functionality largely unexplored. Many forward-thinking programs as well as Food and Drug Administration guidance on the use of PROs and PPI are effectively bringing PROs into nephrology device development. Many resources exist to help researchers select high-quality PROs. There are unique considerations for using PROs and PPI to support regulatory decision-making, including fit-for-purpose, concepts of interest, context of use, and least burdensome selection. The rapid evolution of patient-centric initiatives in nephrology will serve to ensure that medical devices meet the needs of people with kidney disease and improve the quality of care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21756,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in nephrology","volume":"44 3","pages":"Article 151550"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142133675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-Reported Experience Measures to Evaluate and Improve the Quality of Care in Nephrology 用于评估和提高肾脏病学医疗质量的 "患者体验报告"。
IF 2.8 3区 医学
Seminars in nephrology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151551
Helen Munro Wild BSc, MSc, PhD, Amanda Busby BSc, MSc, Lucy Mackintosh BSc, MSc, David Wellsted BSc, PhD
{"title":"Patient-Reported Experience Measures to Evaluate and Improve the Quality of Care in Nephrology","authors":"Helen Munro Wild BSc, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Amanda Busby BSc, MSc,&nbsp;Lucy Mackintosh BSc, MSc,&nbsp;David Wellsted BSc, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151551","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151551","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Patient experience is considered a pillar of high-quality care, integral to patient-centered care, but despite significant policy focus on patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), little is published regarding their development, use, or impact on clinical practice. In nephrology, PREMs are increasingly used in research to capture and quantify patients’ perceptions of their experiences with health care services. It has been shown that a negative patient experience impacts patients’ physical and psychological health, and a small but significant proportion of patients across a selection of settings report their experiences of health care as poor or suboptimal. Evidence of whether PREMs improve quality of care or support person-centered care in the clinical setting remains largely theoretical. Extensive effort has been invested to develop various PREMs for kidney services. Although little evidence linking PREM collection to meaningful change in delivery of care currently exists, work is underway. Early indications are that with the right facilitators, implementing PREMs in routine practice can help providers recognize where change is needed and galvanize transformation. The journey toward understanding the connection between PREM data and modifiable provider characteristics to target and enable change has started, but further evidence is needed. This article outlines the history of PREMs in nephrology and details their current use alongside implementation challenges. The use and benefits of PREMs are discussed before considering the evidence base for their impact on renal health care. Possible next steps for PREMs are suggested and best practices highlighted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21756,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in nephrology","volume":"44 3","pages":"Article 151551"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142146218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Advance Patient-Centered Research, Practice, and Policy in Nephrology 推动肾脏病学以患者为中心的研究、实践和政策的患者报告结果和体验措施。
IF 2.8 3区 医学
Seminars in nephrology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151545
Allison Jaure PhD
{"title":"Patient-Reported Outcome and Experience Measures to Advance Patient-Centered Research, Practice, and Policy in Nephrology","authors":"Allison Jaure PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151545","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151545","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21756,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in nephrology","volume":"44 3","pages":"Article 151545"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142146219","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
相关产品
×
本文献相关产品
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信